Thanks Big Tex! Pettigrew is Bubba Franks IMO, while Casey has the potential to be Dallas Clark.It's floor vs ceiling. JC has a higher ceiling, but Pettigrew's floor is higher at this point.Really surprised the Pett is ranked over Casey. Great rightup though.
Paul Coffman TEI don't recall a Coffman for the Pack in the 80s, who is his dad? Keith?like the Bear writeup
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CoffPa00.htmI don't recall a Coffman for the Pack in the 80s, who is his dad? Keith?
like the Bear writeup
I thought you might catch that!You missed Sperry. Might wanna re-do it; I won't tell.![]()
On the field he has very good athletic ability. Off the field he acts like an ###, and coaches/teammates have questioned his heart because he is such a "me-first" player.
I was wondering about that too. Were those his 10th grade measurements?Not surprised you have Cook low, since you list him at 6'1" 218. Kinda small for a TE no?Combine measurements were 6'5" 246 BTW.![]()
fixed, thanks for that heads up!I was wondering about that too. Were those his 10th grade measurements?Not surprised you have Cook low, since you list him at 6'1" 218. Kinda small for a TE no?Combine measurements were 6'5" 246 BTW.![]()

Cecil Lammey said:fixed, also totally forgot about Sperry...thanks for that heads up!fruity pebbles said:I was wondering about that too. Were those his 10th grade measurements?Not surprised you have Cook low, since you list him at 6'1" 218. Kinda small for a TE no?Combine measurements were 6'5" 246 BTW.![]()
![]()
He certainly could, especially in a goal line situation. The comparison that is tossed around is Mike Vrabel, and it is a somewhat accurate one. Barwin can get after the passer, so I believe most of his playing time will be on defense.any chance Connor Barwin plays TE at the next level?
I was watching the TE drills and was wondering to myself, shouldn't Murtha be out there too. He's really athletic for an O-lineman.He certainly could, especially in a goal line situation. The comparison that is tossed around is Mike Vrabel, and it is a somewhat accurate one. Barwin can get after the passer, so I believe most of his playing time will be on defense.any chance Connor Barwin plays TE at the next level?
I thought maybe GM's would see him as the next Antonio Gates, but maybe that's just me looking for a needle in a hay stack. From his comments after the combine, it seems some teams see him as a TE. Would he crack your rankings if he was a TE only?He certainly could, especially in a goal line situation. The comparison that is tossed around is Mike Vrabel, and it is a somewhat accurate one. Barwin can get after the passer, so I believe most of his playing time will be on defense.any chance Connor Barwin plays TE at the next level?
the next cooley imoI thought maybe GM's would see him as the next Antonio Gates, but maybe that's just me looking for a needle in a hay stack. From his comments after the combine, it seems some teams see him as a TE. Would he crack your rankings if he was a TE only?He certainly could, especially in a goal line situation. The comparison that is tossed around is Mike Vrabel, and it is a somewhat accurate one. Barwin can get after the passer, so I believe most of his playing time will be on defense.any chance Connor Barwin plays TE at the next level?