Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
William Green or Lee Suggs? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter JJ Evans
- Start date
- Status
footballman_696969
Footballguy
Green will start week one, but lose the job by week four. I watched him play last year and he didn't look great at all.
VICK-IS-GOD
Footballguy
I think it's a toss up, but the couple games before Willie Green got injured/suspended he was tearing it up and looking really good.But he is a head case and it wouldn't shock me if he did something bone-headed to get a long suspension. It's a muddy situation in Cleveland.
footballman_696969
Footballguy
He only looked good in one game against Oakland who ranked dead last in rushing yards/game. He did not impress me at all last year.
Marc Levin
Hangs out with Oscar Zeta Acosta
True dat - this could have been made a "closed" poll if all JJ wanted was numbers.
TheFanatic
Footballguy
FLA\/\/ED....Where is RBBC?
Burning Sensation
Footballguy
Nice to see William Greens family is coming out to support George Jefferson and Roasters. 
George Jefferson
Footballguy
William Green is the man in Cleveland come Week 1. Expect to hear the usual rhetoric from Butch Davis throughout the summer....."William needs to earn his job back"....."William has a lot to prove to the team"...."William needs to get things straight in his life".....etc. Don't kid yourselves though, William Green is the starting RB come Week 1 and is exactly the kind of power RB that Butch Davis has wanted to feature in his offense. Butch Davis stuck with William Green during the tough times and has no intentions of sitting him at this point. Lee Suggs lacks size, power, and durability....but he'll make for a nice change of pace back to give William Green a breather every now and then, much to the dissapointment of Lee Suggs owners.
Last edited by a moderator:
TheFanatic
Footballguy
Actually, you never asked who would score the most points. You asked who will win or lose. I assumed you meant the starting job. And I'm saying that neither will win it. Thus FLAW\/\/ED. I would ask you to clarify your comments, but even you have no idea what you said. Show me where you mentioned points in any of your posts besides the one I quoted here. Now, reread your own posts before you start the name calling. Back to the topic. It won't matter because they will be splitting time and thus if anyone is relying on either of these guys he's not making the playoffs. Barring an injury to either, of course.
Marc Levin
Hangs out with Oscar Zeta Acosta
In all fairness, this is a dynasty question:
I voted Suggs b/c I think the team will NOT re-sign Green in RFA on the hope he will garner them some draft picks in return, or they will trade him as an RFA player - with a decent 2004, Green might net a third round choice.JJ - please tone down the combative style, that is semi-acceptable in the FFA, but is straight-up intolerable in the Shark Pool.
TheFanatic
Footballguy
It's been one of those days. Like when all the Suggs/Green debates run together.... 
We need a notebook for them all.
Marc Levin
Hangs out with Oscar Zeta Acosta
FYI - Colin is indiscriminately closing Suggs/Green topics and filtering them here.
Colin Dowling
Footballguy
Yup. If you guys want to have a discussion, than have a discussion. But if you want to Bump every thread you can find just to try and prove a point, I'll be more than happy to close them as you bump them. This is a Football forum...Colin
Mad Strategist
Footballguy
Thanks HERD. Now we all just need to post some interesting topics to drive all those Green/Suggs threads off the front page!Hmm.... I'll see if I can come up with a good topic... maybe something strategy-related... Is there anything we haven't already analyzed? LOL
Marc Levin
Hangs out with Oscar Zeta Acosta
My recommendation is to bump the threads below the closed ones and push them down.As Gatorman's sig says: In the old days, worthless crap would fall off the first page - let it.
Marc Levin
Hangs out with Oscar Zeta Acosta
You're pushing it.Maybe it's time for a Henry/McGahee thread.
I will "pull a Col" and will close every thread on that subject except one.
Colin Dowling
Footballguy
Like I said, if we want to have a football discussion, lets have one. But I'm pretty certain that if my man Shick! shows up and notices a front page of Green/Suggs threads that are running void of pertinent discussion, my simple "locks" will feel like a Happy Ending.COlinMaybe it's time for a Henry/McGahee thread.
aardball44
Footballguy
A lock that feels like a Happy Ending? That would be the greatest invention of all time! Obligatory pertinent info: I voted "Green", and he now leads in the polling (44-43).UPDATE: Tied, 44-44.
Last edited by a moderator:
Colin Dowling
Footballguy
46-44 Suggs.Colin
Marc Levin
Hangs out with Oscar Zeta Acosta
I second thatMay I simply suggest that everyone just finds the spotlights they missed and posts projections, even just the numbers. That would get them off the front page with lighting speed.
I am sure Jason could use some more numbers in the spotlight threads.On topic, last I checked,Suggs had a one point edge of 47-46
Mungo Burrows
Footballguy
Don't have a problem locking the bogus bumps, but of all the threads to keep open and refer to, why did you choose the one (1) which deals with next year when these players might not be on the same team (2) is a poll that doesn't have arguments and opinions to support the numbers being spewed and (3) where half the people don't seem clear on the year to which it refers.And just to stay on topic: Suggs. 
Last edited by a moderator:
amnesiac
beer is good
Do not anger the plutocracy!Don't have a problem locking the bogus bumps, but of all the threads to keep open and refer to, why did you choose the one (1) which deals with next year when these players might not be on the same team (2) is a poll that doesn't have arguments and opinions to support the numbers being spewed and (3) where half the people don't seem clear on the year to which it refers.And just to stay on topic: Suggs.
Colin Dowling
Footballguy
I decided to keep this one open because as JJ stated, there had yet to be a poll. Also, this was the most recent and there was some football discussion going on. THe locked threads all direct people here for discussion and had been bumped simply to put them on the front page, not to offer anything regarding the Cleveland RB situation.Each of the Player Spotlights for these guys is still open as well. Locked threads can be read and quoted at any time. ColinDon't have a problem locking the bogus bumps, but of all the threads to keep open and refer to, why did you choose the one (1) which deals with next year when these players might not be on the same team (2) is a poll that doesn't have arguments and opinions to support the numbers being spewed and (3) where half the people don't seem clear on the year to which it refers.And just to stay on topic: Suggs.
David Yudkin
Footballguy
All I can think of is if NULL VOTES count as OTHER.
regseasonchamps
Footballguy
I voted for Suggs. I had Green last year and watched alot of his games. He takes way too long to hit the hole and when he does he goes down on first contact. Suggs may not be great, but he'll win the job and put up average #s.
JJ Get it? JU What?JJ GOT IT JU Yes SIRJJ GOOD - Status
