Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I've not looked too far into it/her but yes .... she could be paid buy GOP to sabotage Biden, could be a gold digger, could be a DNC thing ... Russia, China ? who the heck knows ..... but yes, its kinda discrimination to treat her any differently isn't it ?
it was all investigated - use the same investigation process on this accuser as we/they did on Trump accusers
Lawyers would not take her case because she was not interested in a legal case. She just wants a PR firm to promote herself.and that is not what these law firms do.
Not to rehash this Democrat debacle, but Blassey Ford’s friend shooting this down put this thing to rest. I can’t believe we still have actual truthers to this day running around.
That established Kavanaugh attended parties. It did not establish the party that Ford described happen. Ford can not establish a single concrete fact. Not one.
That established Kavanaugh attended parties. It did not establish the party that Ford described happen. Ford can not establish a single concrete fact. Not one.
That's not right. - It was a party like the one she described, with roughly the same people and IIRC at roughly the same time period.
Because it is impossible to prove a story which lacks a date or a place happened. You would have to account for every minute if your life to defend against such nonsense. When a story lacks any details it can morph into anything. That has to be something concrete which puts these two people together and there isn't. Not just some wishy washy nonsense where maybe it could of happened. Kavanaugh was rightfully frustrated with the whole process
Wapo
What’s even sadder is Biden has made his rounds on all the networks since this broke and not one question.
There is no therapist confirmation.
On a side, could you lay off the accusations of "sowing discord"? I don't accuse you of trying to spread lies or being disinterested in the truth.
I've been saying since the 2016 election... if everyone who wanted a strong third party went out and voted third party, we'd have a strong third party.
She has, as of a couple nights ago, removed the #metoo hashtag from the bio area of her twitter profile. Pretty disgusting actually.
Yes, it is fascinating to watch people who previously afforded credibility to Blasey Ford instantly morph overnight into rape skeptics.
Believe?
Not "pushing" anything. I believe Joe Biden violated this woman and is morally unfit for office. I don't recall the exact words but she described digital penetration by Joe Biden. I've listened to the full hour interview and her interview on DN! and read multiple pieces on it. I read the Salon piece that provided cover to Time's Up because there was no legal recourse being sought by Reade (although Rose McGowan's statement on Time's Up show it to be a PR outfit for CAA predators) and looked seriously into the Russian asset claims as if they aren't a joke.
Well you do keep making sure its front and center at FBGs. That is all I was saying by "pushing".
I've listened to it too, or a good portion of it. I'm curious about your opinion about something - twice at least Reade mentions that she did not raise the actual assault - as opposed to the inappropriate touching/closeness claims, which she did raise - to supervisors. - This was 1993. Bob Packwood was run out of Congress in 1995. On the one hand we can say there was obviously a culture of harassment at Congress then, but on the other we can say that with proper pressure that was a stage that something could be done about it. - You can listen to Reade address this question directly from Halper at ~19:20. She says she may have raised it with a woman whose name is redacted but I take it was a supervisor of some kind, but - similar to her claim about the Nevada Co. Union reporter - she claims that she was shut down. It's really the same phrasing. And actually in fact ~19:40 it's not even clear she raised the assault itself, as opposed to the inappropriate touching, with the supervisor. Halper directly asked Reade about this and Reade says she is not sure she did raise it with the supervisor. - Did you listen to this part? What are your thoughts about her explanation of this, especially again why she escalated the inappropriate touching issue but not this?ren hoek said:
IIRC WSJ learned of a story about Stormy Daniels or Karen McDougal late in the election. No one picked it up. No one asked Trump about it. Why do you think that was?
And it's a point about journalism, not Trump. Further up you were asking about why a reporter would not ask a question or run a story. I'm using an example to point to you how that could happen, though supposedly there would be a claim of high bias that liberal MSM journalist would very much want to.
Please keep the content in here about Biden. We have plenty of Trump threads to discuss this. TIA!
We have the story, what are you talking about? Your wild hypothetical isn’t needed. It’s a main stream media black ball.
The kavanaugh case is the relevant comparison.
I've kept up with this thread a bit. I read the Salon piece. I did not read/watch the original Reade interview. I really don't have an opinion on her credibility. Ultimately, I live in a "safe state", so my POTUS vote is unimportant. Important or not, I honestly can't think of anything that would cause me to vote for Trump, no matter the opponent.
It’s not a hypothetical, that’s my point. Salon specifically tried to confirm the story but it could not. Just as reporters who tried to confirm the Stormy Daniels story could not because she was in an NDA.
