Snoopy
Footballguy
As school standardized tests were based in Iowa, I wonder if they screwed up my score and put me in the wrong placement.So is it safe to say I don’t want Iowa in charge of my IT?
As school standardized tests were based in Iowa, I wonder if they screwed up my score and put me in the wrong placement.So is it safe to say I don’t want Iowa in charge of my IT?
Came here to post that. It's kind of silly that people are still arguing over delegates at this point. Iowa represents something like 1% of total delegates to be awarded in the primaries. Its main impact is in driving narratives, but those are pretty much set by now. Pete and Bernie basically tied for first, followed by Warren, Biden and Klobuchar. None of that is going to change going forward.We really overrate the idea of “winning” these caucuses and primaries. Winners don’t take all delegates. If you only win by a percent or two, it hardly makes a difference other than for bragging rights.
Just be happy you got your score before you graduated apparently.As school standardized tests were based in Iowa, I wonder if they screwed up my score and put me in the wrong placement.
Interesting article that touches on thisSeveral others also have said Iowa is about momentum and claiming victory regardless of the margin; and not the actual delegates.
Everybody ate at the early bird special and was in bed by Matlock.NYT: What Went Wrong for Joe Biden in Iowa
Does not paint a pretty picture of his campaign organization there. Also highlights some of the enthusiasm issues we all kind of knew about.
I don't think anyone is standing for this and is probably why Tom Perez and the DNC went there to intervene. There aren't many fans of the caucus - Hillary has actually spoken out against caucuses as being anti-democratic in the past, even when she won them. I'm pretty confident that 1. Iowa will not go first again for the foreseeable future and 2. this is the death of the caucus, at least on the D side.Why are the enemies of the Electoral College standing for this?
According to the article, the second largest bounce expected is the Iowa caucus, with Super Tuesday the largest expected bounce!
I'm not going to force feed myself a steak at 4:30 just to save a couple bucks!Everybody ate at the early bird special and was in bed by Matlock.
I always liked the idea of the caucuses. They use to talk about them being held at people’s homes and they would have “neighborhood discussions” and try to persuade people to represent their candidate. Maybe some of the rural ones still occur at homes. Sounded like a real grass roots effort. I know there has been a lot of complaints about people not being able to attend them (might be working, etc) which is why they set up the “satellite” caucuses.I don't think anyone is standing for this and is probably why Tom Perez and the DNC went there to intervene. There aren't many fans of the caucus - Hillary has actually spoken out against caucuses as being anti-democratic in the past, even when she won them. I'm pretty confident that 1. Iowa will not go first again for the foreseeable future and 2. this is the death of the caucus, at least on the D side.
It’s all about the media narrative.We really overrate the idea of “winning” these caucuses and primaries. Winners don’t take all delegates. If you only win by a percent or two, it hardly makes a difference other than for bragging rights.
Forgot to tell everybody that I went ahead and did the coin flip on this and Bernie won. 26% to 26%. That's a wrap folks.95% in .
Bernie with 1499 final round lead.
26.4% to 25.7% Pete for the delegates
It’s not Iowa’s fault at all....
Bernie doesn't win coinflips.Forgot to tell everybody that I went ahead and did the coin flip on this and Bernie won. 26% to 26%. That's a wrap folks.
I’m reporting you to the Iowa Dem Committee!That's why I did it.
Hope you have all night to be on hold.I’m reporting you to the Iowa Dem Committee!
WOAH97% in.
Bernie by 2518 votes after final
26.2% to 26.1 % Pete
Obviously I don’t agree. A caucus in February in Iowa is going to bring in motivated voters. For Democrats, that means progressives. I don’t think it’s at all reflective of the way people vote in November.Sanders just keeps showing that the idea that he isn't electable just doesn't jive with results and polling.
From what I’m seeing Pete’s lead in delegates is down to 3. Amazingly close.97% in.
Bernie by 2518 votes after final
26.2% to 26.1 % Pete
What’s this you say, Timothy?Obviously I don’t agree. A caucus in February in Iowa is going to bring in motivated voters. For Democrats, that means progressives. I don’t think it’s at all reflective of the way people vote in November.
In addition my understanding is that Bernie didn’t produce new voters this time around. That’s very problematic. His entire argument for beating Trump is that he will get new voters to go the polls.
That’s an impressive anecdote but from what I’ve been hearing on the news the overall numbers did not go up. In fact, they seem to be little down from 2016- which is not just bad for Bernie but for Democrats in general. Do you have evidence to the contrary?What’s this you say, Timothy?
I don’t but unless you somehow think this going to be indicative of the other 49 states....I’m not really worried.That’s an impressive anecdote but from what I’ve been hearing on the news the overall numbers did not go up. In fact, they seem to be little down from 2016- which is not just bad for Bernie but for Democrats in general. Do you have evidence to the contrary?
Part of being electable is getting the nomination - Bernie showed last time he was close - it won’t surprise me if he has the delegate lead going in to the convention. I’m not saying he would win a contested convention - he probably won’t - and I’m not saying he definitely beats Trump but the idea that he’s not electable seems laughable at this point. You know who doesn’t seem electable? The guy you’ve been screaming about being the most electable - Biden. You just assume people are scared of Bernie - they aren’t.Obviously I don’t agree. A caucus in February in Iowa is going to bring in motivated voters. For Democrats, that means progressives. I don’t think it’s at all reflective of the way people vote in November.
In addition my understanding is that Bernie didn’t produce new voters this time around. That’s very problematic. His entire argument for beating Trump is that he will get new voters to go the polls.
Personally I think the S word will sink Sanders with independents. He'll need a lot of young people to show up to offset that.You just assume people are scared of Bernie - they aren’t.
DoneHey @BassNBrew - thoughts on just making this the 2020 Caucus/Primary thread? Wanted to start discussing New Hampshire.
Take notice of those obsessing over the delegates and the "Bernie's getting screwed" narrative and consider the source.Came here to post that. It's kind of silly that people are still arguing over delegates at this point. Iowa represents something like 1% of total delegates to be awarded in the primaries. Its main impact is in driving narratives, but those are pretty much set by now. Pete and Bernie basically tied for first, followed by Warren, Biden and Klobuchar. None of that is going to change going forward.
I need for tim to weigh in on the black vote before commenting.Earlier I mentioned to @IvanKaramazov that Biden’s polling in NH had been better than in IA, so there’s still a chance for him to come back with a solid 2nd place finish next week.
Well, the cracks are starting to show now. Here are the first two post-Iowa NH polls:
Sanders 31%
Buttigieg 21%
Biden 12%
Warren 12%
Klobuchar 11%
Sanders 25%
Buttigieg 19%
Biden 12%
Warren 11%
Klobuchar 6%
Pete is up and Biden is down, which is great news for Sanders.
Actually think that's terrible news for Sanders. Biden has apparently had trouble raising funds and Pete and Amy are surging in his lane which is going to carve into his donor base. Add the Bloomberg factor and he's in trouble.Earlier I mentioned to @IvanKaramazov that Biden’s polling in NH had been better than in IA, so there’s still a chance for him to come back with a solid 2nd place finish next week.
Well, the cracks are starting to show now. Here are the first two post-Iowa NH polls:
Sanders 31%
Buttigieg 21%
Biden 12%
Warren 12%
Klobuchar 11%
Sanders 25%
Buttigieg 19%
Biden 12%
Warren 11%
Klobuchar 6%
Pete is up and Biden is down, which is great news for Sanders.
Biden should have been strong armed out months ago.If NH polling is more or less right, it's shaping up to be a two-horse race, with Bloomberg potentially making it three from Super Tuesday forward.
If those results hold Dems should strong arm Biden, Warren, and Klobuchar out of the race immediately after NH. Buttigieg likely picks up more of that support than Sanders.
And get Bloomberg to concentrate on blasting TrumpIf NH polling is more or less right, it's shaping up to be a two-horse race, with Bloomberg potentially making it three from Super Tuesday forward.
If those results hold Dems should strong arm Biden, Warren, and Klobuchar out of the race immediately after NH. Buttigieg likely picks up more of that support than Sanders.
My take is that if Biden totally collapses, Bloomberg is still there to fracture the moderate vote and Pete will be an easy mark in the south for reasons tim can explain.Actually think that's terrible news for Sanders. Biden has apparently had trouble raising funds and Pete and Amy are surging in his lane which is going to carve into his donor base. Add the Bloomberg factor and he's in trouble.
He may be done early, whether officially or not. What's happening in NH could happen nationally very quickly. He's a terrible campaigner and now he's lost the inevitability, opening the door for others to step into. And those voters aren't migrating to Bernie.