Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Correct...when it appears it was a dozen or less protesters and as of now one who said something about hoping someone dies...and some other very classless twitter comments about not caring.
Just like the small minority of bad cops are not at all representative of the vast majority of good cops, right?
Sure...but that isn't the entire problem...as has been discussed many times over. The system that protects the bad cops is a huge huge huge part of the overall problem.
I don't think its just unions or all unions either. I do agree public unions where there isn't really quality or proper representation on behalf of the taxpayers have problems.
When you keep finding bad apples in the barrel, perhaps you should look at your production and storage methods to find improvements
So have training, loyalty and procedure....all of it is part of the problem. It's kind of why "but a few bad cops...." doesn't really do the entire issue justice.
Of course. This shouldn’t need to be said either.
Weird logic. There are srats which suggests 7% of protests are violent vs. 0.01% of cops who shoot unarmed perpatrators. Seems the bad apple analogy is better fitting to thr protesters.
Meh..... several of us have had multiple discussions about exactly this.... from our laws to the importance of family units to lack of opportunity to poor decision making vs. desperation decision making to personal responsibility.
Who said shooting? Was George Floyd shot? Daniel Prude?
Ok...in that case it was killing. You can interchange killing with shooting and it makes no difference.
False equivalence here. The equivalent comparison would be % of protesters, not protests. Or % of police departments, perhaps.
Sure if those numbers existed. Not that it matters because both are over generalization. The absudity of the demonization the police though is dangerous and evil.
https://mobile.twitter.com/MattGarrahan/status/1305052220325584896
Yeah and what’s scary is how many there are.
This is shallow tim.
No, that's not the scary bit. The scary bit is that after the election, whether Trump wins or loses, they'll still be around
There are many different types of Trump supporters. In that post I was describing one type (which is why I wrote “an element of”). My father in law is a different type.
The ones you described are less in number than democrat supports who support democrats because they wanna ef over and hate america.
Im telling u the number of democrats who hate America is greater in number than the trump supporters that timschochet is describing.
Whatever.
Im bored with you trying, you are intentionally obtuse.. trump didn't make them. They made trump. They aren't going away. Regardless of the outcome of the election Your F.I.L. isn't going anywhere.
I’m hoping that after Trump loses they’ll move on to better, more competent, more traditional conservatives. There are a few around.
I was sincere Tim. I got a nasty message from Maurile about my reply.timschochet said:
It’s about power. The President is on live tape saying he knows it’s dangerous even as he exposes his most loyal followers to death and sickness. He knows, they know, just keep power and don’t let go.
Everyone always thinks it's the "other" side gets a free pass and it's "our side" that is picked on. It's just how the internet works today. I guess it's always been like that but the internet shines a brighter light on it.
It’s not funny. (Unless like jon yesterday you mean funny as in odd but it’s not that either really.) It might be funny if he weren’t POTUS.
