Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Rayderr

Members
  • Content Count

    29,230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

508 Excellent

About Rayderr

  • Rank
    Footballguy
  • Birthday 09/15/1972

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    THE Columbus, Ohio

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Oakland Raiders

Recent Profile Visitors

14,332 profile views
  1. Biggest crime is the person recording the fight in vertical mode.
  2. I just came here to post this! I hate this commercial so much. Probably because I haven't heard a pitcher referred to as a Rembrandt once during the thousands of baseball games I've listened to or have watched in my life. I SURE AS #### HAVE HEARD IT IN THIS COMMERCIAL A MILLION TIMES THOUGH!!! Really, all these ads where they compare their to something completely irrelevant. This GMC truck is alike a pitcher who paints the corners, this Chrysler is like Katniss, this Mazda is like the guy who changed how to do the high jump, this Chase banking acccount is like Serena Williams' double back
  3. Because I'm a believer of science. over 2,000 peer reviewed studies have shown that GMOs are safe (as opposed to 0 peer reviewed studies that show GMOs to be harmful to us) A higher percentage of scientists agree that GMOs are safe than agree on vaccines don't cause autism and climate change is man made. That's great and all as far as the GMO seed itself is concerned. What about the actual herbicide, in this case RoundUp? Safe for the environment? Carcinogenic? Residues on the food we eat? I'm asking because I don't know. Isn't RoundUp what The Commish was posting about? to him, they
  4. Because I'm a believer of science. over 2,000 peer reviewed studies have shown that GMOs are safe (as opposed to 0 peer reviewed studies that show GMOs to be harmful to us) A higher percentage of scientists agree that GMOs are safe than agree on vaccines don't cause autism and climate change is man made. link? Link And if you're interested in reading them, here's over 400 of them.
  5. yeah, i spent a few days arguing with him over what was behind chemtrails. i piled on link after link of relevent information attempting to have a reasonable discussion of facts but to no avail. all i got in return was blind denial of anything opposing his viewpoint, and demands for real ... PROOF !!! after a while i just figured i was just being fished and gave up trying. You posted conspiracy drivel. I responded with links (with actual scientific content) that countered what you posted.
  6. Because I'm a believer of science. over 2,000 peer reviewed studies have shown that GMOs are safe (as opposed to 0 peer reviewed studies that show GMOs to be harmful to us) A higher percentage of scientists agree that GMOs are safe than agree on vaccines don't cause autism and climate change is man made.
  7. WHAT WAS FOUND?! And actually found, not some quack's interpretation of it.
  8. Do you really think that a person who believes HIV is harmless and doesn't cause AIDS is a good medical reference? The guy you are attacking isn't the one doing the science and investigation. He reported it. As I said, it would probably be more productive to look at what was found in the FOIA request First, you didn't answer the question. Second, Don't get upset with me. You're the one that brought him into this conversation. You could've just linked the FOIA info, but you chose to link to an article by, and let's be honest here, a quack (and I think I'm being kind in the use of that term)
  9. Do you really think that a person who believes HIV is harmless and doesn't cause AIDS is a good medical reference? The guy you are attacking isn't the one doing the science and investigation. He reported it. As I said, it would probably be more productive to look at what was found in the FOIA request First, you didn't answer the question. Second, Don't get upset with me. You're the one that brought him into this conversation. You could've just linked the FOIA info, but you chose to link to an article by, and let's be honest here, a quack (and I think I'm being kind in the use of that term)
  10. Do you really think that a person who believes HIV is harmless and doesn't cause AIDS is a good medical reference? The guy you are attacking isn't the one doing the science and investigation. He reported it. As I said, it would probably be more productive to look at what was found in the FOIA request The one(s) doing the "science and investigation" here are Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff Love the ending line.
  11. Do you really think that a person who believes HIV is harmless and doesn't cause AIDS is a good medical reference? The guy you are attacking isn't the one doing the science and investigation. He reported it. As I said, it would probably be more productive to look at what was found in the FOIA request First, you didn't answer the question. Second, Don't get upset with me. You're the one that brought him into this conversation. You could've just linked the FOIA info, but you chose to link to an article by, and let's be honest here, a quack (and I think I'm being kind in the use of that term)
  12. Do you really think that a person who believes HIV is harmless and doesn't cause AIDS is a good medical reference?
×
×
  • Create New...