This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I'm not an enormous Mathews believer (maybe a mid-sized believer), but that is rather poor value for him. Zero sure things, a couple of good prospects (Ingram and RGIII) and a couple of average prospects. Yea, it could work out, but that is assuming too much risk.
I would make that deal for Donald Brown as fast as I possibly could.
Ii would've thought you could have got got a lot more for Davis and Stafford than what you did.
I agree. I likely wouldn't give up Stafford alone for all that. Obviously depends a lot on the future picks, but if those picks don't both end up top 2 then I think you got taken.
Yeah that was pretty bad.
I don't think it's as bad as you guys are making it out to be -- 1.04 will be RG3, Luck or Martin, all of whom are terrific prospects. Sure, Stafford has proved to be an elite stud, but he's also still an injury risk -- the gap between Stafford and Luck/RGIII could be very small next year, and while Davis is a great TE I don't think he'll be as dominant with all the new weapons San Fran brought in. I think he should have gotten a better player than Nate Washington back but as long as there is a decent TE to fill in for Davis it's not a bad deal IMO even if the 1sts are middle of the pack.
Hmmm...seems an overreaction. Blackmon's value certainly has taken a hit with this but as a Greg Little owner, if this was deal offered to me, I would pull the trigger without much hesitation.
Yep, I own both players in two leagues and prefer the Blackmon side here.
I have Fred Davis, Jared Cook, and Chris Cooley. Last year picking the wrong one of Fred and Vernon every week cost me a lot of games. My WRs are Fitz, Roddy, VJax, then literally nobody before grabbing Nate here. I do kind of wish I countered for a better WR from his roster, but Nate ain't bad. I have 1.4, 1.5, 2.2, 3.5 in the rookie/FA draft. Should come out of the first 3 picks with RG3/Luck, RB, WR. I'm having a little buyers remorse losing Stafford, but as soon as I ill the trigger on RG3 I will be pretty happy. Like I said, I was going to take RG3 either way. Now instead of going into the year with the same lineup but RG3 as a backup, I added some pieces. As for being able to get more for Stafford: Maybe in theory, but only two teams really need QB help in that league bad enough to put together this kind of deal together. Thanks again for the thoughts.
For which side? Looks like a nice deal to me, perhaps weighted towards the guy selling 1.02.
The side getting Cruz and 1.05. Getting Cruz to move down 3 spots is incredible. 1.02 would usually be Doug Martin. At 1.05 he could take David Wilson. Cruz + Wilson for Martin is killer.
Or, the guy might be drafting Luck or RG3. Luck > Cruz & the 1.05 IMO. It's a good, fair trade.
In a 2 QB league I'd agree but he didn't say that.
Boy I hope Clyde turns it around in Miami for you.
Can't appear to win a trade??? Really???U won this trade going away. Definitely didn't give a "fair" amount.
Ordinarily, no. I generally get the worst offers imaginable(I give Cam for Mendenhall, etc.) Should have noted that I feel good about this one. Thought this might have helped show where Maclin's perceived value has gone(down).
Maclin's value is not down, u just got him at a discount. U should feel ecstatic about this deal.
give me B here (by a lot, really)
Fixed.
