What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2012 Offseason Dynasty Trades (1 Viewer)

I gave Tony RomoMJD Deji KarimWes WelkerRoddy WhiteJason Witten2nd rookieI gotAaron RodgersAhmad BradshawJordy NelsonJeremy MaclinDustin KellerMy starting lineup is nowAaron Rodgers, Arian Foster, Ahmad Bradshaw, Jordy Nelson, Jeremy Maclin, Reggie Wayne, Gates Flx: Benson, Mendenhall, or Keller. I have Eli to back up and I'm going to try to trade him for a decent backup and another good piece at WR. What do you guys think about this trade
I would have stayed with what you had.
 
14-team PPR (1 PPR WR, 0.5 PPR RB, 1.5 PPR TE); no TE required; college draft (14 picks/year)

Owen Daniels

for

Two 2013 developmental picks (college) and Amendola

and

1.09 rookie pick / Bryant

for

V.Davis / Welker

 
I gave

Tony Romo

MJD

Deji Karim

Wes Welker

Roddy White

Jason Witten

2nd rookie

I got

Aaron Rodgers

Ahmad Bradshaw

Jordy Nelson

Jeremy Maclin

Dustin Keller

My starting lineup is now

Aaron Rodgers, Arian Foster, Ahmad Bradshaw, Jordy Nelson, Jeremy Maclin, Reggie Wayne, Gates Flx: Benson, Mendenhall, or Keller. I have Eli to back up and I'm going to try to trade him for a decent backup and another good piece at WR. What do you guys think about this trade
I would have stayed with what you had.

Sold Foster WAY too cheap. :goodposting:
 
NON PPR, deep rostersTeam A gave - Ahmad BradshawHakeem NicksCurtis LoftonSean Lee2.94.9Team B gave -1.1 (Richardson)
You left something off of Team B right? If not, WOW.
Nope, and I was team A. It was a lot to give but have a team that could afford to lose players and take chances.
Being able to afford losing players doesn't make it alright to throw things away, which is IMO what happened here. I get that Richardson is a great prospect but WOW.
 
In a 12 team PPR

I gave -

Arian Foster

Ed Dickson

I got -

Marshawn Lynch

Ryan Mathews

Julius Thomas

It is a salary league and I also saved myself about 1 million in cap space.

 
NON PPR, deep rostersTeam A gave - Ahmad BradshawHakeem NicksCurtis LoftonSean Lee2.94.9Team B gave -1.1 (Richardson)
You left something off of Team B right? If not, WOW.
Nope, and I was team A. It was a lot to give but have a team that could afford to lose players and take chances.
Being able to afford losing players doesn't make it alright to throw things away, which is IMO what happened here. I get that Richardson is a great prospect but WOW.
The LBs and Bradshaw were bye week fillers on this team. Nicks was a starter but WRs aren't very valuable in a nonppr where I start 3RBS. I think this trade makes my scores go up next year but I get value which is what you're talking about.
 
NON PPR, deep rostersTeam A gave - Ahmad BradshawHakeem NicksCurtis LoftonSean Lee2.94.9Team B gave -1.1 (Richardson)
You left something off of Team B right? If not, WOW.
Nope, and I was team A. It was a lot to give but have a team that could afford to lose players and take chances.
Being able to afford losing players doesn't make it alright to throw things away, which is IMO what happened here. I get that Richardson is a great prospect but WOW.
The LBs and Bradshaw were bye week fillers on this team. Nicks was a starter but WRs aren't very valuable in a nonppr where I start 3RBS. I think this trade makes my scores go up next year but I get value which is what you're talking about.
You gave up a lot but I think you got the better end of the deal.
 
It's also a nice time to buy low on Ingram with many overly sour on him.
That may be true - but paying with Calvin Johnson is not buying low.
But it wasn't just calvin for ingram. I did get back a 27 y/o borderline top ten wr in Marshall too. You could say the gap/downgrade between marshall and calvin is essentially what I paid for Ingram. I felt that downgrade was a worthwhile gamble, especially considering my team / roster / rb situation. It's a tough league filled with excellent owners, and especially tough to get good, young RB's in. Taking a risk for sure (because we're still not certain on Ingram), but it's a risk I'm ok with. I have Calvin in a 12 team league as well, and would not trade him for the same package. Much different situation there.

 
It's also a nice time to buy low on Ingram with many overly sour on him.
That may be true - but paying with Calvin Johnson is not buying low.
But it wasn't just calvin for ingram. I did get back a 27 y/o borderline top ten wr in Marshall too. You could say the gap/downgrade between marshall and calvin is essentially what I paid for Ingram. I felt that downgrade was a worthwhile gamble, especially considering my team / roster / rb situation. It's a tough league filled with excellent owners, and especially tough to get good, young RB's in. Taking a risk for sure (because we're still not certain on Ingram), but it's a risk I'm ok with. I have Calvin in a 12 team league as well, and would not trade him for the same package. Much different situation there.
I wasn't necessarily commenting on your trade in general, just in the "buy low" comment, and all that really matters is that you like it. I happen to be an Inram fan - but when you trade a player like Calvin you probably shouldn't take on any risk (obviously every trade has some risk, but I think everyone knows what I mean).I guess how I'd look at it is in a start up dynasty league I could see Calvin Johnson going anywhere from 1.01 to 1.06. My guess (and it is a guess right now) is that Brandon Marshall would be an early third rounder and Ingram a late third or early fourth rounder. In those terms it just seems like you could have got better value. I don't know your league and how difficult the trading is, and this argument is based more on value than what is necessarily best for your team in the long run. Honestly for all we know Ingram could finish as a Top 5 RB next year and then this trade looks good.

I just wouldn't trade Calvin for such speculative value (especially when his value is at its absolute highest based on his 2011 season).

These things dont always turn out how we think though - so good luck.

 
NON PPR, deep rostersTeam A gave - Ahmad BradshawHakeem NicksCurtis LoftonSean Lee2.94.9Team B gave -1.1 (Richardson)
You left something off of Team B right? If not, WOW.
Nope, and I was team A. It was a lot to give but have a team that could afford to lose players and take chances.
Being able to afford losing players doesn't make it alright to throw things away, which is IMO what happened here. I get that Richardson is a great prospect but WOW.
The LBs and Bradshaw were bye week fillers on this team. Nicks was a starter but WRs aren't very valuable in a nonppr where I start 3RBS. I think this trade makes my scores go up next year but I get value which is what you're talking about.
You gave up a lot but I think you got the better end of the deal.
No way to say who won at this point. If T Rich lives up to the hype, then yeah obviously you got the better end. Either way, with your depth that you are describing, I think its a good risk/reward move to possibly lock up the next ADP at the start of his career.
 
It's also a nice time to buy low on Ingram with many overly sour on him.
That may be true - but paying with Calvin Johnson is not buying low.
But it wasn't just calvin for ingram. I did get back a 27 y/o borderline top ten wr in Marshall too. You could say the gap/downgrade between marshall and calvin is essentially what I paid for Ingram. I felt that downgrade was a worthwhile gamble, especially considering my team / roster / rb situation. It's a tough league filled with excellent owners, and especially tough to get good, young RB's in. Taking a risk for sure (because we're still not certain on Ingram), but it's a risk I'm ok with. I have Calvin in a 12 team league as well, and would not trade him for the same package. Much different situation there.
I think the issue is that Calvin is one of those few players that you can find an owner to overpay for in pretty much every league. If you were committed to trading Calvin I find it difficult to believe that this was the best option in the league. I think you could have found someone to give more value.
 
It's also a nice time to buy low on Ingram with many overly sour on him.
That may be true - but paying with Calvin Johnson is not buying low.
But it wasn't just calvin for ingram. I did get back a 27 y/o borderline top ten wr in Marshall too. You could say the gap/downgrade between marshall and calvin is essentially what I paid for Ingram. I felt that downgrade was a worthwhile gamble, especially considering my team / roster / rb situation. It's a tough league filled with excellent owners, and especially tough to get good, young RB's in. Taking a risk for sure (because we're still not certain on Ingram), but it's a risk I'm ok with. I have Calvin in a 12 team league as well, and would not trade him for the same package. Much different situation there.
I think the issue is that Calvin is one of those few players that you can find an owner to overpay for in pretty much every league. If you were committed to trading Calvin I find it difficult to believe that this was the best option in the league. I think you could have found someone to give more value.
I posted the trade initially even though I wasn't involved. I offered what I thought to be considerably more but in the end he did what he felt was best for his team and addressed his needs. He's an Ingram believer, so.....
 
I posted the trade initially even though I wasn't involved. I offered what I thought to be considerably more but in the end he did what he felt was best for his team and addressed his needs. He's an Ingram believer, so.....
Any chance you guys are good with posting that here? I think it'd be an interesting comparison. I have a suspicion on what it was being a member of the league and other recent trades, but curious to compare here.
 
I posted the trade initially even though I wasn't involved. I offered what I thought to be considerably more but in the end he did what he felt was best for his team and addressed his needs. He's an Ingram believer, so.....
Any chance you guys are good with posting that here? I think it'd be an interesting comparison. I have a suspicion on what it was being a member of the league and other recent trades, but curious to compare here.
Sure - there were a few configurations, but Gian essentially offered Vernon Davis, Welker, Knile Davis, Kyle Rudolph, and Meachum I think... that was the one I was considering (for Calvin and Nate Washington)Gian probably offered better value overall. But, it didn't address RB for me (this year). And we discussed this via IM - I'm generally not one to trade for value and flip (he is - he's really good at it, too). I trade more for my team. Probably not the best way to approach it, and I probbaly should work on that (after all, I typically never draft for need.) I mean, even though I didn't really "want" Welker, I could have traded him pretty easily (as Gian ended up doing).ETA - That's probably a good discussion to have - trade for "value" vs. trade for your team needs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posted the trade initially even though I wasn't involved. I offered what I thought to be considerably more but in the end he did what he felt was best for his team and addressed his needs. He's an Ingram believer, so.....
Any chance you guys are good with posting that here? I think it'd be an interesting comparison. I have a suspicion on what it was being a member of the league and other recent trades, but curious to compare here.
Sure - there were a few configurations, but Gian essentially offered Vernon Davis, Welker, Knile Davis, Kyle Rudolph, and Meachum I think... that was the one I was considering (for Calvin and Nate Washington)Gian probably offered better value overall. But, it didn't address RB for me (this year). And we discussed this via IM - I'm generally not one to trade for value and flip (he is - he's really good at it, too). I trade more for my team. Probably not the best way to approach it, and I probbaly should work on that (after all, I typically never draft for need.) I mean, even though I didn't really "want" Welker, I could have traded him pretty easily (as Gian ended up doing).ETA - That's probably a good discussion to have - trade for "value" vs. trade for your team needs.
Yes, so considering the 1.5 ppr for TE, this is what you need to decide:Vernon/Welker/Rudolph/Knile Davis/Meachem/1.4 dev pickvs.Marshall/Ingram/Criner
 
Gave:Brandon MarshallVernon DavisNate WashingtonGot:Darren McFadden
That seems like a good haul for McFadden.
Yeah, I think it was a pretty even trade. Especially since McFadden is such an injury risk. But I couldn't resist the possibility of starting DMC along McCoy, and soon, Trent Richardson. Still having Britt and Austin at WR, I made a tough deal that's the epitome of boom-or-bust.
 
i traded desean jackson for Josh freeman a few days ago. Hoping the Bucs sign a deep threat to compliment williams/winslow. DJax would be perfect

 
PPR

Trade 1

Team A gave Romo, Holmes, mid 2nd

Team B gave Dalton, Antonio Brown

Trade 2

Team A gave Romo, Holmes, Andre Johnson

Team B gave Ryan Williams, StevieJ, DenMoore, Fred Davis

 
Team A gave:

McCoy

Team B gave:

1.2

1.8

Start two qbs, 2 rbs, 3wr, 1 te, 1flex + idp; ppr 3pt passing td,

Team A still has Foster,McFadden,Cj2k at rbs

1.2 will more than likely be Luck, as the guy with 1.1 will take RG3.

 
Jambo Broncos gave up Romo, Tony DAL QB;Redman, Isaac PIT RB;Moore, Lance NOS WR; Year 2012 Round 2 Draft Pick from Melbourne Patriots (2.02)

Queensferry Dolphins gave up Turner, Michael ATL RB;Doucet, Early ARI WR; Year 2012 Round 1 Draft Pick from Forrester Thunder (1.03)

16 team 0.5 PPR (not involved)

 
Team A gave:McCoyTeam B gave:1.21.8Start two qbs, 2 rbs, 3wr, 1 te, 1flex + idp; ppr 3pt passing td,Team A still has Foster,McFadden,Cj2k at rbs1.2 will more than likely be Luck, as the guy with 1.1 will take RG3.
The guy with the 1.02 wasn't interested in McFadden or CJ? Huge risk IMO but you can't really fault it in a 2 QB league, but it would have been better to move one of those other RB's.
 
Dear Calvin owners....please consult the shark pool prior to selling lower than necessary.
Yesterday Calvin went in one of my leagues (I wasn't involved). Calvin, Colt McCoy, Thomas, Jones, 3.07forAJ Green, Peyton Hillis, Evan Royster, Laurent Robinson, 1.05I actually thought it was a decent deal for the guy trading away Calvin as I like the 1.05 this year.
 
Dear Calvin owners....please consult the shark pool prior to selling lower than necessary.
Yesterday Calvin went in one of my leagues (I wasn't involved). Calvin, Colt McCoy, Thomas, Jones, 3.07

for

AJ Green, Peyton Hillis, Evan Royster, Laurent Robinson, 1.05

I actually thought it was a decent deal for the guy trading away Calvin as I like the 1.05 this year.
Great reasoning!
 
12 Team PPR. Start 1 QB, 2-3 RB, 2-4 WR, 1-2 TE

Team A gave up:

Johnson, Andre HOU WR

Smith, Torrey BAL WR

Team B gave up:

Jones, Julio ATL WR

 
'The Captain said:
12 Team PPRTeam A gives Demaryious ThomasTeam B gives Daniel Thomas
I like the Demaryious side better. Daniel Thomas seems like a very average talent.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Two trades:

Team A gave:

Calvin

Team B gave:

Fitz

DWill

Kendall Hunter

------------------------------------

Team C gave:

AP

Gerhart

Team D gave

Ingram

Gresham

Simpson

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'cstu said:
'Spin said:
Team A gave:McCoyTeam B gave:1.21.8Start two qbs, 2 rbs, 3wr, 1 te, 1flex + idp; ppr 3pt passing td,Team A still has Foster,McFadden,Cj2k at rbs1.2 will more than likely be Luck, as the guy with 1.1 will take RG3.
The guy with the 1.02 wasn't interested in McFadden or CJ? Huge risk IMO but you can't really fault it in a 2 QB league, but it would have been better to move one of those other RB's.
Well, the guy who runs team A is an alumni from Arkansas, and we all live in TN, sooo needless to say, he had McCoy as his 4th best rb in his opinion, and offered shady up to the league as trade bait after the season ended. He's going to have Luck/Newton as his qbs, Foster, McFadden, Cj at rbs, but with only Britt as his only real wr, if he gets a random wr to pan out, his team will be real scarey for a few years.
 
'Jaysports said:
PPRTrade 1Team A gave Romo, Holmes, mid 2nd Team B gave Dalton, Antonio BrownTrade 2Team A gave Romo, Holmes, Andre JohnsonTeam B gave Ryan Williams, StevieJ, DenMoore, Fred Davis
That 2nd trade is pretty bad in my opinion. Huge steal for Team B. I'd probably give all 4 of those guys just for AJ, to get Romo and Holmes also is great value.
 
************BLOCKBUSTER ALERT****************

14 team ppr league w/ dev players.

A gives: Mark Sanchez

B gives: Colt McCoy, 2.09 rookie pick

 
Davis had a slow start this year but you can't argue the years of solid production.

Here is a reason for his slow start.

http://blog.sfgate.com/49ers/2012/01/11/after-early-info-overload-vernon-davis-thrives/

Not sure you could find one person that would take Fred over Vernon. And it is a slam dunk. He is only going to get better. Did you not see the game vs NO. Cripes.
V.Davis has yet to hit 1K on the year and F.Davis was going to hit it in his first year as a starter (needed to avg ~50/game in last 4; given his YTD, that would be hit no problem). The NO game was impressive by V.Davis, no doubt, but SF doesn't play New Orleans every week (i.e., Smith isn't going to throw 40+ passes in a game very often). That's just not going to be a frequent occurence.
Yeah I'll still take Vernon. Another showcase of what he is capable of, and Fred is not.

 
12 team PPR starts 1qb 2rb 2-3 wr 1-2 te

Gronkowski

for

Chris Johnson

Finley

Hankerson

Team getting Gronk still has Foster, Charles, MJD, Murray at RB.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top