Recent content by Dvorak

I'm thinking Lydia. Get her to meet him at their normal table at the coffee shop, where he has pre-positioned Stevia packets laced with the ricin.

A warning shot is a sure way to get yourself in real trouble. I would not recommend this, at all. If you are firing a warning shot, the prosecutor is going to claim you weren't truly in fear for your life or in immediate danger. A warning shot is even more reckless as your intention by doing...

And just like all the other gun-grabbers, the other 2 poll questions are completely ignored... How can you proclaim that 90% support expanded background checks to cover private sales when only 52% support stricter gun control of any kind??? Hmm?

The 90% is not a real statistic and Obama knows it. His disciples parrot it like it is the gospel. Here is the exact question asked on that poll:Do you support or oppose requiring background checks for all gun buyers?Pretty misleading. Is it asking if you support the background checks already...

PoliceOne.com survey results: http://ddq74coujkv1i.cloudfront.net/p1_gunsurveysummary_2013.pdf Wow, these results completely confllict with everything Tim has ever claimed about what police officers believe when it comes to guns... Amoung them: 99 percent said policies other than an “assault...

And every time you do, I'll post this link.History lesson by Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership

Woah, WOAH, F-ing WOAH!You've just spent the last 150 pages telling us it was so freaking important to safeguard society that gun owners had to cave in and "compromise" on our God-given, Constitutionally-protected rights. But, when it comes time for society to give up a little, it's not their...

In for a dime, in for a dollar. If one were breaking a law by selling a gun illegally, they might as well remove the serial number...

Actually, Carolyn McCarthy makes Feinstein look like Travis Haley when it comes to guns. She is the speaker of the barrel shroud comment, "It's a shoulder thing that goes up"

A once through of this thread at ar15.com should put to rest the thought that anything short of outright confiscation would have ANY effect on reducing the 30 round AR-15 magazines in circulation...Warning the images above may cause hoplophobes to go into cardiac arrest. Edit to add: Given the...

Tim wants to hear from law enforcement professionals regarding the "high capacity" magazines? Well, here you go. The New York State Sheriffs Association Response to NY SAFE Act: They also weighed in on background checks: I'll sit back and wait for the discrediting of these as not "real" law...

Well, so much for the "No one needs an automatic weapon that holds 30 rounds for self defense" argument (let alone a semi-auto AR-15)... Department of Homeland Security seems to think they are "suitable for personal defense" when they ordered 7000 "5.56X45mm NATO Personal Defense Weapons" DHS...

If we are not at war, then tell me why do our police need these (quoting President Obama), "Weapons designed for the theater of war"???Their only purpose is (quoting the President again) "to pump out as many bullets as possible as quickly as possible, to do as much damage as possible". Doesn't...

Now you want to ban cars that can go 50mph in a residential neighborhood? Because THAT is the apples to apples comparison you are making.