Recent content by Scrapper

Thank you for getting back to me on that. I am not surprised that the team who got Priest is not willing to give him back up, so I guess that's that. Not everyone is willing to do something for the betterment of the league, I guess.Sorry if I was a huge pain in your ### about this. While I do...

:rotflmao: By our point system, Priest is the #1 guy in the league, and none of the other players are even CLOSE. The guy with Priest has Ricky Williams, Coles, Toomer, and plenty of other good players- his eggs are not all in one basket because he didn't have to give any of his good eggs up to...

BSR- great post. One of the owners involved has asked Unlucky to reverse the trade for the good of the league, and I really do appreciate that, especially since he hates my guts right now. We'll see what happens with that I guess.I'm sure Unlucky will make sure this kind of thing is clarified in...

Sandbagger,I'd like to address some of your points: - Unlucky is in a unique situation on these boards, and has a great reputation, that's why some of us blindly trusted him with $50 or more per league. In case you haven't noticed, between this thread and the other one, WAY more people think...

Whoa! I just saw this as I was rereading some posts. Is that true?

Ok, this is getting out of control with semantics, but I'll play :P Unlucky's rules state that you may overturn a veto by a majority vote of everyone except him and the two owners involved- which would be five votes needed. Since this is not a veto, we don't have to throw out Unlucky's vote...

Thankfully, this hasn't been an issue in any of my leagues until today. But I am of the opinion that a majority of league owners should have the right to veto a trade. Why should we be able to vote to overturn a veto, but not to overturn a bad trade? There isn't a lot of consistency in that...

I understand everybody is upset here, including me, but let's try to work this out before we trash the entire league, ok? Hopefully we'll hear from more owners in the league, and Unlucky will consider at least having us vote on this.And I will say that the trade offer you made that he didn't...

No, and I think the league rules do favor RB's-Top Ten players by our scoring system:1. Holmes, Priest KCC RB 109.10 2. Green, Ahman GBP RB 107.60 3. Manning, Peyton IND QB 103.10 4. McNair, Steve TEN QB 102.34 5. Chiefs, Kansas City KCC DT 101.01 6. Lewis, Jamal BAL RB 95.60 7. Plummer, Jake...

Sandbagger- Doug B is right. Collusion would be a great strategy to use in your league, since you seem to condone it. And Eagle Eye is right in that you seem to not even be looking at the players involved.refacer- I don't blame you for defending your nephews, and I'm not trying to insult them...

From the league rules:Tradinga. Both parties must agree to the trade. myfantasyleague.com handles trades well. b. I have the right to veto trades only in the event that collusion is suspected. I will define collusion as “a trade in which one of the owners knowingly and...

Yes, it is BS. And everyone in this thread except for you and Unlucky seems to realize that. If Team Stacked runs away with the league, it will be wrecked. And I'm not going to "chill out" since my money is on the line.

That, or get some family members to join a league with you so you can make sweetheart deals :thumbup: Seriously though, Unlucky has a flawless reputation and this is the first time I've ever had any kind of problem in one of his leagues. Fairness and competitiveness is something he...

That's what I'm worried about. Especially since Team B KNEW he was getting RW2. This trade isn't even close to being fair, and I imagine I'd get laughed at if I proposed that offer to someone.

bigfishboy- which team are you? And I'm glad I'm not the only owner in the league that thinks this way.