What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Admiral McRaven's Message (2 Viewers)

jm192 said:
Also:  Trump claiming it doesn't matter.  But the person who leaked the story claiming it does. 

So really whoever gives the info that fits your narrative gets the umbrella of credible.
That would make sense if we had no access to prior information about the credibility of both individuals. 

But that isn't the case here.

 
Max Power said:
Sure, I posted Jake Tapper's Twitter response to the situation here.

https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/753528-the-russia-investigation-mueller-over-the-course-of-my-career-ive-seen-a-number-of-challenges-to-our-democracythe-russian-govts-effort-to-interfere-in-our-election-is-among-the-most-serious/?do=findComment&comment=22516435

This is the CNN Link posted yesterday repeating it. 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/23/politics/intelligence-briefer-russian-interference-trump-sanders/index.html

Now do you want to take a guess how far I had to dig to find this link on CNN?  It wasn't on the front page.  I had to search Trump and it was the 35th result or 4 pages deep.  So CNN  will run with a bad narrative on page 1 that makes Trump bad.  Then an article that states what actually happened is pushed to back real quick.  

So go right on ahead and bash sites like RedState, but they got it right on their first run of the story.  CNN did not.  
FYI - It is on the front page right now.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top