Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I think you are missing my point though. The tool is there to evaluate players against each other. If you feel like it's too conservative, multiple every player's point total by the same factor until the numbers look right to you. In the end it really does not matter.
Cannot confirm or deny, but as long as they are conservative across the board, why does it matter? The tool is there to compare players, not to give absolute numbers, right?
What an odd point. The thread is about non-homer perspectives and you use this to deduce the number of homers? I guess everyone has a bias, and yours is clear.
Wow, there's tons of information out there about this, and you are worrying about one post in this thread?The 'intent' has nothing to do with the 3.5 year minimum, like I said. It has been all over the news and all it takes is a google search to confirm. If you are going to disagree, please...
Not sure how pacman was a disappointment. He held down the fort while Newman was injured, and his play was more than serviceable.The suspension actually helps his case as the Cowboys now get a 5th round pick back.So in sum, the Cowboys got 6 games of above average corner play for the difference...
Sorry if you don't like people who disagree with you, but he's not in the top 5 in several of my leagues either. So no, he's not tops for me. Thanks for being closed minded and believing that you are in the only league in existence though. :lmao:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.