Recent content by The Funk Bud

A site that you didn't mention and the one I like the most is aol.com. Its interface is nice, the league setup is very customizable, it provides plenty of user options, the living scoring is fast and reliable, and best of all it's FREE! I've used cbssportsline, nfl.com, and myfantasyleague and...

Everyone's situation is different, but in general, starting two RBs is still the correct call. For example, let's assume you're in a 10-team league where the talent is split up equally such that each team has:1 top 10 RB1 top 20 RB1 top 10 WR1 top 20 WR1 top 30 WRStarting three WRs would mean...

Ding-Ding-Ding-Ding

I've temporarily put him in my lineup today. My options are limited though with Losman, Garrard, and Leinert. :cry: Somebody kick me in the head if they think one of my other options is better.

It should be pointed out that the Panther's run game in general looks horrible. D-Will looked no better during the Monday Night game than Foster. This situation reminds me a lot of the Bears run game.

You can get several of us to point out that you're a tool. I think you have that base covered.

Yes. Very similar to his awesome three games in a row and due for a clunker...and then the four games in a row and due for a clunker. Like I've mentioned, he deserves a benching.

I think your original post answers it all:1) "I hate this type of post, but"2) "Guppie"Please sit Tomlinson. It's the non-guppie thing to do. :rolleyes:

Yes. Anytime a player rattles off a five-game streak like LT's had, you bench him. Next.

Why? Because he's a rookie? I'm not saying Colston is a better receiver than Holt, but it's tough to argue with his stats. And nothing I've heard will change his situation as the year winds down. As another poster mentioned, it might be time to trade one of these guys since you're lucky...

So you're advising perhaps substituting a stud for a stud. Hmmm. Novel concept.

I think you gotta cut the guy, period.

Sportsline/NFL.com is the worst. It's ridiculous how the only non-free site is the absolute worst to use come gameday. I'm making a full transition to aol.com's site next year. It's fast and free.

True, but there are situations where the team with the highest points has one or two monster weeks with subpar outings the rest of the time. That's why I think an average of the three (head-to-head, breakdown, and total points) is a pretty good barometer in qualifying the top teams. Sportsline...

You guys are seeing a different "Power Ranking" than I am. NFL.com's power ranking only takes into account head-to-head record, points, and head-to-head vs. other teams. Now the "ratings" might be affected by this bench player stuff, but who the hell uses that? It sounds like your power...