Trade rookie Pick 1.03 for David Montgomery and 2.07? (1 Viewer)

Cybergeek

Footballguy

• May 24, 2020

• #1

I 've been offered  David Montgomery and Rookie pick 2.07 for Rookie pick 1.03. It's in a league where you only need to need to start 1 RB, but I have Saquon Barkley and a bunch of garbage that is not worthy of bye week coverage. I also earned the 1.03 and need to upgrade my starting lineup and create bye week depth.

Is the player that I would draft at 1.03 more valuable than David Montgomery and whoever I would draft at 2.07?

 

Cjw_55106

Footballguy

• May 24, 2020

• #2

I would keep the pick. Montgomery is nothing special. 

 

P

paulbertini

Footballguy

• May 24, 2020

• #3

I’d keep it.  You’re looking at one of CEH JT Burrow depending on how many QBs you start 

 

G

Gally

Footballguy

• May 24, 2020

• #4

put me down for another on the pick side.  Montgomery is fine but not impactful.  Rather keep the picks at this point.

 

ZWK

Footballguy

• May 24, 2020

• #5

I wouldn't take that deal, but I might send a counter like 1.03 for 2.07 + 2021 1st.

 

F

fightingillini

Footballguy

• May 26, 2020

• #6

I would rather keep the pick and hope that it hits bigger than Montgomery.  Montgomery looks like a weak RB2/RB3 type of back.  That's valuable but I would rather spend my high first round pick trying to find a back with top 10 potential, or use it to fill another starting spot.  If you need a WR, why not take Lamb or Jeudy in that spot?

 

P

PantherThunder

Footballguy

• Jun 3, 2020

• #7

You mentioned you earned the 1.03. I would shoot for the sky and hope you get a stud at 1.03. Monte might be washed up by the time you are ready to contend. A 2.07 is a crap shoot 

 

P

pkroper22

Footballguy

• Jun 6, 2020

• #8

Do you think the player you could get at 1.3 would be better than Montgomery?  That should give you your answer.

With that said, I'm keeping the pick.