EBF
Footballguy
Just having some fun with you.
Spiller has a ton of upside. Very explosive. No denying that. On the other hand, there's also no denying that he hasn't really proven himself to be a reliable featured back yet. Doesn't mean it won't happen, but it hasn't yet.
Stewart is a good back. Only a few months older than Spiller. I think he is right up there talent wise. Not as explosive, but far bigger and stronger. So for me it's close to a push. Big difference is that the short term opportunity favors Spiller since Jackson is more ancient than DeAngelo Williams.
Spiller has a ton of upside. Very explosive. No denying that. On the other hand, there's also no denying that he hasn't really proven himself to be a reliable featured back yet. Doesn't mean it won't happen, but it hasn't yet.
Stewart is a good back. Only a few months older than Spiller. I think he is right up there talent wise. Not as explosive, but far bigger and stronger. So for me it's close to a push. Big difference is that the short term opportunity favors Spiller since Jackson is more ancient than DeAngelo Williams.


In some leagues probably so. IN a lot of my leagues though...QB's are hard to trade. Not always easy to get "value" out of them. I like this thread and talks about player values in trades, but QBs are generally the hardest to translate league to league.IN one of my leagues where QB's are tough to move, I recently traded RG3 and a throwaway WR for Matt Schaub and Crabtree. ON paper, I know I lost the trade, but QBs don't move in that league and I had another legit QB1 in Eli Manning. I like Crabtree as a long term high end WR2, so the deal made sense for me.Perhaps he should have shopped Luck looking for more, but it's wrong to assume he could have gotten more, and it's still a waste to hold both him and RG3 on the same roster if there's a need elsewhere.