What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Former staffer accuses Joe Biden of sexual assault (1 Viewer)

He is obviously very scared as evidenced by the fact he hasn't run with this constantly on Twitter (as one would have expected and like he does about Biden's alleged mental incapacity or living in his basement). This is ammunition he really can't use because he is not exactly bullet proof. 
Like I said in another post he's probably waiting for Biden to be locked in. If Trump pounces on this now and does a good enough job with it the Dems could just replace Biden and it's wasted. If he waits until he's locked in he can really do some damage. 

 
Like I said in another post he's probably waiting for Biden to be locked in. If Trump pounces on this now and does a good enough job with it the Dems could just replace Biden and it's wasted. If he waits until he's locked in he can really do some damage. 
I am almost certain that Trump, with his sordid history, has the sense enough to not go there - but we will see. 

 
I am almost certain that Trump, with his sordid history, has the sense enough to not go there - but we will see. 
Yea we won't know for sure until August. I think if it was up to him alone he wouldn't have patience enough to sit back on it. I would imagine his campaign team would be smart enough to though. 

One thing we know for sure, he SHOULD be afraid to go there, but he's an interesting man.

 
Doesn't have to be Trump.  Super Pacs will take care of it.   Kind of like the off season in the NFL, everything is quiet here for awhile.  Just wait.
Eh, Reade's been contacted by Trump's team, and Trump will use it all day long personally as well as the Pac's. The point isn't Trump being neutralized - he waves his transgressions and bad character all over the place, it's a feature (Lol his lawyer got convicted in a hush money scheme directed by Trump) - the point is Trump trying to neutralize Biden because character is supposed to be an advantage for him. Btw Trump will just add on made up claims as part of this, it really won't be limited to Reade or her claims.

Thing is the media heat had died down because Reade has sort of halted her movement on it. That this is already embedded in the Trump base is just there, it's a question of the purposeful strategy to drive down Biden's favorables with a wide swath of America in the middle.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am almost certain that Trump, with his sordid history, has the sense enough to not go there - but we will see. 
Yea we won't know for sure until August. I think if it was up to him alone he wouldn't have patience enough to sit back on it. I would imagine his campaign team would be smart enough to though. 

One thing we know for sure, he SHOULD be afraid to go there, but he's an interesting man.
If Trump's numbers are showing a loss in August he WILL go there, at least he will want to. Actually I consider it a virtual certainty he'll bring it up in his ramblings at his rallies (splinter beam eye something something)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eh, Reade's been contacted by Trump's team, and Trump will use it all day long personally as well as the Pac's. The point isn't Trump being neutralized - he waves his transgressions and bad character all over the place, it's a feature (Lol his lawyer got convicted in a hush money scheme directed by Trump) - the point is Trump trying to neutralize Biden because character is supposed to be an advantage for him. Btw Trump will just add on made up claims as part of this, it really won't be limited to Reade or her claims.

Thing is the media heat had died down because Reade has sort of halted her movement on it. That this is already embedded in the Trump base is just there, it's a question of the purposeful strategy to drive down Biden's favorables with a wide swath of America in the middle.
Reade may have thought that the #METOO, Blassey-Ford, media and elected female Democrats would rally behind her like they did Ford but that never happened.  Instead of taking down Biden Reade inadvertently took down the #METOO movement instead. I doubt we will hear from them again now.

With support women like Reade gain confidence, without support the writing is on the wall and best to cut bait.

 
Reade may have thought that the #METOO, Blassey-Ford, media and elected female Democrats would rally behind her like they did Ford but that never happened.  Instead of taking down Biden Reade inadvertently took down the #METOO movement instead. I doubt we will hear from them again now.

With support women like Reade gain confidence, without support the writing is on the wall and best to cut bait.
I read something like this and it reads to me like an accusation against Reade, because it would suggest what she is doing is politically motivated.

To me 'me too' would mean telling one's story, what happened. It's not my movement though. To me it's a reform issue, partly about transparency, partly about prosecution. The movement belongs to the victims.

I'm not criticizing her, the political outfall or effects are different from the incident, at least to me.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If Trump's numbers are showing a loss in August he WILL go there, at least he will want to. Actually I consider it a virtual certainty he'll bring it up in his ramblings at his rallies (splinter beam eye something something)
For sure, I agree its 100% chance he'll bring it up and probably often. I just think he's waiting until August 21st

 
If Trump's numbers are showing a loss in August he WILL go there, at least he will want to. Actually I consider it a virtual certainty he'll bring it up in his ramblings at his rallies (splinter beam eye something something)
I think Trump will go there but Trump will really go after Joes mental decline more. I am worried in a one on one debate joe might really struggle and start making a number of gaffes.

 
Oof.  I've always found Reade to be a compelling witness.  I still believe she's being honest in her recounting of the sexual assault.  Obviously this doesn't prove or disprove the assault allegation. 

But it's only fair to acknowledge countervailing information when it comes in.  Barring any further updates to the story, it looks like she misrepresented her accreditation to courtrooms where she testified as an expert witness.  Now defense attorneys are looking to undo verdicts issued against their clients:

Defense lawyers in California are reviewing criminal cases in which Tara Reade, the former Senate aide who has accused Joseph R. Biden Jr. of sexual assault, served as an expert witness on domestic violence, concerned that she misrepresented her educational credentials in court.

Then known as Alexandra McCabe, Ms. Reade testified as a government witness in Monterey County courts for nearly a decade, describing herself as an expert in the dynamics of domestic violence who had counseled hundreds of victims.

But lawyers who had faced off against her in court began raising questions about the legitimacy of her testimony, and the verdicts that followed, after news reports this week that Antioch University had disputed her claim of receiving a bachelor’s degree from its Seattle campus. ...

To protect her identity as a survivor of domestic abuse, Ms. Reade says she received her degree through the private assistance of the school’s then-president, Tullisse Murdock. She says she never received a diploma or requested one since she was “fast-tracked” to law school.

“The president took it from the registrar and did it herself for complete confidentiality,” she said in an interview.

But Ms. Hamilton, the Antioch spokeswoman, told The Times that it had spoken with Ms. Murdock, and that there was no such special arrangement with Ms. Reade. It takes 180 credits to graduate, and students earn up to a maximum of 45 for life experience or prior studies, according to the school’s website.

Seattle University School of Law confirmed that Ms. Reade graduated with a J.D. degree in 2004. The school only considers accepting students with bachelor’s degrees, according to its website. But it would not share what degree Ms. Reade presented with her initial application, citing federal privacy standards.

 
And what does this mean exactly? Protect her identity from??
This NYT article notes that she was trying to protect her identity from her ex-husband, as a victim of spousal abuse.

As Tara Reade’s Expert Witness Credentials Are Questioned, So Are Verdicts

Ms. Reade maintains that she has an undergraduate degree, saying the school has no record of her graduating because of special arrangements put in place to protect her from her ex-husband. She sent The Times a screenshot of a transcript showing her with 35 course credits, her department as “BA Completion” and nothing listed under “date conferred” or “degree conferred.” According to the photo, she entered school on Oct. 2, 2000.

Credits from her earlier studies at Pasadena City College were linked to her old social security number and name — the same one she now uses — making her worried that her ex-husband could find her and her daughter, she says. To protect her identity as a survivor of domestic abuse, Ms. Reade says she received her degree through the private assistance of the school’s then-president, Tullisse Murdock. She says she never received a diploma or requested one since she was “fast-tracked” to law school.

“The president took it from the registrar and did it herself for complete confidentiality,” she said in an interview.

But Ms. Hamilton, the Antioch spokeswoman, told The Times that it had spoken with Ms. Murdock, and that there was no such special arrangement with Ms. Reade. It takes 180 credits to graduate, and students earn up to a maximum of 45 for life experience or prior studies, according to the school’s website.

Credibility is certainly an issue here....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In her testimony in the 2018 trial, Ms. Reade was questioned about her degree by Mr. Soltesz. She testified that she received a liberal arts degree, as was stated on her résumé provided by the district attorney’s office. “The focus was political science,” she said, according to a trial transcript.

Ms. Reade also told the court that she was currently a substitute teacher but had worked in domestic violence prevention for more than two decades and testified in more than 20 cases. Her career began, she said, in Mr. Biden’s office.

“I was a legislative assistant,” she said, according to the testimony. “He worked on the Violence Against Women Act, the federal act.”

Staff lists published in 1993 show Ms. Reade listed as a staff assistant, a different position from the legislative assistant job she cited in her testimony. Both titles are common in congressional offices, with legislative assistant indicating a slightly more senior post that involves working on policy. In multiple interviews, Ms. Reade described her duties as managing the interns, never mentioning any direct work on the Violence Against Women Act.
- And Reade may have misrepresented her job position and her implication that she worked on the VAWA. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
...The public defender’s office in Monterey County has begun scrutinizing cases involving Ms. Reade and compiling a list of clients who may have been affected by her testimony, according to Jeremy Dzubay, an assistant public defender in the office.

Roland Soltesz, a criminal defense lawyer, says he believes Ms. Reade’s testimony made a significant difference in the outcome of the 2018 trial of his client Victoria Ramirez. Both Ms. Ramirez and her co-defendant, Jennifer Vasquez, received life sentences for attempted murder, arson and armed robbery.

“People have been convicted based upon this, and that’s wrong,” said Mr. Soltesz, adding that he “could care less about the politics of this whole thing.”

...

Now, Mr. Soltesz says he is exploring whether he can reopen his case. On Wednesday evening, he emailed a network of more than 100 public defenders, alerting them to questions about Ms. Reade’s background and credibility.

Monique S. Hill, a lawyer in another domestic violence case in which Ms. Reade served as an expert witness, said she also saw grounds to challenge the conviction.

“Had I had the information that I have now, this case, in my mind, would have gone differently,” said Ms. Hill, who served as a public defender.

The Monterey County chief assistant district attorney, Berkley Brannon, said that if Ms. Reade had misrepresented her academic credentials, the office would alert all defense lawyers involved in cases that featured her as an expert.

“That would absolutely be of concern to us, and it’s something that the defense attorneys would need to know about,” he said. “We don’t want people that we call lying about anything.”

He said the office would not make any move to contact defense lawyers until it was satisfied that she indeed had not obtained her bachelor’s degree. And, speaking hypothetically, he said that the extent to which a false academic claim would affect the cases she participated in would depend on how material her testimony was to the outcome.

The Sixth District Appellate Program, a state-funded public interest law firm that represents low-income clients in the region, is also reviewing all the cases involving Ms. Reade. ...
- NYT

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ms. Reade maintains that she has an undergraduate degree, saying the school has no record of her graduating because of special arrangements put in place to protect her from her ex-husband. She sent The Times a screenshot of a transcript showing her with 35 course credits, her department as “BA Completion” and nothing listed under “date conferred” or “degree conferred.” According to the photo, she entered school on Oct. 2, 2000.

...But Ms. Hamilton, the Antioch spokeswoman, told The Times that it had spoken with Ms. Murdock, and that there was no such special arrangement with Ms. Reade. It takes 180 credits to graduate, and students earn up to a maximum of 45 for life experience or prior studies, according to the school’s website.
In her testimony in the 2018 trial, Ms. Reade was questioned about her degree by Mr. Soltesz. She testified that she received a liberal arts degree, as was stated on her résumé provided by the district attorney’s office. “The focus was political science,” she said, according to a trial transcript.
Something seriously wrong here.

 
Probably nothing in it:

Lisa Lerer @llerer · 17m

The lawyer for Tara Reade, the former Senate aide who has accused Joseph R. Biden Jr. of sexual assault, said Friday that he was no longer representing her, just two weeks after taking her on as a client.

 
Ben Savage, who said his desk was next to Reade’s in the Biden mailroom, disputed her charge that she was forced out of her job in retaliation for a sexual harassment complaint she claims to have filed.

Savage, who worked as the office’s systems administrator, overseeing computers and information processing, told the NewsHour that Reade was fired for her poor performance on the job, which he witnessed — not as retaliation for her complaints about sexual harassment.

But according to Savage, Reade had been mishandling a key part of her job and an essential office task — processing constituent mail, something they worked on together. Savage said he recalls reporting these issues to his boss, deputy chief of staff Dennis Toner. After that, Savage said he began diminishing Reade’s duties, taking over some of her tasks and rerouting parts of the process to exclude her.

“Of all the people who held that position, she’s the only one during my time there who couldn’t necessarily keep up or who found it frustrating,” said Savage, who worked in the office for three years, from 1993 to 1996.
This also ties in with Reade's claims about her job at the Senate and also her varying reasons for departure.

 
I support the #metoo movement.  But this article shows why each case should be judged on its own merits.  Tara Reade is undeniably a conniver of the highest magnitude.  Article originally appeared in the New York Times.

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/tara-reades-tumultuous-journey-to-the-2020-campaign/

Last spring, after years of strife with friends and neighbors and a constant struggle for money, Tara Reade was making a fresh start in a new town, Grass Valley, California, near the outskirts of Tahoe National Forest.

She found a place for her adopted rescue horse, Charm, and a tidy ground-level apartment for herself and her cats. Reade, who had moved from the Santa Cruz, California, area, told friends about a new passion and appreciation for Russia, its culture and its leader. She was working on a novel.

But trouble would find her in Grass Valley, too. Work would be hard to come by. Her car would be repossessed. Rent would fall into arrears. Acquaintances who tried to help would accuse her of failing to repay the money they had lent her, of skipping out on bills and misleading them, just as others had done in the places she had left behind.

It was a messy life, played out in obscurity.

Then came accusations from several women that former Vice President Joe Biden had made them uncomfortable by touching or kissing them inappropriately in public settings.

Reade was reminded of her own experience with Biden, as a junior aide in his Senate office in 1993, and she went public in her local paper. Biden, she said, would rest his hands on her shoulder and run a finger along her neck. After he requested that she serve drinks at a reception because he “liked my legs,” she said, she refused, only to be marginalized and ultimately forced out.

Eleven months later, after alleging behavior that in her own telling fell short of “sexual misconduct” — it was “about abuse of power,” she said then — she would level a much more serious charge, of sexual assault, which Biden flatly denies.

Now Reade’s own backstory has been caught up in the churn of #MeToo-era politics, as rising questions about her credibility add fuel to the social media combat between Biden’s defenders and detractors.

In May, Antioch University Seattle said Reade had not obtained a bachelor’s degree there, as claimed on her resume. That in turn raised questions about how she had gained admission to law school, and led defense lawyers and prosecutors in California to begin reviewing domestic violence cases in which she had served as an expert witness. A prominent #MeToo lawyer, Douglas Wigdor, dropped her only two weeks after taking her as a client.

If the national stage is new for Reade, the sturm and drang is anything but.

To better understand Reade’s tumultuous journey to the roiling center of the presidential campaign, The New York Times interviewed nearly 100 friends, relatives, co-workers and neighbors and reviewed court records. What emerged was a shambolic life in which Reade, through her own pluck and smarts and powers of persuasion, overcame an unsettled and abusive childhood to find opportunities on the big stages of acting, politics and law. She won praise for what friends took as a sincere commitment to helping other abuse victims and to animal rescue.

“She was very funny and very engaging and completely well educated, intelligent,” said one former friend and co-worker, Deborah Ayres. But, she added, there was also “this other side that didn’t add up.”

It was there, on that other side, that those opportunities would dissipate amid new blows of abuse, acrimony and regret, leading to Reade’s more recent scramble for work as a pet sitter and census field supervisor. (That, too, would end in an allegation of maltreatment against her bosses.) She had “a heavy, dark sadness to her,” another friend recalled.

In many ways, The Times’ findings comport with the autobiography Reade, now 56, has rendered in cinematic detail across blog posts, online essays and court statements. But in the dramatic retelling of her life story she has also shown a tendency to embellish — a role as a movie extra is presented as a break; her title of “staff assistant” with clerical responsibilities in Biden’s office becomes “legislative assistant” when his shepherding of the Violence Against Women Act is an asset for her expert witness testimony in court.

And there are the former friends who describe how she spun her way into their confidence with her story of abuse and perseverance, only to leave them feeling disappointed and duped.

Reade has insisted those friends were in the wrong — one was a “slumlord,” another a “drunk,” a third a tax cheat — just as she said Antioch was mistaken about her degree. In an email, she acknowledged taking “creative license” in some parts of her online biography. Other parts, she said, might include honest mistakes.

“If memories are not perfectly accurate, I will be condemned as a liar in the national press,” she wrote. “This standard is not applied to Joe Biden, who is allowed to make his denials without a simultaneous airing of all the hundreds of inconsistencies between reality and his public statements over the course of his life.”

Only two people know what did or did not happen between Reade and Biden in the spring of 1993. Still, like other significant chapters of the #MeToo moment, Reade’s comes with the statements of confidants who say they heard her account long before it became public.

But while five people have said Reade shared all or part of her account of sexual harassment with them around the time she says it happened, corroboration of the assault charge is shakier.

The two people who say she told them of it contemporaneously — her brother and a longtime friend — initially offered accounts of harassment, not assault. The friend told The Times in 2019 that Biden’s behavior was “a little bit just over the line, but nothing like, ‘Oh, my God, call 911.’”

The friend says she had withheld the full story because Reade was not ready to share it, and two other people have said she told them of an assault a few years later. Professionals who counsel sexual abuse victims say it is not uncommon for them to reveal what happened piecemeal, over time.

It was fear of how her background would be portrayed, Reade has indicated, that kept her from speaking out sooner.

“It took me a long time to come forward,” she told television journalist Megyn Kelly, “because of things that were happening in my life.”

Early Abuses and Ambitions

Reade grew up as Tara Moulton, spending her early years on the family farm in Wausau, Wisconsin, where she gained her love of horses and what she said was her first experience with abuse.

“The first powerful man who abused me physically and emotionally was my father,” she wrote in a Medium essay in January titled “Powerful Men and the Women They Choose to Destroy.”

Her father, Bob Moulton, was a journalist and community theater actor turned public relations executive. She was far closer to her mother, Jeanette Altimus, an amateur painter of some local renown. Reade described her in an email as “a beautiful inspiration” who “always stood up for justice” and took her along to protest marches in Madison, Wisconsin, and Chicago.

Both parents abused alcohol. They fought constantly, as did Tara with her father.

“They pushed each other’s buttons, and that brings the worst out in people,” her brother, comedian Collin Moulton, said in an interview, describing their father as “a good guy in some ways, flawed in others,” who later found sobriety. “They had an abusive event, I don’t know exactly what it was,” he added.

Reade has not detailed the abuse, but wrote of her father as a defense contractor with the corporate ethics of a pirate who died “alone and broke” — karma, she suggested.

A stepbrother, Scott Thoma, disputed that characterization as “mean-spirited.” Moulton’s defense work never went beyond public relations, he said, and he died neither broke nor alone.

Adding to the strife was Bob Moulton’s affair with Thoma’s mother, which led to divorce, and the first beat in the peripatetic rhythm of Reade’s life.

Her mother would move her 160 miles south, to Verona, Wisconsin. That pulled her away from what she portrayed in an online biography as qualifying for “the Junior Olympics in downhill ski racing” but which she acknowledged in an email was a regional “Jr. Ski race training program” in which she had shown promise.

High school brought a new passion: acting. In the Medium essay, Reade described moving to Los Angeles, looking for her big break, studying with Robert Reed of “The Brady Bunch.”

She would go on to nail her auditions for the Juilliard School in New York, she wrote, only to have an instructor inform her that no scholarships were awarded until junior year. Her father, whose income disqualified her for aid, refused to help, telling her, “Acting is a pipe dream.” (Her brother remembers their father denying tuition.) A Juilliard spokeswoman said school policy prohibited discussing specific applicants.

Even so, Reade wrote, she won parts in Equity productions and was “cast as a dancer in the film ‘La Bamba.’”

She is not one of the two dancers named in the film’s cast list, but is among scores of extras shown dancing in bars and music venues. Her brother recalled her excitement when she was singled out to do a hop and a twirl, visible briefly on screen as Brian Setzer plays “Summertime Blues.”

It was during that time that she was nursing her older half brother, Michael Enterline, through the final stages of cancer. He had become a father figure, she recalled in an interview last year, and his death was devastating.

Her acting hopes were fading, too, and she shifted her ambitions to politics while studying at Pasadena City College. In the winter of 1991, she landed an internship with her congressman, Leon E. Panetta.

Then she spotted the opportunity she had been waiting for: a job opening in the U.S. Senate, in the office of Joe Biden of Delaware.

The Complaint

Reade’s descriptions of that inflection point in her life are sharply, dramatically precise.

“As the plane descended into Washington, D.C., my siamese cat, Cleo, meowed loudly from under my seat,” she wrote in a 2009 essay for The WIP, an international women’s site. She recalled the city lights reflecting in the airplane’s windows as “my new job as a Senate staffer lay ahead of me.”

She came in as a staff assistant whose primary responsibilities were sorting mail and managing interns.

In interviews with The Times last year, she described Biden’s office as dominated by “alpha males.” But her arrival also came as Biden was working to undo the reputational damage wrought by his leadership of the insensitive all-male questioning of Anita Hill during the 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Clarence Thomas.

By 1993, Biden was crafting the Violence Against Women Act and going out of his way to empower women on his staff. It was an unwritten rule that the senator preferred male aides to do menial tasks like chauffeuring him or fetching coffee, former aides have said.

The Biden Senate world was populated by striving Type A’s, and had a small-c conservative culture in which Reade didn’t quite fit. Former aides remember her as prone to storytelling and oversharing personal information. She rarely socialized with colleagues after work.

Reade has described chafing at the Ivy League tilt of the staff, and arguing for more interns from state schools. But her workplace issues would grow exponentially, starting with what she has described as the uncomfortable shoulder rubs from Biden.

None of the nearly two dozen former aides The Times interviewed remembered seeing Biden touch Reade.

By her account, her problems came to a head with her refusal to serve drinks at a reception. A few days later, she said, Biden’s office manager, Marianne Baker, admonished her to dress more modestly — what Reade has described as one step in a campaign of retaliation.

Then, she says, when she met Biden in an empty Senate hallway to deliver his gym bag, he pushed her up against a wall, reached his hand underneath her skirt and penetrated her digitally.

Reade says she filed a harassment complaint to a Senate personnel office. She does not recall the date or the aide to whom she filed the complaint.

The Biden campaign said it could not locate documents that could shed light on Reade’s claims. Biden had called on The National Archives to release any pertinent documents, but it deferred to records-keepers at the Senate, who said they could not, citing privacy requirements. The campaign has refused to search for the record in Biden’s papers at the University of Delaware, saying nothing relevant is stored there.

What followed, Reade says, was effectively a demotion and freeze-out.

“I would get the silent treatment,” she said. “People looked at me like I did something wrong.”

She says she was removed, that April, from her position supervising the interns — which two of them recall — and her desk was moved to a windowless office.

Biden’s senior aides, Ted Kaufman and Dennis Toner, later gave her a month to find a new position, she says. Both men, as well as Baker, say they do not recall Reade or her charges against Biden.

There is some contemporaneous evidence that she complained of mistreatment while in Biden’s office.

As The Intercept reported in April, a woman living in California called in to “Larry King Live” in August 1993 to say her daughter had been working “for a prominent senator and could not get through with her problems at all.” She did not say what that trouble was. Reade has previously said her mother, who has since died, called into the program after she told her about her experience.

Three years later, in divorce proceedings, her husband, Ted Dronen, said Reade had “related a problem she was having at work regarding sexual harassment in U.S. Senator Joe Biden’s office.” He did not say Biden had himself harassed her.

She had started dating Dronen, then working for Rep. Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota in the spring of 1993. As she struggled to find work — which she would attribute to being blacklisted by Biden’s office — Dronen helped her with money and eventually moved her into his apartment, he said in court papers.

And when his job required a move to North Dakota, Reade has written, the couple traded the capital for the “frozen tundra” of the Plains.

Trouble at Home

The years that followed were ones of deepening struggle, punctuated by spasms of violence.

In North Dakota, Reade quickly became pregnant. But when Dronen reacted to the news by “slamming things around the house,” she fled to stay with her mother in California, fearing for her safety, she wrote in a sworn statement in 1996.

The mother-daughter living arrangement ended speedily and rancorously, Dronen wrote in a sworn statement, and soon the couple was back together, on California’s Central Coast.

Reade found work as an aide for state Sen. Jack O’Connell. But two people familiar with her tenure said she regularly failed to appear at constituent meetings. When confronted by supervisors, these people said, Reade would insist she had shown up when she hadn’t.

She and Dronen had married in late 1994, and as the complaints about her work continued, Reade confessed that she was having a hard time at home, these people recalled. She was given a lighter schedule, but when the behavior repeated itself, she and the office agreed to part ways.

Asked about that account, Reade said she left because the office was not accommodating to her family situation, and she sent The Times a letter of recommendation from O’Connell; one of the people familiar with her time there said he had written it as a matter of course, hoping the best for her despite the outcome.

There was indeed trouble at home.

On the night of Feb. 21, 1996, Reade said in a court document, Dronen “slammed me up against the wall with such force that my neck, arms, shoulder and back are bruised. He punched my stomach and upper chest with a closed fist.”

Public divorce records show that Dronen admitted to spousal abuse, and that Reade got a temporary restraining order.

During an ensuing custody battle, Reade said she feared Dronen would beat their daughter if left alone with her for too long.

An official evaluation attributed Dronen’s eruptive anger to a tumultuous childhood, but suggested that Reade was exaggerating the threat, describing her as having “personality characteristics that predispose her to dramatically respond to a variety of situations.” Reade’s fear for her daughter, the evaluator wrote, was based less on a realistic assessment of risk than on her “unresolved anger towards her ex-husband.”

Dronen did not dispute Reade’s account of the violence on Feb. 21, calling it inexcusable. But according to the court record, he asserted that Reade had previously hit him in the face and, at one point, made a false allegation to get his probation revoked, resulting in the issuance and then withdrawal of an arrest warrant. (Reade denied doing so in a court declaration, and said she never initiated violence.)

In short, Dronen declared, “abuse, sexual harassment and other traumatic incidents” in Reade’s life were the “underlying psychological reason” she was “making me out to be some sort of monster.”

Reade would go on, actually, to describe him as a potential murderer. Dronen’s probation officer, she told her friend Wendy Dale, with whom she briefly worked on a biographical project a few years later, had warned her that her life was in danger, and that she should flee the state and change her identity. (The probation officer declined to comment.) Later, Reade would write that she learned her ex-husband’s “DNA was collected by the FBI for two missing women’s cases.”

Apparently because of his record with Reade, Dronen was in fact among scores of local men questioned in the disappearance of two local women, two people familiar with the investigation said. But within weeks in 1999, police had traced the women’s murders to a convicted serial killer, Rex Allan Krebs; a senior investigator said DNA was used only sparingly and was not collected by the FBI.

Dronen declined to comment beyond a statement from a representative saying he did not want to relive that period of his life but wished Reade well.

By then, mother and daughter had headed north to Seattle, seeking refuge with a domestic violence organization called New Beginnings.

New Identity, Familiar Problems

Reade and her daughter had acquired new names and Social Security numbers in January 1998 under a program authorized by the Violence Against Women Act — the same law whose chief advocate had been Biden.

The newly renamed Alexandra McCabe secured a job as a victim advocate with the King County prosecutor’s office. She and her daughter lived in domestic violence “safe houses” before settling into an apartment in the city’s Magnolia section.

By 2001, McCabe had enrolled at the Seattle University School of Law, where classmates recall that she struggled with some concepts and sought tutoring. She was so poor she had to borrow law books and occasionally brought her daughter to class when she couldn’t find child care. Her classmate Jenifer Robinson, who now practices law in Seattle, recalled her “heavy, dark sadness” and said it “appeared to be a real, genuine fear and was a huge part of her identity.”

She also harbored a secret. She had never obtained the undergraduate degree required for law school admission.

An Antioch University Seattle spokeswoman, Karen Hamilton, said McCabe had taken classes, but not enough to receive a degree; nor had she worked as an online instructor, as she claimed on resumes.

The law school, where she received a degree in 2004, has declined to comment on her status in light of that revelation.

After law school, McCabe took a job at the Snohomish County Center for Battered Women, where she was credited with creating a system to help victims navigate the courts.

But a legal career would not come together. She did not pass the bar exam and by 2006 was back in California, working in the domestic violence program at the YWCA of Monterey. Soon, she was also testifying as an expert in domestic violence cases.

“She was meticulous and caring and sensitive,” said Ayres, her former co-worker and friend. “She always had that very calm demeanor about her. Her voice is such that it puts you at ease.”

But she frequently appeared at work late and had difficulty managing money as she tried to establish an upper-middle-class veneer for her daughter, Ayres said.

The two women had a falling out after Ayres, who had agreed to guarantee McCabe’s Pacific Gas & Electric account, received a bill of nearly $350, which included McCabe’s balance.

“She didn’t want to own it,” Ayres said. “She stuck me with the PG&E bill, and that was the last time I spoke to her.”

The YWCA job ended after McCabe and several other employees settled a lawsuit alleging various forms of discrimination by their superiors.

Another job, as executive director of a local animal shelter, would end after a couple of years amid concerns she was ill-suited for it, according to several people associated with the shelter.

McCabe was also running afoul of her landlord in Pacific Grove.

She had answered an ad in 2008 for a two-bedroom house, telling the landlord, Austin Chung, that she had little in the way of credit or references because she had escaped a domestic violence situation. She appeared for her move-in without the full rent or security deposit.

“I knew it was a red flag, but I just walked right over it because she seemed so nice and I thought I could help a domestic abuse victim and her daughter,” Chung said. “I put in new carpets for her, even repainted the bedrooms to their liking.”

Chung said he had to prod her to pay her rent, even after cutting the rate. Finally, feeling awful but fed up, he evicted her.

“She is the only tenant who ever made me weep,” Chung said. After she left, he recalled, Home Depot declared the carpets, damaged by her dogs and cats, a biological hazard.

Reade disputes his account of the condition of the house.

McCabe and her daughter moved across the bay, to Santa Cruz. By 2011, she had a new job as an adjunct professor at Hartnell Community College in Salinas. She moved in with a new boyfriend, Edward Walker, with whom she hosted a radio show, “Soul Vibes.”

Her financial stresses, though, were growing. A bankruptcy filing from 2012 shows that McCabe owed her landlord $12,750 and was bringing in only $581 a month in government assistance. She was $400,000 in debt, largely in student loans.

Her relationship with Walker eventually came to an end after another instance of domestic violence. A neighbor told the police that Walker had physically abused McCabe and her daughter, The Associated Press reported, and he pleaded guilty to misdemeanor battery. He was sentenced to probation, and the charges were later dismissed.

McCabe moved to the next town, Aptos, where she started two ventures: a dog-walking service and a nonprofit that distributed outdated or damaged pet food to needy families.

That made for an odd fit with her work as an expert witness. “Now you’re working for Gracie’s Pet Food Pantry,” a defense lawyer said pointedly when she testified in an attempted murder case against two women. Noting that McCabe had no certification in psychology or sociology, defense lawyers asserted that they did not believe she was qualified.

The judge overruled the objection. One of the defense lawyers, Roland Soltesz, said in an interview that he decided not to press the issue after McCabe implied that, as a “legislative” aide in Biden’s office, she had worked on the Violence Against Women Act. Based on questions about her Antioch degree, he is considering a bid to reopen the case.

McCabe also volunteered at Pregnant Mare Rescue, a sanctuary for unwanted horses. There she fell in love with a foal, Charm.

She may have been broke, but she wanted to adopt him. The group’s founder, Lynn Hummer agreed to waive the $500 adoption fee, only to learn months later that McCabe had billed $1,400 in routine veterinary bills to Pregnant Mare Rescue.

She increasingly relied on the hospitality of strangers. Harriet Wrye and her husband, who knew a friend of McCabe’s, permitted her to move into a yurt on their property in Aptos. She would pay discounted rent and care for their horses.

“She confided in me a lot,” Wrye said, adding that “it was an irregular profile”: McCabe was caring and kind but also unstable and volatile, someone who did a good job with the horses but paid her $800 rent sporadically and asked for other financial assistance.

When Wrye and her husband decided to sell their house, they told McCabe she would have to move. She threatened to sue, and ultimately, Wrye said, “We had to pay her to leave.” That was in May 2018.

Asked about allegations that she had skipped out on rent, Reade wrote in an email, “I’m not going to wrestle in the mud with pigs.”

She moved to a rented room at a ranch owned by Kelly Klett, a lawyer who has worked pro bono for domestic abuse victims. Klett, hearing McCabe’s history of abuse, used her truck to help her move. She offered her a reduced rent and lent her law books so she could study for the California bar exam.

“She knew that I had advocated for women in abusive situations,” said Klett, but in her time there, “she never once told me about all of these allegations that are coming out right now.”

The Fallout

When the rent at Klett’s ranch became too much, she moved north, to Grass Valley. Friends were retiring there and offered to rent her their guest apartment.

Reade — she had reclaimed her name, she says — was beginning to write her novel, “The Last Snow Tiger,” a political thriller about a friendship between a Wisconsin farm girl and her Russian American neighbor.

At the same time, her online life was taking a sharp, pro-Russia turn. In 2017, on Twitter, she had shown support for the special counsel’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. By late 2018, she was inveighing against “anti-Russian propaganda” in America.

“Why would a liberal Democrat support Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin?” she wrote in an essay on Medium. “Maybe it is because I believe he has saved the world from a large conflict on more than one occasion.”

She reposted that essay on the information-sharing social platform Quora, where she was following three accounts, all Russian-oriented, including those of a self-described former “Soviet propaganda executive” and a “Russian national-conservative” who has alleged that Ukraine’s anti-Moscow regime is a puppet of Biden.

She told visitors about a Russian man with whom she was video-chatting online.

The relationship was active when she made her first public accusations of harassment against Biden, according to two women who saw photos of the man, who they took to be a love interest. Neither could recall his name. The relationship lasted through the summer, recalled one of the women, who would speak only on the condition of anonymity.

“She had a picture of a guy and said that they had been communicating,” recalled the other woman, Rachel Sabajo, a former housemate of Reade who confessed to developing a personal aversion to her. “I said, ‘Why Russia?’ And she said, ‘Putin is so dreamy, I really get him.’”

Reade denied having a romantic relationship with anyone in Russia, saying her online activity was part of her book research. She said Sabajo was trying to besmirch her, McCarthy style, because of personal animus, which she said Sabajo had exhibited through harassing messages. (Sabajo denied sending them.)

A close relative, who spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid becoming a target of online harassment, called the implication that Reade was somehow in league with Russia absurd, saying there was no interaction beyond innocent online chats as she explored Russian culture for her novel.

Reade was workshopping the book in a writing group that included Don Rogers, the publisher of the local newspaper, The Union. After Lucy Flores, a former Nevada politician, published an essay recounting an uncomfortable encounter with Biden — he squeezed her shoulders and kissed the back of her head during an event, she wrote — Reade informed Rogers she had her own story to share.

That story, she told The Union, was about “power and control” in an abusive workplace. “I wasn’t scared of him, that he was going to take me in a room or anything,” she told The Associated Press.

And a friend who said she heard of Reade’s complaint at the time — she worked for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy but now supports President Donald Trump — told Vox that Biden “never tried to kiss” Reade, and “never went for one of those touches.”

Reade’s account was in line with other public complaints against Biden and did not get wide coverage.

Yet she came under harsh attack online. Biden’s defenders dug into her digital history and, upon finding her praise of Putin and her Quora page, would use that — with no substantive evidence — to suggest she was a Russian plant. Reade taunted them, in turn.

Working with her friend Dale, she produced a comic video of a mock interview in which she denied being a Russian spy while speaking in a bad Russian accent and being offered a lunch of vodka and caviar.

Behind the scenes, there was new trouble. Reade had begun working as a field supervisor for the Census Bureau, but she left after clashing with superiors, who she accused in a formal complaint of creating a hostile work environment and discriminating against her.

Her online embrace of Russia seemed only to intensify. After the release of the Mueller report documenting Russian meddling in 2016, Reade posted an essay that decried xenophobia and opened with Putin spokesman Dmitri Peskov quoting a proverb: “It is very hard to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if it is not there.”

She was also finding common cause with Biden’s detractors on the left, many of whom supported Bernie Sanders and believed Russia had been unfairly maligned in coverage of the Mueller investigation.

Among them was Katie Halper, a left-leaning podcast host. It was on Halper’s show that Reade made the assault allegation.

This time, her story moved toward center stage, fodder in the online political wars.

Biden denied her allegation even as he defended her right to be heard, while his defenders took to Facebook and Twitter to highlight the change in her account and emerging accusations of deceit from her friends.

Republicans in turn accused Democrats of hypocritically ignoring the “believe women” battle cry of the #MeToo movement even as they gave a pass to the two dozen allegations of harassment and abuse lodged against Trump.

Reade, deluged with messages of encouragement and threat, was by turns timorous and combative.

She gained and then lost a high-profile lawyer, Wigdor, but quickly procured the pro bono services of a lesser-known consumer protection and civil rights lawyer, Daniel Hornal.

When The Times approached her to discuss details of this article, she referred reporters to Maria Villena, her public relations consultant, who asked for written questions. After The Times submitted them, actress and #MeToo activist Rose McGowan posted them on Twitter, as an example, she said, of the newspaper’s “tactics.”

Reade also put The Times in touch with a number of supporters. Among them was a law school classmate, Joseph Backholm, who said she had told him about an assault by an unnamed senator when they were students together. Backholm has run an organization in Washington state that opposes same-sex marriage and has received funding from local donors to Trump.

Ultimately, Reade responded in a string of emails and text messages.

“By coming forward about Joe Biden,” she wrote Friday, “I have lost everything again, my job, my housing and my reputation. I have been called every vile name imaginable and presented as a monster by the media for daring to speak about Joe Biden and what happened. But I am free.”

 
#AlyssaMilanoIsALie has been trending on Twitter since last night.  Not that I don't think she is a massive hypocrite, but this just shows how awful the Twitter universe is in general.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top