This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I’ve heard this before. The just of it was if you can retire in your late 50s, do it. Putting it off for a few extra dollars isn’t worth it because later on in life you’ll spend far less than you think since you more than likely can’t do much.
Yeah, hard to go wrong here with Meta and Amazon in particular here imo. Both are now down for the year and have had a year’s worth of growth in the mean time. Not to say they can’t go lower but these two in particular I’ll be buying more every 3% further drop.
Yeah. Everyone wants a solution but a solution that doesn’t affect them………so nobody really wants a solution. Hence why we have the 50 year mortgage idea. A non solution.
Yup. I would add restricting foreign ownership. If you don’t have enough houses for US citizens. Why are we allowing foreign buyers of second, third, fourth houses particularly by countries that restrict foreign ownership themselves. About 2% of US house sales were from foreign individuals or...
Aren’t there countries that do this now? I’m guessing the original lender would still be on the hook for the original loan somehow and have partial stake in the new house as collateral. Would also have to be government backed I’m guessing.
I just don’t see any benefit. A foot in the door or any other way. It would be one thing if the payment was noticeably cheaper but it’s not. Factoring in the higher interest rate and higher pmi, you’re talking $100 a month or so on the average house. If things are that tight that $100 a month...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.