Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Dave Stauff

Members
  • Content Count

    652
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

35 Excellent

About Dave Stauff

  • Rank
    Footballguy
  • Birthday 06/27/1949

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    DStauff
  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Keizer, OR

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    All Teams

Recent Profile Visitors

3,920 profile views
  1. Sure, but where in the draft? They only have one pick at the top of each round until 2 comps at the end of Round 5. How high a priority can an additional RB be in their grand scheme?
  2. Been at this game a long time, but I don't remember one worse: I was offered Adam Humphries and a 2021 2nd for Hopkins. Scored out at 2966-183 on the dynasty trade calculator I use. Some people weren't meant to play this game . . .
  3. Anyone have access to how Vegas is setting lines differently? I would think they've given this a lot of thought and research . . .
  4. This kool-aid has been in my refrigerator a long time now. Think I'll pour myself a glass . . .
  5. You gotta be happy . . . even if it is chalky.
  6. I'd take Akers but I hoard RB's (took him at 1.06 in 2 drafts). Honestly, if you take Lamb ar 1.05 and 1.06 takes Akers, are you happy pairing Jeudy with Lamb for the next 10 years - I'd guess yes. So for me it comes down to how scarce RB's are in your league and whether you have any confidence in picking the right one at 1.08. Then again, in one of my drafts, Ruggs went at 1.04 - something unpredictable like that could happen and you might have two RB's to choose from at 1.05. I also think your question about value at this time next year begs the other question of shelf life - you take th
  7. Give me Lamb over Jeudy here . . . clearer path to WR1 in a couple years . . . Lamb Jeudy Reagor - 1st year impact Ruggs - won't be taking this guy unless he falls a long way, but could be #1 target in LV Jefferson - if he gets 2/3 of Diggs in 1st year don't be surprised. Aiyuk - love his upside Pittman - what are we to make of Paris Campbell? Higgins - lady in waiting until Green departs?? Shanault - health is the only thing that will keep him from significance, but it's a large risk Mims - not sure what to make of this one - some question his
  8. Not to belabor the discussion, but we're talking two guys who will be lucky to see the field on Sunday (Smith may not even hold down the Saint's WR3 spot) vs. the #5 QB in this league on an average points per game played basis. I too looked at the DTC, but I believe the eye test serves me better here.
  9. Just took over an orphaned team in an 8 year old dynasty. My first day in the system was offered J. Brissett and Tre'Quan Smith for Drew Brees. Oof!
  10. See Colts at 25-1, tied with Pitt and LAC for 12th on the list . . . there's a glimmer there.
  11. "People have the wrong idea of who he is as a person," said one general manager. "The issue, instead, is that Beckham isn't a good fit with quarterback Baker Mayfield." What do you Browns insiders make of this statement? An indictment of Mayfield's ability to take advantage of Beckham's enormous talent, some personality disorder on Beckham's part that discourages Mayfield from targeting him, or an NFL GM blowing smoke rings out his ####? Just a curious statement to me . . .
  12. Does this news resurrect the Gronkowski rumors?
  13. If I'm reading this correctly, you currently have the 40th pick and your next pick is 81. A lot happens, so I'd be evaluating what's likely to be my option at 81 on. Seems QB is out of the question right now - too expensive and too old (and the early draft picks are gone). You're going to have to be creative at TE, but on the ADP I checked, Fant slotted in at 82. For me it's RB or WR and I see a whole bunch of the WRs you listed all bunched in the same area (around pick 40). Taking it a step further, for me it's RB as the dropoff gets steep. You might get Conner (85) or Guice on your nex
  14. Won't you be forced to draft situation instead of talent? Not that this is all bad, but counting on a couple rookies without any track record in a final season is ambitious to say the least . . .
×
×
  • Create New...