Recent content by Depth Charge

yeah man, 70 pt lead down to 2? how did it end??

now that Barber is active, I am benching Choice and going with Ronnie Brown at RB2. If Choice were the only option, I would have played him but Barber is too good and BALT is too tough on the run to chance part time stats.

Here is a bit more info from another thread here on the same subject.http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...howtopic=427949

Cheatsheats, top 250, podcasts, and dynasty rankings!

I would like to see a top 120 or 150 list of IDP players, ideally weekly or at least bi-weekly. The IDP podcast is great tool but Jene and Sig can't really hit on each team, each position. Also, How about a weekly podcast of dynasty analysis? Your rankings are great but hearing the FBG...

yes it was.... just seconds after Bumble announced Newman out of the game with an injury. Just look on the other side of the field Bumble right across the LOS from S Smith! the guy has no business being in on a play by play.

nope

The 89 49ers show was solid. That team came damn close to winning 3 in a row. I'd put them up against ANY team. Poor George, :lmao: never was carried off the field!!

:coffee: :coffee: Now you are going to have to clarify. The 89 Niners, One of the top 3 teams IMO won their Superbowl 55-10. Ha, you'd think a Niner Fan would know the difference! I was thinking of the 89 team when I said 1990. Sorry for the confusion :coffee: Yes the 1989 49ers was...

allow me to clarify....a dominant team that dominates the playoffs and the Superbowl should be higher in the voting than a team than struggles in either. comprende? bring it out when it matters the most! Using that logic, shouldn't the 1990 49ers and even the 1994 49ers be ranked higher than...

good thing Montana was more precise with the football than 49ers fans R wid dare spellun'. :football: just kidding friend, dont throttle me!

lends well to my point. 89 49ers and 92 Cowboys should really be 3 & 4. 78 Steelers are overrated. IMO How does that lend you your point? :confused: allow me to clarify....a dominant team that dominates the playoffs and the Superbowl should be higher in the voting than a team than...

lends well to my point. 89 49ers and 92 Cowboys should really be 3 & 4. 78 Steelers are overrated. IMO

92 Cowboys definitely deserve Top 5 consideration. Beating the heavily favored 92 Niners on the ROAD and then kicking the crap out of an experienced AFC champion by scoring how many points (could have been more Mr Lett)? When was the last time a Superbowl champ scored 52 or more in the big game?

As I mentioned in an earlier post, the 71-73 Dolphins just don't get the respect. Somehow, perfect season, losing 2 games over 2 seasons while caring 2 Lombardi's to the trophy case just doesnt win it with most people. I dont get it.