This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Not an explicit attempt to replicate EPA; rather, taking facets of EPA into account. A similar view as you've laid out in the OP was the starting point; the desire for a scoring system more indicative of true added value.
This type of a system is not for everyone as it can get a bit complicated.
I'm in a league with such a scoring system. Works pretty well but can have some odd results. 1 long rush can be worth more than a 30 rushes for 100 yards.
Here's the detailed scoring:
RULES FOR QB, WR, PK, PN, DT, DE, LB, CB, S
EVENT RANGE (LOW-HIGH) POINTS
Receptions 0-99 .2 points each...
Your arguments were that he could get injured and they're playing in a new offense. I just feel like you grasping for arguments, especially when they've looked pretty good, granted in very limited action. I'm not hearing any substantial reasons to temper expectations.
Fair enough. I'll agree that he's probably not going to have a long career but, for this year, I don't see him as a significantly higher injury risk than others.
The real reason there's such a dropoff in your stats is because you're lumping in all 4-7 rounders with your 3rd rounders. Remove that group and the thirds will look a lot better.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.