GRIDIRON ASSASSIN
Footballguy
Per Chicago radioJets get #4Bears get BOTH of the Jets first rounders.YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If that's the case then i see Houston getting some very nice offers for #3.The Jets must be making this move to get Dwayne Robertson DT, unless Andre Johnson slides to them at #4
Link to full articleMight as well move up and get 1st round talent for first round money, rather than paying first round $ for 2 people with 2nd round talent.One general manager insisted to ESPN.com that his draft board includes just nine players -- and, no, that isn't a typo -- who have first-round grades. The leaguewide consensus seems to be that there are only about 13-15 players, at the high end, with legitimate first-round grades."The real impact guys run out early," said Washington Redskins personnel director Vinny Cerrato. "Of course, we don't have to worry about it, which is why (wide receiver) Laveranues Coles is looking pretty good to us right now. He's better than any rookie we would have taken and, actually, he didn't cost us that much more than a rookie contract would have."The dearth of true first-rounders means, essentially, that franchises in the second half of the stanza are going to be paying first-round money for a lot of prospects with second-round grades. This is a draft where teams picking in the bottom of the round might be better served dealing their choice and gaining an additional second-rounder in the transaction.From about the Nos. 15-40 point in the draft, there is a legion of players with similar grades. Owners blanch at overpaying for a prospect in the first round, when there are like players available in the second.But to deal back from its original pick, a team requires a dance partner and, surprisingly, there will be some clubs willing to move up. The Raiders, for example, feel there will be teams in the second round anxious to move up into the final two slots in the first round, which Oakland currently holds. The rationale is that some player, like Texas quarterback Chris Simms, will still be on the board, and that a team that wants him won't want to gamble that he will fall to them in the second round.
Yeah, just heard it on ESPN radio. Bears get the Jets 4th round pick too.Is this confirmed?
Boller will have to slip past Baltimore and the only way that's happening is if Leftwich slips past Carolina and Jacksonville.Just got a couple of bets down - Jets to take DT with first pick at 1/1 odds and Bears to select Kyle Boller as their first QB at 10/1.
Great point. Maybe the Jets really, really want one of the WRs and made this move so early to force the Pats' hand. If NE wants Robertson so much, now they have to give up their two first-rounders to get to #3, which then allows Johnson to fall to the Jets (and forces their AFC East rival to burn two first-round picks).I have to think that the Jets would be satisfied with Rogers, Andre Johnson, or Robertson. Otherwise, they did make this trade too early. After all, New England might just be so desperate for Robertson that they'd go ahead and give up both of their first rounders to the Texans or something.
There's no way Baltimore takes Boller at 10. If Leftwich is gone by then, they'll go with their highest-rated player, likely to be Trufant, Gross or Kennedy.Boller will have to slip past Baltimore and the only way that's happening is if Leftwich slips past Carolina and Jacksonville.
Dr. Z at SI seems convinced Baltimore wants Boller if they can't get Leftwich.There's no way Baltimore takes Boller at 10. If Leftwich is gone by then, they'll go with their highest-rated player, likely to be Trufant, Gross or Kennedy.
andThe Ravens are definitely willing to trade down -- but not too far. They don't want to risk losing their guy, Kyle Boller, the QB, whom they don't love at No. 10 but they do farther down. The problem: If they get too cute and drop much lower they might see him taken, so the No. 17 spot would seem just about right for them.
To me it sounds like they really want a QB. Now they might now want to take him at 10, like you said but now with the Bears picking at 12 and possibly looking QB that means if they trade down they are looking at Grossman or nothing and personally I think Grossman as a first rounder is way more of a reach than Boller as the #10 overall.This is part of that three-way trade I projected, you remember? It might not work out this way, but I just wanted to make sure the Ravens got Boller, no matter what the position is. Baltimore really loves Leftwich, though. And Gross.
Robertson, the DT from Kentucky, has really risen the last few weeks and now is rated higher than Suggs by pretty much everyone. Supposedly the Jets'll take whomever of him, Rogers, and Johnson falls to #4. Also some people are saying that Detroit wants to take Newman at 2 so tomorrow should be interesting.Am I missing something? If we assume that Palmer, Rogers and Johnson go with the first 3 picks, then the best players left are Newman and Suggs.
Agreed. Pats will hang on to both 1sts and maybe package a third to move up. If it took two #1s to move from 13 to 4, Pats won't have to drop both to move into the top ten. I see them either staying put, or trading with Minnesota to move into the top ten for the 13th and a third.. Good deal for the Bears. They did it way tooo early though. Now everyone has 24 hours to figure out a fix. Betcha there are some calls to Houston right about now.... :(No way the Pats move up to #3 to ensure Robertson. The main concern of the Pats was that 2 of the top DL fit their current scheme. Robertson and Sullivan. It was pretty much assured that the Jets who drafted just ahead of the Pats at 13 would end up taking Sullivan.Now I think that you will see the Pats stand pat with what then have and deal the 14 and one of their 3rd round picks on draft day to ensure that they land Sullivan. They have 13 picks in this draft and I think it would be a good move.
I have not doubt in my mind that Bill Parcells is on the phone with Houston right now. Although the whole Texas rivalry might put the kybosh on any talks.Agreed. Pats will hang on to both 1sts and maybe package a third to move up. If it took two #1s to move from 13 to 4, Pats won't have to drop both to move into the top ten. I see them either staying put, or trading with Minnesota to move into the top ten for the 13th and a third.. Good deal for the Bears. They did it way tooo early though. Now everyone has 24 hours to figure out a fix. Betcha there are some calls to Houston right about now....No way the Pats move up to #3 to ensure Robertson. The main concern of the Pats was that 2 of the top DL fit their current scheme. Robertson and Sullivan. It was pretty much assured that the Jets who drafted just ahead of the Pats at 13 would end up taking Sullivan.Now I think that you will see the Pats stand pat with what then have and deal the 14 and one of their 3rd round picks on draft day to ensure that they land Sullivan. They have 13 picks in this draft and I think it would be a good move.![]()
Sorry, but I see this as a bad move for the Jets. As others have noted, this draft is very deep at DL anyway, so if that's what they're after, this trade seems completely unneccesary.I like The Man's idea that this is a move made partly to force the Patriots to burn their two picks to get to #3... if that's true, and the Jets really want Robertson anyway, then they get the added bonus of hampering their divisional rival...![]()
Pats would have to burn both firsts anyway. Chicago last week did that when they said that they wanted DeWayne. So the Pats would have to trade with Chicago (or someone higher). That would have costs them both picks. So the Jets didn't tuck it to the Pats with this one. They hurt Dallas more than the Pats. Dallas wants either Robertson or Newman. The Jets can dictate which one Dallas gets. Thats why the Jets moved soo far up. Has to be. Why else move to #4? No one was going to take DeWayne after 8 down to 13 (Jets). They could have traded up to 8 or 9 (they already had a deal with Minnesota to do so) and still landed Dewayne. I think they were looking to get Bill upset.I like The Man's idea that this is a move made partly to force the Patriots to burn their two picks to get to #3... if that's true, and the Jets really want Robertson anyway, then they get the added bonus of hampering their divisional rival...![]()
I don't think this will hamper the Pats at all. If anything it allows them to keep both 1st round picks. I would not be surprised at all to see the Patriots deal the #17 and their second rounder to move up in the top 10. That way they would be ensured of getting the DL that they want, and possible Newman or Truffant.The Pats have picks to burn and I would consider it a coup if they could get Sullivan and Truffant.I like The Man's idea that this is a move made partly to force the Patriots to burn their two picks to get to #3... if that's true, and the Jets really want Robertson anyway, then they get the added bonus of hampering their divisional rival...![]()
Gross and Trufant go Top 10, Bailey goes to the Rams. I'm thinking the Bears grab Sullivan here, though the Pats will try mightily to get ahead of them for him.Is Steinbach worth the #13? I could see the Bears take Boller here, then pick up a quality DT at 22.Johnnathon Sullivan, Jordan Gross, Boss Bailey, Eric Steinbach, Marcus Trufant all could be possible Bears now. Granted, they won't ALL fall, but three of them should be there.
I've been saying this also and couldn't agree more of how much of a coup it would be.I don't think this will hamper the Pats at all. If anything it allows them to keep both 1st round picks. I would not be surprised at all to see the Patriots deal the #17 and their second rounder to move up in the top 10. That way they would be ensured of getting the DL that they want, and possible Newman or Truffant.The Pats have picks to burn and I would consider it a coup if they could get Sullivan and Truffant.
The only "other" reason to make the trade is if they feel Robertson is THE player at DT in the draft and fits their system....They'll go WR in round 2.....You dont' NOT pay Coles and then trade away 2 1st round picks and wind up paying some unknown almost as much as you didn't give Coles.... Otherwise you can lose fans like myself off bridges.I just have a feeling that the Jets are trying to get Johnson, mainly because that's the only reason for making the trade today. They're trying to get Dallas or someone to trade up to #3 to take Robertson. If Robertson was the guy they really wanted, it would make more sense to wait until Chicago was up to make sure he was available. But maybe I'm overthinking this.What worries me as a Jets fan is that they may be overcompensating for losing Coles and feel they need to get a big-time WR. I think they could survive with their current WRs, and that's not how they should be making decisions anyway. In absolute value of the picks, it seems like a decent trade. (The Pick Value Calculator disagrees, though.)Kyle Boller just got a nice raise, huh?
I think you're kidding yourself if you think Sullivan is going to be around at #17, even with the Jets taking Robertson.Seattle, Chicago, San Diego and even KC and New Orleans all pick before 17 and have strong interest in DTs.I don't think this will hamper the Pats at all. If anything it allows them to keep both 1st round picks. I would not be surprised at all to see the Patriots deal the #17 and their second rounder to move up in the top 10. That way they would be ensured of getting the DL that they want, and possible Newman or Truffant.The Pats have picks to burn and I would consider it a coup if they could get Sullivan and Truffant.