There is similar analytics with edge players, but I think they both get to the same point for different reasons. Edge guys, there is a physical minimum you must meet to beat NFL tackles, and if you have those traits, the NFL will find you , and overdraft you. QBs, I have a suspicion that QBs taken after the 1st are a lot less likely to have the team commit to them, the way a team really needs to for a QB to succeed. If Minshew is only average this year, he's not guaranteed 2021 the way Daniel Jones is, right? Still, no matter the reason, QBs that go later rarely pan out.
I will always believe people wrote off Hurts when he left Alabama, and it's just confirmation bias for a LOT of evaluators that we've been reading. They're looking for bad. And maybe the NFL is guilty as well. Why was Jordan Love taken over Hurts? I don't get it.
Every negative I have seen with Hurts, frankly, looks a lot like the same negatives we get every time an athletic running QB appears. Can't read defenses, gets stuck on first read, etc. That's all fixable. And probably overrated. We were told Cam Newton and Lamar Jackson needed YEARS on the bench. Not for nothing, but if you want to find some really stupid takes, go looking at scouting profiles for some really successful QBs that were cursed with the ability to run.
To me, toughness, accuracy cannot be coached. By ANY accuracy analytics, and I've seen a few, Burrow/Tua/Hurts are in a class all by themselves. Hurts was incredibly accurate, and while that category gets mentioned with Tua/Burrow, you never read that about Hurts as a major strength, it gets mentioned in passing.