Recent content by pk4239

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1065608/index.htm From day one, Packer-Bear games—the first game was played in 1921—have tended to be slugfests. Last season the rivalry intensified. In the first meeting, a Monday night game on Oct. 21 (1985) at Soldier Field, coach...

Seems to be the rumor of the week. It took me three pages on a google search to get to this.Agility tests: 4.45 in the 40-yard dash...31 5/8-inch arm length...9 5/8-inch hands...Right-handed...17 Wonderlic score. http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/2005draft/White,Roddy-WR-Alabama.htm

I am going Minn this week just so I have the option of the Skins at home vs. Cle next week.

I haven't had any problem accessing fanball, but don't even bother live drafting unless you have Mozilla Firefox. The live draft room has major problems with IE.

I can't agree more. This is fantastic.

From Matt Waldman at FFToday.comhttp://www.fftoday.com/articles/waldman/07_rookies_rbs.htm Kenneth Darby, Buccaneers: When he was a junior, I thought Ken Darby was a surefire, first day pick. But the Buccaneers 7th round selection dropped due to an unimpressive senior year and poor showing at...

Waldman has been pimping him over at FFtoday http://www.fftoday.com/articles/waldman/07...below_radar.htm I have taking a flyer or two on him late in a couple of leagues. :thumbdown:

Not a Bill, But Paul Hornung accomplished this even if you only count what he did in the 60s.

This is a tough one. I like Jackson and I think he will be of great help to the Chargers, but I am having difficultly building up a really strong fantasy case for him. I do think he will be the number 1 guy in San Diego this season, but if not these would be quite optimistic. :( Targets...

Wannabe, great thread and great insights. This is somewhat of an odd question. I have an off the wall 2nd year 14 team, 9 keeper league, you can keep a player for one year minus their draft round. All of the first rounders from last year go into a specail draft with rookies, but with the...

From a stat guy :confused: You are right, from the Footballguys "population" the ranking should be a mean. If you didn't catch my last paragrah, I am a member because I value the dispersion of the mean (and thus the mean) more important than median.

The OP is correct, using a mean rather than median in this case is incorrect from a statistical approach, although I must agree he has been unable to fully defend his post . I am going to screw up these terms because it is pretty much Stats 401, which I took many, many years ago. The problem...

Brandon Marshsall isn't even on the board. Interesting.

Matt Waldman at FFtoday has done a pretty good job with downside consistency. http://www.fftoday.com/articles/waldman/05...nsistency_1.htm But I am with code, less so because of predictibility, more so to do with low correlations between players which tends to lower the standard error (when...

Smith ran a 4.35 and Harrison a 4.38