2012 In Season Dynasty Trade Thread (1 Viewer)

[BearsFan4Life]

Would love thoughts on: R Mathews for Nicks

I own both and both are frustrating the heck out of me with injuries. I gotta believe Mathews(with a coaching change I hope) will still out perform Nicks.

 

[Skeletore Eh]

16 team .5pprMike Wallacefor Miles Austin

Terrible trade, the Wallace owner should have been able to get Austin plus. Doesn't really make sense

I think the two are fairly close in value to be honest. Not sure why people under-rate Austin.

Regardless of what you think the point still stands. Wallace's market value is much higher which is why the Wallace owner should have been able to get more.

 

[SSOG]

16 team .5pprMike Wallacefor Miles Austin

Terrible trade, the Wallace owner should have been able to get Austin plus. Doesn't really make sense

I think the two are fairly close in value to be honest. Not sure why people under-rate Austin.

Regardless of what you think the point still stands. Wallace's market value is much higher which is why the Wallace owner should have been able to get more.

I have a lot of trouble with discussions of market value. First off, the "market" isn't all dynasty owners in the world, it's all dynasty owners in your league willing to trade. If nobody in your league thinks Wallace will amount to anything without Ben, no amount of expert rankings to the contrary will do the tiniest bit of good. Second off, at the end of the day, the point of any trade should be making your team better, not "getting market value". If, two years ago, you thought Mike Williams TB was a mirage and Demaryius Thomas was a stud, then trade Williams for Thomas, market value be damned. If you can get the Thomas owner to kick in something extra to get closer to market value, then great. If you can't, why on earth should you avoid trading for the player you actually want just because the market says otherwise? If you'd traded for Boldin and Finley, instead, you would have done better according to the market, but you wouldn't have gotten the guy you wanted, and your team would be worse off today.Market value is great in theory, but in dynasty leagues, every player is unique, and if you want that player, you're forced to bargain with an owner who holds a monopoly. In a monopoly, the "market value" is whatever that owner is willing to accept. If team A really liked and wanted Austin, and Wallace was what he cost, and team A decided he was worth that cost, then good for team A. Those values are not egregiously out of whack with conventional wisdom. I don't think we need to be questioning right now how much more or less he could have gotten for Wallace. Context: the Wallace owner in my league has been shopping him all season. Nobody in my league is buying. He offered to send me his Wallace for my Austin, and I declined. I think the two players are comparable in dynasty, but Austin's reliability is a better fit for my current roster makeup, where he serves as a low-risk bye week filler. Plus, I know that in my particular league, the market for Austin is much better than the market for Wallace (as evidenced by the fact that he's still shopping Wallace, and I've had 3 owners inquire about the availability of Austin). Knowing the overall dynasty market is nice (and this thread is extremely helpful in that regard), but knowing your own particular local dynasty market is more important.

 

[r0llin_game]

Team A gaveQB Locker TENRB Morris WASRB Leshoure DETWR Sanders PITTeam B gaveQB Brees NORB Green-Ellis CINRB Jackson STLQR Colston NOObviously Team is in contention this year, Team B is not

In a league I'm trying to get either Brees/Brady and Bree's owner wants a top tier RB, Brady owner wants Demaryius... In light of that trade, must be fkin nice to get Brees AND Colston that cheap.

I am a fringe playoff team in my league and was willing to deal Brady to help build my team into a powerhouse starting next year. The best offer I got was Rivers, Manningham and a late second for him. For that price I will ride him until he retires.

Not to get the thread off track but original offer he sent me was Brady/McGahee for 1st/Crabs/Vince Brown. Didn't want to give up VB, so this in turn, turned him into wanting Demaryius. I know Brady still has value left, but when you can start up to 4 WRs and only 1 QB, there's a select few I would trade a WR1 for, for those QBs.

 

[duaneok66]

16 team .5pprMike Wallacefor Miles Austin

Terrible trade, the Wallace owner should have been able to get Austin plus. Doesn't really make sense

I think the two are fairly close in value to be honest. Not sure why people under-rate Austin.

Regardless of what you think the point still stands. Wallace's market value is much higher which is why the Wallace owner should have been able to get more.

I have a lot of trouble with discussions of market value. First off, the "market" isn't all dynasty owners in the world, it's all dynasty owners in your league willing to trade. If nobody in your league thinks Wallace will amount to anything without Ben, no amount of expert rankings to the contrary will do the tiniest bit of good. Second off, at the end of the day, the point of any trade should be making your team better, not "getting market value". If, two years ago, you thought Mike Williams TB was a mirage and Demaryius Thomas was a stud, then trade Williams for Thomas, market value be damned. If you can get the Thomas owner to kick in something extra to get closer to market value, then great. If you can't, why on earth should you avoid trading for the player you actually want just because the market says otherwise? If you'd traded for Boldin and Finley, instead, you would have done better according to the market, but you wouldn't have gotten the guy you wanted, and your team would be worse off today.Market value is great in theory, but in dynasty leagues, every player is unique, and if you want that player, you're forced to bargain with an owner who holds a monopoly. In a monopoly, the "market value" is whatever that owner is willing to accept. If team A really liked and wanted Austin, and Wallace was what he cost, and team A decided he was worth that cost, then good for team A. Those values are not egregiously out of whack with conventional wisdom. I don't think we need to be questioning right now how much more or less he could have gotten for Wallace. Context: the Wallace owner in my league has been shopping him all season. Nobody in my league is buying. He offered to send me his Wallace for my Austin, and I declined. I think the two players are comparable in dynasty, but Austin's reliability is a better fit for my current roster makeup, where he serves as a low-risk bye week filler. Plus, I know that in my particular league, the market for Austin is much better than the market for Wallace (as evidenced by the fact that he's still shopping Wallace, and I've had 3 owners inquire about the availability of Austin). Knowing the overall dynasty market is nice (and this thread is extremely helpful in that regard), but knowing your own particular local dynasty market is more important.

outstanding post.

 

[menobrown]

I was part of 3 trades this league, all different leagues. All PPR leagues except the league Gonzalez was traded which is a 1.25 TE PPR.Trade 1:Team A gave: Shone GreeneTeam B gave: Daryl RichardsonTrade 2:Team A gave: Jared Cook and Lance KendricksTeam B gave: Tony GonzalezTrade 3:Team A gave: Collin Kaepernick and third round rookie pickTeam B gave: Carson Palmer

I don't see why one would give up Richardson for Greene.

It seems like a good trade to me if you are in playoff contention and don't have an rb2. Richardson has shown flashes but I don't consider him a sure thing.

Exactly. I made the trade to get Greene and did not feel great about as I absolutely prefer Richardson's long term potential but it's still just potential and he could be mired in a RBBC and/or taking a back seat to Pead. For me I have Chris Johnson and a pile of mediocrity as my RB2. Rest of the roster is rock solid. I'm competing for a playoff spot and have a must win game this week with my only decent RB, Chris Johnson, on bye.If this move fails to get me into the playoffs it still has a benefit. This league takes the 6 non-playoff teams and they have a playoff for draft spot. Team I traded with will be one of these 6 so I weakened their roster and improved mine. So bottom line is Greene improved my chances of making playoffs or improving my draft position but if the situations were different I'd be the guy trading Greene for Richardson.

 

[DansRams]

12team ppr

Team A trades

DMac, Dwyer, 2 2013 2nds, 2013 3rd, L Robinson, T Benjamin

Team B trades

A Morris, Royster, SJax, D Richardson, I Pead

 

[KentGraham10]

Team A gets:

J. Stewart

Team B gets:

Gates

 

[FUBAR]

The Trade deadline is today in one of my leagues, so a lot of deals this week:

Cushing, Brian HOU LB for Dunlap, Carlos CIN DE;Suggs, Terrell BAL DE

Smith, Kevin DET RB for 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick

Brown, Ronnie SDC RB;Mathews, Ryan SDC RB;Bennett, Michael TBB DE for Abraham, John ATL DE;Smith, Aldon SFO LB

Kerley, Jeremy NYJ WR; Draft picks - round 2, 3, 4 for Willis, Patrick SFO LB

Green, Virgil DEN TE;Tamme, Jacob DEN TE;Trevathan, Danny DEN LB for Hillis, Peyton KCC RB;Jennings, Rashad JAC RB

Jones, Taiwan OAK RB; Year 2013 Round 6 Draft Pick for Brown, Ronnie SDC RB

Palmer, Carson OAK QB for Timmons, Lawrence PIT LB; Year 2013 Round 5 Draft Pick

Welker, Wes NEP WR for Britt, Kenny TEN WR;Orakpo, Brian WAS LB

Decker, Eric DEN WR;Welker, Wes NEP WR; Year 2014 Round 1 Draft Pick for Charles, Jamaal KCC RB;Jackson, DeSean PHI WR;Bennett, Martellus NYG TE;Babin, Jason PHI DE

Gonzalez, Tony ATL TE;Johnson, Derrick KCC LB for Crabtree, Tom GBP TE;Finley, Jermichael GBP TE;Beason, Jon CAR LB; Year 2014 Round 3 Draft Pick (I received Gonzo and DJ)

Benn, Arrelious TBB WR; Year 2013 Round 6 Draft Pick ;Year 2014 Round 1 Draft Pick for Houston, Justin KCC LB

Sproles, Darren NOS RB;Thomas, Pierre NOS RB for Williams, D.J. GBP TE;Johnson, Leonard TBB CB; Year 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick

McCarthy, Colin TEN LB for Greene, Shonn NYJ RB;Hardy, Greg CAR DE;Chancellor, Kam SEA S; Year 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick

Gore, Frank SFO RB;Johnson, Andre HOU WR;Jones, Jacoby BAL WR;Moss, Randy SFO WR for Charles, Jamaal KCC RB;Crabtree, Michael SFO WR

Foles, Nick PHI QB;Amendola, Danny STL WR;Manningham, Mario SFO WR;Henderson, Erin MIN LB for Whisenhunt, Ken ARI Coach;Thomas, Daniel MIA RB;Edelman, Julian NEP WR;Allen, Dwayne IND TE;Washington, Daryl ARI LB

Dwyer, Jonathan PIT RB;Harvin, Percy MIN WR;Angerer, Pat IND LB for Rice, Sidney SEA WR;Smith, Torrey BAL WR;Beason, Jon CAR LB; Year 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick

 

[Skeletore Eh]

16 team .5pprMike Wallacefor Miles Austin

Terrible trade, the Wallace owner should have been able to get Austin plus. Doesn't really make sense

I think the two are fairly close in value to be honest. Not sure why people under-rate Austin.

Regardless of what you think the point still stands. Wallace's market value is much higher which is why the Wallace owner should have been able to get more.

I have a lot of trouble with discussions of market value. First off, the "market" isn't all dynasty owners in the world, it's all dynasty owners in your league willing to trade. If nobody in your league thinks Wallace will amount to anything without Ben, no amount of expert rankings to the contrary will do the tiniest bit of good. Second off, at the end of the day, the point of any trade should be making your team better, not "getting market value". If, two years ago, you thought Mike Williams TB was a mirage and Demaryius Thomas was a stud, then trade Williams for Thomas, market value be damned. If you can get the Thomas owner to kick in something extra to get closer to market value, then great. If you can't, why on earth should you avoid trading for the player you actually want just because the market says otherwise? If you'd traded for Boldin and Finley, instead, you would have done better according to the market, but you wouldn't have gotten the guy you wanted, and your team would be worse off today.Market value is great in theory, but in dynasty leagues, every player is unique, and if you want that player, you're forced to bargain with an owner who holds a monopoly. In a monopoly, the "market value" is whatever that owner is willing to accept. If team A really liked and wanted Austin, and Wallace was what he cost, and team A decided he was worth that cost, then good for team A. Those values are not egregiously out of whack with conventional wisdom. I don't think we need to be questioning right now how much more or less he could have gotten for Wallace. Context: the Wallace owner in my league has been shopping him all season. Nobody in my league is buying. He offered to send me his Wallace for my Austin, and I declined. I think the two players are comparable in dynasty, but Austin's reliability is a better fit for my current roster makeup, where he serves as a low-risk bye week filler. Plus, I know that in my particular league, the market for Austin is much better than the market for Wallace (as evidenced by the fact that he's still shopping Wallace, and I've had 3 owners inquire about the availability of Austin). Knowing the overall dynasty market is nice (and this thread is extremely helpful in that regard), but knowing your own particular local dynasty market is more important.

One example of players (Williams and Thomas) does not prove a point. Neither does one particular league (yours). I think it's pretty safe to say that Wallace holds much more value than Austin in fantasy circles. Whether you want to look at age (Wallace is two years younger) or production (Wallace has been the more productive wr the past two seasons although they are almost dead even this season) or injury history, Wallace is the more valuable dynasty player. I have a hard time believing the guy who traded Wallace couldn't get a third round pick or a similarly valued player thrown in. Also, if people are discounting Wallace in dynasty circles because of the injury to Ben, I think that is extremely short sighted and presents a great buy low opportunity for Wallace.

 

[joey]

Keep-15, non-ppr, 12 team

Gave: A Morris RB WAS, I Pead RB STL

Got: P Manning QB DEN, A Bradshaw RB NYG

Lost both Big Ben and Cutler to injury last week.

Have opinion to start only 1RB and already have TRIch.

Also have Wilson RB NYG to go with Bradshaw.

In WIN NOW mode sitting in first place and needing a QB for the playoffs.

 

[SSOG]

16 team .5pprMike Wallacefor Miles Austin

Terrible trade, the Wallace owner should have been able to get Austin plus. Doesn't really make sense

I think the two are fairly close in value to be honest. Not sure why people under-rate Austin.

Regardless of what you think the point still stands. Wallace's market value is much higher which is why the Wallace owner should have been able to get more.

I have a lot of trouble with discussions of market value. First off, the "market" isn't all dynasty owners in the world, it's all dynasty owners in your league willing to trade. If nobody in your league thinks Wallace will amount to anything without Ben, no amount of expert rankings to the contrary will do the tiniest bit of good. Second off, at the end of the day, the point of any trade should be making your team better, not "getting market value". If, two years ago, you thought Mike Williams TB was a mirage and Demaryius Thomas was a stud, then trade Williams for Thomas, market value be damned. If you can get the Thomas owner to kick in something extra to get closer to market value, then great. If you can't, why on earth should you avoid trading for the player you actually want just because the market says otherwise? If you'd traded for Boldin and Finley, instead, you would have done better according to the market, but you wouldn't have gotten the guy you wanted, and your team would be worse off today.Market value is great in theory, but in dynasty leagues, every player is unique, and if you want that player, you're forced to bargain with an owner who holds a monopoly. In a monopoly, the "market value" is whatever that owner is willing to accept. If team A really liked and wanted Austin, and Wallace was what he cost, and team A decided he was worth that cost, then good for team A. Those values are not egregiously out of whack with conventional wisdom. I don't think we need to be questioning right now how much more or less he could have gotten for Wallace. Context: the Wallace owner in my league has been shopping him all season. Nobody in my league is buying. He offered to send me his Wallace for my Austin, and I declined. I think the two players are comparable in dynasty, but Austin's reliability is a better fit for my current roster makeup, where he serves as a low-risk bye week filler. Plus, I know that in my particular league, the market for Austin is much better than the market for Wallace (as evidenced by the fact that he's still shopping Wallace, and I've had 3 owners inquire about the availability of Austin). Knowing the overall dynasty market is nice (and this thread is extremely helpful in that regard), but knowing your own particular local dynasty market is more important.

One example of players (Williams and Thomas) does not prove a point. Neither does one particular league (yours). I think it's pretty safe to say that Wallace holds much more value than Austin in fantasy circles. Whether you want to look at age (Wallace is two years younger) or production (Wallace has been the more productive wr the past two seasons although they are almost dead even this season) or injury history, Wallace is the more valuable dynasty player. I have a hard time believing the guy who traded Wallace couldn't get a third round pick or a similarly valued player thrown in. Also, if people are discounting Wallace in dynasty circles because of the injury to Ben, I think that is extremely short sighted and presents a great buy low opportunity for Wallace.

Not because of an injury to Ben, but because Wallace is an UFA and Pitt is unlikely to resign him, which means he won't be playing with Ben any more going forward. And if ever there was a QB who was tailor-made to take advantage of Wallace, it was Ben. You said it yourself- Wallace and Austin are essentially a wash this season. Wallace's situation is about to get a lot worse. Austin's is not. It's not crazy for someone to think they're essentially a wash in dynasty. And you say you can't imagine the other owner not being willing to kick in a third, but (a) I can very easily imagine that to be the case, and as I said, within leagues you're dealing with monopolies, and (b) would the addition of a third really change your opinion of the trade? Even if the third was kicked in, you'd still think the Wallace owner could/should have gotten more.

 

[jeter23]

Made a couple of deals this week. All 12 team PPR

Gave: Welker/Housler

Got: DMoore/Crabtree

Gave: V Davis

Got: Gordon/2014 4th

Gave: Leshoure/Celek/VBrown/20132nd/2013 3rd

Got Hernandez/Gordon

 

[ninerfan]

12 Team PPR Dynasty League

Team A gives: Ryan Mathews

Team B gives: Dwayne Bowe, 2013 2nd

 

[dewmass]

I've just had this accepted. No negotiations, I sent it midweek and he's accepted now, which I why I'm worried but I think its a great deal. Non PPR

I give

J.Stew

Vincent Jackson

Ryan Fitzpatrick

I get

Julio Jones

Its a start 3 RBs and 3 WRS so trading J Stew so soon after I acquired him for a 2nd rounder is a worry as I have nothing at RB3, but the Julio owner is struggling for RBs so I thought I'd try and snag a stud.

 

[Billy Ball Thorton]

You had one. Vincent Jackson is his name

 

[cstu]

You had one. Vincent Jackson is his name

I think it's a very good sell high/buy low.

 

[dewmass]

You had one. Vincent Jackson is his name

I think it's a very good sell high/buy low.

Thats how I viewed it. I figured now was a great time to sell high on Jackson but didn't expect to get Julio Jones with him.

 

[Spin]

I value the opinion of lots of people that post in this thread, as the majority have a good take on trades and dynasty leagues as a whole. Without taking over the thread I'd like to get some of your opinions on this issue: http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=668203

TL/DR: Two owners with a history of lopsided trades, league is upset.

That being said, to contribute, here are a few of the semi impactful trades that happened relatively recently in our league (we have a lot of worthless trades due to our high rosters and ability to trade FABB):

.Spin gave up Bolden, Brandon NEP RB

Team B gave up Butler, Donald SDC LB;Woodyard, Wesley DEN LB; Year 2013 Round 6 Draft Pick from Team B

(This was after week 4, Team B is a Ridley owner)

Team C gave up Thomas, Pierre NOS RB

Team D gave up Bell, Joique DET RB;Pitta, Dennis BAL TE; Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Team E

(This was after the Sproles injury report came out. Initial report said he'd be out a few weeks)

.Spin gave up Avery, Donnie IND WR;Ogletree, Kevin DAL WR

Team E gave up Year 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick from E

.Spin gave up Year 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from .Spin (Will hopefully be late, I'm currently leading the league in points and on cusp of playoff, if I lose next two games it will end up top 4, most points for, with by far the most points against)

Team E gave up Year 2014 Round 1 Draft Pick from Team E (This is team B from the linked thread, always in the bottom 2)

.Spin gave up Year 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Team D;Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Team D;Year 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick from .Spin

Team C gave up Year 2014 Round 1 Draft Pick from Team C;Year 2014 Round 1 Draft Pick from Team D

The F gave up Bradford, Sam STL QB

Team E gave up Cutler, Jay CHI QB;Quick, Brian STL WR; Year 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from Team B

I left my name in my trades. After reading through this thread I was convinced that moving 2013 picks into 2014 picks was the way to go.

 

[Billy Ball Thorton]

You had one. Vincent Jackson is his name

I think it's a very good sell high/buy low.

Jackson may not have the youth but he's every bit as good as Julio minus hype. I have both on various teams but feel more confident. In vj

 

[cstu]

You had one. Vincent Jackson is his name

I think it's a very good sell high/buy low.

Jackson may not have the youth but he's every bit as good as Julio minus hype. I have both on various teams but feel more confident. In vj

That's true but Julio is 6 years younger and not even in his prime yet. When Roddy is gone I expect him to put up top 5 numbers.

 

[Andrew74]

12 team start 1 QB.

I give: Ryan/1st (prob 1.04-1.05)

I get: Brees

We have limited rosters and I wanted to get a sure-fire QB. I still have a 1st left.

Edit: I feel better having Brees but do have that "overpaid" feeling.

 

[I was in the pool]

12 team start 1 QB. I give: Ryan/1st (prob 1.04-1.05)I get: BreesWe have limited rosters and I wanted to get a sure-fire QB. I still have a 1st left.Edit: I feel better having Brees but do have that "overpaid" feeling.

Definitely better when you look at your lineup down the stretch, not a big piece to give up for the upgrade IMO

 

[dewmass]

Another one in my standard scoring league

Team A gives

Dwyer

Rueben Randle

Team B gives

Ben Tate

A. Boldin

 

[thriftyrocker]

12 team ppr

Wallace

for

2013 late 1st

Jeffery

for

Daryl Richardson

Dwyer

for

Pead

TJ Graham

SJax

for

2 2013 3rds

1 2014 3rd

Ben Tate

Cyrus Gray

for

Lamar Miller

Jarrett Boykin

 

[Billy Ball Thorton]

12 team start 1 QB. I give: Ryan/1st (prob 1.04-1.05)I get: BreesWe have limited rosters and I wanted to get a sure-fire QB. I still have a 1st left.Edit: I feel better having Brees but do have that "overpaid" feeling.

I dont know many that would trade Ryan for Brees straight. I know I wouldn't. Not trying to be a #### but I think this is an awful trade.

 

[Andrew74]

12 team start 1 QB. I give: Ryan/1st (prob 1.04-1.05)I get: BreesWe have limited rosters and I wanted to get a sure-fire QB. I still have a 1st left.Edit: I feel better having Brees but do have that "overpaid" feeling.

I dont know many that would trade Ryan for Brees straight. I know I wouldn't. Not trying to be a #### but I think this is an awful trade.

I'm not offended by your being a ####. So you think Ryan has "arrived"?

 

[fbomb]

Last weeekend in a 12 team ppr

Team A (out of playoffs) received: Cutler

Team B (trying to earn playoff spot, just lost Cutler/Big Ben and had Wilson on bye) received: Palmer

 

[SSOG]

12 team start 1 QB. I give: Ryan/1st (prob 1.04-1.05)I get: BreesWe have limited rosters and I wanted to get a sure-fire QB. I still have a 1st left.Edit: I feel better having Brees but do have that "overpaid" feeling.

I dont know many that would trade Ryan for Brees straight. I know I wouldn't. Not trying to be a #### but I think this is an awful trade.

Depends on roster makeup. If I were a contender and a Brees owner (I am, and I am), there's no way in hell I'd trade him for Ryan and a junk first. Brees may be 33, but banners never age.

 

[Andrew74]

12 team start 1 QB. I give: Ryan/1st (prob 1.04-1.05)I get: BreesWe have limited rosters and I wanted to get a sure-fire QB. I still have a 1st left.Edit: I feel better having Brees but do have that "overpaid" feeling.

I dont know many that would trade Ryan for Brees straight. I know I wouldn't. Not trying to be a #### but I think this is an awful trade.

Depends on roster makeup. If I were a contender and a Brees owner (I am, and I am), there's no way in hell I'd trade him for Ryan and a junk first. Brees may be 33, but banners never age.

I am a strong contender and the other guy is bottom barrel. I felt Brees gave me a lock at QB.

 

[cstu]

12 team start 1 QB. I give: Ryan/1st (prob 1.04-1.05)I get: BreesWe have limited rosters and I wanted to get a sure-fire QB. I still have a 1st left.Edit: I feel better having Brees but do have that "overpaid" feeling.

I dont know many that would trade Ryan for Brees straight. I know I wouldn't. Not trying to be a #### but I think this is an awful trade.

Depends on roster makeup. If I were a contender and a Brees owner (I am, and I am), there's no way in hell I'd trade him for Ryan and a junk first. Brees may be 33, but banners never age.

I would do that trade and then trade for Peyton.

 

[Texas989]

I was scared of Amendola being made of glass and really wanted Kaep so I made this trade:

I gave:

Amendola

Parmele

I got:

Broyles

Kaepernick

 

[ConnSKINS26]

Not a big one now, but could be in the future:

Gave:

Andrew Hawkins

Got:

Emannuel Sanders

 

[Sebowski]

12 team PPR

1st (from current #1 seed)

for

Colston

 

[dewmass]

Been targeting Ingram after reading so much about him here. I tried to buy lower, but the owner wouldn't budge. 12 team standard, deep rosters start 3 RBs where I desperately need a RB3

I gave: Mike Williams, 2nd round pick

I received: Mark Ingram.

 

[gadkins]

6 pts for passing td.

I gave Mike Wallace and Shane Veneer for Andrew Luck.

 

[King of the Jungle]

6 pts for passing td.I gave Mike Wallace and Shane Veneer for Andrew Luck.

Love the Luck side. I have him and it require 5 times that amount of value to pry him from me.

 

[finito]

Not a big one now, but could be in the future:Gave:Andrew HawkinsGot:Emannuel Sanders

Really like this one, as I see Hawkins' upside as a decent role player while Sanders *could* nail down a starting gig if Wallace moves on.

 

[BearsFan4Life]

Thoughts on this one:

Give: Lynch

Get: Murray, TSmith

Team getting Lynch in playoffs other team is not

 

[pacman_fl]

12 team PPR (Q, 2R, 3W, 1T, 1R/W/T) - 25 player roster

Team A (strong contender but injuries at RB) - receives AP

Team B (re-building team but still hanging around playoff contention as most teams are) - receives D Murray and Lafell (had AP on bait for 3 weeks)

Team C (strong contender but trade was for the future) - receives Steve Johnson and E. Sanders

Team D (re-building) - receives T. Benjamin, T. Doss, 2013 4th and 2014 1st (early to mid based on past performance)

Several teams in this league trying to acquire 2014 picks (and surely 2015 when those open up with then new league season)

 

[pacman_fl]

16 team IDP/contracts - various starting formations. 3 points QB TDs, 6 for others, PPR leagues. Teams with with 2 worse records:

Team A gets Dalton, Andy CIN QB;Stewart, Jonathan CAR RB;Boykin, Jarrett GBP WR; LaFell, Brandon CAR WR

Team B gets Felix Jones, Sid Rice, 2013 1st for Team B (should be the 1.2)

 

[I was in the pool]

12 team PPR (Q, 2R, 3W, 1T, 1R/W/T) - 25 player rosterTeam A (strong contender but injuries at RB) - receives APTeam B (re-building team but still hanging around playoff contention as most teams are) - receives D Murray and Lafell (had AP on bait for 3 weeks)

Give me AP over Murray regardless of team direction

 

[renesauz]

Greg Jennings for Kaepernick. PPR league with Devys.

 

[donnie baseball]

Traded Stafford and Wallace for Spiller. PPR dynasty, had Ryan, Big Ben, and Stafford. Wallace was my number three behind Calvin and Julio. Other guy was dead set on not trading CJ.

 

[I was in the pool]

Traded Stafford and Wallace for Spiller. PPR dynasty, had Ryan, Big Ben, and Stafford. Wallace was my number three behind Calvin and Julio. Other guy was dead set on not trading CJ.

Apparently not. Outside of a rare case, everyone had their price for a player.

 

[ConnSKINS26]

Win-now move for a bandaid at RB in the event of a RB injury to my playoff team. Not excited about it, but if I need 12 points in a pinch I'll know where to go for the rest of the season.

Gave:

Pierre Thomas

Aldrick Robinson

Got:

Michael Turner

 

[finito]

Thoughts on this one:Give: Lynch Get: Murray, TSmithTeam getting Lynch in playoffs other team is not

I'd take Murray/Smith but I could see it either way.

 

[JPeso]

6 pts for passing td.I gave Mike Wallace and Shane Veneer for Andrew Luck.

Love the Luck side. I have him and it require 5 times that amount of value to pry him from me.

Certainly this must be hyperbole. Even at 2.0 of this amount it's either a overpay for Luck or an undervalue of Wallace.

 

[JPeso]

Win-now move for a bandaid at RB in the event of a RB injury to my playoff team. Not excited about it, but if I need 12 points in a pinch I'll know where to go for the rest of the season.Gaveierre ThomasAldrick RobinsonGot:Michael Turner

That's fine.

 

[JPeso]

Traded Stafford and Wallace for Spiller. PPR dynasty, had Ryan, Big Ben, and Stafford. Wallace was my number three behind Calvin and Julio. Other guy was dead set on not trading CJ.

Got to pony up to buy young studs.