Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

KChusker

Members
  • Content Count

    484
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

240 Excellent

1 Follower

About KChusker

  • Rank
    Footballguy

Previous Fields

  • Favorite NFL Team
    Kansas City Chiefs

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Of Washington/Saints/Bucs, which is most likely to have a 2017 Jaguars, 2018 Bears or 2019 49ers/Steelers type breakout and dominance--not just a streamer Wondering if in dynasty better to grab one of those as a possible trade chip or take a deep shot on a RB/WR instead
  2. No, no. This is their year I swear. Especially after their offseason AFC West Championship streak was just broken this summer. It just means things are changing (as in going from under achievers to cellar dwellers) Seriously though I like the Eagles this week. Colts too but that's obvious. Avoid NE: Miami can play Under the radar: Titans if Sutton sits maybe. You could do worse
  3. I agree on the ADI for affirmative action Vegetarians are usually associated with being tree hugging progressives from my experience (not that they should be)
  4. I don't want to support Trump especially in a swing state. I despise him. Even as a really moderate Republican for small government/2nd amendment/pro capitalism reasons I wrote in Mitt Romney/voted down ballot Red in 2016 and by Democrat standards I don't hate Biden. He's a decent guy and relatively moderate. But when his side believes me to be inferior and seeks to deprive me of opportunity solely on the basis of my race (Asian) I see no other choice. And then throw in Kamala being that close to being president Still genuinely undecided between Trump and just voting down ballot but
  5. Certainly could Ideally they'd fire Gase and give Darnold a real coach But if they are in a position to take a top 3 QB maybe not Either way though unless Darnold goes full Trubisky I think he will be fine Even if the Jets take a QB, Darnold has shown enough to get traded to a team looking for their QB of the future but not picking high enough to draft one (Colts, Saints. Steelers, Bucs)--may even be better for him in the long run Even Rosen who was way worse with a comparable supporting cast got a 2nd chance (before he sucked there too)
  6. Bad in the 1st round Good after that--though I agree the Seahawks have had some crappy drafts lately and that is going to hurt them big in these last prime years of Wilson
  7. Fair enough. Rosen was considered pro ready but I don't think anyone wanted to throw in a guy considered to have issues with mobility/being a statue being the Cardinals OL. Sam Bradford sucking so much he had to be cut after 3 games pressed the issue I do agree that the Gruden bit was an issue. He is better than Wilks in a vacuum but should have been fired before last year if they were set on Haskins or they should just not have picked Haskins and listened to Gruden I just don't think Tua is the type of prospect you pass on though when your QB hasn't shown anything yet. Jos
  8. You can play this same excuse game with Rosen--who had an even worse supporting cast in the 2018 Cardinals (IMO the worst NFL team of the last few years-worse than the 0-16 Browns) and a way worse head coach in Steve Wilks (Gruden was definitely better than that guy) Hitting on a QB is more important than anything else I really doubt the Cardinals are regretting taking Kyler over Bosa because they "only" got a 2nd for Rosen (who is now worthless) Admittedly I never liked Haskins as a prospect. Thought he was a late 2nd/early 3rd rounder propped up by playing at Ohio State. Certa
  9. I mean if we are being honest: them picking Tua would have meant Dwayne getting traded. Taking Tua and then dealing him in camp for less than the number 2 pick would have been a real Adam Gase move
  10. I still can't believe they didn't pick Tua and dump selfie man for whatever random 2nd or 3rd they could have gotten. I really thought Rivera had the guts to do it Might take the Cardinals having some success for teams to realize finding a legit QB>>>all I bet they're sure regretting passing on "generational" Bosa and having him and Chandler Jones dominate up front only to go 3-13 every year because Rosen sucks 🙄
  11. I think the division is the weakest in football wide open for the taking BUT If I were a Lions fan I'd be totally good with bottoming out and getting rid of Fatty P ...as opposed to going 8-8, finishing one game out of a playoff spot and bringing him back With that said, the roster looks too good to be to truly bottom out if Stafford stays healthy
  12. And now that I think about it: the Redskins D wouldn't as formidable without Chase Young. I guess they can still get their QB next year--or Haskins can improve. That's still an option I guess
  13. Colts are going to be the waiver pick up top 5 defense this year IMO. Easy strength of schedule--which is a common denominator in breakout defenses (Bears two years ago, 49ers+Bills last year), and the Buckner addition is going to be huge If they are off, I think the Redskins will be a diet version of them with how dominant their front 7 looks (most important factor for a fantasy defense), and the toughness and experience brought by proven minds like Rivera and Jack Del Rio. If Haskins can simply not be terrible I think this is a sleeper team with an outside shot to be th
×
×
  • Create New...