Recent content by bleedgreen

Anyway, I'm outta this thread. Seasons over for me and I'm looking forward to the real NFL playoffs. In summary, my thoughts... 1. Yahoo's policy in this instance sucks 2. If your league allowed it, and you picked up Webb for WR, it's a shark move and congrats, don't feel bad. 3. I don't...

Well I thought I already answered it with my question and example. Any player on the field can take a snap or two at another position but that shouldn't make them eligible for being started at that position because of it....or else you could start just about any player at any position and that...

I don't think I had any one kicker on my team for more than a few weeks at a time. Probably started about 6 different ones throughout the season. Same with a lot of my league, dropping and picking up different kickers every couple of games or so. It wouldn't bother me if our league decided to...

My question is just as relevant and you didn't answer either. What if Vick has one designed run play in a game. How about 2 or 3? Where do you draw the line before he can become an RB start?

In fact, why even bother having positions since technically any player could take a snap where points could accumulate across multiple categories. Running backs sometimes throw the ball, Tight Ends sometimes line up at receiver. Receivers sometimes run the ball. Why not just have 9 positions and...

Mike Vick rushes the ball several times a game. Maybe he should be able to start at RB?That would be sweet. Peyton Manning as my QB, Joe Webb as my WR, and Vick as my RB. :wolf:

Maybe a new computer chair and a flat screen monitor.

I agree that Yahoo's policy is stupid. If a players primary position clearly changes, the designation for that player should change. Something like this creates a hassle for commissioners of leagues, and probably ended some leagues because of disputes. Because the more I think about it, I can...

:towelwave: My 2nd trophie in 4 years. Thanks to the helpful non trolls on this site.

He played a couple of snaps in 1 game with no targets. Oh my bad I stand corrected. :lol:

Isn't something like this what commissioners are for? The guy hasn't played WR for the Vikings, he was only drafted as a "prospect" at that position. Since draft day he became a potential QB for the Vikings and a definite QB going into this game. In other words, common sense says it would be...

That's true and I guess it was decided before tonight's game. Bears/Packers seemed like the obvious pick but with tonight's result I guess it was a better choice because the Bears might not be playing for a win.Still I think either team is a one and done in the playoffs. But I guess anything...

I can't believe that's the game that NBC chose to pick up. Zero interest in seeing that game.

To be fair I knew it involved defenses but not to what degree or how many players start at what position. I couldn't be bothered with that. I'm already comfortable with standard leagues.

Well I can't fault anyone for making that decision. It is a smart move if your league allowed it. Congrats.