stiff, straight-line runner, hands arent the most reliable - not that high on him.Demaryius Thomas?Love to see thoughts on him, after you have bottled, fed, burped, changed tar-like poop substance....Congrats Sig!
Nice Job Bloom, i thought i was the only one who liked Dwyer more than Mathews. I think you are right on with Mathews, he will only be as good as his situation. I also agree that this class of RB's remnds me alot of the 2008 class.
One problem i have, isnt Best shorter and heavier than Spiller?

ht and wt arent the guiding attributes here - Best is more high-cut and narrow-hipped like a WR, Spiller has wider hips and thicker legs.Image of BestNice Job Bloom, i thought i was the only one who liked Dwyer more than Mathews. I think you are right on with Mathews, he will only be as good as his situation. I also agree that this class of RB's remnds me alot of the 2008 class.
One problem i have, isnt Best shorter and heavier than Spiller?
Sig I agree 100% with your assessment here. I am intrigued by Best's athleticism but fear he is JNorwood Pt.2 for an NFL team. That same athleticism will likely keep him on many fantasy owners minds year after year as he teases us with bursts of solid play.ht and wt arent the guiding attributes here - Best is more high-cut and narrow-hipped like a WR, Spiller has wider hips and thicker legs.Image of BestNice Job Bloom, i thought i was the only one who liked Dwyer more than Mathews. I think you are right on with Mathews, he will only be as good as his situation. I also agree that this class of RB's remnds me alot of the 2008 class.
One problem i have, isnt Best shorter and heavier than Spiller?
Image of Spiller
Am really hoping that Bloom's opinion here starts holding more and more water.. I have the 1.07 and would LOVE for Bay Bay to be sitting there for me. Here's hoping Bloom is like the WiseGuys who move the initial line in Vegasstiff, straight-line runner, hands arent the most reliable - not that high on him.Demaryius Thomas?Love to see thoughts on him, after you have bottled, fed, burped, changed tar-like poop substance....Congrats Sig!

What scares me the most is his concussion issue and bruised spine(?). Not to mention his lengthy injury history.Sig I agree 100% with your assessment here. I am intrigued by Best's athleticism but fear he is JNorwood Pt.2 for an NFL team. That same athleticism will likely keep him on many fantasy owners minds year after year as he teases us with bursts of solid play.ht and wt arent the guiding attributes here - Best is more high-cut and narrow-hipped like a WR, Spiller has wider hips and thicker legs.Image of BestNice Job Bloom, i thought i was the only one who liked Dwyer more than Mathews. I think you are right on with Mathews, he will only be as good as his situation. I also agree that this class of RB's remnds me alot of the 2008 class.
One problem i have, isnt Best shorter and heavier than Spiller?
Image of Spiller
I am sure baby Miles is well beyond the meconium. He's probably full-on into that green Haz Mat stage. Now THAT poop smells.Not sure if De Thomas smells, but was surprised to see Arrelious Benn so high. Can't recall what the knocks were on Benn, just that there were doubts.Demaryius Thomas?Love to see thoughts on him, after you have bottled, fed, burped, changed tar-like poop substance....Congrats Sig!
I have picks 5 and 6 in the ppr league may take D Thomas and Best with those picks.I am sure baby Miles is well beyond the meconium. He's probably full-on into that green Haz Mat stage. Now THAT poop smells.Not sure if De Thomas smells, but was surprised to see Arrelious Benn so high. Can't recall what the knocks were on Benn, just that there were doubts.Demaryius Thomas?Love to see thoughts on him, after you have bottled, fed, burped, changed tar-like poop substance....Congrats Sig!
That song practically writes itself."Baby on board....something, something, Burt Ward."
Is this the direction of most fantasy football leagues? Is my non-PPR 2 WR league becoming a dinosaur?

Wow, it appears Spiller is thicker everywhere, Best looks like he weighs 175 lb's there. Something is wrong, either that is an old picture, or Bests listed height/weight is wrong.ht and wt arent the guiding attributes here - Best is more high-cut and narrow-hipped like a WR, Spiller has wider hips and thicker legs.Image of BestNice Job Bloom, i thought i was the only one who liked Dwyer more than Mathews. I think you are right on with Mathews, he will only be as good as his situation. I also agree that this class of RB's remnds me alot of the 2008 class.
One problem i have, isnt Best shorter and heavier than Spiller?
Image of Spiller
Doesnt everybody?Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.
Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.
But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
So you're disappointed that someone else has a different opinion on Mathews than you do? That explains a lot.Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
I have Mathews ahead of SpillerDoesnt everybody?Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.
Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.
But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
I would say it explains about the same amount as you coming into all these threads with my posts and making sarcastic comments.I just think the consensus was very disappointed with Dwyer. Then to have Mathews have a great workout and solid pro day.....it doesn't add up.So you're disappointed that someone else has a different opinion on Mathews than you do? That explains a lot.Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
WHOOOOOOAAAA! Stop the presses! You have Matthews ahead of Spiller?!?!?I have Mathews ahead of SpillerDoesnt everybody?Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.
Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.
But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.

REALLY?!?!?! Seriously though, even though you might, i am not sure why it shocks you that Bloom has Spiller ahead of Mathews, since 90% of everyone else does too.I have Mathews ahead of SpillerDoesnt everybody?Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.
Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.
But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
Some people dont put alot of stock into combine numbers. Sure, they were a bit dissappointing, but that doesnt change what he did on the field.I would say it explains about the same amount as you coming into all these threads with my posts and making sarcastic comments.So you're disappointed that someone else has a different opinion on Mathews than you do? That explains a lot.Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.
Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.
But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
I just think the consensus was very disappointed with Dwyer. Then to have Mathews have a great workout and solid pro day.....it doesn't add up.
It's called fore-shortening. :artnerd:Wow, it appears Spiller is thicker everywhere, Best looks like he weighs 175 lb's there. Something is wrong, either that is an old picture, or Bests listed height/weight is wrong.ht and wt arent the guiding attributes here - Best is more high-cut and narrow-hipped like a WR, Spiller has wider hips and thicker legs.Image of BestNice Job Bloom, i thought i was the only one who liked Dwyer more than Mathews. I think you are right on with Mathews, he will only be as good as his situation. I also agree that this class of RB's remnds me alot of the 2008 class.
One problem i have, isnt Best shorter and heavier than Spiller?
Image of Spiller
Edit to add, i found a pic of Best at the combine, its kind of small, but he looks bigger.
http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/0304/pg2_a_bestj_200.jpg
I just rewatched them both at the combine(yes, i DVR'd it), and i would have to say Best looks stockier than Spiller, although its very close.It's called fore-shortening. :artnerd:Wow, it appears Spiller is thicker everywhere, Best looks like he weighs 175 lb's there. Something is wrong, either that is an old picture, or Bests listed height/weight is wrong.ht and wt arent the guiding attributes here - Best is more high-cut and narrow-hipped like a WR, Spiller has wider hips and thicker legs.Image of BestNice Job Bloom, i thought i was the only one who liked Dwyer more than Mathews. I think you are right on with Mathews, he will only be as good as his situation. I also agree that this class of RB's remnds me alot of the 2008 class.
One problem i have, isnt Best shorter and heavier than Spiller?
Image of Spiller
Edit to add, i found a pic of Best at the combine, its kind of small, but he looks bigger.
http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2010/0304/pg2_a_bestj_200.jpg
Both of SPiller's thighs are coming forward. That makes them appear shorter and wider.
yesLove thisIs this the direction of most fantasy football leagues? Is my non-PPR 2 WR league becoming a dinosaur?
and you still have him at 3?and thisNFL Comparison: Jonathan Stewart minus fifth gear with LenDale White conditioning issues
wouldn't that be bad?NFL Comparison: Jerome Bettis with heavier feet
Great work Bloom! Love the analysis and I really appreciate the time and effort you put into your work. Top notch.I think th ppr vs. non-ppr argument is important (maybe not in this thread but...). I'm still in a non-ppr 2WR dynasty league and I think it is far better then my ppr 3 WR league. When ppr became very popular you had RB's dominating fantasy leagues so it made sense to adjust WR scoring to even things out. Today you have more RBBC than before plus fewer "bell cow" RB's and therefore WR's are making a larger and larger impact in the game. Basically, I think ppr overweights WR too much at this point. It's hard to adjust scoring every year due to the changing nature of RB involvement in real football.Max Fischer said:Nice work. The articles and podcasts really help me out each season.I don't mean to hijack the thread away from the analysis, but I'm curious what people think. Clearly, if you listen to The Audible, Bloom has inserted PPR as the new standard in most rankings and analysis (with 3 WR PPR making a push). Is this the direction of most fantasy football leagues? Is my non-PPR 2 WR league becoming a dinosaur?
I think Stewart's size/quicks/strength/instincts combo is rare and special even without a fifth gear - that plus the conditioning issue is why he isn't #1.Bettis had exceptionally light feet for a BIG back. He's pretty much a hall of fame level player. Bettis with heavier feet is still a very good NFL power back.Zoomanji said:yesLove thisMax Fischer said:Is this the direction of most fantasy football leagues? Is my non-PPR 2 WR league becoming a dinosaur?and you still have him at 3?and thisNFL Comparison: Jonathan Stewart minus fifth gear with LenDale White conditioning issueswouldn't that be bad?NFL Comparison: Jerome Bettis with heavier feet
Trust me, you deserve the sarcastic comments. And I have Mathews ahead of Dwyer.ETA: LOL at people hitting you with sarcastic comments right after my post.benson_will_lead_the_way said:I would say it explains about the same amount as you coming into all these threads with my posts and making sarcastic comments.I just think the consensus was very disappointed with Dwyer. Then to have Mathews have a great workout and solid pro day.....it doesn't add up.ConstruxBoy said:So you're disappointed that someone else has a different opinion on Mathews than you do? That explains a lot.benson_will_lead_the_way said:Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
Some put more stock into game film than combine/workout numbers is shorts. Crazy isn't it?benson_will_lead_the_way said:I would say it explains about the same amount as you coming into all these threads with my posts and making sarcastic comments.I just think the consensus was very disappointed with Dwyer. Then to have Mathews have a great workout and solid pro day.....it doesn't add up.ConstruxBoy said:So you're disappointed that someone else has a different opinion on Mathews than you do? That explains a lot.benson_will_lead_the_way said:Pretty disappointed that you have Dwyer ahead of Mathews.Heck even Spiller ahead of Mathews.But Dwyer dropped weight....was out of shape at the combine or didn't show up physically. I think its safe to say he is the least creative runner out of the top 4 RB's. I would put them Best, Spiller, Mathews, Dwyer in those terms. But it's okay Mathews is used to being the underdog and I will gladly take him in every league that I can.
Isn't Felix like 220lbs? I don't think he's in that category of under 200lb backs either...Hi Sigmund,In the future I would not put Chris Johnson and Spiller in the same conversation. I know what you are trying to say but I would use a comparison to Jamal Charles or Jerome Harrison...there a re a lot of these slightly under 200 lb RBs and I think Jamal, Felix, Jerome, and there are others that I call speed backs, he is in line with all those guys but Chris Johnson...no way. I know you said without this and that...I just don't think he is close to CJ here. I did take him witht he 6.05 in PDSL4 so I like him plenty as you do but I wouldn't tell epople he is anything like Chris Johnson.
Listed right at 200 according to Pro Football Reference...he is nowehre near 220 IMHO.Rice, Harrison, Felix, Jamal...I think those guys are all on the speed side and somewhat thinner frames compared to other backs. Doesn't make them inferior but they aren't built for 350 carries either.Isn't Felix like 220lbs? I don't think he's in that category of under 200lb backs either...Hi Sigmund,In the future I would not put Chris Johnson and Spiller in the same conversation. I know what you are trying to say but I would use a comparison to Jamal Charles or Jerome Harrison...there a re a lot of these slightly under 200 lb RBs and I think Jamal, Felix, Jerome, and there are others that I call speed backs, he is in line with all those guys but Chris Johnson...no way. I know you said without this and that...I just don't think he is close to CJ here. I did take him witht he 6.05 in PDSL4 so I like him plenty as you do but I wouldn't tell epople he is anything like Chris Johnson.
Hmmm... On NFL.com he's listed at 6'0 218lbs. Whatever, I get your point but I saw it and thought it looked low... it's a 9% difference. I wonder which one is more accurate and why there's such a discrepancy? Weird.Felix on NFL.comListed right at 200 according to Pro Football Reference...he is nowehre near 220 IMHO.Isn't Felix like 220lbs? I don't think he's in that category of under 200lb backs either...Hi Sigmund,
In the future I would not put Chris Johnson and Spiller in the same conversation. I know what you are trying to say but I would use a comparison to Jamal Charles or Jerome Harrison...there a re a lot of these slightly under 200 lb RBs and I think Jamal, Felix, Jerome, and there are others that I call speed backs, he is in line with all those guys but Chris Johnson...no way. I know you said without this and that...I just don't think he is close to CJ here.
I did take him witht he 6.05 in PDSL4 so I like him plenty as you do but I wouldn't tell epople he is anything like Chris Johnson.
Rice, Harrison, Felix, Jamal...I think those guys are all on the speed side and somewhat thinner frames compared to other backs. Doesn't make them inferior but they aren't built for 350 carries either.
Yeah, and nobody thought CJ was CJ until CJ was CJ.Hi Sigmund,In the future I would not put Chris Johnson and Spiller in the same conversation. I know what you are trying to say but I would use a comparison to Jamal Charles or Jerome Harrison...there a re a lot of these slightly under 200 lb RBs and I think Jamal, Felix, Jerome, and there are others that I call speed backs, he is in line with all those guys but Chris Johnson...no way. I know you said without this and that...I just don't think he is close to CJ here. I did take him witht he 6.05 in PDSL4 so I like him plenty as you do but I wouldn't tell epople he is anything like Chris Johnson.
Seriously though, i think comparing players is always a bad idea, as nobody is ever like anyone else. I dont think Bloom is suggesting Spiller is as good as Chris Johnson, just that his style is similar. Whats wrong with that, Jamal charles and Felix Jones also have a similar style to Johnson. Is Jerome supppose to be Harrison? Im not sure i see the similarties with him.Ive noticed alot of sites dont update the weight of players. NFL.com is not one of them, i would bet any sites that has him at 200 lbs havnt updated thier info since originally putting it in.Hmmm... On NFL.com he's listed at 6'0 218lbs. Whatever, I get your point but I saw it and thought it looked low... it's a 9% difference. I wonder which one is more accurate and why there's such a discrepancy? Weird.Felix on NFL.comListed right at 200 according to Pro Football Reference...he is nowehre near 220 IMHO.Isn't Felix like 220lbs? I don't think he's in that category of under 200lb backs either...Hi Sigmund,
In the future I would not put Chris Johnson and Spiller in the same conversation. I know what you are trying to say but I would use a comparison to Jamal Charles or Jerome Harrison...there a re a lot of these slightly under 200 lb RBs and I think Jamal, Felix, Jerome, and there are others that I call speed backs, he is in line with all those guys but Chris Johnson...no way. I know you said without this and that...I just don't think he is close to CJ here.
I did take him witht he 6.05 in PDSL4 so I like him plenty as you do but I wouldn't tell epople he is anything like Chris Johnson.
Rice, Harrison, Felix, Jamal...I think those guys are all on the speed side and somewhat thinner frames compared to other backs. Doesn't make them inferior but they aren't built for 350 carries either.