What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

My transition from supporting Obama to Trump (1 Viewer)

NorvilleBarnes

Footballguy
I'd say my transition from Obama supporter to Trump supporter happened in three phases. One was simply a move away from the left. No the Democrats didn't leave me, I left them. The second was a period of keeping everyone at arms length and equally mocking/ridiculing both sides and binging Joe Rogan. The third was realizing that I was a citizen of the greatest nation on Earth and that red, white, and blue were the greatest colors and our military was the greatest  - sorry, got carried away. Third phase was simply realizing I was far more aligned with the right and Trump.
Spoiler: this is probably going to be boring AF. Also, I don't have precise political definitions and tend to conflate terms like left and liberal.
Spoiler 2: At my peak I was only about 60% left and 40% right so this isn't about my going from 100% Dem to zero.

I supported Obama when he first ran, before he won Iowa, and I thought I was "throwing away my vote". I thought Hillary was everything wrong with politicians. Peak Obama support was election night, partying in Nashville, drinking champagne, hugging total strangers, and thinking we'd all just saved America. Good times.
I also supported marriage equality for several years. That was my last "cause". After the SCOTUS ruling, the pride marches in Nashville were no fun. At first, it was LGBTQA - where A stood for advocate. But somewhere along the line A was dropped and it seemed that straights and advocates were not welcome at any parades or events. It's pretty common for excluded groups to first want inclusion and then, later, self exclude. Anyway, with marriage equality settled, there wasn't really a cause any more.

In 2010 Nashville flooded and I learned that "Volunteers" wasn't just a state slogan - people in Tennessee really took it to heart. During the cleanup and recovery it seemed like everyone was volunteering for everything. It was awesome. People were rolling up their sleeves and digging in. There was such a strong sense of self reliance everywhere. I didn't care much for the disdain for FEMA or the hostility towards Obama "He don't need to come here!" but I really liked seeing the community come together and recover. Now, I was dating a really hot girl at the time so my flood memories are intermingled with that particular romance. To this day, a weather alert can get me pretty excited so I am not well.
I really shifted away from the left during Occupy Wall Street. It just seemed like a big dumb tantrum to me. It wasn't like the 1% were all going to say gee you're right, we have too much, here it is, and walk away. I hated it, and I hated discussing it because I didn't agree with it.

As a side note I also shifted from Christian to atheist just in time to put me at odds with all my new found conservative friends. And from pro-choice to pro-life.
The 2016 election was weird. Again, not a fan of Hillary, but also no fan of Bernie. But even less of a fan of Bernie getting screwed. Was really cheering Trump going though the Republican nomination and treating the candidates like chew toys. I had resigned myself to a Hillary presidency and didn't vote. I don't think illegal immigration is the biggest problem we're facing - but there's certainly nothing wrong with enforcing our laws and supporting legal immigration. I don't agree with everything Trump says or tweets (ugh) but yes in general, I support him and will vote for him against anyone running on the left. I haven't attended a Trump rally and don't really feel the need.

Sorry for going on so long - I edited out some stories here and there but this is the gist of it for me. I'd be very interest to hear of anyone else changed or went the other direction

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In my opinion left and right aren't really the correct words to be using to describe the two parties. It sort of implies a single line with the two on opposite ends. But to me it's more like two completely separate lines on different planes. Not only do different things matter to different parties, but they even disagree about them using different language. Warning: these are generalities. Yes there are exceptions and single anecdotes don't undo the whole thing. But generally the left seem to talk in terms values and morality and the right seems to talk in terms of policy. It seems like I see this everywhere - even on this board. Vote Bernie, he's a decent human being. And don't vote Bernie, he's a socialist. Yes there's lots of policy talk on the left (See Elizabeth Warren) but generally it seems like the morality is driving the policy. And yes, there's lots of rhetoric about who is good or bad on the right, but generally it seems to be driven by policy. It's as though one side is shouting "Blue and yellow make green and that's TRUE and if you disagree you're BAD (or a bigot, homophobe, etc)" and the other side is shouting "Two plus two is four and that's TRUE and if you disagree you're DUMB (or crazy or unAmerican, etc)". A few poor hapless souls saying "I can reach across the aisle and add four plus . . .green" and everyone hates them.

So for me, in absence of a candidate or platform that perfectly align with my beliefs (and that's never), I choose which I emphasize and which I overlook. Some of you may go "I don't overlook anything" and good for you. Statistically speaking there has to be some that align almost perfectly with their candidates and I envy you. Go away.
For me, supporting Barrack Obama meant going with the fact that I truly liked the guy. I liked the generalities he was promoting and didn't get into too much detail on the policies. I was tired of Bush and war and Republicans. And Obama had done the impossible - he won the nomination. Anything was possible. 
Like I said earlier, after marriage equality was settled, I wasn't really interested. I didn't hate Obamacare, I was mostly indifferent and sort of thought of it as Romneycare anyway. I was planning on voting for Jeb! He was a really good governor and I thought he'd be a pretty restrained President. Watching Trump tear through the entire field of Republican candidate was quite impressive. I really liked the fact that he didn't cave in to media pressure. I remember early on him losing a lot of sponsors, and he just doubled down. No one had ever done that. Ever. Even the things he did or said that I didn't like, I appreciated the fact that he would just move on. I was very (pleasantly) surprised he defeated Hillary. I'm not a racist or a homophobe or a misogynist - so when my liberal friends went on rants I didn't get too defensive. I saw it more along the lines of "OMG you didn't vote green, you're bad". But it never stopped. It was like Trump broke the Democrats. being called a bigot was sort of like being called Japanese, it didn't upset me but I often was left simply going 'Am not." I tried to reason with some (ok, you have two, and then add two more, and that's where I'm at . . . four). Thousands of people ("blue" states) voting for "the black guy with a funny name", twice, and THEN turned racist?

They say things like "Don't give me that LEGAL immigration nonsense." No, sorry, I am for legal immigration and I'm against illegal immigration. I'm a second amendment supporter. It's never been a voting issue, but if the left is going to try to restrict it, then I guess it is. I'm pro life. I'm very patriotic. In general, I'm simply more aligned with Trump than any of the Dems running. I fought for marriage equality but I don't need drag queen story hour. I wanted to expand voting rights - but not for illegals. I'm for freedom of speech (including freedom to burn the flag) but not for de-platforming, banning or shouting down other voices. I'm pro life and it wouldn't really be a voting issue for me unless the left tried to remove all restrictions.

Again, apologies for being so long winded, and not even funny, but that's most of it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- This thread was mostly in response to the one about the person attending a Trump rally and I was a little disappointed she was so focused on "good" and "bad"  people that seem to be more a liberal preoccupation. "OMG I thought they were horrible people but it turns out they were good people!" It reminded me of my reaction to visiting a Raider bar in Oakland.

- I apologize in advance if I frustrate anyone by not having perfect information or fully thought out positions on every question that interest you. I'm paying pretty close attention to things but I don't have any inside info and I'm not a constitutional lawyer or anything. 

- I am conservative but I'm not a lifelong Republican or lifelong conservative. Technically I'm an "unreliable voter" because I didn't vote in 18 or 16, and I've voted for both Rs and Dems in the past. I like the idea of neither party being able to "rely" on my vote. I know that's not for everyone. This election will probably bring out a lot of unreliable voters and "non-voters" (people registered to vote but have not in more than the past 2 elections) 

- Like my analogy before where some people are saying blue and yellow make green, and that's true, and some people are saying 2 plus 2 is 4 and that's true, the green people are probably going to be frustrated with the numbers and math people for not being interested in discussing colors. That doesn't mean the math people are dishonest, or just repeating "talking points". It simply means they have a different set of criteria. The people saying Trump is "bad", and "not a good example" cannot understand how people support him. But many of the Trump supporters are simply using different criteria. Inevitably the color people will be caught mixing blue and red and the math people will point out they're not getting green. To which the color people will predictably respond "I thought you didn't care about color! NOW you care about color." And the math people will say "I'm not point out the lack of green because it's important to me, but because you've claimed it was important to you."  Everyone ends up talking past each other and accusing the other of dishonesty because it seems dishonest by their own criteria and not the others criteria.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That was a beautiful story. I have a couple friends who used to be Obamaguys who have locked arms in support of President Trump with myself and others. Most Democrats (especially here) will never understand President Trumps crossover appeal.

 
I considered myself probably 70% right / 30% left until a few years ago and would have voted for any Republican in the 2016 election besides Trump.  Now, especially in the age of Trump, I would say I'm more 75% left 25% right. I'd say it is mostly due to my perception that  many of my fellow Christians on the right seem only to care about abortion but otherwise seem to be all about getting mine, while I found the left to be more interested in loving all people and reflecting my Christian values. 

 
Interesting experience.  Would love to hear more about areas you agree with Trump most on and which parts of his presidency give you the most pause.

are there any complaints about him that give you pause to vote for him in the next election?  

also, going from Christian to atheist at the same time as going from pro choice to pro life can’t be a common combination.  Would be curious to hear more about that combo if there is a relationship there.

 
Substance aside, I admire your courage to publicly admit, in this forum in particular, your support of the President.

 
I think you may want to take another crack at explain it as I don’t have a clue why you support Trump. 
:lmao:  

I'll fill in some gaps tonight. I wrote that all in one take, in notepad, without word wrap. When I pasted it in here I learned two things. One, I rely on spell check about ten times more than I thought. Red underlines freaking everywhere.  Two, my god I can be long winded. I was convinced my original would have ended with a dozen "tl;dr" responses, so I edited out a lot. Including one of the key points. Oops.

 
  • Laughing
Reactions: Ned
I mean this sincerely - I find it fascinating you say you went from:

- Obama to Trump

- Christian to atheist 

- pro-choice to pro-life

Those are 3 big shifts.  I do wonder how becoming an atheist and moving to right aligns as Christians have dominated both parties but typically atheist seem to align more with the left (from my experience). 

 
I can only assume that you'll be following up with the things you like about Trump?  I get the transition away from Democrats...makes total sense.  I'm most interested to hear why a shift in support to Trump though.  Do you simply keep it at the "by any means necessary" phase if the policies you see, you like?

 
Thanks for sharing.

My experience has been the complete opposite.  Ive moved away from the GOP and towards the left as the GOP moved further right and away from fiscally conservative policy.

 
Can understand why you wanted to vote the way you did.  Commend you for sharing and also voting.  Whether for Trump or whomever.  Always vote.

 
I don’t really see a political transition of Obama to trump in your post.  You are favoring a candidate.  I think a transition would be more like hate trump to love him.  Or left to right on policy.  But nit candidate to candidate

 
Thanks for sharing. The thing that stuck out to me the most was the line, "treating the candidates like chew toys."

Can you expand on that thought? What was it about those actions that galvanized you?

 
I understand philosophical shifts happen.  A normal process.  I don’t understand supporting pathological, dim-witted, craven, criminal self-promoters.
Exactly the kind of thing that kills real discussion and exactly the kind of thing we do not want here on this board. 

 
Good thread.  I also transitioned from Obama voter to Trump in 2020.  He has put America in a great place despite this viscous hate coming from the left.  A big reason why I now lean right is due to the hypocrisy I see on the left.  They started claiming anyone who supports Trump is a racist and it didn't sit well with me.  I have many conservative friends and they are good folks who care about people and I was sick of the negative hating folks on the left.  
I respect your change of heart but I am dumbfounded by this statement.  I agree there is PLENTY of hypocrisy form the left but I am not sure how you can look at the statements and actions of Graham, McConnell and Trump and not see hypocrisy.   They don't even try to hide from it.

 
Thanks -- great post.  This is definitely a function of my own little bubble, but I don't personally know any Obama-to-Trump voters so it's really interesting to hear your explain your thoughts.  

 
If you find that you have a spare moment, I'd be interested in hearing more about your move from Christianity to atheism and from pro-choice to pro-life.  I've been arguing for years that religion and abortion ought to be uncorrelated issues, but the fact is that they are correlated for most people, and you moved from one slightly-out-of-place position to another.  Nothing wrong with that of course -- it's just unusual.

 
If you find that you have a spare moment, I'd be interested in hearing more about your move from Christianity to atheism and from pro-choice to pro-life.  I've been arguing for years that religion and abortion ought to be uncorrelated issues, but the fact is that they are correlated for most people, and you moved from one slightly-out-of-place position to another.  Nothing wrong with that of course -- it's just unusual.
Good point...as this has come  up recently and I explained even being a Catholic how I have a pro-choice stance politically.  I may feel abortion is wrong (and I do)...but taking my own faith out of it and what my choice would be...is not the same as thinking the government should make that choice for everyone.

 
I may feel abortion is wrong (and I do)...but taking my own faith out of it and what my choice would be...is not the same as thinking the government should make that choice for everyone.
It’s not an illogical stance. Most religious people believe that adultery is wrong (you don’t need the Ten Commandments to reach that conclusion) but most would oppose making adultery illegal in a modern society. 

 
It’s not an illogical stance. Most religious people believe that adultery is wrong (you don’t need the Ten Commandments to reach that conclusion) but most would oppose making adultery illegal in a modern society. 
I have just tended to let my faith...be my faith...its about how I live my life and my family as well.  Its up to each person to choose that path...not for the government to choose for them. That goes for many issues outside of abortion as well (like adultery as you mention).

 
First of all, thanks for sharing. I don't agree with you, and I don't completely understand what caused the shift. (Actually, and correct me if I'm wrong about this, but I sense that you don't completely understand it either. That's not meant as a criticism -- complex decisions like this often involve multiple interacting factors, and I think lots of times people can feel very certain about their destination even if they don't totally comprehend every step of the journey.)

Anyway, I think all of us can benefit from hearing your perspective.

 
As someone who has admired Norville’s wit on these boards for years, the news that he embraces and supports Trumpism is eye opening, to say the least. 

 
I respect people who transition. I couldn’t do it, but to each their own. 
I generally agree with you -- and certainly in @NorvilleBarnes's case -- but I make one exception: I remain eternally skeptical when people move from one political extreme to the other, no matter which way they go. Prime example is David Horowitz, who was a radical leftist member of the Black Panthers and then became a right-wing pundit. In the other direction (if somewhat less extreme), David Brock went from writing right-wing hit pieces for The American Spectator to founding Media Matters. There's just something about people like that that prevents me from ever trusting them, even when they're saying things I agree with. 

 
I generally agree with you -- and certainly in @NorvilleBarnes's case -- but I make one exception: I remain eternally skeptical when people move from one political extreme to the other, no matter which way they go. Prime example is David Horowitz, who was a radical leftist member of the Black Panthers and then became a right-wing pundit. In the other direction (if somewhat less extreme), David Brock went from writing right-wing hit pieces for The American Spectator to founding Media Matters. There's just something about people like that that prevents me from ever trusting them, even when they're saying things I agree with. 
I absolutely agree with this and have said as such on many occasion, but as someone who has seen his immoderate views become less immoderate over time while grasping the proper ends, I think people can be forgiven. I do not trust either man you listed as an example, though. Wildly intelligent or quotable, yes. Trustworthy? No. 

 
I absolutely agree with this and have said as such on many occasion, but as someone who has seen his immoderate views become less immoderate over time while grasping the proper ends, I think people can be forgiven. I do not trust either man you listed as an example, though. Wildly intelligent or quotable, yes. Trustworthy? No. 
I've wondered exactly where I would draw the line. For example, I once heard an interview with a reformed skinhead who now helps other people transition out. Obviously, a guy like that is completely praiseworthy, especially considering that he was recruited into the movement as a scared, confused teenager.

I think in the examples I cited, it has something to do with them still being pundits. It's the hubris of thinking that people still want to hear what they have to say. If they just went about quietly doing good work and atoning for their past sins, I might be more sympathetic. But I admit I don't have a really good handle on what drives my emotional reaction to them.

 
But I admit I don't have a really good handle on what drives my emotional reaction to them.
I never did have a good explanation, either, but both men have come up for consideration in several walks of life, and I've chosen to avoid and avoid arguing about. I think it might be because someone that immoderate makes connections about things that leave one as "seer" and seers often have trouble contemplating opposing viewpoints. Plus it also means that there was a major malfunction about what the ends of society should look like, whereas other people get tripped up in the procedures and machinations of how to get to universally-agreed upon, non-nebulous ends. 

 
People change.  Times change.  I voted for W in 2000 and will probably have to vote for Bernie this year.  Go figure.

 
People change.  Times change.  I voted for W in 2000 and will probably have to vote for Bernie this year.  Go figure.
Going from voting for W to voting for the Democrat who wins the primary this year and taking David Horowitz and David Brock intellectually seriously are two different things entirely, IMHO. People do change, but Horowitz's change from the radical left to right and Brock changing from Republican operative to leftist critic seems like more than just intellectual growth. There's something unseemly about both men. 

 
Going from voting for W to voting for the Democrat who wins the primary this year and taking David Horowitz and David Brock intellectually seriously are two different things entirely, IMHO. People do change, but Horowitz's change from the radical left to right and Brock changing from Republican operative to leftist critic seems like more than just intellectual growth. There's something unseemly about both men. 
agree

 
Going from voting for W to voting for the Democrat who wins the primary this year and taking David Horowitz and David Brock intellectually seriously are two different things entirely, IMHO. People do change, but Horowitz's change from the radical left to right and Brock changing from Republican operative to leftist critic seems like more than just intellectual growth. There's something unseemly about both men. 
Another one in that group, for me at least, is Cenk Uygur. I actually went to college with him -- he was a senior when I was a freshman -- and he was that right-wing bomb-throwing columnist that every college paper loves to hire to get people stirred up (or at least they did back in the '90s. No idea if that's still the case.) Now I see him on TV as the ultimate BernieBro and I just can't.

One thing I will say -- especially in the era of Never Trump -- is that I've gained a lot of respect for people who are willing to stand up for principle, even if it means burning bridges with former colleagues. I know there are plenty on the left who want to snipe at, say, Bill Kristol, but I refuse to do so, even if there's still plenty I don't like about the guy. Because I think what he's done takes courage, and I want to honor that.

Anyway, we're getting further afield from the OP, so I'll just say that I think it's kind of fascinating how political evolutions can range from admirable to understandable to unseemly. Or, as the British philosopher David St. Hubbins put it, it's such a fine line between stupid and clever:headbang:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
@NorvilleBarnes ' post also highlights something I've said for years: People are complicated. 

Lots of people love to make sure everyone fits into a nice clean category or box. I get it. It helps us organize the world. But the reality is it sometimes doesn't work that way. Maybe OFTEN doesn't work that way. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting path. Not sure I follow it though. A fringe group of extreme leftists protesting billionaires and millionaires who gambled with American’s money and helped cause a massive recession is what broke you? Did the Tea Party bother you?

You didn’t like the perceived anti- American sentiment on the Left but enjoyed Trump berating other elected officials, reporters, DOJ members, parents of a killed soldier, etc. I think we just feel how we feel and sometimes logic isn’t really the driving force. 

Just trying to figure it out. 

 
Exactly the kind of thing that kills real discussion and exactly the kind of thing we do not want here on this board. 
I don't totally understand this objection. I (and I reckon many others) have no trouble understanding someone being a republican or conservative. But Trump is a step too far - because of who he is. He's a bad dude. 

So when the OP says he has transitioned from an Obama supporter to a Trump supporter the question isn't why is the OP conservative. Its why does the OP support this really bad guy. 

Maybe cobalt could have worded it differently, but that's the essential question. To not let it be asked basically renders this thread meaningless.

 
@NorvilleBarnes ' post also highlights something I've said for years: People are complicated. 

As much as people love to make sure everyone fits into the nice clean box. The reality is it sometimes doesn't work that way. Maybe OFTEN doesn't work that way. 
I was once the foreman of a jury. As we deliberated, it became clear that there was a solid majority in favor of acquittal, but we had a few holdouts. Eventually those people came around and we voted to acquit. What I found really fascinating was the different paths people took to get to acquittal, and seeing how their brains worked in real time. Some of the rationales I thought made sense, others didn't, but I realized it wasn't my place to question them. (The one exception came when the final holdout seemed to be giving in simply to go along with everyone else so they would stop badgering her; I told her that wasn't an acceptable reason, and I refused to send the verdict to the judge based on that alone.)

Point being, it's important to recognize that, not only will people sometimes disagree with you, they will approach the problem from a completely different perspective that you might find non-sensical, but which doesn't necessarily make it wrong.

 
@NorvilleBarnes ' post also highlights something I've said for years: People are complicated. 

Lots of people love to make sure everyone fits into a nice clean category or box. I get it. It helps us organize the world. But the reality is it sometimes doesn't work that way. Maybe OFTEN doesn't work that way. 
That’s the truth. People are complicated and often it’s thing we can’t even pinpoint that drive us. I remember one of the Gladwell books talking about some dating research where people described their ideal partner and then they did some speed dating exercises to see who the people liked the most. They found almost no correlation between what people said they were looking for and whom they actually liked. Often we don’t even know what is driving is to do what we do.

 
I do think a lot of the Trump appeal (and the lack of appeal for guys like Rubio or Cruz) is the way they make voters feel. He has energy, he’s funny, he’s confident and an entertainer. As much as policy matters, it’s not nearly as important imo as just the vibe the person gives off. The old “who would rather have a beer with” measurement. 

 
I do think a lot of the Trump appeal (and the lack of appeal for guys like Rubio or Cruz) is the way they make voters feel. He has energy, he’s funny, he’s confident and an entertainer. As much as policy matters, it’s not nearly as important imo as just the vibe the person gives off. The old “who would rather have a beer with” measurement. 
I don’t see how Trump is more appealing to have a beer with than Rubio.  Trump is the exact opposite of the “regular” guy.  I guess the fame part of it is something.

 
  • Smile
Reactions: Ned
I don’t see how Trump is more appealing to have a beer with than Rubio.  Trump is the exact opposite of the “regular” guy.  I guess the fame part of it is something.
Rubio is robotic and boring. I’m sure he’s a nice guy but he has little charisma. While Trump isn’t a regular guy, he’s funny and would be entertaining. He rallys are basically a traveling comedy show. People love it. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top