Faust said:
Little bit of wrong in the article:
1) Lets get this out on the table: In 2013 (one year ago), Foles threw for 27 TDs, 2 INTs, and rushed for 3 more TDs. The young man was 24 at the time. I am a 40 year-old man who is a lifelong Jets fan. During my lifetime the best years for a Jets QB have been a a 29/7 year for Vinny and a 25/8 year by Ken O'Brien...beyond those two, the Jets landscape has been smattered by 16/17 years for decades. Understand, what Foles pulled off is a 1 in 20 year phenomena for me.
2) "Good luck building a contender paying Nick Foles over $10 million a year" - Well, unless I am getting a winning QB on his rookie contract, any bonafide starting QB in the NFL commands $15 million plus per year. The other good ones are on their rookie contracts. If we can get a "normal" (and I can't understate "normal") QB for north of $10 million a year, sign me up every day of the week.
3) Roster status - Really? Not in bad shape? It is pretty piss poor in general. The O-Line needs guards, desperately. We could also use some depth there in general. Well, we do need a QB, and likely a RB...these are relatively small holes to fill until you realize your secondary is a hot mess. We are talking two CB, and one Safety territory, not to mention a rushing OLB. We do not have the picks to add 7-8 starters...we will have holes.
I love the optimism, but do not see what the author is seeing.