Ok, maybe I can see this.Harris ran a poor campaign and was out early.
As VP she is not running a campaign - just following someone else’s plan. I think she is a much better candidate than she is a campaign strategist.
Ok, maybe I can see this.Harris ran a poor campaign and was out early.
As VP she is not running a campaign - just following someone else’s plan. I think she is a much better candidate than she is a campaign strategist.
I haven’t followed the VP pick closely because it won’t move the needle for me either. So, assuming the poll is accurate, and I believe it is, I would see if there’s a candidate that would help in Florida. To me, that is the key state, as it usually is. I don’t know if one of these folks would help there or not.Morning Consult did a Biden vs. Trump poll with 12 different potential running mates. Bottom line: his pick doesn’t move the needle at all. https://morningconsult.com/2020/07/29/biden-vp-pick-polling/
I don't think there is a Florida needle-mover either. I hope Biden picks the candidate on his list that will be most effective in the role and could be the best president of the bunch. (I think that's Susan Rice.)I haven’t followed the VP pick closely because it won’t move the needle for me either. So, assuming the poll is accurate, and I believe it is, I would see if there’s a candidate that would help in Florida. To me, that is the key state, as it usually is. I don’t know if one of these folks would help there or not.
This is the tricky part to handicapping the race.I hope Biden picks the candidate on his list that will be most effective in the role
Best pick IMO as well with just seeing interviews and how the names being thrown out there have handled them.I don't think there is a Florida needle-mover either. I hope Biden picks the candidate on his list that will be most effective in the role and could be the best president of the bunch. (I think that's Susan Rice.)
I bet Biden will be excited to find out too:I don't think there is a Florida needle-mover either. I hope Biden picks the candidate on his list that will be most effective in the role and could be the best president of the bunch. (I think that's Susan Rice.)
Right up there with with those people thinking Paw Patrol was canceled. In their defense, it was the White House that reported it.Well, since we're on the subject, do others have friends posting articles from the satire sites enraged because they think they are real?
I've seen form "both sides". The ultimate confirmation bias.
If they don't know the difference between satire and real, then they're too stupid to vote.Well, since we're on the subject, do others have friends posting articles from the satire sites enraged because they think they are real?
I've seen form "both sides". The ultimate confirmation bias.
Yeah she can’t be it.Back on topic, following Church of Scientology and Cuba,today's walk back from the Bass campaign is that the church, which her statement claimed was in her district, is nowhere near her district. Bass' 15 minutes may have literally lasted 15 minutes.
And Benghazi brings the Russia taliban bounties Comparison. The latter is far worseI’m kinda thinking that Rice is the best pick strategically after I read this Politico article claiming that Republicans are hoping she gets picked so they can talk about Benghazi and unmasking and all that stuff.
If the pandemic is still killing lots of Americans (it will be) and the economy is still in the toilet (it will be), it seems like an absolutely terrible strategy for Republicans to be talking about Benghazi. But I don’t think they can help themselves.
I prefer Rice to Harris.I’m kinda thinking that Rice is the best pick strategically after I read this Politico article claiming that Republicans are hoping she gets picked so they can talk about Benghazi and unmasking and all that stuff.
If the pandemic is still killing lots of Americans (it will be) and the economy is still in the toilet (it will be), it seems like an absolutely terrible strategy for Republicans to be talking about Benghazi. But I don’t think they can help themselves.
This is news to me and I'm somewhat skeptical. If Harris has so many fans why did she flame out in the primaries?But the KHive twitter world is every bit as obnoxious as the Bernie Bro world. They will rant and rave if it’s not Harris.
KHive has lots of theories...This is news to me and I'm somewhat skeptical. If Harris has so many fans why did she flame out in the primaries?
Similar to Bernie Bro’s - a vocal subset of supporters for Kamela Harris. The “swarm” in support of Harris.WTF is KHive?
KHive is a pretty small (but tenacious) population on twitter. I’ve never seen such fanatical devotion to a presidential candidate who dropped out before Iowa. Bizarre stuff.This is news to me and I'm somewhat skeptical. If Harris has so many fans why did she flame out in the primaries?
I would have to think those people wouldn't be voting for Biden regardless.I suppose there are some voters who would vote Trump over Biden simply due to picking Rice and concerns with Benghazi. But hardly any.
I made that mistake on Twitter. The short answer is - no.Would this KHive crew be satisfied if Biden also announced that Harris would be his AG? In a typical administration, that would be a more important position. In this potential one, though, I suppose the thought might be that AG would not be the springboard to POTUS?
What about SCOTUS? I imagine this KHive might like that quite a bit.
I thought “The Squad” was calling the shots now?Do any of the others on the short list have KHive equivalents? The Rice Pack? The Liz-ards? The Bassturbators?
Only in Sean Hannity and Fox News programming director’s minds.I thought “The Squad” was calling the shots now?
Duckworthies.Do any of the others on the short list have KHive equivalents? The Rice Pack? The Liz-ards? The Bassturbators?
Rich Conway said:Would this KHive crew be satisfied if Biden also announced that Harris would be his AG? In a typical administration, that would be a more important position. In this potential one, though, I suppose the thought might be that AG would not be the springboard to POTUS?
What about SCOTUS? I imagine this KHive might like that quite a bit.
I don’t disagree with that, but would add most media also. One of the major story lines this year is how progressive does Biden go. Similar to when the Tea Party tried to take the GOP far right.The General said:Only in Sean Hannity and Fox News programming director’s minds.
I hope you're right. I've come around to her as my top choice.I'm too biased to trust my ability to be objective, but from what I'm seeing and hearing Duckworth still has as good of a chance as Harris or Rice. She seems like a no-brainer to me, but everyone's political calculus is different in what's an inherently fickle exercise to begin with.
Kamala has always been the front runner since Amy dropped out. Safest pick.Just an observation......Axios reporting of it being down to Harris/Rice ( "nearly unanimous read that we get from more than a dozen people close to him") brings optics of reducing the field to the two light-skinned black women with white husbands.
This is one of my big reasons for preferring GrishamBiden talks about wanting someone whose strengths balance his. And is not concerned about his pick having nat'l defense or foreign policy experience because he considers that his specialty. A Rice pick doesn't fit this. It also, as I've said in here before, does nothing to branch out from Clinton/Obama Establishment World.
the "Pod Save" people, at least one of whom was in the Obama administration, seem to think Biden has a special respect for Rice as a factotum, beyond her areas of expertise, which is the only reason he'd be willing to hand the Behghazi card back to the magpies by making her his Major Domo & heir apparentBiden talks about wanting someone whose strengths balance his. And is not concerned about his pick having nat'l defense or foreign policy experience because he considers that his specialty. A Rice pick doesn't fit this. It also, as I've said in here before, does nothing to branch out from Clinton/Obama Establishment World.
You want an oldie? Here's where your post took me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BwmztGRxoki hear she's maybe even more "can do" than even Warren
The Clinton and Obama runs were pretty good.Biden talks about wanting someone whose strengths balance his. And is not concerned about his pick having nat'l defense or foreign policy experience because he considers that his specialty. A Rice pick doesn't fit this. It also, as I've said in here before, does nothing to branch out from Clinton/Obama Establishment World.
Rice is filthy rich and might look down on "Poor Joe"yeah, i likes my oldie words - you can't even say OKBoomer to em, only "balderdash!" & ####
i think Rice is effete (folderol!) and would never want her in a campaign, but i hear she's maybe even more "can do" than even Warren
do you speak in buzzwords at home?Rice is filthy rich and might look down on "Poor Joe"
Rice’s first financial disclosure as an Obama White House official, filed in 2008, formed a parade of horribles for progressives. Her investments ranged from fossil fuels and large financial institutions to pharmaceuticals and holdings in Las Vegas casinos owned by the Republican megadonors Sheldon Adelson and Steve Wynn.
Rice had so many investments that a full analysis of her assets was only publicly released once, in 2009, by the Center for Responsive Politics. It estimated she was worth between $23.5 million and $43.5 million.
The TransCanada investment stands out from the others owing to the project’s political significance.
Despite the controversy surrounding the TransCanada investment in 2012, Rice clung to the stock and listed as much as $100,000 of it in her last public financial disclosure as she exited the White House in 2017 as national security advisor. She was appointed to that post after John Kerry beat her out as secretary of state in the aftermath of her handling of the attacks on the lethal attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Though Benghazi was more of a political liability for Rice than TransCanada at the time, her entire stock portfolio was part of an internal whisper campaign to undermine her chances, according to a Democratic official who recalled the behind-the-scenes jockeying.
A Rice spokeswoman would not discuss her investments or whether Rice shared her latest holdings with the Biden campaign.
“We are not going to comment on the vetting process,” the spokeswoman said, adding that the former ambassador filed financial disclosures as required throughout her tenure in the Obama administration. “Ambassador Rice is still a private citizen and will disclose her holdings if and when required by law and a return to service.”