What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2012 In Season Dynasty Trade Thread (2 Viewers)

Just having some fun with you.

Spiller has a ton of upside. Very explosive. No denying that. On the other hand, there's also no denying that he hasn't really proven himself to be a reliable featured back yet. Doesn't mean it won't happen, but it hasn't yet.

Stewart is a good back. Only a few months older than Spiller. I think he is right up there talent wise. Not as explosive, but far bigger and stronger. So for me it's close to a push. Big difference is that the short term opportunity favors Spiller since Jackson is more ancient than DeAngelo Williams.

 
10 team, 1/2 ppr for WR/TE only, rookie/2nd year taxi squad, up to 5 year contracts

I am not involved:

A gave Dez Bryant (5 yr), Andre Johnson (1 yr), A.Hawkins (TS)

B gave Ridley (TS), B.Bolden (TS), Decker (4 yr)

 
Busy week in my 10 idp .5 ppr (1 ppr for te)

Early third rd pick

for

W. Powell

Fitz and a late 2nd rd pick

for

colston

Late first rd pick

For

Tony g.

Late 2nd rd pick

For

alex smith

Gore

for

a. Hernandez and an early 2nd rd pick

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 ppr full dyno

i gave alf, royster, tannehill

i got luck, criner

he also has rg3. both of us are rebuilding

 
Well Tannehill is younger than Cutler and maybe has more upside (though it's probably unlikely that he'll end up being any better).

I'm not sure why a rebuilding team would give up Luck. Seems like a big mistake to me.

Good for you though.

 
This went down today in a 12 team PPR. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 1 TE, and 3 FLEX.

Team A gave: Michael Floyd, Titus Young

Team B gave: Larry Fitzgerald

I had offered Jon Baldwin and a 2013 1st for Fitz just a couple days earlier. A little surprised that Team B rejected that package, but accepted this. :kicksrock:

 
This went down today in a 12 team PPR. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 1 TE, and 3 FLEX.Team A gave: Michael Floyd, Titus YoungTeam B gave: Larry FitzgeraldI had offered Jon Baldwin and a 2013 1st for Fitz just a couple days earlier. A little surprised that Team B rejected that package, but accepted this. :kicksrock:
Trade seems bad enough to make a train take a dirt road... IMO.
 
Two trades I made last week in PPR Dynasty:

I gave up:

Titus Young

Jermaine Greshman

I got:

Michael Vick

Hankerson

AND...

I gave up:

Golden Tate

Jaquizz Rogers

I got:

Desean Jackson

Bryce Brown

I guess I'm an eagles can now?

:confused:

 
12 team Dynasty PPR with TE Bonus

Team A recieves

Donald Brown

Vincent Brown

Robert Houslet

Team B recieves

Shonn Greene

Malcolm Floyd

Antonio Gates

 
Just made this trade. I wrestled with it, but finally caved because I desperately need a RB.

12 Team ppr dynasty. Start 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, 1-2 TE

Gave T. Smith, Fleener, AJ Jenkins, 2013 1st

Got T. Richardson and 2013 3rd

I won this league last year with no RBs. I now have 1. Still have Graham and Tony G at TE and generally start both every week. I just won't have any depth at TE. Top 3250 WRs are Calvin, D. Thomas, and Crabtree.

 
Just made this trade. I wrestled with it, but finally caved because I desperately need a RB.12 Team ppr dynasty. Start 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, 1-2 TEGave T. Smith, Fleener, AJ Jenkins, 2013 1stGot T. Richardson and 2013 3rdI won this league last year with no RBs. I now have 1. Still have Graham and Tony G at TE and generally start both every week. I just won't have any depth at TE. Top 3250 WRs are Calvin, D. Thomas, and Crabtree.
Why did you have to "wrestle with it"? I'd snap my arm in half reaching for the accept button.
 
Just made this trade. I wrestled with it, but finally caved because I desperately need a RB.12 Team ppr dynasty. Start 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, 1-2 TEGave T. Smith, Fleener, AJ Jenkins, 2013 1stGot T. Richardson and 2013 3rdI won this league last year with no RBs. I now have 1. Still have Graham and Tony G at TE and generally start both every week. I just won't have any depth at TE. Top 3250 WRs are Calvin, D. Thomas, and Crabtree.
Pure theft to get Richardson for that. :thumbup:
 
12 team ppr

Marshall

Turbin (to the Lynch owner)

3rd (non-playoff team)

for

Reggie Bush

A. Hernandez

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just made this trade. I wrestled with it, but finally caved because I desperately need a RB.12 Team ppr dynasty. Start 2-3 RB, 3-4 WR, 1-2 TEGave T. Smith, Fleener, AJ Jenkins, 2013 1stGot T. Richardson and 2013 3rdI won this league last year with no RBs. I now have 1. Still have Graham and Tony G at TE and generally start both every week. I just won't have any depth at TE. Top 3250 WRs are Calvin, D. Thomas, and Crabtree.
Pure theft to get Richardson for that. :thumbup:
No kidding
 
10 team ppr starting 2 rb, 2 wr and a flex

my receivers are mediocre(Llyoyd, Austin, Maclin, Crabtree, Cobb, and James Jones)

my rbs are decent right now(Foster, Murray, Ridley, Stewart, Mendenhall)

i gave up Miles Austin and Steve Ridley(also have Brady & Hernandez, so at times starting 4 pats)

and received Dewayne Bowe and Doug Martin.

Hoping for an upside upgrade at WR and consistent contributor at rb without a temperamental coach.

I've made a few other offers with Ridley involved, and found there wan't that much interest.

 
Another trade today with Greg Jennings. 12 team, no PPRTeam A gives: MJD/Jennings/3rdTeam B gives: Harvin/2nd
Seems a lot to pay for Harvin. I do think he is top 5 but still seems like a lot
I'd like to hear what some others think of this.
Depending on roster constructions (contender, 1 year away, total rebuild), I think that's a palatable if underwhelming return for Jones-Drew. In a vacuum, though, I would much, much rather have the MJD/Jennings side.
10 team ppr starting 2 rb, 2 wr and a flexmy receivers are mediocre(Llyoyd, Austin, Maclin, Crabtree, Cobb, and James Jones)my rbs are decent right now(Foster, Murray, Ridley, Stewart, Mendenhall)i gave up Miles Austin and Steve Ridley(also have Brady & Hernandez, so at times starting 4 pats)and received Dewayne Bowe and Doug Martin.Hoping for an upside upgrade at WR and consistent contributor at rb without a temperamental coach.I've made a few other offers with Ridley involved, and found there wan't that much interest.
I'd rather have Ridley than Martin, and I'd rather have Austin than Bowe (although those two are essentially a wash). Solid return if you were determined to sell Ridley (determined sellers can rarely count on getting great value), but I'd prefer the Ridley/Austin side, even if I already owned Brady, Welker, Lloyd, Gronk, Hernandez, Vereen, Bowen, Woodhead, and Gostkowski.
 
i appreciate the thoughts. Just when I was gaining confidence in Ridley, the fumble lost it all. He was already losing most of the goal line touches, and if ball security is a concern, I felt that would only hurt his production more.

 
Another trade today with Greg Jennings. 12 team, no PPRTeam A gives: MJD/Jennings/3rdTeam B gives: Harvin/2nd
Seems a lot to pay for Harvin. I do think he is top 5 but still seems like a lot
I'd like to hear what some others think of this.
Depending on roster constructions (contender, 1 year away, total rebuild), I think that's a palatable if underwhelming return for Jones-Drew. In a vacuum, though, I would much, much rather have the MJD/Jennings side.
I'm a strong contender and we start 1/2/3/1 with 22 man rosters. I've lost a lot of faith/hope in Jennings. The picks should move from back half of 3rd to top half of 2nd. Is your preference b/c you think Jennings can be low end WR1/high end WR2 or that MJD is just worth a significant amount?
 
10 team ppr starting 2 rb, 2 wr and a flexmy receivers are mediocre(Llyoyd, Austin, Maclin, Crabtree, Cobb, and James Jones)my rbs are decent right now(Foster, Murray, Ridley, Stewart, Mendenhall)i gave up Miles Austin and Steve Ridley(also have Brady & Hernandez, so at times starting 4 pats)and received Dewayne Bowe and Doug Martin.Hoping for an upside upgrade at WR and consistent contributor at rb without a temperamental coach.I've made a few other offers with Ridley involved, and found there wan't that much interest.
Id take the martin side. Rookies get off to a slow start sometimes and i believe thats the case w martin. Ridley is coached by the hoodie although he might have more big play ability then martin. Id still go with martin
 
I'm a strong contender and we start 1/2/3/1 with 22 man rosters. I've lost a lot of faith/hope in Jennings. The picks should move from back half of 3rd to top half of 2nd. Is your preference b/c you think Jennings can be low end WR1/high end WR2 or that MJD is just worth a significant amount?
It's not that I'm high on Jennings, although you definitely sold low on him, and I do think he's still a high-end wr2. It's that I'm very high on MJD, especially for a contender, and I think the difference between a third and a second (even a late third and an early second) is, in most drafts, little more than a rounding error. Not in this last year's draft, but next year's draft isn't looking anywhere near as deep. Harvin's a beast, but the upgrade from Jennings to Harvin isn't worth a guy like MJD who will put championship trophies on the mantle over the next two years. If you weren't contending, then sure, move Jones-Drew rather than let him continue to leak value and waste production playing out the string for you.
 
'EBF said:
'flc735 said:
12 ppr full dynoi gave alf, royster, tannehilli got luck, crinerhe also has rg3. both of us are rebuilding
Good deal. I like the Luck side by far.
my first offer was alf and cutler, he countered with tannehill :confused:
that same owner just traded mccoy to get martin, late 1st and gordon :loco:
Nothin wrong with that trade. I'd move McCoy for that
Lot of faith in a 3.5 YPC.
 
'EBF said:
Well Tannehill is younger than Cutler and maybe has more upside (though it's probably unlikely that he'll end up being any better).I'm not sure why a rebuilding team would give up Luck. Seems like a big mistake to me. Good for you though.
Because he also had RG3.No reason to carry them both on a rebuild if there's needs elsewhere. I like the Luck side of this one too, but sometimes a seemingly uneven trade can still be a win-win.
 
'EBF said:
Well Tannehill is younger than Cutler and maybe has more upside (though it's probably unlikely that he'll end up being any better).I'm not sure why a rebuilding team would give up Luck. Seems like a big mistake to me. Good for you though.
Because he also had RG3.No reason to carry them both on a rebuild if there's needs elsewhere. I like the Luck side of this one too, but sometimes a seemingly uneven trade can still be a win-win.
He could have got much more than that out of Luck - that's why it's a bad trade.
 
Just turned this down in a PPR dynasty

I give: Richardson

I get: Spiller and Wallace

2 great players were offered for sure, but man T-Rich is approaching Calvin status IMO. You just can't trade him away!

 
'EBF said:
Well Tannehill is younger than Cutler and maybe has more upside (though it's probably unlikely that he'll end up being any better).I'm not sure why a rebuilding team would give up Luck. Seems like a big mistake to me. Good for you though.
Because he also had RG3.No reason to carry them both on a rebuild if there's needs elsewhere. I like the Luck side of this one too, but sometimes a seemingly uneven trade can still be a win-win.
He could have got much more than that out of Luck - that's why it's a bad trade.
Easy to say from the comfort of your BarcaLounger, but not necessarily true. Maybe he's in a league where the owners historically have a huge "prove it" mentality, and won't rate players highly until they have a top 10 performance under their belts. Maybe he's in a league that criminally undervalues QBs. Maybe he's in a league where only 4 owners ever make trades, and those four owners are sitting on Rodgers, Newton, Stafford, and Ryan. If he could have gotten more, then that was a bad trade, but we cannot take that as a foregone conclusion. I have, in the past, been forced to sell low because the alternative was wasting production and not selling at all. Even a below-market trade can improve your team.Edit: an owner in my league last year sat on Graham, Gronk, Hernandez, and Gates for the whole season, because after contacting every team in the entire league, no one was willing to offer what he thought those players were worth. He lost the championship game by a single point after being forced to start garbage receivers and watch them all put up goose eggs. Had he traded one of those TEs for even a mediocre wr2, he would have taken home the championship.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'EBF said:
Well Tannehill is younger than Cutler and maybe has more upside (though it's probably unlikely that he'll end up being any better).I'm not sure why a rebuilding team would give up Luck. Seems like a big mistake to me. Good for you though.
Because he also had RG3.No reason to carry them both on a rebuild if there's needs elsewhere. I like the Luck side of this one too, but sometimes a seemingly uneven trade can still be a win-win.
He could have got much more than that out of Luck - that's why it's a bad trade.
:shrug: In some leagues probably so. IN a lot of my leagues though...QB's are hard to trade. Not always easy to get "value" out of them. I like this thread and talks about player values in trades, but QBs are generally the hardest to translate league to league.IN one of my leagues where QB's are tough to move, I recently traded RG3 and a throwaway WR for Matt Schaub and Crabtree. ON paper, I know I lost the trade, but QBs don't move in that league and I had another legit QB1 in Eli Manning. I like Crabtree as a long term high end WR2, so the deal made sense for me.Perhaps he should have shopped Luck looking for more, but it's wrong to assume he could have gotten more, and it's still a waste to hold both him and RG3 on the same roster if there's a need elsewhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top