The General
Footballguy
It’s a fact that the lower educated voter block going hard for Don was what got him in the WH.Lesser educated? Interesting. You guys still wonder why you lost?
It’s a fact that the lower educated voter block going hard for Don was what got him in the WH.Lesser educated? Interesting. You guys still wonder why you lost?
Who’s you guys? If he or Trump or Prince Andrew are guilty, lock them up.And yet you guys keep featuring him at all your gatherings.
Well, I'm not sure what the bold means anymore. I really struggle to identify with many of them.This is funny on many levels, not the least is that @Zow is a solid GOP guy.
But, its also common knowledge that Trump does exceptionally well among white voters with no college education - particularly males. Trump does not do well with college-educated voters.
There's a reason why you guys keep saying that. And it's not because you're trying to build bridges.It’s a fact that the lower educated voter block going hard for Don was what got him in the WH.
Come on man. Stop playing stupid.Who’s you guys? If he or Trump or Prince Andrew are guilty, lock them up.
My point is that Trump won over a demographic where Trump himself didn't appear to fit. I made this point in response to the point that Kamala Harris can't win over the demographic of the average black voter because she doesn't entirely fit the demographic.But I'm not sure what your point is. What's the point about calling people lesser educated? Some of the smartest people I know never went to college at all.
The dumbest people I've worked with are college educated. There is only one reason you bring stuff like that up.
So you can continue to demean them. That's all it is. That's all The reason you do it.
Sorry you feel that way about the Republican party. I don't know how you think the Democrat party is even close to a fit for you though.My point is that Trump won over a demographic where Trump himself didn't appear to fit. I made this point in response to the point that Kamala Harris can't win over the demographic of the average black voter because she doesn't entirely fit the demographic.
Its just the stats.There's a reason why you guys keep saying that. And it's not because you're trying to build bridges.
What? I'm merely pointing out that your candidate is doing exactly what you seem to be complaining about. He demeaned his supporters right to their face.So you can continue to demean them. That's all it is. That's all The reason you do it.
I was directly responding to this portion of your post, "I don't think the daughter of a slave owning Jamaican and an elitist from India who hasn't been through "the struggle" blacks talk about is going to a) shred anyone and b) able to shore up the "black" vote."My point is that Trump won over a demographic where Trump himself didn't appear to fit. I made this point in response to the point that Kamala Harris can't win over the demographic of the average black voter because she doesn't entirely fit the demographic.
I'm not a registered democrat. I also don't view politics as two binary teams.Sorry you feel that way about the Republican party. I don't know how you think the Democrat party is even close to a fit for you though.
Lesser educated? Interesting. You guys still wonder why you lost?
You can’t make it up lol
I prefer the inanimate carbon rod.I'm not a registered democrat. I also don't view politics as two binary teams.
I find Trump to be an embarassment to our nation and the walking embodiment of everything wrong with the Republican party. Like a poster above I would also vote for a steel rod over Trump. That sentiment doesn't mean I've somehow changed my ideological perspective on several political issues.
As a half Asian woman, I agree. I was going to vote for Trump but this pick convinced me to switch my vote.As a black man I like the pick.
Right. And nobody (at least not me since I apparently started this ####storm) is suggesting that more education = more intelligence/smarter.I don't understand these responses. Its true - there was an education gap in the 2016 election results. That's not an insult. Its a fact.
A million unforeseen things can happen. but this sentiment is why Trump loses this time.I'm not a registered democrat. I also don't view politics as two binary teams.
I find Trump to be an embarassment to our nation and the walking embodiment of everything wrong with the Republican party. Like a poster above I would also vote for a steel rod over Trump. That sentiment doesn't mean I've somehow changed my ideological perspective on several political issues.
Either works for me v. Trump.I prefer the inanimate carbon rod.
Nia-Malika Henderson made a good point that given electoral history picking a women of color is hard to consider a safe pick. However given that Joe had committed to picking a woman she is likely the safest pick. She has been considered the favorite the whole time. Picking her rocks the boat the least. Given he is currently in a very strong position, that seems smart.You guys are all a ton more into this than I am. But for the casual observer like me, she seems like a great and safe choice.
A big reason Trump won is because people are sick of the same old same old retread bull#### in DCIts just the stats.
It’s smart on Trump’s part, it’s how he won.
It doesn’t take away from the observation that it’s odd that Trump, a silver spoon elitist snob appeals to them.
This is exactly how I feel and probably how most of the country feels.IvanKaramazov said:Definitely not who I would have picked, but I don't fundamentally care. Just so Trump loses.
Totally agree that played a role.A big reason Trump won is because people are sick of the same old same old retread bull#### in DC
Imo
And is just the same old BS in Washington with him as well.Totally agree that played a role.
Four years later enough people see that he’s in over his head I believe.
Let's hope. Anecdotally though, I haven't seen to many of my friends and colleagues change their minds. Most who seem to share my sentiment still voted against Trump in 2016 (albeit they may have voted for Johnson). Most people I know who voted for Trump will be doing so again in 2020. Again, this is just my anecdotal world which consists of personal conversations and, primarily, facebook and this website.A million unforeseen things can happen. but this sentiment is why Trump loses this time.
He’s narrowed his margins way too far.
Kind of hard to run as an outsider when you are the incumbant.And is just the same old BS in Washington with him as well.
If I had to bet I’d bet he gets smoked this time.Totally agree that played a role.
Four years later enough people see that he’s in over his head I believe.
It wasn’t then. That’s the pointAnd is just the same old BS in Washington with him as well.
Whatever. Biden could have picked Kim Jong-Un and this board would be justifying why it's a great choice. SHOCKED you guys ignore Harris' history and want to focus on Trump supporters. SHOCKEDI, for one, am shocked that the Harris pick DIDN'T pull any of the guys in this board who were adamantly for Trump*. I really thought she would have made inroads into the vocal Trump supporter contingency.
* Or those guys who say they are Leftists/Bernie Bros....but do everything they can to give Trump a pass.
I hope you are right and agreed.If I had to bet I’d bet he gets smoked this time.
I was just saying I don’t think it’s odd that he got the ppl to vote for him that he did last time.
Going against Hillary didn’t hurt either of course
The bold was certainly a factor. Though, oddly, it was upper to upper middle class white women who drastically shifted against Hillary.If I had to bet I’d bet he gets smoked this time.
I was just saying I don’t think it’s odd that he got the ppl to vote for him that he did last time.
Going against Hillary didn’t hurt either of course
But he didn’t pick Kim Jong (probably a better bet for Trump’s cabinet tbh).Whatever. Biden could have picked Kim Jong-Un and this board would be justifying why it's a great choice. SHOCKED you guys ignore Harris' history and want to focus on Trump supporters. SHOCKED
I myself would have been SHOCKED if ANY pick by Biden didn’t draw huge dismay from Trump supporters and/ or “conservatives” here. Go figure.But he didn’t pick Kim Jong (probably a better bet for Trump’s cabinet tbh).
People aren't focusing on Trump supporters it was brought up during the conversation.
In terms of total numbers, Trump got 2 million more votes than Romney did.The bold was certainly a factor. Though, oddly, it was upper to upper middle class white women who drastically shifted against Hillary.
My recollection is that Trump received about the same number of votes in total as Mitt Romney. So, arguably, his win resulted more from two factors: 1) Hillary turned out a significantly fewer amount of votes compared to Obama; 2) Trump successfully re-arranged the Republican votes in swing states and in particular demographics (such as blue collar men and upper middle class women).
Plus, he and his family donated to her, which is hilarious.I think based on the early attacks against her, she is s better choice than I was expecting. It seems particularly lame. Trump's comments are she is nasty and super liberal. The nasty comment is just his continued sexism. Trying to paint her a super liberal seems a big stretch even for Trump.
she was the favorite, BUTI totally get the idea of being done - I don't see how Kamala Harris should have any bearing on that at all. If anything, the pick of Harris was completely predictable and should have been the presumptive selection.
In 2008, when a McCain supporter errantly accused Obama of being a Muslim terrorist, McCain corrected her and assured her that Obama was a "good family man."While scrolling through Twitter:
When Sarah Palin was selected in 2008, Obama/Biden released a statement praising the fact that “old barriers were falling in politics.”
When Kamala Harris was selected in 2020, Trump called her “nasty” and “horrible”.
You don't sound insulted. I was told people would be insulted by Biden choosing Harris.
On the anniversary of the Charlottesville march. Trump only sees fine people on one side.When Kamala Harris was selected in 2020, Trump called her “nasty” and “horrible”.
Great job, Kev...you absolute carpet-covered toilet seat lid of a human.ELECTION 2020: Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield) issued the following statement in response to Sen. Kamala Harris joining the Joe Biden ticket:
"Kamala Harris wants to turn the entire United States into San Fransisco (sic).
Her radical agenda has been terrible for Californians, and it would be terrible for the rest of America too."
The School of Hard Knocks has many meanings.Great job, Kev...you absolute carpet-covered toilet seat lid of a human.
We went to the same college, FFS.
Um have you not been following along in this thread? A college education doesn’t mean you’re smart.Great job, Kev...you absolute carpet-covered toilet seat lid of a human.
We went to the same college, FFS.
He was probably as surprised as anyone else when he found out.Disappointing selection by Biden, but not a surprising one. I suspect the extreme left is pitching major fits over this one.