What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

1st round WRs from 1993-2007 (1 Viewer)

Kitrick Taylor

Footballguy
Took a look at all the first round WRs from 93-07. Just wanted to see outcomes, as we've now had enough time to judge all these players. I'll admit to being very subjective in my judgements (and could be swayed to move a few players), but most were not close calls. I also thought of it from a fantasy football perspective, not a NFL perspective.

I broke them down into three categories.

1. Studs.

2. Middling outcomes. Some players had quality seasons on their resumes, but not enough to consider them a long term stud.

3. Busts.

There were 62 players involved.

11 were studs 17.7%

14 were middling outcomes 22.5%

37 were busts 59.6%

Studs:

Calvin Johnson, Dwayne Bowe, Roddy White, Larry Fitzgerald, Andre Johnson, Reggie Wayne, Plaxico Burress, Torry Holt, Randy Moss, Marvin Harrison, Eric Moulds

Middling Results:

Santonio Holmes, Braylon Edwards, Roy Williams, Lee Evans, Javon Walker, Santana Moss, David Boston, Ike Hilliard, Keyshawn Johnson, Terry Glenn, Joey Galloway, Johnnie Morton, Derrick Alexander, Curtis Conway

Busts:

Ted Ginn, Robert Meachem, Craig Davis, Anthony Gonzalez, Troy Williamson, Mike Williams, Matt Jones, Mark Clayton, Micheal Clayton, Reggie Williams, Michael Jenkins, Rashaun Woods, Charles Rodgers, Bryant Johnson, Donte Stallworth, Ashley Lelie, David Terrell, Koren Robinson, Rod Gardner, Freddie Mitchell, Peter Warrick, Travis Taylor, Sylvester Morris, RJ Soward, Troy Edwards, Kevin Dyson, Marcus Nash, Yatil Green, Reidel Anthony, Rae Carruth, Eddie Kennison, JJ Stokes, Michael Westbrook, Charles Johnson, Thomas Lewis, Sean Dawkins, OJ McDuffie

 
Nice work and very interesting.

I know it's subjective, but i'd put Keyshawn in the stud category. Middling-bump up Eddie Kennison.

Something that would be interesting is to figure out why each bust happened. To draw a conclusion such as: "speed" is a category that's overrated when analyzing WR's, etc.

 
With the exception of the two Colts receivers, 6'2" or better, combined with NOT coming from a school west of LSU seems to be a pretty good common denominator for the best WRs falling into the median of the bell curve.

 
For comparison, I looked at 2nrd round WR to see if there was much difference. Obviously some guys are borderline in each category, but this is how I slotted them . . .

Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7 = 11%

Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17 = 27%

Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38 = 61%

Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7

Isaac Bruce

Muhsin Muhammad

Chad Johnson

Anquan Boldin

Amani Toomer

Chris Chambers

Greg Jennings

Vincent Jackson

Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17

Bobby Engram

Chris Chambers

Frank Sanders

Deion Branch

Darnay Scott

Jabar Gaffney

Antonio Bryant

Peerless Price

Qadry Ismail

Bert Emanuel

Kevin Johnson

Antwaan Randle El

Devery Henderson

Jerry Porter

Sidney Rice

Germane Crowell

Steve Smith NYG

Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38

Dennis Northcutt

Joe Jurevicius

Josh Reed

Jerome Pathon

Vincent Brisby

Todd Pinkston

Reggie Brown

Andre' Davis

Quincy Morgan

Kevin Williams

Jacquez Green

Robert Ferguson

Reche Caldwell

Derrick Mayes

Kevin Lockett

Keary Colbert

Roscoe Parrish

Patrick Johnson

Mark Bradley

Bryan Still

Tim Carter

Tony Simmons

Victor Bailey

Will Blackwell

David Palmer

Bethel Johnson

Tyrone Calico

Ryan Yarborough

Dwayne Jarrett

Sinorice Moss

Darius Watts

Taylor Jacobs

Alex Van Dyke

Chad Jackson

Joey Kent

Kevin Lee

Terrence Murphy

Jimmy Oliver

 
For comparison, I looked at 2nrd round WR to see if there was much difference. Obviously some guys are borderline in each category, but this is how I slotted them . . .

Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7 = 11%

Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17 = 27%

Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38 = 61%

Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7

Isaac Bruce

Muhsin Muhammad

Chad Johnson

Anquan Boldin

Amani Toomer

Chris Chambers

Greg Jennings

Vincent Jackson

Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17

Bobby Engram

Chris Chambers

Frank Sanders

Deion Branch

Darnay Scott

Jabar Gaffney

Antonio Bryant

Peerless Price

Qadry Ismail

Bert Emanuel

Kevin Johnson

Antwaan Randle El

Devery Henderson

Jerry Porter

Sidney Rice

Germane Crowell

Steve Smith NYG

Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38

Dennis Northcutt

Joe Jurevicius

Josh Reed

Jerome Pathon

Vincent Brisby

Todd Pinkston

Reggie Brown

Andre' Davis

Quincy Morgan

Kevin Williams

Jacquez Green

Robert Ferguson

Reche Caldwell

Derrick Mayes

Kevin Lockett

Keary Colbert

Roscoe Parrish

Patrick Johnson

Mark Bradley

Bryan Still

Tim Carter

Tony Simmons

Victor Bailey

Will Blackwell

David Palmer

Bethel Johnson

Tyrone Calico

Ryan Yarborough

Dwayne Jarrett

Sinorice Moss

Darius Watts

Taylor Jacobs

Alex Van Dyke

Chad Jackson

Joey Kent

Kevin Lee

Terrence Murphy

Jimmy Oliver
I think a lot of the middling guys on your list are closer to being busts for FF purposes. Randle El, Gaffney, and Henderson in particular have never really been that useful.

 
Nice work and very interesting. I know it's subjective, but i'd put Keyshawn in the stud category. Middling-bump up Eddie Kennison. Something that would be interesting is to figure out why each bust happened. To draw a conclusion such as: "speed" is a category that's overrated when analyzing WR's, etc.
I'll leave that stuff to wdcrob and ZWK. Those guys are taking it to a whole new level. As for Kennison, I'd agree he's borderline. 13 years in the league, but only 2 over 1000 yards, and one of those two was a 2td year. It also took him 9 years to hit the 1000 yards. I'd think if you were a dynasty owner, you'd have likely cut him during one of his 5 seasons with less than 600 yards.Keyshawn pretty borderline too. Lots of WR2 seasons.
 
For comparison, I looked at 2nrd round WR to see if there was much difference. Obviously some guys are borderline in each category, but this is how I slotted them . . .

Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7 = 11%

Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17 = 27%

Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38 = 61%

Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7

Isaac Bruce

Muhsin Muhammad

Chad Johnson

Anquan Boldin

Amani Toomer

Chris Chambers

Greg Jennings

Vincent Jackson

Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17

Bobby Engram

Chris Chambers

Frank Sanders

Deion Branch

Darnay Scott

Jabar Gaffney

Antonio Bryant

Peerless Price

Qadry Ismail

Bert Emanuel

Kevin Johnson

Antwaan Randle El

Devery Henderson

Jerry Porter

Sidney Rice

Germane Crowell

Steve Smith NYG

Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38

Dennis Northcutt

Joe Jurevicius

Josh Reed

Jerome Pathon

Vincent Brisby

Todd Pinkston

Reggie Brown

Andre' Davis

Quincy Morgan

Kevin Williams

Jacquez Green

Robert Ferguson

Reche Caldwell

Derrick Mayes

Kevin Lockett

Keary Colbert

Roscoe Parrish

Patrick Johnson

Mark Bradley

Bryan Still

Tim Carter

Tony Simmons

Victor Bailey

Will Blackwell

David Palmer

Bethel Johnson

Tyrone Calico

Ryan Yarborough

Dwayne Jarrett

Sinorice Moss

Darius Watts

Taylor Jacobs

Alex Van Dyke

Chad Jackson

Joey Kent

Kevin Lee

Terrence Murphy

Jimmy Oliver
I think a lot of the middling guys on your list are closer to being busts for FF purposes. Randle El, Gaffney, and Henderson in particular have never really been that useful.
Agreed. Steve Smith NYG has been better than WR60 only once in his career. Same with Germane Crowell.

 
OJ McDuffie???

62/800/8

74/900/8

76/950/1

90/1050/7

He was 25-29 yrs old when he turned in these numbers. He holds the record for most receptions in 1 season for a Miami Dolphin and that includes Duper, Clayton, Fryar, and Marshall to name a few. Was he a Pro bowl type, certainly not but he was reliable and solid for many seasons until he damaged his toe and had to retire shortly after he turned 30. Some of those other busts hardly ever took the field or even had 1 season like several of the ones that McDuffie posted up.

 
imo times have changed. WR data ending at 2007 is not as applicable as i'd like for 2013. good thoughts and interesting numbers but i don't know how much stock i'd put in extrapolating to 2013.

 
For comparison, I looked at 2nrd round WR to see if there was much difference. Obviously some guys are borderline in each category, but this is how I slotted them . . . Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7 = 11%Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17 = 27%Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38 = 61% Studs (Or Maybe Regular Fantasy Producers): 7Isaac BruceMuhsin MuhammadChad JohnsonAnquan BoldinAmani ToomerChris ChambersGreg JenningsVincent Jackson Middling Outcomes (Occasional Fantasy Producers): 17Bobby EngramChris ChambersFrank SandersDeion BranchDarnay ScottJabar GaffneyAntonio BryantPeerless PriceQadry IsmailBert EmanuelKevin JohnsonAntwaan Randle ElDevery HendersonJerry PorterSidney RiceGermane CrowellSteve Smith NYG Mostly Busts (Or Not Great Fantasy Options Even If They Played a Fair Amount): 38Dennis NorthcuttJoe JureviciusJosh ReedJerome PathonVincent BrisbyTodd PinkstonReggie BrownAndre' DavisQuincy MorganKevin WilliamsJacquez GreenRobert FergusonReche CaldwellDerrick MayesKevin LockettKeary ColbertRoscoe ParrishPatrick JohnsonMark BradleyBryan StillTim CarterTony SimmonsVictor BaileyWill BlackwellDavid PalmerBethel JohnsonTyrone CalicoRyan YarboroughDwayne JarrettSinorice MossDarius WattsTaylor JacobsAlex Van DykeChad JacksonJoey KentKevin LeeTerrence MurphyJimmy Oliver
I think a lot of the middling guys on your list are closer to being busts for FF purposes. Randle El, Gaffney, and Henderson in particular have never really been that useful.
Thanks for the effort Anarchy. I agree with EBF though. A bit too lenient on some of the guys. Knocking those three guys down a level leaves this comparison.62 players taken in both the first and 2nd rounds.1st rd studs 11 or 17.7%2nd rd studs 7 or 11.3%1st rd middling 14 or 22.5%2nd rd middling. 14 or 22.5%1st rd busts 37 or 59.6%2nd rd busts 41 or 66.1%A lot closer than I'd have thought between the two rounds. Another observation. Take out the 6 players drafted in the top 3 (Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, Charles Rodgers, Andre Johnson, Keshawn Johnson, Braylon Edwards) the first rd loses 3 studs, 2 middling, and 1 bust. That makes the rest of RD 1 remarkably similar to RD2.
 
OJ McDuffie??? 62/800/874/900/876/950/190/1050/7 He was 25-29 yrs old when he turned in these numbers. He holds the record for most receptions in 1 season for a Miami Dolphin and that includes Duper, Clayton, Fryar, and Marshall to name a few. Was he a Pro bowl type, certainly not but he was reliable and solid for many seasons until he damaged his toe and had to retire shortly after he turned 30. Some of those other busts hardly ever took the field or even had 1 season like several of the ones that McDuffie posted up.
Your right I should move McDuffie to middling.
 
OJ McDuffie??? 62/800/874/900/876/950/190/1050/7 He was 25-29 yrs old when he turned in these numbers. He holds the record for most receptions in 1 season for a Miami Dolphin and that includes Duper, Clayton, Fryar, and Marshall to name a few. Was he a Pro bowl type, certainly not but he was reliable and solid for many seasons until he damaged his toe and had to retire shortly after he turned 30. Some of those other busts hardly ever took the field or even had 1 season like several of the ones that McDuffie posted up.
Your right I should move McDuffie to middling.
No biggie KT, like the thread, had to share some meaningless Miami Dolphins stats :)

 
Another observation. Take out the 6 players drafted in the top 3 (Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, Charles Rodgers, Andre Johnson, Keshawn Johnson, Braylon Edwards) the first rd loses 3 studs, 2 middling, and 1 bust. That makes the rest of RD 1 remarkably similar to RD2.
I think that's going to bend back the other way a little bit when the Dez/Demaryius/Julio/Green classes are included in the sample.

The 2nd and 3rd round yield a lot of value, but the first round still has an edge. That seems especially true for the really top level guys. I'd say Marshall, VJax, Steve Smith, Boldin, and maybe Cruz are the only current superstar caliber WRs to emerge from outside the first round. Welker would also qualify based on his stats, though I think he's more tied to his system than the others. On the flipside you have Fitzgerald, Andre, Calvin, Thomas, Bryant, Green, Julio, Wayne, Roddy, Harvin, and maybe Crabtree and Nicks flying the flag for the first round.

It's rare for the really special athletes to fall out of the first round. The league snaps up the height/weight/speed freaks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another observation. Take out the 6 players drafted in the top 3 (Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, Charles Rodgers, Andre Johnson, Keshawn Johnson, Braylon Edwards) the first rd loses 3 studs, 2 middling, and 1 bust. That makes the rest of RD 1 remarkably similar to RD2.
I think that's going to bend back the other way a little bit when the Dez/Demaryius/Julio/Green classes are included in the sample. The 2nd and 3rd round yield a lot of value, but the first round still has an edge. That seems especially true for the really top level guys. I'd say Marshall, VJax, Steve Smith, Boldin, and maybe Cruz are the only current superstar caliber WRs to emerge from outside the first round. Welker would also qualify based on his stats, though I think he's more tied to his system than the others. On the flipside you have Fitzgerald, Andre, Calvin, Thomas, Bryant, Green, Julio, Wayne, Roddy, Harvin, and maybe Crabtree and Nicks flying the flag for the first round. It's rare for the really special athletes to fall out of the first round. The league snaps up the height/weight/speed freaks.
It does seem like that will be the case. RD2 has some good players coming too, just not as many or as good. These are the guys from 2008-2011.Jordy NelsonRandall CobbDeSean JacksonTorrey Smith
 
Another observation. Take out the 6 players drafted in the top 3 (Calvin Johnson, Larry Fitzgerald, Charles Rodgers, Andre Johnson, Keshawn Johnson, Braylon Edwards) the first rd loses 3 studs, 2 middling, and 1 bust. That makes the rest of RD 1 remarkably similar to RD2.
I think that's going to bend back the other way a little bit when the Dez/Demaryius/Julio/Green classes are included in the sample. The 2nd and 3rd round yield a lot of value, but the first round still has an edge. That seems especially true for the really top level guys. I'd say Marshall, VJax, Steve Smith, Boldin, and maybe Cruz are the only current superstar caliber WRs to emerge from outside the first round. Welker would also qualify based on his stats, though I think he's more tied to his system than the others. On the flipside you have Fitzgerald, Andre, Calvin, Thomas, Bryant, Green, Julio, Wayne, Roddy, Harvin, and maybe Crabtree and Nicks flying the flag for the first round. It's rare for the really special athletes to fall out of the first round. The league snaps up the height/weight/speed freaks.
It does seem like that will be the case. RD2 has some good players coming too, just not as many or as good. These are the guys from 2008-2011.Jordy NelsonRandall CobbDeSean JacksonTorrey Smith
Do these four strengthen the "situation > talent" argument?

Aaron Rodgers and an Andy Reid-led offense aren't bad places to end up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is part of the reason why I am so against SSOG's strategy which states that no plyer is worth more than 3-4 first round fantasy picks. The risk is too high to trade a guy like Calvin for any amount of draft picks.

 
I'll leave that stuff to wdcrob and ZWK. Those guys are taking it to a whole new level.
Hey, thanks KT. I know someone must be reading this stuff since I can see pageviews, but it's really nice to hear it directly from someone who's enjoying it!

ETA: Here's the intro post on WRs (with links to other intro posts) for people who are curious.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is part of the reason why I am so against SSOG's strategy which states that no plyer is worth more than 3-4 first round fantasy picks. The risk is too high to trade a guy like Calvin for any amount of draft picks.
Forget fantasy picks, it blows my mind that proven commodities in the NFL are even traded for picks.Minny trades away Harvin and uses a first on Cordalle Patterson.NY trades Revis for Dee Milner essentially.The chances that either of those teams that traded away their player will get an equivalent replacement is low. The odds say most likely not.I understand there are other factors, but picks seem overvalued in the NFL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is part of the reason why I am so against SSOG's strategy which states that no plyer is worth more than 3-4 first round fantasy picks. The risk is too high to trade a guy like Calvin for any amount of draft picks.
Forget fantasy picks, it blows my mind that proven commodities in the NFL are even traded for picks.Minny trades away Harvin and uses a first on Cordalle Patterson.NY trades Revis for Dee Milner essentially.The chances that either of those teams that traded away their player will get an equivalent replacement is low. The odds say most likely not.I understand there are other factors, but picks seem overvalued in the NFL.
While I agree, I think the main reasons they were moved are those "other factors" you stated.

-Character. Both players caused big issues on the team from holding out, poor locker room players, etc

-Both players have injury histories

-$$$. It's just like when doing a 3 for 1 FF trade. You have to also value the roster spots gained, but instead $$$.

 
This is part of the reason why I am so against SSOG's strategy which states that no plyer is worth more than 3-4 first round fantasy picks. The risk is too high to trade a guy like Calvin for any amount of draft picks.
Forget fantasy picks, it blows my mind that proven commodities in the NFL are even traded for picks.Minny trades away Harvin and uses a first on Cordalle Patterson.NY trades Revis for Dee Milner essentially.The chances that either of those teams that traded away their player will get an equivalent replacement is low. The odds say most likely not.I understand there are other factors, but picks seem overvalued in the NFL.
While I agree, I think the main reasons they were moved are those "other factors" you stated.

-Character. Both players caused big issues on the team from holding out, poor locker room players, etc

-Both players have injury histories

-$$$. It's just like when doing a 3 for 1 FF trade. You have to also value the roster spots gained, but instead $$$.
Yep, and I'd add age and contract controlled years as well.

 
I think that's going to bend back the other way a little bit when the Dez/Demaryius/Julio/Green classes are included in the sample.

The 2nd and 3rd round yield a lot of value, but the first round still has an edge. That seems especially true for the really top level guys.
This is a good point, with which I agree. It does seem the NFL is doing a better job with their WRs. Nicks, Britt, Harvin, Maclin, Crabtree all from one class is going to alter the numbers greatly. Then Dez, Thomas, followed by Julio, and Green.

In Bruce's rankings, there was only one non-1st round pick in the first two tiers.

 
I think that's going to bend back the other way a little bit when the Dez/Demaryius/Julio/Green classes are included in the sample.

The 2nd and 3rd round yield a lot of value, but the first round still has an edge. That seems especially true for the really top level guys.
This is a good point, with which I agree. It does seem the NFL is doing a better job with their WRs. Nicks, Britt, Harvin, Maclin, Crabtree all from one class is going to alter the numbers greatly. Then Dez, Thomas, followed by Julio, and Green.

In Bruce's rankings, there was only one non-1st round pick in the first two tiers.
Even if you add all these guys the numbers are still pretty bad:

17 Studs (Nicks, Harvin, Dez, DT, Julio, and Green added) 23%

17 Middling (Britt, Maclin, Crabtree added) 23%

39 Busts (DHB and Jon Baldwin added) 53%

Think about that. Even if you combine the studs and middling players into one group, you're still more likely to draft a bust. I understand that players need to be evaluated on a person by person basis, but this does give us insight into the value of future rookie picks.

Also, the WRs from last year (Blackmon, Floyd, Wright, and Jenkins) aren't exactly lighting the world on fire. The only one who was looking like a stud was Johnnie Blacklabel, who could become a Koren Robinson style bust if he doesn't curb his drinking.

Edit to add the busts from those drafts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Even if you add all these guys the numbers are still pretty bad:

17 Studs (Nicks, Harvin, Dez, DT, Julio, and Green added) 24%

17 Middling (Britt, Maclin, Crabtree added) 24%

37 Busts 52%

Think about that. Even if you combine the studs and middling players into one group, you're still more likely to draft a bust. I understand that players need to be evaluated on a person by person basis, but this does give us insight into the value of future rookie picks.
True. DFL ran the numbers a year or two ago and came up with numbers close to this. 50% bust rate for WRs drafted in the first round, and (IIRC) about 45% bust rate for RBs drafted in the first round.

ZWK has done some awesome work using VBD to calculate based on player and draft position. Gives another piece of the puzzle.

 
I appreciate the kind words, Kitrick Taylor & Concept Coop.

When I did a similar analysis of players by position & round (in this spreadsheet, for this post), the top category that I used was 100+ career VBD - 34% of first round WRs (drafted 1993-2006) met that cutoff. "Stud" is a higher standard than that, though. Breaking them down into the categories that I tracked:

34% 100+ VBD

12% 50-99 VBD

25% 1-50 VBD

29% 0 VBD

For round 2 WRs:

14% 100+ VBD

8% 50-99 VBD

24% 1-50 VBD

54% 0 VBD

That's a lot worse.

Round 3 WRs:

12% 100+ VBD

2% 50-99 VBD

13% 1-50 VBD

73% 0 VBD

 
Take this for whatever you think it's worth. I've got 62 WRs who were drafted in the first round between 1999 and 2013. Here are those that qualify using the measurables explained in the links here:

DeAndre Hopkins 2013Justin Blackmon 2012Jonathan Baldwin 2011A.J. Green 2011(1)Dez Bryant 2010Demaryius Thomas 2010Michael Crabtree 2009Hakeem Nicks 2009Kenny Britt 2009Calvin Johnson 2007Dwayne Bowe 2007Santonio Holmes 2006Roddy White 2005Larry Fitzgerald 2004Andre Johnson 2003Charles Rogers 2003Ashley Lelie 2002Reggie Wayne 2001Santana Moss 2001Plaxico Burress 2000David Boston 1999Torry Holt 1999I didn't have AJ Green on this list when he was drafted and I still don't have a good read on his WR type. So you can move him down if you like.

And here are the 1st round WRs that failed to qualify using the same guidelines, along with the reason:

Braylon Edwards 2005Troy Williamson 2005Roy Williams 2004Donte Stallworth 2002David Terrell 2001Travis Taylor 2000These players are eliminated because they're in the Dead Zone on the chart. Note that no one with this body type, including Keenan Allen this year, has been drafted in the first round since 2005.

Jerome Pathon 1998Javon Walker 2002These two are cut out because they caught fewer than 70 balls their last two NCAA seasons. That's not necessarily a deal-killer but it does add risk due to the possiblity of injury problems, disciplinary problems or that the player was performing in a limited role and saw his performance measures inflated as a result. This would be much better broken into games played and receptions/game. But I've got 500 guys I'd have to clean that up for, and other things I want to work on.

Mike Williams 2005Excluded because Williams missed his rookie season and couldn't go back to USC after he lost his lawsuit. Again, not a deal-killer but an added risk.

Koren Robinson 2001Sylvester Morris 2000Dropped because they ran slower than 4.59 at the combine or their pro day. I actually like a cutoff of 4.52(ish) better, but for now I'm not automatically ruling out guys in the 4.53-4.59 range if they qualify otherwise.

Tavon Austin 2013Percy Harvin (RB) 2009Matt Jones (QB) 2005These three are not in the top group because they didn't play a true WR position in college and their receiving measures are either non-existant or goofy as a result of the role they played. Austin is also too small (like Harvin, I won't be surprised if he breaks the model).

Cordarrelle Patterson 2013Michael Floyd 2012A.J. Jenkins 2012Julio Jones 2011Darrius Heyward-Bey 2009Craig Davis 2007Michael Jenkins 2004Reggie Williams 2004Michael Clayton 2004Bryant Johnson 2003Freddie Mitchell 2001Rod Gardner 2001R. Jay Soward 2000Kevin Dyson 1998These players don't qualify because their receiving measures are negative (below average). Until the last few weeks that was automatically a disqualifier. Now that I'm adding explosion to the mix though it looks like there are some players (Julio Jones for sure, and maybe Michael Floyd) that succeed with pretty much any receiving measure due to their overwhelming physical abilities. So going forward he'd probably be included in the top list.

Kendall Wright 2012Jeremy Maclin 2009Robert Meachem 2007Anthony Gonzalez 2007Ted Ginn Jr. 2007Mark Clayton 2005Rashaun Woods 2004Lee Evans 2004Peter Warrick 2000Dennis Northcutt 2000Kevin Johnson 1999Troy Edwards 1999This is a catch all of WRs who are either small and not fast/explosive enough to be elite WRs, who have positive but still not sufficient receiving metrics for their body type, or are 40-yard fast but lack the explosion to go with it.

So tying all this up...fully qualified WRs:

DeAndre Hopkins 2013Justin Blackmon 2012Jonathan Baldwin 2011A.J. Green 2011(1)Dez Bryant 2010Demaryius Thomas 2010Michael Crabtree 2009Hakeem Nicks 2009Kenny Britt 2009Calvin Johnson 2007Dwayne Bowe 2007Santonio Holmes 2006Roddy White 2005Larry Fitzgerald 2004Andre Johnson 2003Charles Rogers 2003Ashley Lelie 2002Reggie Wayne 2001Santana Moss 2001Plaxico Burress 2000(2)David Boston 1999Torry Holt 1999Basically these guys pan out unless they have character problems (Boston, Rogers, Holmes, Britt, Blackmon?). I'd also say that the top two, Blackmon and Hopkins, are really marginal calls. I'm still not sure how to handle WRs like them.

The 'other' list looks like this:

Cordarrelle Patterson 2013Tavon Austin 2013Kendall Wright 2012Michael Floyd 2012A.J. Jenkins 2012Julio Jones 2011Jeremy Maclin 2009Darrius Heyward-Bey 2009Percy Harvin (RB) 2009Robert Meachem 2007Anthony Gonzalez 2007Ted Ginn Jr. 2007Craig Davis 2007Braylon Edwards 2005Troy Williamson 2005Mark Clayton 2005Matt Jones (QB) 2005Mike Williams 2005Roy Williams 2004Rashaun Woods 2004Lee Evans 2004Michael Jenkins 2004Reggie Williams 2004Michael Clayton 2004Bryant Johnson 2003Donte Stallworth 2002Javon Walker 2002David Terrell 2001Freddie Mitchell 2001Rod Gardner 2001Koren Robinson 2001Travis Taylor 2000Peter Warrick 2000Dennis Northcutt 2000R. Jay Soward 2000Sylvester Morris 2000Kevin Johnson 1999What's most interesting to me is that you have nine guys on the top list drafted in the last five years (2009-2013), and thirteen guys drafted in the previous nine years to that (1999-2007). A pretty steady rate around ~1.5 per year. And of the fully qualified WRs that we can say we know something about (leaving off Baldwin, Blackmon and Hopkins) 14/19 have had good or great careers. With the exceptions being almost all character driven.

On the bottom list though... there's a totally different story pre- and post-2009. In the last five years there have been nine players drafted in this group. However, in the previous nine years (1999-2007) there were 28 -- a rate of 3/year, almost double the rate since.

Additionally, the players on the bottom list from the the last five years are better bets, talented players with warts -- like Patterson (a developmental player with insane tools and only one year of D-I ball), Harvin and Austin (who are really more 'non-standard' than 'not qualifying'). I'd also (subjectively) say that even the recent misses are useful -- Maclin and Wright for example. Finally, some of the players on the bottom list don't belong there (Julio Jones, maybe Michael Floyd). There really aren't very many truly terrible picks in the last five years. The only two that really stand out are Heyward-Bey and possibly AJ Jenkins.

So the point of all this?

First, the reasons WRs fail are knowable and don't involve anything mystical. They fail either because they're not good enough at actually doing WR stuff (mostly getting open/creating space for their QB to get them the ball) or they don't have physical tools that allow them to succeed against NFL caliber defensive backs. Or because they're knuckleheads.

Second, the changes in the types of WRs teams are drafting in the first round is very telling IMO. The number of what I call non-qualifying WRs being drafted in the first round has been cut in half in the last 6-7 years, and those that remain are mostly a matter of risk tolerance. My model shuns high risk players, but it's not unreasonable to take the risk if the potential reward is there too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cordarrelle Patterson 2013Michael Floyd 2012A.J. Jenkins 2012Julio Jones 2011Darrius Heyward-Bey 2009Craig Davis 2007Michael Jenkins 2004Reggie Williams 2004Michael Clayton 2004Bryant Johnson 2003Freddie Mitchell 2001Rod Gardner 2001R. Jay Soward 2000Kevin Dyson 1998These players don't qualify because their receiving measures are negative (below average).
In general, I think your approach has merit and is interesting, but this is the part that seems a bit wonky to me. What stats are you using to come up with the receiving measure? Michael Floyd and Reggie Williams each had multiple 1000+ yard seasons in college. Gardner, Jenkins, and Clayton each had at least one big year. If they don't meet the production measure and somebody like Demaryius Thomas does, then I'm guessing that yards per catch and TD rate are part of the equation.

If those are the stats you're emphasizing then I think your WR measure might say more about a prospect's athletic ability than his actual receiving skills. Does someone like Quincy Morgan have a positive receiving score in your system? He had tremendous yardage, YPC, and TD rate numbers in college. He looks like a dynamic receiver on paper, but in reality he was just an athlete with awful innate WR skills. Terrible instincts. Couldn't catch a cold. At the college level being bigger and faster than everyone was enough for him to dominate, but in the NFL his lack of skill was exposed.

Overall, the list of players above just seems like a mixed bag of different risk factors. You've got some athletes with suspect innate WR skills (Patterson, DHB, Gardner). Some great receivers with suspect physical tools (Clayton, Floyd, Williams). Some knuckleheads who might have succeeded if not for off-field issues (Williams, Soward, Mitchell). If the receiving score succeeds in picking out all manners of busts then that's great, but I'm not sure how well it quantifies actual receiving ability so much as it might just be another way of filtering for character issues and athletic deficits.

 
Nice stuff wdcrob, I think you may very well be onto something, but I fear your process may just be the post-hoc fallacy gone haywire. Imo you've got too many exceptions for players based on factors with little reasoning as to why those factors aren't trivial. You say things like "I'm not sure how to treat WRs like them", when it seems clear to me how you treat them depends simply on how their careers are viewed retrospectively.

If I can give any advice, it'd be to not be so afraid of having busts in your "elite" group or studs in your "bust" group. I think you're trying to hard to force it to be perfect, which prediction models can't be, and don't need to be to have significant value.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top