What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

10-team, 2QB leaguers ... (1 Viewer)

burd

Footballguy
Every Mock Draft or player ranking I see out there is based on the 1QB league setup, which is fine since that's what most leagues use. But I'm in two leagues that use 2QBs and i'm trying to predict as to how other owners draft in the first two rounds. Obviously, incorporating 2QBs makes the few great QBs even more valuable. Does anyone w/ experience in 10-team, 2QB leagues have any experience as to how the other teams draft? Obviously, someone will take Manning in the 1st round, but I'm also thinking that Palmer, Brees and maybe even Brady will be gone by the end of the first or early 2nd round since they have more value (IMO) than a Ronnie Brown or Cadillac Willaims. Is there a trend that any of you have seen? thanks!

 
Every Mock Draft or player ranking I see out there is based on the 1QB league setup, which is fine since that's what most leagues use. But I'm in two leagues that use 2QBs and i'm trying to predict as to how other owners draft in the first two rounds. Obviously, incorporating 2QBs makes the few great QBs even more valuable. Does anyone w/ experience in 10-team, 2QB leagues have any experience as to how the other teams draft? Obviously, someone will take Manning in the 1st round, but I'm also thinking that Palmer, Brees and maybe even Brady will be gone by the end of the first or early 2nd round since they have more value (IMO) than a Ronnie Brown or Cadillac Willaims. Is there a trend that any of you have seen? thanks!
It really just depends on your league. I have one league where all four of the QBs you mention will most likely be gone by 2.2. Another league I am in will probably only see Manning and maybe one other QB go in the first. Look at your league's drafting history to give you an idea on how things might go.
 
You can set up the Draft Dominator for a 2QB starting lineup and then run through a handful of automated mocks to get a sense of things. Have you given that a try yet? In the most basic sense, think of it as decreasing the baseline value of QBs, ergo increasing their X-values.

 
Does anyone w/ experience in 10-team, 2QB leagues have any experience as to how the other teams draft?
I've been playing in a 10-team start 2 QB league for ten+ years. Based on data from the last four drafts, here is an average of how the first few rounds have gone with respect to position:Round 1:QB: 2 SelectedRB: 8 SelectedWR: 0 SelectedRound 2:QB: 2 selected (4 total)RB: 7 Selected (15 total)WR: 1 Selected (1 total)Round 3:QB: 2.5 selected (6.5 total)RB: 4.5 selected (19.5 total)WR: 3 selected (4 total)Round 4:QB: 2 selected (8.5 total)RB: 4 selected (23.5 total)WR: 4 selected (7 total)*TE's may start to go in this round, but I rounded up the numbersRound 5:QB: 4 selected (12.5 total)RB: 2 selected (25.5 total)WR: 4 selected (11 total)*TE's may go in this round, but I rounded up the numbersFYI - we play a few flex positions, which is why RB's go pretty quickly. Also, the 20th QB usually gets selected by round 10, so after round 5 about one or two QB's go each round until everyone has two on their roster, some may have three and others have one, but hopefully these numbers give you a starting pontHTH
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone w/ experience in 10-team, 2QB leagues have any experience as to how the other teams draft?
I've been playing in a 10-team start 2 QB league for ten+ years. Based on data from the last four drafts, here is an average of how the first few rounds have gone with respect to position:Round 1:QB: 2 SelectedRB: 8 SelectedWR: 0 SelectedRound 2:QB: 2 selected (4 total)RB: 7 Selected (15 total)WR: 1 Selected (1 total)Round 3:QB: 2.5 selected (6.5 total)RB: 4.5 selected (19.5 total)WR: 3 selected (4 total)Round 4:QB: 2 selected (8.5 total)RB: 4 selected (23.5 total)WR: 4 selected (7 total)*TE's may start to go in this round, but I rounded up the numbersRound 5:QB: 4 selected (12.5 total)RB: 2 selected (25.5 total)WR: 4 selected (11 total)*TE's may go in this round, but I rounded up the numbersFYI - we play a few flex positions, which is why RB's go pretty quickly. Also, the 20th QB usually gets selected by round 10, so after round 5 about one or two QB's go each round until everyone has two on their roster, some may have three and others have one, but hopefully these numbers give you a starting pontHTH
My leagues also use 2 Flex players so they sound like they're pretty much in line w/ your league. I didn't consider the Flex player's affect on the draft. I expected more QBs to go early but like you said, the extra flex positions make RB's as valuable as in a 1QB league. thanks for the info ... very helpful!
 
Here's a post I made in another thread a couple of weeks ago:

I've been in a ten team, start 2 QB league since 2001 (that was around for years before) with the following QB scoring: 1 pt/20 yds pass, 4 pts/TD, 5 pt bonus over 300 yds, -1 (or -2; it has changed) for an INT. For what it's worth, here's how the past five years have gone in terms of cumulative number of players taken by the end of each of the first five rounds:

2006

9 RB, 1 QB (Round 1)

14 RB, 3 QB, 3 WR (Round 2)

16 RB, 5 QB, 9 WR (Round 3)

18 RB, 9 QB, 13 WR (Round 4)

19 RB, 15 QB, 16 WR (Round 5)

2005

8 RB, 2 QB

15 RB, 3 QB, 2 WR

17 RB, 7 QB, 6 WR

19 RB, 11 QB, 10 WR

22 RB, 14 QB, 14 WR

2004

7 RB, 3 QB

12 RB, 4 QB, 4 WR

16 RB, 9 QB, 5 WR

18 RB, 14 QB, 8 WR

19 RB, 15 QB, 16 WR

2003

10 RB

14 RB, 3 QB, 3 WR

18 RB, 7 QB, 5 WR

18 RB, 13 QB, 9 WR

20 RB, 15 QB, 15 WR

2002

4 RB, 4 QB, 2 WR

12 RB, 5 QB, 3 WR

13 RB, 11 QB, 6 WR

17 RB, 12 QB, 11 WR

20 RB, 15 QB, 15 WR

AVERAGES:

Round One 7.6 RB, 2 QB, 0.4 WR

Round Two 13.4 RB, 3.6 QB, 3 WR

Round Three 16 RB, 7.8 QB, 6.2 WR

Round Four 18 RB, 11.8 QB, 10.2 WR

Round Five 20 RB, 14.8 QB, 15.2 WR

Overall, it's still pretty imperative that you get the stud RBs early, but you also don't want to let the QB run pass you by. You can still do well getting your QBs in Round 4 or later (I did last year), but it's a lot riskier to wait that long.

 
Here's a post I made in another thread a couple of weeks ago:I've been in a ten team, start 2 QB league since 2001 (that was around for years before) with the following QB scoring: 1 pt/20 yds pass, 4 pts/TD, 5 pt bonus over 300 yds, -1 (or -2; it has changed) for an INT. For what it's worth, here's how the past five years have gone in terms of cumulative number of players taken by the end of each of the first five rounds:20069 RB, 1 QB (Round 1)14 RB, 3 QB, 3 WR (Round 2)16 RB, 5 QB, 9 WR (Round 3)18 RB, 9 QB, 13 WR (Round 4)19 RB, 15 QB, 16 WR (Round 5)20058 RB, 2 QB15 RB, 3 QB, 2 WR17 RB, 7 QB, 6 WR19 RB, 11 QB, 10 WR22 RB, 14 QB, 14 WR20047 RB, 3 QB12 RB, 4 QB, 4 WR16 RB, 9 QB, 5 WR18 RB, 14 QB, 8 WR19 RB, 15 QB, 16 WR200310 RB14 RB, 3 QB, 3 WR18 RB, 7 QB, 5 WR18 RB, 13 QB, 9 WR20 RB, 15 QB, 15 WR20024 RB, 4 QB, 2 WR12 RB, 5 QB, 3 WR13 RB, 11 QB, 6 WR17 RB, 12 QB, 11 WR20 RB, 15 QB, 15 WRAVERAGES:Round One 7.6 RB, 2 QB, 0.4 WRRound Two 13.4 RB, 3.6 QB, 3 WRRound Three 16 RB, 7.8 QB, 6.2 WRRound Four 18 RB, 11.8 QB, 10.2 WRRound Five 20 RB, 14.8 QB, 15.2 WROverall, it's still pretty imperative that you get the stud RBs early, but you also don't want to let the QB run pass you by. You can still do well getting your QBs in Round 4 or later (I did last year), but it's a lot riskier to wait that long.
i totally see the majority of owners going RB in round 1. I'm kind of surprised that the majority of owners are going RB in round 2 though since the quality of RB is dimished at that point in the draft. Again, i'm just looking at it from the point of "there are only so many QBs to go around and very few are studs" and I'd tend to be inclined to pick up a Brees or Bulger in Round 2 instead of say a Jamal Lewis or Magahee because i'd think that there'd be a huge run on QBs, but apparently I am mistaken. thanks for the info!
 
Here's a post I made in another thread a couple of weeks ago:I've been in a ten team, start 2 QB league since 2001 (that was around for years before) with the following QB scoring: 1 pt/20 yds pass, 4 pts/TD, 5 pt bonus over 300 yds, -1 (or -2; it has changed) for an INT. For what it's worth, here's how the past five years have gone in terms of cumulative number of players taken by the end of each of the first five rounds:20069 RB, 1 QB (Round 1)14 RB, 3 QB, 3 WR (Round 2)16 RB, 5 QB, 9 WR (Round 3)18 RB, 9 QB, 13 WR (Round 4)19 RB, 15 QB, 16 WR (Round 5)20058 RB, 2 QB15 RB, 3 QB, 2 WR17 RB, 7 QB, 6 WR19 RB, 11 QB, 10 WR22 RB, 14 QB, 14 WR20047 RB, 3 QB12 RB, 4 QB, 4 WR16 RB, 9 QB, 5 WR18 RB, 14 QB, 8 WR19 RB, 15 QB, 16 WR200310 RB14 RB, 3 QB, 3 WR18 RB, 7 QB, 5 WR18 RB, 13 QB, 9 WR20 RB, 15 QB, 15 WR20024 RB, 4 QB, 2 WR12 RB, 5 QB, 3 WR13 RB, 11 QB, 6 WR17 RB, 12 QB, 11 WR20 RB, 15 QB, 15 WRAVERAGES:Round One 7.6 RB, 2 QB, 0.4 WRRound Two 13.4 RB, 3.6 QB, 3 WRRound Three 16 RB, 7.8 QB, 6.2 WRRound Four 18 RB, 11.8 QB, 10.2 WRRound Five 20 RB, 14.8 QB, 15.2 WROverall, it's still pretty imperative that you get the stud RBs early, but you also don't want to let the QB run pass you by. You can still do well getting your QBs in Round 4 or later (I did last year), but it's a lot riskier to wait that long.
i totally see the majority of owners going RB in round 1. I'm kind of surprised that the majority of owners are going RB in round 2 though since the quality of RB is dimished at that point in the draft. Again, i'm just looking at it from the point of "there are only so many QBs to go around and very few are studs" and I'd tend to be inclined to pick up a Brees or Bulger in Round 2 instead of say a Jamal Lewis or Magahee because i'd think that there'd be a huge run on QBs, but apparently I am mistaken. thanks for the info!
At least from what I have observed in my league, there still is a "Stud RB" mentality that is hard for some owners to overcome. I mean, every magazine list and a majority of internet lists are set up this way or are very similar to that theory. So part of the art of drafting is to take advantage of the knowledge you acquire from other owners actions. True, QB's are just as valuable as RB's are in the early rounds. But sometimes the savvy drafter will "go with the flow" and seize the advantage moment at its best opportunity. So I myself may hold off a round or two later than VBD says that I should in drafting a QB or a 2nd QB. But that is strictly because I have a good idea how the rest of my league is thinking and consequently valuing.
 
MrJimiT said:
burd said:
i totally see the majority of owners going RB in round 1. I'm kind of surprised that the majority of owners are going RB in round 2 though since the quality of RB is dimished at that point in the draft. Again, i'm just looking at it from the point of "there are only so many QBs to go around and very few are studs" and I'd tend to be inclined to pick up a Brees or Bulger in Round 2 instead of say a Jamal Lewis or Magahee because i'd think that there'd be a huge run on QBs, but apparently I am mistaken. thanks for the info!
At least from what I have observed in my league, there still is a "Stud RB" mentality that is hard for some owners to overcome. I mean, every magazine list and a majority of internet lists are set up this way or are very similar to that theory. So part of the art of drafting is to take advantage of the knowledge you acquire from other owners actions. True, QB's are just as valuable as RB's are in the early rounds. But sometimes the savvy drafter will "go with the flow" and seize the advantage moment at its best opportunity. So I myself may hold off a round or two later than VBD says that I should in drafting a QB or a 2nd QB. But that is strictly because I have a good idea how the rest of my league is thinking and consequently valuing.
Where you see the separation in your QB tiers is what is critical. This year, I may be inclined to grab my first QB in Round 2 or early Round 3 (depending on where my pick is) b/c after Manning, Palmer, Brees, Brady, and probably Bulger, I get a little skittish relying on any of the other guys as my QB1 in a 2 QB league. But I haven't really given that a lot of thought yet, and the continued RBBC scene makes me very hesitant to grab an RB2 later than Round 2.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top