Recent content by BroadwayG

Both pumped and sad to hear. Bob is tops in my book, both knowledgeable and humble, a rare combination.

I'm in

Neat stuff for sure. :thumbup: Would really like to be able to filter by Tournament and see some percentages instead of raw number count. And the black text on navy background has to go.

MFL draft only is free. http://home.myfantasyleague.com/free-draft-only-league/

:towelwave: Through 30 BBM3, 144 Puppy 1, 38 Puppy Superflex, 37 Puppy 2 and have about 25 slow Puppy 2 ongoing. Highest exposures are Duvernay, Landry, Hopkins, Gibson, Gesicki, and H Henry

Waist deep in Puppy 2, it's half filled already. The swath of 9th-10th round RBs seems to have shifted higher by a half round or so. New target in the 10th is Tim Patrick, and I'm avoiding Jeudy. I was ok with DJ Moore in the early 4th, but early 3rd is too pricey for me. Baker isn't that much...

July update: Pretty happy with my June targets and fades. Been expanding my QB range to get increase exposure to Hurts and Lance. Other QB targets/fades remain. K. Herbert has been added to a target. I like both him and Jamaal as very cheap options with no ambiguity in their roles. Mid range...

Starting to come around on Gibson now that he is falling into the 6th round a lot. Mike Williams has climbed in ADP (Underdog) from 37 to 31 which is a huge change for no news. Still not really drafting him. Darrel Williams moved into the land of the living from the occasional last round pick...

Not FFPC, but in general I'm currently targetting: Watson Winston Mac Jones Hines/McKissic (PPR) Jamaal Williams Mark Ingram Breida DJ Moore Cooks Landry Crowder Tolbert/J Washington R Anderson Doubs/Velus Jones Westbrook-Ikhine Hockenson Gesicki Kmet Everett Fading: QBs...

It's kind of hard to believe Durham has been at this 1.5 times as long as the entire Mueller investigation.

Thanks. I didn't see any mention of a reputable study about time duration between boosters in the article. I'd really like to know about it if it exists.

I'm legit trying to figure out if I'm missing something in the article. Sorry dude.

I'm asking about the 'legit study' you referenced. I didn't see mention of it in the article. Just the press conference where they warned that 3-4 month boosters might be not long enough time between boosters.

I did not see any study referenced in the article you linked, it just linked to a press conference. Do you have a link to this study?

Saving this for gun threads. ETA: Just playing around with you SC. I support you having and elaborating your opinions on things in here. I could just barely believe my eyes when I saw that you wrote those words.