What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

2 Dobermans, 8 Racoons, 30 Squirrels (1 Viewer)

You VS which "blood thirsty" animals - 30 x 30 space - only one of you leaves alive.

  • 2 Dobermans

    Votes: 10 14.1%
  • 8 Racoons

    Votes: 10 14.1%
  • 30 Squirrels

    Votes: 51 71.8%

  • Total voters
    71

Hov34

Eephus's Great Great Great Love Child
You VS which "blood thirsty" animals - 30 x 30 enclosed space - only one of you leaves alive.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pretty sure I'd get my ### beaten by all of them, and get the bonus of death by rabies with the coons...I guess I'd last longest with the squirrels though.

 
Do I have a weapon or just bare hands?  If latter, anyone claiming victory over 2 full grown, angry dobies is out of their mind 

 
Voted 8 Trash Pandas, they’re probably tear me up pretty good but no way I have a chance at catching 30 squirrels 

 
2 Dobermans, easy winner
But these are blood thirst dobermans. If it was just average dobermans, raccoons, and squirrels, then I’d prefer to be in a room with dobermans. But when they are blood thirsty and a fight to the death, I don’t want to deal with 2 dobermans. 

 
But these are blood thirst dobermans. If it was just average dobermans, raccoons, and squirrels, then I’d prefer to be in a room with dobermans. But when they are blood thirsty and a fight to the death, I don’t want to deal with 2 dobermans. 
S2 of The Patriot covers this.

 
I once pulled two pit bulls off my black lab.  Now, I didn't kill them (kinda wanted to).  I voted raccoons though.  I think you could kick them pretty easily.  Just 8 of them.  :shrug:   

 
Least total body weight is probably a good way to go at this:

  • Dobermans - 160-170
  • Racoons - 160-200(+)
  • Squirrels - 30
Seems like an easy choice.

 
The dobermans and raccoons would absolutely tear you up.

The squirrels would be annoying as hell, and while they might take a few small pieces out of your limbs, are stompable as hell - especially at that density in that confined space.

 
The dobermans and raccoons would absolutely tear you up.

The squirrels would be annoying as hell, and while they might take a few small pieces out of your limbs, are stompable as hell - especially at that density in that confined space.
but 30 of them is an awful lot...not sure it would be any better than the dogs and coons

 
Give me the dogs. I need to stun one, find a way to kill the other before the first comes back. 

8 raccoons are the most terrifying. 

30 squirrels would wear you down  

🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿

🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿

🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿

 
It depends if they are small grey squirrerls or like those giant northern fox squirrels.  However, I'm thinking it probably doesn't matter.  They would be like piranahs.  Far too many.

I think the answer is Dobermans.  We have all seen True Lies.  Just do what Arnold did and have them chase you, then slam their heads together, DOUBLE TKO!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless you have a way to kill them all in the first few seconds, your multiplier will be significantly larger than 30.  
That's what I've been thinking about.

I think you get messed up bad no matter what.  But your best chance might be the dogs and hope you can get lucky and disable one quick.  The other options you can't whittle their numbers before you're in bad shape.

 
If I have a weapon of some kind then I'd go with the Dobermans - no weapon, I go with squirrels because they would be the easiest to stun/kill.  I think people overestimate what they are capable of barehanded - I don't see any way to stop the Dobermans - my kicks or punches aren't going to do much of anything to them.  While they are fast as hell, I'm assuming I would be able to get a hold of one of those little squirrel bastards and could crush it's skull.

 
If I have a weapon of some kind then I'd go with the Dobermans - no weapon, I go with squirrels because they would be the easiest to stun/kill.  I think people overestimate what they are capable of barehanded - I don't see any way to stop the Dobermans - my kicks or punches aren't going to do much of anything to them.  While they are fast as hell, I'm assuming I would be able to get a hold of one of those little squirrel bastards and could crush it's skull.
and the other 29?

 
and the other 29?
One at a time - I plan to be taking some good injuries no matter which of the 3 I pick.  I feel I'm less likely to die before I can kill them or get them to stop.  Maybe after I kill a couple of the squirrels the rest stop - the Dobermans and Raccoons are going to be fitting the entire time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The dobermans and raccoons would absolutely tear you up.

The squirrels would be annoying as hell, and while they might take a few small pieces out of your limbs, are stompable as hell - especially at that density in that confined space.
...add that the squirrels could possibly jump up on/run up you and take pieces out of your neck or face (MAYBE your balls if you're wearing shorts). That would be their only chance.

 
Is anyone else confused on how to answer the actual pole?  :unsure:

Couldn't tell if I was picking the easiest or toughest to handle.  Also wasn't sure if it was all of us in one big melee or we just take on one of three options.

Either way, the one I think would be the toughest would be the dobermans.  They are the only ones that have the strength to truly incapacitate a human in a short time.  The other two could cause a lot of flesh wounds, but to the death, I think I kill them before they could kill me.

 
So, this came up on the LeBatard show yesterday when they have Ron Magill (from the Miami Zoo) on to answer "sports" related animal questions.  Someone asked him (an animal expert) this question (might have been one of you knuckleheads).  He without hesitation said he would rather fight the dogs.  His theory was he could maybe snap one of the dogs necks without taking too much damage from the other one and then just have the one to deal with. 

He was adamant about not fighting the squirrels - saying there were too many and all it would be over if one bit or the jugular. And he said the raccoons were nasty with very sharp teeth.

I was like most of you and would have said squirrels, but now I'm not so sure.

 
So, this came up on the LeBatard show yesterday when they have Ron Magill (from the Miami Zoo) on to answer "sports" related animal questions.  Someone asked him (an animal expert) this question (might have been one of you knuckleheads).  He without hesitation said he would rather fight the dogs.  His theory was he could maybe snap one of the dogs necks without taking too much damage from the other one and then just have the one to deal with. 

He was adamant about not fighting the squirrels - saying there were too many and all it would be over if one bit or the jugular. And he said the raccoons were nasty with very sharp teeth.

I was like most of you and would have said squirrels, but now I'm not so sure.
I guess the guy's an animal expert, but I have a hard time believing a squirrel can easily cut my jugular.

I really feel like squirrels would be pretty easy to smash. I'm assuming this fighting room has hard surfaces for the floor and walls. Throwing a squirrel hard into those surfaces or stepping on them or slamming your back into the wall with them on your back would probably do some serious damage.

How easy is it to snap a Doberman's neck? Does that require some special skill/training to do successfully? He's not worried about the other Doberman biting his jugular while he's trying to snap the other one's neck?

 
The dobermans and raccoons would absolutely tear you up.

The squirrels would be annoying as hell, and while they might take a few small pieces out of your limbs, are stompable as hell - especially at that density in that confined space.
Obligatory "altruism" comment. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top