Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Bamac

FBG Apps Beta Tester
  • Content Count

    1,558
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bamac

  1. Personally i have never seen wr/wr drafting work at winning a league, and in this thread seems some people when wr/wr/wr. reminds me of the talking heads that are always excited about going heavy wr early, then half way through the season they are out of it because their rbs are waiver wire fodder while streaming qbs.*every hipster podcast* "Really like demaryius this week and playing him alongside julio and jeffrey in one of my leagues." "Oh yeah how are you doing in that league?" "Last place in points with 2 wins but man my team is so good it makes no sense..." lol I'm 9-1, first in points.
  2. I'll gladly play the dope. Benched him for FJax and Reggie Bush. If I were an underdog, I might've rolled the dice on Foster.
  3. Gordon likes country.https://twitter.com/josh_gordonxii/status/510222764138315776
  4. It was either the rule at the time of your test or it wasn't. But we already know that's not the agreement. Six months before the agreement vs eight months before is arbitrary.
  5. Do they lose a year off the contract? I thought he had to be eligible for eight weeks. play 6 games, you get credited for the year Cool. Don't know where I got 8.
  6. Do they lose a year off the contract? I thought he had to be eligible for eight weeks.
  7. Not laughing at you, but :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Cases take forever when both sides want them to move quickly. With Gordon dragging his heels, no chance there's a result on the DWI in 2014.
  8. Browns have week 4 bye, so wouldn't be back til week 10. Rotoworld on top of it, as usual.
  9. On topic: Bovada has lowered the payout for betting against Gordon playing this year. Plays again: -400 Doesn't: +250 (was +300) Sharks were betting better than 25% Gotdon doesn't play.
  10. It's a bookmark on my desktop. But I'll still bill you for a quarter hour.Plus another .25 for that post.
  11. Pretty sure you're wrong. Feel free to follow up with the law. I am confident that even outside those states the laws only refer to possession, sale, cultivation, and sale of paraphernalia. Just get us the facts though and educate everyone. http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr/21usc/844.htm21 u.s.c. section 844. Thanks for doing the legwork.
  12. You do realize its legal in several states. When the Feds legalize it let me know. Pretty sure its not breaking any federal laws if you use it in a state where its legal. There, now you know. Pretty sure you're wrong.
  13. Things were moving forward. Any major disruption can only have a negative effect.
  14. As well as they should....To go retro is a stupid bad decision. Wow, did Josh Gordon steal your dog or something? What do you have against the kid? Easy..he continually violates the terms of his employment and uses illegal drugs and many of you want to make him some kind of a cult figure..This is exactly what is currently wrong with our society, nobody wants to infuse personal responsibility in anyone...Oh he's not a bad kid, he is just misunderstood, lets give him another break...This kid needs to learn a lesson or it will end a lot worse for him than a 1 year suspension from a kids game
  15. https://www.change.org/p/mike-florio-let-josh-gordon-play# :lmao:
  16. Getting a TRO for an arbitration award is not easy. Why would the burden be low, in favor of the person requesting it? There's been an award pursuant to an agreement to arbitrate, and the standard for overturning that award is quite high. Arrrrggghhhh. Now that the p-word has emerged this has gone /threadWe've covered 2/3 of Webster's. Was a matter of time.
  17. Can't have an epic thread without manufactured debate over the existence of (G/g)od(s).
  18. To be fair, I was grossly exaggerating how easy it would be to show irreparable harm. But I still think it would be quite easy.
  19. 2 -- assuming it's not conceded -- would be one of the easiest showings ever made in a courtroom. A first-year law student at University of Phoenix Online would have no trouble winning that one.How so? If he ultimately won the lawsuit, he could win damages in the amount of his salary for the year.He's saying that it would be an easy argument for Gordon's side to show irreparable harm. Gordon stands to lose a year's salary, and will be one more year further removed from free agency. He can never earn that money back. His career will be cut one year short. Thus irreparable harm. I understand wh
  20. 2 -- assuming it's not conceded -- would be one of the easiest showings ever made in a courtroom. A first-year law student at University of Phoenix Online would have no trouble winning that one.
  21. Agree on all points. The only debatable question is whether a state could enforce such a law if it existed. I suspect it could, but it's not obvious. This is tangential, but not irrelevant to Gordon, as some have speculated that state law may offer Gordon protections that the league did not afford him. I'm pretty sure that's a misreading of Ohio law, but I can't say I've done enough research to know.
×
×
  • Create New...