pinequick

If you would, expand on your thought process with Hurts a little... because if you are right (that he won't pan out and now is the time to move him), I'll bet that you could get WAY more than you paid for him. My take is that all arrows are pointing up on him right now. I definitely would take him off your hands. Tell me why I shouldn't.

It would probably be more complicated than what is is worth, but I've always thought about having "home field advantage" where the home team gets to dictate the lineup of their home games, like this: 1. Ground and pound: QB, RB, RB, RB, WR, TE, TE, K, D 2. Spread: QB, RB, WR, WR, WR, WR, TE, K, D 3. Standard: QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, WR, TE, K, D So the home team AND the visitor have to set the same style of lineups, whichever one that the home team chose. You could play to your team's advantages or play to your opponent's disadvantages. Hell of a headache for the commish to m

#math

Frost from Nebraska talks about "the dangers (for athletes) of not being around the program" or some such. Sooooo... are they kicking athletes out of the football program this fall if the school plays no games? Could the school not continue the monitoring/accountability that would supposedly keep these athletes "safer" during the season, even if they don't play games? Why is it this notion of, "we have to play, or the athletes will all go out and get sick"? Sort of telling if you ask me.