gianmarco
Footballguy
Some of us more than once!Shocking that this forum pretty much all voted for Biden.
Some of us more than once!Shocking that this forum pretty much all voted for Biden.
Exactly, there's no way Biden can get this much votes in this forum without fraud being in play. Nobody cares about him, he's just not Trump.Some of us more than once!
I'm not even American and I voted for Biden at least 7 times.Exactly, there's no way Biden can get this much votes in this forum without fraud being in play. Nobody cares about him, he's just not Trump.
Now, the truth comes out!I'm not even American and I voted for Biden at least 7 times.
I'd say sure depending on the evidence. Something significant enough to impact an election would be very obvious and very wide spread. I don't know what you mean by "statistical anomalies" here but they'd likely have to be across the board in very obvious areas.A follow up question would be if a whistleblower comes forward or there are statistical anomalies, would you support an audit of the process/count?
Something that occurred to me:I'd say sure depending on the evidence. Something significant enough to impact an election would be very obvious and very wide spread. I don't know what you mean by "statistical anomalies" here but they'd likely have to be across the board in very obvious areas.
Save the humor attempts for somewhere else.I'm not even American and I voted for Biden at least 7 times.
I know several people who voted Biden and then straight R after that. They see Trump as the issue and not those enabling him. That doesn’t include me, BTW.This statistical anomaly, if it is such a thing, is one of the main arguments being made by the Trump team - If there were so many Biden voters in a given state, why did the down-ticket Democrat candidates not show the same support? I think there is an obvious answer, but the numbers alone can serve two masters.
Gotcha. Sorry. Got carried away.Save the humor attempts for somewhere else.
Can I get Cliff notes on this reference? I see memes all over imgur and I'm out of the loop here.Or give it to Rudy. You can find him at the Four Seasons Landscaping Center tucking his pants in.
https://www.themarysue.com/trump-campaign-ends-with-saddest-press-conference-at-four-seasons-total-landscaping/Can I get Cliff notes on this reference? I see memes all over imgur and I'm out of the loop here.
That was from Project Veritas.I think given the chaos by all the different voting options there was some fraud, to what extent not sure. Did read about some whistle blower in Michigan was said they were ordered to past date votes that came in late.
I think some happens in every election big or small.
This has always been the case. Now, throw on top of it that one precinct isn't going to really do much to move the needle and multiple would have to be involved, it makes the "fear" of election fraud very silly in terms of national races. Of course we have evidence in the last couple cycles of where fraud was attempted and thwarted and those incidents weren't going to move the national needle as intended but probably could have impacted local outcomes. To me, this "fear" of election fraud from our citizenry is as worrisome as the second amendment being overturned.Something that occurred to me:I'd say sure depending on the evidence. Something significant enough to impact an election would be very obvious and very wide spread. I don't know what you mean by "statistical anomalies" here but they'd likely have to be across the board in very obvious areas.
Election fraud has got to be MUCH harder to pull off in battleground states than in safe states. Why? The level of investment of local observers and local party apparatuses. When the stakes of a given precinct's outcome go up, the spotlight on that precinct's ballot counting shines that much brighter.
It wasn't Michigan it was supposedly done in PennsylvaniaThat was from Project Veritas.
My understanding is that Michigan doesn't have a ballot postmark date requirement. They have a received date requirement. Even if they were back dated, and then delivered on the 4th, they would not be accepted or counted. Only ballots received by the clerk by 8pm on Nov 3rd are counted.
Project Veritas @Project_Veritas Nov 4It wasn't Michigan it was supposedly done in Pennsylvania
Read the factsI think given the chaos by all the different voting options there was some fraud, to what extent not sure. Did read about some whistle blower in Michigan was said they were ordered to past date votes that came in late.
I think some happens in every election big or small.
Strangely the same group is also claiming the almost exact same thing happened in Pennsylvania.Project Veritas @Project_Veritas Nov 4
If you can see this video, share this video right now
Whistleblower details how Michigan Mail-In-Ballots were ORDERED by
@USPS supervisors to be “Back Dated” to November 3rd, 2020
#MailFraud
https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1324235930115448835 (video clip at link)
I doubt that will ever happen, because the courts will never permit the type of investigation that Trump supporters seem to want (based on what I've seen from the likes of Don Jr and others in Trump's circle). It won't be enough for them to simply lose in court, because they'll just be able to blame liberal/RINO judges.BTW, I would like all those shouting about fraud now to reevaluate their biases and sources once no fraud is found in court.
I don't think the Trump circle cares about actually investigations just the noise about them. Keeps the money coming in. If Trump really cared about the facts of an investigation then he wouldn't be saying nonsense like there were 100s of millions of mail in votes in Philadelphia and Detroit.Joe Summer said:I doubt that will ever happen, because the courts will never permit the type of investigation that Trump supporters seem to want (based on what I've seen from the likes of Don Jr and others in Trump's circle). It won't be enough for them to simply lose in court, because they'll just be able to blame liberal/RINO judges.
Not sure any of the accusations will even get to court.The Z Machine said:BTW, I would like all those shouting about fraud now to reevaluate their biases and sources once no fraud is found in court.
Probably about as likely as all those shouting about a Biden landslide or Blue Wave re-evaluating their biases and sources. I guess it's just easier to see the splinter in others eye.The Z Machine said:BTW, I would like all those shouting about fraud now to reevaluate their biases and sources once no fraud is found in court.
I’ve studied the topic extensively (prior to 2020). No idea whether or not others have.I think this is an awful question. Not a single person that reads or responds to this has a meaningful % of relevant information necessary to potentially offer a cohesive answer.
240,000 or so dead...how many more dead today. That is incredibly insulting to claim Covid was all some joke because a small minority of those who voted are out celebrating (and mostly in masks).Oh boo hoo, mail in ballots because of a pandemic? Are you serious. The same pandemic that's allowing Dems to dance in the streets celebrating? Your covid was all a joke to allow for the ballots to be mailed out. Such a fraud. The entire thing
I disagree. We should not lower the bar to the point where extremist groups get to dictate how the American government and judicial system operates.For the sake of the democracy, and future integrity of the elections, I want a full transparent investigation so it will be clear to all of the Trump supporters he lost.
You make it seem like it's a small faction of extremist. It's half the country. I don't see any unity happening when half the people are going to distrust the entire process.I disagree. We should not lower the bar to the point where extremist groups get to dictate how the American government and judicial system operates.
Also, I disagree with the entire concept of "give the extremists what they want because then they will stop their demands." That type of appeasement rarely works.
Nah, I wouldn't think so. People who are convinced the election was stolen are fringe among Trump supporters. Though they voted for the same person, they are not a monolith.You make it seem like it's a small faction of extremist. It's half the country. I don't see any unity happening when half the people are going to distrust the entire process.
It seems like everyone I know that voted for him thinks it was stolen and they will somehow win it in the supreme court.Nah, I wouldn't think so. People who are convinced the election was stolen are fringe among Trump supporters. Though they voted for the same person, they are not a monolith.
You really think that over 70 million people believe that Biden only won because of massive voter fraud? Really?You make it seem like it's a small faction of extremist. It's half the country. I don't see any unity happening when half the people are going to distrust the entire process.I disagree. We should not lower the bar to the point where extremist groups get to dictate how the American government and judicial system operates.
Also, I disagree with the entire concept of "give the extremists what they want because then they will stop their demands." That type of appeasement rarely works.
Ah. Well, with all due respect, perhaps it would be wise to entertain opinions a little bit further outside of your social circle before assuming that your circle represents the thoughts of 70 million people?It seems like everyone I know that voted for him thinks it was stolen and they will somehow win it in the supreme court.Nah, I wouldn't think so. People who are convinced the election was stolen are fringe among Trump supporters. Though they voted for the same person, they are not a monolith.
If the Supreme Court rejects Trump's cases, do you think that will be enough to satisfy your friends? If not, why? Would they assume that the Court was part of the plot?It seems like everyone I know that voted for him thinks it was stolen and they will somehow win it in the supreme court.
For sure, one can't project a handful of people onto 70 million people.Ah. Well, with all due respect, perhaps it would be wise to entertain opinions a little bit further outside of your social circle before assuming that your circle represents the thoughts of 70 million people?
It is not half the country. People are really over estimating how many of Trump's votes were by Trump fanatics.You make it seem like it's a small faction of extremist. It's half the country. I don't see any unity happening when half the people are going to distrust the entire process.
I agree and have been surprised as well by some who have bought into the massive or rampant fraud or other narratives for a while now.For sure, one can't project a handful of people onto 70 million people.
But the entire reason I asked this poll was to see how far off scale my Trump voting friends are. I asked three of them this past week on a scale of 1 (minimal) to 10 (rampant) how much cheating was going on. One didn't answer and the other two said 11. I was very surprised by this. These are highly educated, super reasonable, very successful people. These aren't fringe guys.
They asked me how much I thought I said minimal. They think I'm naive. It's an odd time.
I have a lot of friends who voted for Trump and are disgusted with everything he is doing post election. They think he really is nuts....but voted with their wallets and political belief systems.I agree and have been surprised as well by some who have bought into the massive or rampant fraud or other narratives for a while now.
Its where I just don’t know how we come together being that far off in what people believe is true/fact.
American Idol and DWTS can count votes faster and better than Michigan.For the sake of the democracy, and future integrity of the elections, I want a full transparent investigation so it will be clear to all of the Trump supporters he lost. Right now I'm a little uneasy of the feeling of all these gun carrying mma fans thinking the election was stolen.
The margins on these elections were very slim, so cheating could be effective for something this close. I think its definitely possible, but so far I haven't seen a shred of evidence. If there was cheating I think dead people still on voter rolls, people voting in states they no longer live in, and care takers filling out ballots for people would be the ways.
I don’t have a problem with this, let there be no question.For the sake of the democracy, and future integrity of the elections, I want a full transparent investigation so it will be clear to all of the Trump supporters he lost. Right now I'm a little uneasy of the feeling of all these gun carrying mma fans thinking the election was stolen.
The margins on these elections were very slim, so cheating could be effective for something this close. I think its definitely possible, but so far I haven't seen a shred of evidence. If there was cheating I think dead people still on voter rolls, people voting in states they no longer live in, and care takers filling out ballots for people would be the ways.
In my state, SC, Trump garnered 55% of the vote, roughly 28% of the population. It is solidly a Trump state. I don’t know all 1,369,852 that voted for him but the ones I do all think the election was rigged. Not even a question in their mind.Nah, I wouldn't think so. People who are convinced the election was stolen are fringe among Trump supporters. Though they voted for the same person, they are not a monolith.