Recent content by :lurker:

Keeping rosters smaller keeps it more interesting for the owners who are less involved while still giving you room to keep some younger players who have yet to break out.In a perfect world I would love to expand the rosters but it would definitely push guys out of my league.

I guess technically you are right but I put my league in dynasty camp given we can keep a starting lineup +. It is more dynasty than 4 player keeper league.

I play in a dynasty league that has evolved over the years. Just wondering what other leagues look like looking across the following criteria: 1. Number of keeps 2. Number of teams 3. Starters 4. In season roster size 5. IR or no IR 6. Misc My league looks like this: 1. 14 2. 10 3. 1QB...

Now that Braylon only got a fine it seems like Benson is in the clear

looks like otis invited this guy to his wedding http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_0...SPL_468x426.jpg ladies must be impressed

that is the point of the back end of the post. my point is that a guy like lewis is a better gamble at the bottom of your starting lineup than momass.

That offense is a mess. Nobody wants to give up value for a guy in a true rbbc in a terrible offense.

still works though. not many people use 2 te's because it just seems odd.

In leagues where you can play tight ends as wide receivers Dallas Clark is a strong wr3 option if you have a high risk high reward second tight end on your team (e.g. Marcedes Lewis td's). Clark is clearly the 1 or 2 option on the colts flip flopping with Wayne week to week. With the number of...

It's clear that Harrison isn't the guy here. Hillis isn't the future but he is probably the best option for this year. The cleveland rb situation is no better than the seahawks situation. If you're in a bind throw one of those guys out there and hope for the best. Nothing more to be seen here...