What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

*** OFFICIAL *** COVID-19 CoronaVirus Thread. Fresh epidemic fears as child pneumonia cases surge in Europe after China outbreak. NOW in USA (10 Viewers)

Knowing Newsom it will be part of the relaxing plan. I'm glad he's our governor. Can't wait to hear his plans for the state tomorrow at noon. Tune in to KPIX, CBS. They always air his pressers.
thanks, i will try if not wrapped up in a project. 

and agreed: happy to have Gavin as the governor. curious to see what framework he will reveal as CA works in concert with WA and OR. 

 
Yes, the steps toward it. Not that it means anything will happen soon. He, gov of OR and WA are going to work together like how NY, NJ, CT, DE, RI are doing. 
Looking ahead to some of what might be unveiled...

Oregon's Governor, Kate Brown, has previously mentioned a benchmark of 10 straight days without Covid-19 deaths before opening. Going off current IMHE models, here are when the members of the western states are modeled to begin seeing estimated ranges of zero deaths on the low end...

California - zero to 2 deaths per day beginning May 13th

Oregon - zero to 10 deaths per day beginning May 21st

Washington - zero to 3 deaths per day beginning May 9th

And here are the dates when those 3 states are modeled to have estimated deaths at a flat zero...

California - flat zero deaths per day beginning May 18th

Oregon - flat zero deaths per day beginning June 26th

Washington - flat zero deaths per day beginning May 17th

Going by those estimates and the standard of zero deaths for 10 straight days, we'd project the declarations to end the shutdown to come in these date ranges...

CA: May 23-28

OR: May 31-July 6

WA: May 19-May 27

Let's hope Oregon's current modeling is an outlier. I'm also assuming all the states will wait for all three to record 10 straight days of zero death. If Oregon levels out like CA and WA, then I'd bet the governors are currently floating June 1st in their minds.

 
Looking ahead to some of what might be unveiled...

Oregon's Governor, Kate Brown, has previously mentioned a benchmark of 10 straight days without Covid-19 deaths before opening. Going off current IMHE models, here are when the members of the western states are modeled to begin seeing estimated ranges of zero deaths on the low end...

California - zero to 2 deaths per day beginning May 13th

Oregon - zero to 10 deaths per day beginning May 21st

Washington - zero to 3 deaths per day beginning May 9th

And here are the dates when those 3 states are modeled to have estimated deaths at a flat zero...

California - flat zero deaths per day beginning May 18th

Oregon - flat zero deaths per day beginning June 26th

Washington - flat zero deaths per day beginning May 17th

Going by those estimates and the standard of zero deaths for 10 straight days, we'd project the declarations to end the shutdown to come in these date ranges...

CA: May 23-28

OR: May 31-July 6

WA: May 19-May 27

Let's hope Oregon's current modeling is an outlier. I'm also assuming all the states will wait for all three to record 10 straight days of zero death. If Oregon levels out like CA and WA, then I'd bet the governors are currently floating June 1st in their minds.
To start to loosen a bit like limiting employees in a non essential biz and customers to be able to social distance and everyone wearing masks is what I'm guessing. 

 
Jacksonville overdoses up 20% in March.

Some city officials are concerned it’s connected to COVID-19.

“So our concern is, and what we relate to the mayor, is that people you know their doctor’s offices are closed, and pain management clinics are closed and then they’re turning to street drugs to supplement their pain medications. And so I’m just asking people to please you know, please don’t do that," Powers said

 
  • Sad
Reactions: JAA
I'm not aware of what Newsom has said previously about how he plans to relax restrictions, but Governor Inslee has addressed it several times.  One point that is interesting is that Newsom relies on the Johns Hopkins model.   Inslee has been using University of Washington's.   The UW model is slightly more optimistic, yet Inslee increased lockdown measures even as the measures he had introduced were showing positive results.   If he's agreed to a joint approach, it's going to fall on the conservative side.

Since they're taking a joint approach, I expect to see small, slow relaxation of restrictions, which has been what Inslee has consistently said.   Inslee said that the first measures would be small things like allowing small social gatherings.   We've already called the school year here, so we don't need to worry about that.  

We still have no way to do community testing or contact tracing.  Unless that happens, we're probably not going to see major changes until June or July.  In the meantime I expect that we may see some nonessential businesses allowed to reopen if they can maintain social distancing.   Golf, fishing, and some other recreational activities that allow social distancing may reopen.   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gloves too? Even with the average person not grasping cross contamination?
Do you think this is true, or could it be a gross exaggeration?  I keep hearing interviews with doctors talking about how these people are wearing gloves all day and defeating the purpose, but I also see reports on local news lamenting the fact that people are discarding used gloves in grocery store parking lots.   Seems like a lot of people are perfectly capable of understanding that they should only be wearing gloves for a limited purpose.

 
  • Smile
Reactions: JAA
Here's the joint statement from the governors of Washington, Oregon and California:

Joint statement from the governors:

COVID-19 has preyed upon our interconnectedness. In the coming weeks, the West Coast will flip the script on COVID-19 – with our states acting in close coordination and collaboration to ensure the virus can never spread wildly in our communities.

We are announcing that California, Oregon and Washington have agreed to work together on a shared approach for reopening our economies – one that identifies clear indicators for communities to restart public life and business. 

While each state is building a state-specific plan, our states have agreed to the following principles as we build out a West Coast framework: 

Our residents’ health comes first. As home to one in six Americans and gateway to the rest of the world, the West Coast has an outsized stake in controlling and ultimately defeating COVID-19.

Health outcomes and science – not politics - will guide these decisions. Modifications to our states’ stay at home orders must be made based off our understanding of the total health impacts of COVID-19, including: the direct impact of the disease on our communities; the health impact of measures introduced to control the spread in communities —particularly felt by those already experiencing social disadvantage prior to COVID-19; and our health care systems’ ability to ensure care for those who may become sick with COVID-19 and other conditions. This effort will be guided by data. We need to see a decline in the rate of spread of the virus before large-scale reopening, and we will be working in coordination to identify the best metrics to guide this.

Our states will only be effective by working together. Each state will work with it’s local leaders and communities within its borders to understand what’s happening on the ground and adhere to our agreed upon approach.

Through quick and decisive action, each of our states has made significant progress in flattening the curve and slowing the spread of COVID-19 among the broader public. Now, our public health leaders will focus on four goals that will be critical for controlling the virus in the future.

Protecting vulnerable populations at risk for severe disease if infected. This includes a concerted effort to prevent and fight outbreaks in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.

Ensuring an ability to care for those who may become sick with COVID-19 and other conditions. This will require adequate hospital surge capacity and supplies of personal protective equipment.

Mitigating the non-direct COVID-19 health impacts, particularly on disadvantaged communities.

Protecting the general public by ensuring any successful lifting of interventions includes the development of a system for testing, tracking and isolating. The states will work together to share best practices.

COVID-19 doesn’t follow state or national boundaries. It will take every level of government, working together, and a full picture of what’s happening on the ground.

In the coming days the governors, their staff and health officials will continue conversations about this regional pact to recovery.

 
Now that WFH feels a little more routine, I think I could do this for a very long time.  Netflix, Amazon, and YouTube are all great.  I'm getting concerned about video game delays, but I like replaying old games so I'm fine there.  And I've wanted to do some more reading for a while now.  

I can see where this is going to drive people literally crazy though.  My dad is handling this situation extremely poorly -- he and I are the opposite in the sense that he can't sit still and just relax, and he is getting very antsy about when things will open up again.  More generally, this has to be hell on extroverts.  I imagine a hypothetical pandemic that required people to live with a group of 20 strangers for an extended period of time in close quarters, and I would be willing to take my chances with the virus by the end of week one.
Yeah, my wife (introvert) loves this — except for having the kids and me invading her space.

I’m definitely on the extroverted end of the scale, but really this hasn’t bothered me (yet).  I’m on the phone a lot all day, on videoconferences, etc.   During the afternoon / evening I hang with the kids or talk to family & friends on the phone.  It’s been awesome to connect with old friends, or just get a lot more chances to call my closest friends.   Lots of ways to get a social outlet.

 
I like this teamwork. The only good thing out of this is how people are coming together to help each other, together as one. I hope this can continue after all this is behind us.
It’s definitely a solid approach. The virus doesn’t care where a geographic border begins and ends.

Speaking of which, any talk of them including ID, NV and AZ in this?

 
Do you think this is true, or could it be a gross exaggeration?  I keep hearing interviews with doctors talking about how these people are wearing gloves all day and defeating the purpose, but I also see reports on local news lamenting the fact that people are discarding used gloves in grocery store parking lots.   Seems like a lot of people are perfectly capable of understanding that they should only be wearing gloves for a limited purpose.
I’ve seen a pretty significant percentage of people touching their faces with the gloves, touching surfaces like phones, etc that they are likely not wiping down, and doing all sorts of stupid things with their PPE. On the whole I think it’s still probably more beneficial than not, but your average person using PPE with no training and no experience are pretty likely to screw up and do something that risks contamination at some point.

Heck, what I do for a living requires PPE including respirators, gloves, coveralls, etc, for a lot of what I do and even a large percentage of these guys screw it up because they just don’t take it seriously enough or get complacent for just a moment.

I’ve caught myself screwing it up at times too. Grab my keys with my glove covered hand, get in the car, take the gloves off carefully so as to not touch the outside with my bare hands, use hand sanitizer to clean my hands, then reach up and turn my key to start my car (yes my car is old). Suddenly I’ve touched my key with my bare hand after last touching the key with my potentially contaminated glove. Now anything I touch between that key and remembering to sanitize my hands is also potentially cross contaminated. Now I need to make sure I wipe down all of those surfaces as well.

That’s not even mentioning the number of people I see in public places taking a glove off and putting it back on, or pulling down their mask for a moment, or touching their glasses/mask with their gloved hands, etc.

In developing safety programs/plans to mitigate safety risks, there’s a reason that PPE is considered the last option and should be used in conjunction with other measures unless absolutely impossible.

 
So the Karen who was so sure she had it last December told our group today that it’s all a ploy for the elite to get more power and money. When I said they already had all that, she said it was a plan of satan to usher in the mark of the beast. Is there really any point in trying with these people? 

 
Don’t know. Someone sent me a bottle of Tito’s as a gift. They commented on how fast it arrived, which is why I knew the timing.
I wish I wasn't such a tightwad.

The nearest Spec's with curbside is at Ben White and Mopac. I have an appointment at noon tomorrow to buy a bunch of beer. I'm in good shape on booze and wine, but I sure don't want to run out of beer before July.

 
It’s definitely a solid approach. The virus doesn’t care where a geographic border begins and ends.

Speaking of which, any talk of them including ID, NV and AZ in this?
Quite a few, justaflu bros in AZ.  Probably not going to happen  

an ongoing issue, is the conflict between populated places, and those less populated  it completely makes sense  there are 13 confirmed cases in my  ‘city’.  but I live in SoCal , with an extremely heavy population.  I’m chaffing at the bit to get back to normal. I can’t imagine how much worse my cabin fever would be, if I lived in bfe  

 
It’s definitely a solid approach. The virus doesn’t care where a geographic border begins and ends.

Speaking of which, any talk of them including ID, NV and AZ in this?
Governors of Arizona and Idaho are Republicans.  Although it is possible that they will put public health over politics, I doubt it.   Someone with deep pockets might not fund their next campaign if they don't stick with the party line that Democrats are crazy socialists hell bent on the destruction of our country.

 
Mr Anonymous said:
I think my favorite (ok, least favorite) notion in all this is that despite shutting down just 3 days apart, those 72 hours must be the reason why California has this well under control compared to New York despite California having twice the population. There's no way it could have been that the outbreak struck California well before it was on everyone's radar. Despite now having shut down for over 3 weeks, New York has more new cases in what, the last 3 days, than California has over the entirety of this spread? It doesn't add up.
A couple of super spreader events can really skew the numbers. Moreover, three extra days of growth on the exponential part of the curve makes a big difference.

 
  • Smile
Reactions: JAA
Non-China Reported Cases

2/7 - 277 reported cases

2/12 - 490 reported cases

2/17 - 893 reported cases -  5 dead 

2/22 - 1,834 reported cases - 19 dead

2/26 - 3,650 reported cases - 57 dead

2/29 - 7,155 reported cases - 109 dead - USA 68 cases - 1 dead

3/5 - 17,353 reported cases - 344 dead - USA 210 cases - 12 dead

3/9 - 33,303 reported cases - 881 dead - USA 628 cases - 26 dead

3/13 - 64,567 reported cases - 2,239 dead - USA 2,269 cases - 48 dead

3/18 - 138,059 reported cases - 5,715 dead - USA 9,301 cases - 152 dead

3/22 - 255,584 reported cases - 11,350 dead - USA 33,346 cases - 414 dead

3/27 - 514,956 reported cases - 24,048 dead - USA 104,126 cases - 1,695 dead

4/2 - 932,707 reported cases - 49,664 dead - USA  244,320 cases - 5,897 dead 

4/6 - 1,264,826 reported cases - 71,366 dead - USA 367,004 cases - 10,871 dead

4/9 - 1,521,741 reported cases - 92,380 dead - USA 468,566 cases - 16,691 dead - Active USA cases 425,947

4/10 - 1,615,613 reported cases - 99,349 dead - USA 502,036 cases - 18,717 dead - Active USA cases 456,080

4/11 - 1,698,260 reported cases - 105,487 dead - USA 532,879 cases - 20,577 dead - Active USA cases 481,849 

4/12 - 1,770,995 reported cases - 110,906 dead - USA 560,433 cases - 22,115 dead - Active USA cases 505,684

4/13 - 1,841,688 reported cases - 116,277 dead - USA 586,941 cases - 23,640 dead - Active USA cases 526,353

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-J_vry7rclLIGooJ-Cu7OFH8rRRjB51lz1iGkwcTETc/edit#gid=0

Column I in Ned's sheet is not an enjoyable column to track...
100,000 addtl active cases in 4 days (and 7,000 dead)

 
So the Karen who was so sure she had it last December told our group today that it’s all a ploy for the elite to get more power and money. When I said they already had all that, she said it was a plan of satan to usher in the mark of the beast. Is there really any point in trying with these people? 
No.And they're all Karens

 
Mr Anonymous said:
No, I'm saying I'm not eliminating something as a possibility when we clearly still don't have a full picture of this virus. All those people who were testing negative for the flu in Dec/Jan had something. A different strain? A current strain that we still can't accurately detect?

Either way, this news about false negatives couldn't be anymore clear - we're basing sweeping decisions with massive consequence on bad data. Blanket decisions under false pretenses have to come to an end.  
There is usually no need to elaborate what agent is responsible for viral syndromes, as it typically will not effect management. The goal is to exclude treatable infections due to influenza and bacteria, for which specific antimicrobials are available. Testing for other viruses adds cost without clinical benefit.

 
Do you touch the soles of your shoes often? I know I don't
Not only do I never touch the soles of my shoes, in the highly unlikely event that I did, my very first reaction would be "Ew, gross -- I need to wash my hands."

Touching contaminated things is no big deal.  You could literally soak your hands in a big bowl of coronavirus and be perfectly fine, assuming you have healthy skin. Just wash them before touching your face.

 
Governors of Arizona and Idaho are Republicans.  Although it is possible that they will put public health over politics, I doubt it.   Someone with deep pockets might not fund their next campaign if they don't stick with the party line that Democrats are crazy socialists hell bent on the destruction of our country.
:lmao:

Well this will get one of two responses...

1. Don't

2. Try being helpful if you come back. 

Given history and the lean of the subject, my money is on the first.

 
Blick said:
Sorry for butting in.  I don't disagree at all with your statement.  However, the world is at least three months into this situation and it seems like we haven't learned much of anything.  Its seems to still all be a big guess.

  • Drugs show promise, but we really don't know if they work.
  • Masks don't work until they do, or don't.  Maybe to protect you, maybe others.
  • Contact with contaminated surfaces spreads the virus, or maybe not.
  • It only seriously affects older or  immuno-suppressed, until it doesn't.
  • We need to slow the spread to avoid over-running hospitals.  We have.  Now what?
  • On, and on, and on.
We cannot stop this virus.  We're going to have to live with it in some fashion for some time.  Easing restrictions while monitoring hospital capacity seems to me to be the only way through this.
FWIW, my somewhat informed opinion in response your bullet points:

Drug studies never happen quickly, and realistically are unlikely to be a big part in controlling the pandemic.

Masks always worked, both as source control (to prevent spread) and protection. It's hard to prove exactly how well they work for any infection, let alone a novel one. Infection control is an inexact science.

Fomites likely contribute to spread, but the extent is unclear. Refer to above.

It primarily infects elderly and those with chronic medical problems. But if enough people are infected, or you're exposed to a sh!t ton of it (e.g. healthcare workers), you're bound to see some outliers. Plus there may be genetic susceptibility to infection that has yet to be elaborated. Oh yeah, eventually it may mutate to become more virulent.

We need to keep the numbers low until we have widespread access to rapid testing of acute infection and prior exposure (hopefully conferring immunity). Additionally, we need to ramp up the infrastructure for contact tracing, before we open society back up. If we rush this step, we risk setting ourselves back several weeks to months.

And I almost forgot stockpiling PPE, ventilators and training extra medical staff for surges that will invariably occur.

We can stop the virus, but we have to be patient until we have the tools to track and contain it. That's about the best we can do until a vaccine is developed IMO.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not only do I never touch the soles of my shoes, in the highly unlikely event that I did, my very first reaction would be "Ew, gross -- I need to wash my hands."

Touching contaminated things is no big deal.  You could literally soak your hands in a big bowl of coronavirus and be perfectly fine, assuming you have healthy skin. Just wash them before touching your face.
You’re soaking in it!

 
So the Karen who was so sure she had it last December told our group today that it’s all a ploy for the elite to get more power and money. When I said they already had all that, she said it was a plan of satan to usher in the mark of the beast. Is there really any point in trying with these people? 
So many Karens out there. And whatever the male Karen is called. I simply questioned a Karen several weeks ago on something that was clearly conspiracy theory material, and she informed me that she had done her research about all this for a long time and referred me to a YouTube link that was like 3 hours long. :eek:   She's part of the Q-Anon group or whatever they're called. No thanks, Karen. Anyway, that's when I went to my "don't try to reason, only reply with facts/links" strategy. It works well! Effectively shuts down most discussions. :thumbup:  

 
The Commish said:
FWIW, this is already happening.  Some beaches never shut down.  Kinda went like this.  "Leave it to municipalities to decide"...ok, they decided.  First was the "shutting down public parks and parking lots on the beach.  That thinned some people, but many weren't to be deterred.  The next step was "you can be on the beach for exercise.  No sitting, or laying out etc".  Some continue to not be deterred.  So, final step is to shut things down completely.  All the various beaches are at various stages.  Most never made it to the final stage.  

Florida is a microcosm of why "relying on the public to do the right thing" is simply not an option in any real, meaningful solution IMO.  That's the rub that I see.  Sure, you can come up with these logical plans that allow for targeted isolation etc, but if you aren't willing to (and most aren't...they can't handle the volumen they'd face) put people in jail for it and right an actual law around it, it's going to fail 99 times out of 100.  I see WAY TOO MANY "solutions" that require (and have faith in) the general public to "do the right thing" with just a smidge above ZERO evidence to support they would actually do the right thing.
Yep. Gaming the system and individual exceptionalism are too ingrained in American culture. Plus we distrust and disrespect authority.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top