Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Hey...at least you moved on from false claims about CNN. Have anything to say about what I said...or just more attempts to go after a poster? Is that the type of day it will be again...ignore all fact, logic, and reason and just make things up to slam other people?
If only someone would invent a device that let you watch one channel live and record a different channel to view later. I bet that would be really popular.
Yeah, Ivanka's suddenly granted Chinese copyrights were all about real estate.
So NOT in the Trump family real estate business as you claimed and available for influence peddling. Got it.
Not at all what I said there...please refrain from assuming anything about topics you don't know the facts about.
While actually working on the staff in the administration. Yeah...not corrupt there at all.
The Brand has expanded because the name attached to real estate is recognized as the epitome of class and opulence. Marketing 101.
Yeah, that's Trump OK--pure class. I wasn't aware that by responding to your post I was the one responsible for a whataboutism. Carry on.
https://nypost.com/2020/10/15/biden-gets-no-questions-on-hunter-biden-expose-at-abc-news-town-hall/amp/?__twitter_impression=true
COMPLETE FATIGUEThe dramatics over the last 4 years are too much.
Voting for Biden won’t be complicated, he stands for nothing and is just your cookie cutter politician that got rich off the corrupt system.
Let’s stay on point then. Biden used his influence to have Shokin fired. Because he wasn’t investigating Burisma and corruption in the Ukraine. Which reflected US policy.
Looks like others saw Biden’s performance differently
Its not a whataboutism...you brought up the kids this morning. People are responding to a post you made bringing them up. Seems fair game.
The post complaining that a candidate wasn't asked about their unverified BS report. That is rich.
Im shocked that a far right wing biased source did not like Biden's performance and stooped to making things up about barely keeping his eyes open.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
Sounds like a pretty good night to me.
If you didn't see it you need to check out the clip where he asked Biden about his "you ain't Black if you don't vote for me" comment. Very uncomfortable weak politician response to an awful statement he originally made. See the look on the young man's face afterwards, feel bad for him.
Trump doesn’t respect anybody - every relationship in his life is transactional. If he thought he could win without a single African American voting for him he wouldn’t care and even brag about it.
It really is amazing don’t you think - horrible night after horrible night and Trumps going to lose to them. It almost defies logic if you don’t actually think about it.
Was there ever an in focus shot of her? She looked hot and was definitely all in for Trump.
This just another flavor of not calling out Qanon and he should be derided for it. I imagine whatever he says before the election will be wishy-washy. He should have just said there’s not point in addressing it and that he won’t answer it - or come out against it if that’s how he really feels.
I have no opinion yet about the laptop outside of my concern about how twitter, facebook and other media are keeping it quiet, but if Biden did, in fact, meet with him after lying about it multiple times that does seem suspicious. He is also on record as saying he never discussed Hunter's business with him.
I’m shocked a Biden fanboy raved about his performance. Reality is probably somewhere in between.
The one where Joe just assumed he went to college, and they guy is like wtf?
The moderator was completely unfair to President Trump, what are you even talking about? He couldn’t say two sentences without her jumping down his throat. It was embarrassing.
The story arrives just in time for the accusation to get out there, but no investigation to conclude.
I raved? Where? fanboy? Not really at all...
There was nothing unfair about her questions. Embarrassing was his attitude and inability to directly answer simple questions (an ongoing problem). Its always the moderators fault or people are just too nice to Biden.
I think that putting her there was a condition of Trump. Fine, good for him. I mean, are they supposed to allow some angry lib to sit there?
She's a pro-Trump activist and political candidate who somehow slipped through NBC's firewall even though the event was supposed to feature "undecided voters."
Pretty sad that Trump needs fake crowds.
I shouldnt have been surprised to see the left triggered by a black women agreeing with things Trump said, but this is where we are.
There's the part of me that would just say it depends on McConnell. He blocked (hundreds of?) Obama's appointees then flooded the judiciary with Trump's. This isn't just a Garland/Barrett thing. McConnell's gonna win re-election, but will he be majority or minority leader of the senate? I'm sure Biden doesn't want to mess with the court, but given McConnell's history I think it'd be silly to remove it from the table. It's a bargaining chip.
Sheldon Whitehouse said it right at the hearings.
It was very uncomfortable, I felt awful for him.The one where Joe just assumed he went to college, and they guy is like wtf?
I didnt know it was possible to be that ignorant.
