This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
It's same in that they would be making an organizational decision to improve their team. They would not be worried about ONE game...they would be concerned about the bigger picture.I'm not saying they should do it. It's just not really that different.
And by the way.....It's the Colts that...
It's same in that they would be making an organizational decision to improve their team. They would not be worried about ONE game...they would be concerned about the bigger picture.I'm not saying they should do it. It's just not really that different.
And by the way.....It's the Colts that...
I don't think it's an unreasonable question. The Colts tanked a game to "help" their team in the bigger picture. What's the real difference in the Rams taking an intentional loss to ensure they get a potential difference maker in Suh. That's also looking at the bigger picture. Who could...
I am sheepishly posting this, because we all know kickers aren't really football players. Then again, you can certainly lose your playoff game with a bad outing from your kicker. I had picked up Billy Cundiff (Baltimore) when Rackers went down. Now with the weather concerns in Baltimore I've...
How true. My wife works in the ER admitting department of large St Louis hospital. She regularly is reminded of how fragile life is. You never know when it's time. Prayers to the family and teammates of Chris Henry.
I'm still starting Beannie versus Detroit. Granted.....bad fumble. But Wisenhunt HAS to play someone.....right? Other than the fumble, he's run hard....averaging over 5 yards a carry. He caught a ball for over 20 yards....and had a great goalline effort. All things considered, I believe...
Perhaps he wasn't feeling well, but 1) didn't want to let his team down....2) didn't want to give Jennings the opportunity to cut into his time & carries...3) didn't want to miss the opportunity to player against the Steelers....etc. THEN perhaps after being in the game for a few carries...
With injuries and byes, I'm also probably going to play Leon. I'm hoping that, if nothing else, Braylons presence will keep the secondary honest and stretch the field ....and open things up underneath for Leon in the short passing game. That's what I'm counting on.
I'm a lifelong Browns fan and embarrassed about how some Browns fans represent themselves today on message boards about Braylon. I have no animosity toward him and hope he does well in NY. Having said that I'm glad the Browns are finished with him. He's fallen well short of my expectations...
Pure speculation on my part, but I could see them using Harrison between the 20's and Jamal in the redzone. Similar to how they use Ray Rice in Baltimore. Rice gets most of the work up and down the field, then he gives way to McGahee or Le'Ron. I'm confident that Harrison can handle 20...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.