Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Catbird

Members
  • Content Count

    948
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

191 Excellent

About Catbird

  • Rank
    Footballguy
  • Birthday 12/14/1950

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    New Mexico

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I don't think its that those guys will create an elite TE, but that Fant has shown that he might be one and has been held back by Lock. Saying Denver has maxed out its TE use with Lock seems awfully dismissive.
  2. Fant is just starting his 3rd year and 24. One way or another (Lock improving a lot or, more likely, by FA or draft pick) they are going to have a very different QB in 2022. Assuming Fant is capped at his past level is not a good premise. If they win the Watson sweepstakes or Wilson sees a good situation and makes SEA trade him, Fant's whole world changes. It is hard to envision a TE future with more potential for improvement than a 24 year old kid, coming late to the position who has only had Lock as a QB.
  3. Wilson would make the Bears a LOT more competitive. At some point, when you have all the money ever printed, maybe you just go live where you want to.
  4. Edmonds seems to do better with a lighter load. I think they at least need a complimentary pounding back for the short but necessary yards, even if the guy doesn't have even Drake's talent level. Edmonds could be fantasy productive being the receiving backin that offense and longer yardage back, which might help also with his frequent minor injuries
  5. Just to agree with Gally. SF RBs are top end performers. Whichever guy is playing - and they rely primarily on one at a time - will be a quality producer. The other guys get very little and so are generally waiver-available, but the team understands the modern run game. I think its not favoring a committee that makes the guy playing valuable. Who can be sure if that lasts. This year is seemed that the many injuries took guys out and you knew who was going to perform in the next game. I didn't have Mostert (wish I did), but I picked up Wilson in Week 12 desperation and had to use him in t
  6. Amari is not going unnoticed. You asked which will be the best and that is unequivocally Julio. If you wanted who was 2nd and who 3rd, you should have asked. You won't get that by counting up the votes from the handful of guys that don't know how special Julio is.
  7. I don't know anything, but I seriously doubt the have launched and announced a substantial investigation about Miller over allegations of his personal controlled substance use.
  8. Why compare the second (or third) tier of 2020 rookies to the first tier of 2021 rookies. You'd get more interesting answers pitting top talents to top talents.
  9. The league rules say what is fair and unfair. I think you should use every legal option to compete as effectively as you can. I would be amazed if an opponent didn't compete at that level. Change the rule after the year if it allows people more ability to screw with each other's chances than the majority likes. I'm in 5 leagues, no other ownership overlap. 2 are re-draft and 3 dynasty. They all have prizes still to be won while the playoffs wind down and/or simultaneous losers brackets. None of them have any limit on who can pick up players under the same waiver system we use all year thr
  10. Because he's their best player? Because although your fanatsy team may no longer have anything to play for, NFL teams don't go out on the field trying to lose.
  11. Oops. I misread your first post. I can see your frustration with the guy, but in dynasty I always think you keep the future front and center in any trade, along with what you really think your odds are of winning with or without the trade. I have too little idea of his roster and chances to say much more than that. Apologies for mid-understanding.
  12. If I were almost a championship team but with Kittle out and a need at TE, I still wouldn't trade the 1/1 for Goedert - and I am a Goedert fan. The 1/1 and 1/2 are potential roster changers. A top 5-7 TE is not. I would look for another way to fix the TE situation, maybe giving up my 1.12 and 2nd rounder for a solid TE (knowing Kittle was my future at the position). Giving a best in draft pick up for Goedert in dynasty wouldn't be in my plans.
  13. If colleges don't play at least a fair number of games, the players will be slower to develop, but will still be the same players physically and talent-wise once they get pro coaching and pro action under their belt - in some cases less to unlearn. So the value of the draft class will be about the same, but it will he harder to spot who will be the achievers and who won't.That means a harder task to be right on picks, but also a higher chance of getting a better player than you expected. It probably hurts good drafters some and helps the odds for poorer drafters.There still will be tape on mos
×
×
  • Create New...