Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
I sure hope Obama doesn't day we're safe from dirty bombs or alien attack.
I'll admit I know little about the process. What means, "The amendments were offered to an Obamacare repeal package currently being debated in the Senate"How about if we try to expand background checks and try to prevent people on the terror watch list from purchasing firearms? Maybe it wouldn't have stopped this attack (although it's possible someone on the list purchased some of the weapons for him). But it could help prevent similar attacks in the future, or reduce the firepower available to the terrorist.Unless you have the ability to get rid of all guns in this country, increased background checks, limited round capacity mags, ban on assult weapons (old ones grandfathered in) will change nothing. California has some of the strictest gun control laws and apparently he got the weapon legally (still waiting on full confirmation). California requires a background check for private sales. If that was done, what else do you propose for gun control besides eliminating them?To be fair, gun control could make the ISIS problem a lot worse in the US. It would be hard for ISIS to get weapons from the middle east to the US if there were few guns here. Of course that's not something they need to worry with because it appears that half of the people in this country have armories in their basements for some reason.What is CNN doing? It goes against Obama's agenda. Gun control. Gun control would have prevented this. Back on task.Least surprising news ever
Oh, wait- we did try that. The Republicans voted it down last night.
Imagine that no compromise. Everyone to their corners and buckel down.The Manchin and Feinstein measures went down during a series of votes in which the Democratic proposals were paired with Republican counteroffers that also failed to be adopted by the Senate. All the amendments needed 60 votes to be adopted.
Page 34, guy.Glad to hear this thread has turned into "our president sucks" so quickly.
Indeed it does."pledged loyalty to ISIS"... makes for easy conclusion jumping.
but also from the same CNN article:
A law enforcement official said it appeared that Wednesday's attack -- which left 14 people dead and 21 wounded before the two attackers, Malik and her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, were killed in a shootout with police -- may have been inspired by ISIS. But none of the officials said that ISIS directed or ordered the attack.
.
"This is looking more and more like self-radicalization," a law enforcement official said.
Another official said authorities haven't ruled out that others may have influenced this radical view. In addition, the law enforcement source said investigators have a greater focus on whether the shooting occurred after a workplace issue with religion.
I'm not sure what the "pairing" references. Maybe it was just a reference to the way they were presented? I'm pretty sure each amendment received a vote. Here's the roll call on the terror watch list amendment.I'll admit I know little about the process. What means, "The amendments were offered to an Obamacare repeal package currently being debated in the Senate"How about if we try to expand background checks and try to prevent people on the terror watch list from purchasing firearms? Maybe it wouldn't have stopped this attack (although it's possible someone on the list purchased some of the weapons for him). But it could help prevent similar attacks in the future, or reduce the firepower available to the terrorist.Unless you have the ability to get rid of all guns in this country, increased background checks, limited round capacity mags, ban on assult weapons (old ones grandfathered in) will change nothing. California has some of the strictest gun control laws and apparently he got the weapon legally (still waiting on full confirmation). California requires a background check for private sales. If that was done, what else do you propose for gun control besides eliminating them?To be fair, gun control could make the ISIS problem a lot worse in the US. It would be hard for ISIS to get weapons from the middle east to the US if there were few guns here. Of course that's not something they need to worry with because it appears that half of the people in this country have armories in their basements for some reason.What is CNN doing? It goes against Obama's agenda. Gun control. Gun control would have prevented this. Back on task.Least surprising news ever
Oh, wait- we did try that. The Republicans voted it down last night.
Imagine that no compromise. Everyone to their corners and buckel down.The Manchin and Feinstein measures went down during a series of votes in which the Democratic proposals were paired with Republican counteroffers that also failed to be adopted by the Senate. All the amendments needed 60 votes to be adopted.
It's not that, it's just his timing on the statements were so terrible. He just needs to stop making sweeping statements concerning ISIS. They are a real threat to this country. I get that he's trying to calm people's fears, but these guys are so unpredictable there's no telling what they can do.I will say my biggest fear when it comes to terrorism, and I'm surprised we haven't seen it already in this country, is a car bomb. I mean it seems to be a daily occurrence in the Middle East with somebody setting off a car bomb. All it would take is a few of those going off in some major cities and that would create some real genuine fear in this country.Glad to hear this thread has turned into "our president sucks" so quickly.
Amazing how powerful the NRA is with the R's. They are bought. Win for D's politically though. Probably already making the "Senator ________ voted to allow known terrorists the freedom to buy guns." ads.I'm not sure what the "pairing" references. Maybe it was just a reference to the way they were presented? I'm pretty sure each amendment received a vote. Here's the roll call on the terror watch list amendment.I'll admit I know little about the process. What means, "The amendments were offered to an Obamacare repeal package currently being debated in the Senate"How about if we try to expand background checks and try to prevent people on the terror watch list from purchasing firearms? Maybe it wouldn't have stopped this attack (although it's possible someone on the list purchased some of the weapons for him). But it could help prevent similar attacks in the future, or reduce the firepower available to the terrorist.Unless you have the ability to get rid of all guns in this country, increased background checks, limited round capacity mags, ban on assult weapons (old ones grandfathered in) will change nothing. California has some of the strictest gun control laws and apparently he got the weapon legally (still waiting on full confirmation). California requires a background check for private sales. If that was done, what else do you propose for gun control besides eliminating them?To be fair, gun control could make the ISIS problem a lot worse in the US. It would be hard for ISIS to get weapons from the middle east to the US if there were few guns here. Of course that's not something they need to worry with because it appears that half of the people in this country have armories in their basements for some reason.What is CNN doing? It goes against Obama's agenda. Gun control. Gun control would have prevented this. Back on task.Least surprising news ever
Oh, wait- we did try that. The Republicans voted it down last night.
Imagine that no compromise. Everyone to their corners and buckel down.The Manchin and Feinstein measures went down during a series of votes in which the Democratic proposals were paired with Republican counteroffers that also failed to be adopted by the Senate. All the amendments needed 60 votes to be adopted.
A measure like this shouldn't be something that requires compromise. The public favors it 77%-18%. Even Republicans favor it 76%-20%. I can't recall seeing low-cost legislation with those kind of numbers get voted down before. This was about one thing and one thing only- NRA money.
So you think stricter gun control will keep radical Muslim terrorists from getting guns,How about if we try to expand background checks and try to prevent people on the terror watch list from purchasing firearms? Maybe it wouldn't have stopped this attack (although it's possible someone on the list purchased some of the weapons for him). But it could help prevent similar attacks in the future, or reduce the firepower available to the terrorist.Unless you have the ability to get rid of all guns in this country, increased background checks, limited round capacity mags, ban on assult weapons (old ones grandfathered in) will change nothing. California has some of the strictest gun control laws and apparently he got the weapon legally (still waiting on full confirmation). California requires a background check for private sales. If that was done, what else do you propose for gun control besides eliminating them?To be fair, gun control could make the ISIS problem a lot worse in the US. It would be hard for ISIS to get weapons from the middle east to the US if there were few guns here. Of course that's not something they need to worry with because it appears that half of the people in this country have armories in their basements for some reason.What is CNN doing? It goes against Obama's agenda. Gun control. Gun control would have prevented this. Back on task.Least surprising news ever
Oh, wait- we did try that. The Republicans voted it down last night.
they're both bad.Baloney Sandwich said:Isn't inspired by ISIS acts worse than an actual plot and isn't this the next evolution of terrorism ISIS is actively trying to employ?
I think we have our motive folks.shader said:Least surprising news everWidbil83 said:
Does anyone remember terrorists not using guns to kill large numbers of people in America?Arsenal of Doom said:
But that's the thing about terrorism, is that if you allow yourselves to be terrified they have achieved their motives. And there are politicians who very much want the fears stoked to achieve their goals. The world is a dangerous place. The US is a dangerous place. I'm not sure how much ratcheting up fear does anyone any good, except those who want to sell guns and lead us down a path to Fascism.Courtjester said:It's not that, it's just his timing on the statements were so terrible. He just needs to stop making sweeping statements concerning ISIS. They are a real threat to this country. I get that he's trying to calm people's fears, but these guys are so unpredictable there's no telling what they can do.I will say my biggest fear when it comes to terrorism, and I'm surprised we haven't seen it already in this country, is a car bomb. I mean it seems to be a daily occurrence in the Middle East with somebody setting off a car bomb. All it would take is a few of those going off in some major cities and that would create some real genuine fear in this country.the moops said:Glad to hear this thread has turned into "our president sucks" so quickly.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/12/lynch-warns-against-anti-muslim-backlash-216421#ixzz3tNGee8MJ"The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence," Lynch told a dinner hosted by a Muslim civil rights organization. "My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on."
Granted, guns haven't typically been the weapons of choice for terrorists. The recent attacks in Paris may signal a shift. Particularly for the lone wolf or ISIS/AQ "inspired" type attackers.ETA- we didn't exactly sit on our hands and claim there was nothing we could do when they exploited a weakness in our air travel system.Does anyone remember terrorists not using guns to kill large numbers of people in America?Arsenal of Doom said:
Did that happen? Could swear there was one time...
Yeah wtf. How is this stuff not all in an evidence warehouse somewhere?This is weird, the apartment tour. The baby stuff was pretty sad. The toy they showed is sitting on my kids playroom floor right now.
Looks like they are getting some good shots of the spatula on the stove!!!They are having an open house now in the killers' home? This is bizzare.
How do you not have one cop posted out front telling people to stay out?Apparently newspaper reporters, shocked at what they're seeing, called the FBI to ask if the apartment is open to the media and were told no, that it's still an active investigation site.
Excellent work, everyone.
You mean the FBI is collectively morons. How do you not have two agents sitting outside drinking coffee?Jesus that landlord is a moron.Apparently newspaper reporters, shocked at what they're seeing, called the FBI to ask if the apartment is open to the media and were told no, that it's still an active investigation site.
Excellent work, everyone.
That ship has sailed -- as far as I'm aware, the bulk of terrorist activity since 9/11 has not been centrally planned and delegated down to agents of a traceable enemy.Baloney Sandwich said:Isn't inspired by ISIS acts worse than an actual plot and isn't this the next evolution of terrorism ISIS is actively trying to employ?
She was talking about her greatest fear "as a prosecutor" and per the article she did not address the San Bernardino mass shooting.http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/12/lynch-warns-against-anti-muslim-backlash-216421#ixzz3tNGee8MJ"The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence," Lynch told a dinner hosted by a Muslim civil rights organization. "My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on."
Our US Attorney General wants you to know that dozens of people getting mowed down by terrorists, is in fact not her greatest fear about San Bernardino.
Well, that's understandable.
eta - Losing the American ideal of never judging people by race, ethnicity, or religion is maybe her greatest fear, but oddly enough that's exactly why ISIS is at war with us.
Because they don't need Teddy Bears and treadmills laying around police warehouses? FBI did the house search, they got everything they needed. Plus people are always #####ing about forfeiture methods, anything taken from that house is considered evidence and is now a law enforcement responsibility. Taking anything that doesn't have to do directly with the case is both irresponsible and inefficient.Yeah wtf. How is this stuff not all in an evidence warehouse somewhere?This is weird, the apartment tour. The baby stuff was pretty sad. The toy they showed is sitting on my kids playroom floor right now.
Best post I've read in a thread on terrorism or an incident in a long time.But that's the thing about terrorism, is that if you allow yourselves to be terrified they have achieved their motives. And there are politicians who very much want the fears stoked to achieve their goals. The world is a dangerous place. The US is a dangerous place. I'm not sure how much ratcheting up fear does anyone any good, except those who want to sell guns and lead us down a path to Fascism.Courtjester said:It's not that, it's just his timing on the statements were so terrible. He just needs to stop making sweeping statements concerning ISIS. They are a real threat to this country. I get that he's trying to calm people's fears, but these guys are so unpredictable there's no telling what they can do.I will say my biggest fear when it comes to terrorism, and I'm surprised we haven't seen it already in this country, is a car bomb. I mean it seems to be a daily occurrence in the Middle East with somebody setting off a car bomb. All it would take is a few of those going off in some major cities and that would create some real genuine fear in this country.the moops said:Glad to hear this thread has turned into "our president sucks" so quickly.
Look, I am open minded to the gun debate. I get too academic about it. We have had several multiple shootings here, like 10-20 at a time, here. No one gives a damn nationally. No presidential words, no message board threads, nothing. But it is a big deal.Granted, guns haven't typically been the weapons of choice for terrorists. The recent attacks in Paris may signal a shift. Particularly for the lone wolf or ISIS/AQ "inspired" type attackers.ETA- we didn't exactly sit on our hands and claim there was nothing we could do when they exploited a weakness in our air travel system.Does anyone remember terrorists not using guns to kill large numbers of people in America?Arsenal of Doom said:
Did that happen? Could swear there was one time...
Unreal. You have idiots tromping through the apartment touching stuff with their bare hands on live television.You mean the FBI is collectively morons. How do you not have two agents sitting outside drinking coffee?Jesus that landlord is a moron.Apparently newspaper reporters, shocked at what they're seeing, called the FBI to ask if the apartment is open to the media and were told no, that it's still an active investigation site.
Excellent work, everyone.
She did mention Paris though. So Lynch spoke at a muslim civil rights organization meeting right after San Bernadino and spoke of Paris and backlash against muslims but in no way was she in any suggesting there could be backlash from the SB attacks. Ok.She was talking about her greatest fear "as a prosecutor" and per the article she did not address the San Bernardino mass shooting.http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/12/lynch-warns-against-anti-muslim-backlash-216421#ixzz3tNGee8MJ"The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence," Lynch told a dinner hosted by a Muslim civil rights organization. "My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on."
Our US Attorney General wants you to know that dozens of people getting mowed down by terrorists, is in fact not her greatest fear about San Bernardino.
Well, that's understandable.
eta - Losing the American ideal of never judging people by race, ethnicity, or religion is maybe her greatest fear, but oddly enough that's exactly why ISIS is at war with us.
I agree. This is really outrageous. Unbelievable.Unreal. You have idiots tromping through the apartment touching stuff with their bare hands on live television.You mean the FBI is collectively morons. How do you not have two agents sitting outside drinking coffee?Jesus that landlord is a moron.Apparently newspaper reporters, shocked at what they're seeing, called the FBI to ask if the apartment is open to the media and were told no, that it's still an active investigation site.
Excellent work, everyone.
If it's true that a lot of people were coming and going at the apartment in recent weeks, don't they have to preserve these items meticulously for like fingerprints and DNA? I'm no expert, but I do watch Forensic Files.Because they don't need Teddy Bears and treadmills laying around police warehouses? FBI did the house search, they got everything they needed. Plus people are always #####ing about forfeiture methods, anything taken from that house is considered evidence and is now a law enforcement responsibility. Taking anything that doesn't have to do directly with the case is both irresponsible and inefficient.Yeah wtf. How is this stuff not all in an evidence warehouse somewhere?This is weird, the apartment tour. The baby stuff was pretty sad. The toy they showed is sitting on my kids playroom floor right now.
I'm outraged that you're outraged.I agree. This is really outrageous. Unbelievable.Unreal. You have idiots tromping through the apartment touching stuff with their bare hands on live television.You mean the FBI is collectively morons. How do you not have two agents sitting outside drinking coffee?Jesus that landlord is a moron.Apparently newspaper reporters, shocked at what they're seeing, called the FBI to ask if the apartment is open to the media and were told no, that it's still an active investigation site.
Excellent work, everyone.
What are you guys expecting? A bubble be placed over the house? Landowner was not the culprit and has rights. FBI did the search and seizure, got what they needed, and turned the hoyse back over to the owner. There is nothing there worth anything of value to the case.I consider myself a moderate on gun issues. I've posted this in the gun control threads but I actually worked at the NRA around the time of Waco and the "Jackbooted Thugs" fiasco. Was an interesting time. The problem is that I find it increasingly hard to be a moderate, as the NRA ILA (which is the lobbying arm) has basically taken an intransigent position against ANY legislation that can be interpreted as curtailing access. This has gotten worse over the last 20 years since I left and is out of step with even what the rank and file members typically want.Look, I am open minded to the gun debate. I get too academic about it. We have had several multiple shootings here, like 10-20 at a time, here. No one gives a damn nationally. No presidential words, no message board threads, nothing. But it is a big deal.Granted, guns haven't typically been the weapons of choice for terrorists. The recent attacks in Paris may signal a shift. Particularly for the lone wolf or ISIS/AQ "inspired" type attackers.ETA- we didn't exactly sit on our hands and claim there was nothing we could do when they exploited a weakness in our air travel system.Does anyone remember terrorists not using guns to kill large numbers of people in America?Arsenal of Doom said:
Did that happen? Could swear there was one time...
I don't think our gun control measures will do one thing to help stop ISIS or AQ or any of their little sick splinter groups from attacking and harming us. The TSA was a security measure based on screening every single person who gets on a plane. We obviously don't want that (or NSA data collection which I've largely been against on 4th amendment grounds...) but obviously that's the kind of thing at issue here.
You know how 5 wolves can strip a cow to the bone in three hours? 20 federal agents can process the most complex crime scenes in 24 hours with ease.If it's true that a lot of people were coming and going at the apartment in recent weeks, don't they have to preserve these items meticulously for like fingerprints and DNA? I'm no expert, but I do watch Forensic Files.Because they don't need Teddy Bears and treadmills laying around police warehouses? FBI did the house search, they got everything they needed. Plus people are always #####ing about forfeiture methods, anything taken from that house is considered evidence and is now a law enforcement responsibility. Taking anything that doesn't have to do directly with the case is both irresponsible and inefficient.Yeah wtf. How is this stuff not all in an evidence warehouse somewhere?This is weird, the apartment tour. The baby stuff was pretty sad. The toy they showed is sitting on my kids playroom floor right now.
From what I've read, FBI and Sheriff's office have both told reporters it's a live crime scene and media has not been cleared to enter.I'm outraged that you're outraged.I agree. This is really outrageous. Unbelievable.Unreal. You have idiots tromping through the apartment touching stuff with their bare hands on live television.You mean the FBI is collectively morons. How do you not have two agents sitting outside drinking coffee?Jesus that landlord is a moron.Apparently newspaper reporters, shocked at what they're seeing, called the FBI to ask if the apartment is open to the media and were told no, that it's still an active investigation site.
Excellent work, everyone.What are you guys expecting? A bubble be placed over the house? Landowner was not the culprit and has rights. FBI did the search and seizure, got what they needed, and turned the hoyse back over to the owner. There is nothing there worth anything of value to the case.
then why would anyone think it is important to make the distinction that this Islamic terrorist act was ISIS inspired?That ship has sailed -- as far as I'm aware, the bulk of terrorist activity since 9/11 has not been centrally planned and delegated down to agents of a traceable enemy.Baloney Sandwich said:Isn't inspired by ISIS acts worse than an actual plot and isn't this the next evolution of terrorism ISIS is actively trying to employ?
The US has seen a dramatic drop on gun violence over the past decade or so, from 7/100k in 1993 to 3.6/100k now. So yes, the US is much safer than it has been - that curve continues to go down. (If you compare to the 70s we're hugely safer - horrible numbers back then). And this is with more gun ownership in the US. Really the only place we seem to be less safe is in gun free zones.I really don't think the U.S. is all that dangerous. We don't all work in coal mines or die from diphtheria.
At that point in time, they were just starting to look into the background of the shooters. I don't think she officially wanted to draw any conclusions right then as the FBI was still sorting out a motive.She did mention Paris though. So Lynch spoke at a muslim civil rights organization meeting right after San Bernadino and spoke of Paris and backlash against muslims but in no way was she in any suggesting there could be backlash from the SB attacks. Ok.She was talking about her greatest fear "as a prosecutor" and per the article she did not address the San Bernardino mass shooting.http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/12/lynch-warns-against-anti-muslim-backlash-216421#ixzz3tNGee8MJ"The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence," Lynch told a dinner hosted by a Muslim civil rights organization. "My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on."
Our US Attorney General wants you to know that dozens of people getting mowed down by terrorists, is in fact not her greatest fear about San Bernardino.
Well, that's understandable.
eta - Losing the American ideal of never judging people by race, ethnicity, or religion is maybe her greatest fear, but oddly enough that's exactly why ISIS is at war with us.
Btw, why would she mention Paris but not San Bernardino?
WHY!@#!@#!@#!#@So apparently the landlord let TV news folks into the suspects' apartment and they're just walking around rifling through stuff on air right now.