ConnSKINS26
Footballguy
Hate trades where one guy gets all the best pieces.Ppr 12 teamsAP and maclin for jstew and decker
Hate trades where one guy gets all the best pieces.Ppr 12 teamsAP and maclin for jstew and decker
I'm thinking you hang on to Starks and send some thank you chocolates to the new Gabbert owner.Just sent Gabbert away for James Starks in return.I have an owner who now wants Starks in exchange for McGahee. I own Hillman and he owns Alex Brown. But I am thinking this is me giving up a bit much. McGahee has to be near the end. Whereas Starks is only 26. Thoughts?
I agree if the only option is McGahee. I'd dry to dump Starks for someone else while his value is decent.I'm thinking you hang on to Starks and send some thank you chocolates to the new Gabbert owner.Just sent Gabbert away for James Starks in return.I have an owner who now wants Starks in exchange for McGahee. I own Hillman and he owns Alex Brown. But I am thinking this is me giving up a bit much. McGahee has to be near the end. Whereas Starks is only 26. Thoughts?
He also has Donald Brown (I own Delone Carter). I am thinking either asking for Brown for Starks or sending him Carter for McGahee.I agree if the only option is McGahee. I'd dry to dump Starks for someone else while his value is decent.I'm thinking you hang on to Starks and send some thank you chocolates to the new Gabbert owner.Just sent Gabbert away for James Starks in return.I have an owner who now wants Starks in exchange for McGahee. I own Hillman and he owns Alex Brown. But I am thinking this is me giving up a bit much. McGahee has to be near the end. Whereas Starks is only 26. Thoughts?
Starks for Brown seems fair for both sides. I'd def prefer Brown over Starks this year, even more so if I had Delone Carter as insurance.Unless Indy drafts a RB in the 1st round the next couple of years, you shouldn't have a problem trying to acquire any relevant rookies in the future to monopolize their run game.He also has Donald Brown (I own Delone Carter). I am thinking either asking for Brown for Starks or sending him Carter for McGahee.
I would send Starks for Brown, regardless of my team situation, 100 times out of 100. Always. Immediately. If you can do that, I'd be all over it. That said - I'm trying to get both Brown and Starks in a lot of places - I think they're both undervalued. There's a few trades of each scattered over the last few pages to gage value, iirc.Starks for Brown seems fair for both sides. I'd def prefer Brown over Starks this year, even more so if I had Delone Carter as insurance.Unless Indy drafts a RB in the 1st round the next couple of years, you shouldn't have a problem trying to acquire any relevant rookies in the future to monopolize their run game.He also has Donald Brown (I own Delone Carter). I am thinking either asking for Brown for Starks or sending him Carter for McGahee.
I offered him Starks for Brown and also Delone Carter for McGahee. See if he snags one.I would send Starks for Brown, regardless of my team situation, 100 times out of 100. Always. Immediately. If you can do that, I'd be all over it. That said - I'm trying to get both Brown and Starks in a lot of places - I think they're both undervalued. There's a few trades of each scattered over the last few pages to gage value, iirc.Starks for Brown seems fair for both sides. I'd def prefer Brown over Starks this year, even more so if I had Delone Carter as insurance.Unless Indy drafts a RB in the 1st round the next couple of years, you shouldn't have a problem trying to acquire any relevant rookies in the future to monopolize their run game.He also has Donald Brown (I own Delone Carter). I am thinking either asking for Brown for Starks or sending him Carter for McGahee.
Thoughts on this?Just did this in a 16 team half PPRFirst should be late (guaranteed playoff team)Second is about the sameCorstorphine Steelers gave up:Murray, DeMarco DAL RBYear 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Craigentinny ChargersKaunas Buckeyes gave up:Forte, Matt CHI RBYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Corstorphine Steelers
I think these 2 rbs are closer to even when factoring in Forte's holdout/injury risk - so I would take Murray and the pick upgrade. Wouldn't want either as RB1s but they are ideal high ceiling RB2s.Thoughts on this?Just did this in a 16 team half PPRFirst should be late (guaranteed playoff team)Second is about the sameCorstorphine Steelers gave up:Murray, DeMarco DAL RBYear 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Craigentinny ChargersKaunas Buckeyes gave up:Forte, Matt CHI RBYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Corstorphine Steelers
I like the Demarco and the 1st side.Thoughts on this?Just did this in a 16 team half PPRFirst should be late (guaranteed playoff team)Second is about the sameCorstorphine Steelers gave up:Murray, DeMarco DAL RBYear 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Craigentinny ChargersKaunas Buckeyes gave up:Forte, Matt CHI RBYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Corstorphine Steelers
Id take Demarco and the first, unless I was a uber contender.In a rebuild I was offered Forte for 1.02, turned it downThoughts on this?Just did this in a 16 team half PPRFirst should be late (guaranteed playoff team)Second is about the sameCorstorphine Steelers gave up:Murray, DeMarco DAL RBYear 2013 Round 1 Draft Pick from Craigentinny ChargersKaunas Buckeyes gave up:Forte, Matt CHI RBYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from Corstorphine Steelers
I think Julio is greatly overratedYeah that doesn't make much sense. Obviously depends on specific scoring rules and roster requirements, but from what I've seen in some recent startups:Richardson= Late 1st Julio= Early 2ndMartin= Mid 3rdRG3= Late 2nd in QB Flex, 5th in 1 QBLuck= Late 2nd in QB Flex, 5th in 1 QBWilson= 5th or 6th Floyd= 5th or 6thSo to prefer 1.5 is basically saying one of the guys (Wilson/Floyd) going in the 5th or 6th round of a startup is worth more than a guy going in the top 15 overall in most startups.Even if you are a bit lower on Julio than most and feel he'll remain the 2nd option behind White, you can say the same about Floyd and Fitz. And Julio has Matt Ryan vs. Kolb/Skelton. Not to mention I think the talent comparison between Julio and Roddy is much more favorable for Julio than Floyd vs. Fitz, where I think most would agree Fitz is the more elite talent and much closer to his prime than Roddy.Please explain. Are you projecting that Julio is going to announce his retirement before the 2012 season?I wouldn't trade 1.5 or better for Julio.
1.5 was probably an exaggeration, but I'd easily rather have Rich, Luck, RG3, and Martin over him. I would consider Wilson depending on need. I don't see Julio that much better than Blackmon. That's my opinion on it. I've been wrong before. No one has ever been right on every single player in the league. Time will tell.Thanks for your opinion. I understand that is all we are ALL are throwing out there (opinions that is). When watching the rookie Julio Jones last year I am not sure how someone does not come away impressed. My opinion is that he is miles above Blackmon (and most current NFL receivers) physically and professional and also works under a top notch organization with a franchise quarterback. I see a future top 5 receiver withstanding injury. It is my opinion and has been that Blackmon is slightly overrated due to the receiver class of this year not being very top heavy. I think he can develop into a nice player but I don't see him as one with elite skills like Julio. Throw in his poor decision-making and you will not find him on any of my squads unless I am absolutely able to steal him.I think Julio is greatly overratedYeah that doesn't make much sense. Obviously depends on specific scoring rules and roster requirements, but from what I've seen in some recent startups:Richardson= Late 1st Julio= Early 2ndMartin= Mid 3rdRG3= Late 2nd in QB Flex, 5th in 1 QBLuck= Late 2nd in QB Flex, 5th in 1 QBWilson= 5th or 6th Floyd= 5th or 6thSo to prefer 1.5 is basically saying one of the guys (Wilson/Floyd) going in the 5th or 6th round of a startup is worth more than a guy going in the top 15 overall in most startups.Even if you are a bit lower on Julio than most and feel he'll remain the 2nd option behind White, you can say the same about Floyd and Fitz. And Julio has Matt Ryan vs. Kolb/Skelton. Not to mention I think the talent comparison between Julio and Roddy is much more favorable for Julio than Floyd vs. Fitz, where I think most would agree Fitz is the more elite talent and much closer to his prime than Roddy.Please explain. Are you projecting that Julio is going to announce his retirement before the 2012 season?I wouldn't trade 1.5 or better for Julio.1.5 was probably an exaggeration, but I'd easily rather have Rich, Luck, RG3, and Martin over him. I would consider Wilson depending on need. I don't see Julio that much better than Blackmon. That's my opinion on it. I've been wrong before. No one has ever been right on every single player in the league. Time will tell.
This in spades, my only real concerns with Julio are injury and even then they're minor.Thanks for your opinion. I understand that is all we are ALL are throwing out there (opinions that is). When watching the rookie Julio Jones last year I am not sure how someone does not come away impressed. My opinion is that he is miles above Blackmon (and most current NFL receivers) physically and professional and also works under a top notch organization with a franchise quarterback. I see a future top 5 receiver withstanding injury. It is my opinion and has been that Blackmon is slightly overrated due to the receiver class of this year not being very top heavy. I think he can develop into a nice player but I don't see him as one with elite skills like Julio. Throw in his poor decision-making and you will not find him on any of my squads unless I am absolutely able to steal him.I think Julio is greatly overratedYeah that doesn't make much sense. Obviously depends on specific scoring rules and roster requirements, but from what I've seen in some recent startups:Richardson= Late 1st Julio= Early 2ndMartin= Mid 3rdRG3= Late 2nd in QB Flex, 5th in 1 QBLuck= Late 2nd in QB Flex, 5th in 1 QBWilson= 5th or 6th Floyd= 5th or 6thSo to prefer 1.5 is basically saying one of the guys (Wilson/Floyd) going in the 5th or 6th round of a startup is worth more than a guy going in the top 15 overall in most startups.Even if you are a bit lower on Julio than most and feel he'll remain the 2nd option behind White, you can say the same about Floyd and Fitz. And Julio has Matt Ryan vs. Kolb/Skelton. Not to mention I think the talent comparison between Julio and Roddy is much more favorable for Julio than Floyd vs. Fitz, where I think most would agree Fitz is the more elite talent and much closer to his prime than Roddy.Please explain. Are you projecting that Julio is going to announce his retirement before the 2012 season?I wouldn't trade 1.5 or better for Julio.1.5 was probably an exaggeration, but I'd easily rather have Rich, Luck, RG3, and Martin over him. I would consider Wilson depending on need. I don't see Julio that much better than Blackmon. That's my opinion on it. I've been wrong before. No one has ever been right on every single player in the league. Time will tell.
Tell us more oh wise one.Jesus, where do you people come from?Anyone who thinks Blackmon is on the same level as Julio jones doesn't know football. Yes, it's their opinion but it's just flat out wrong. Trying to convince someone to make a trade probably.
Nice work by the guy turning Crabs/Gore/Hightower into Newton. I will say I like the value the team giving Newton got, though. In a 10 team league it's generally easier to find a decent starting QB, so I think it's not a bad deal there provided he has someone good enough to replace Newton and not lose a ton (Rivers, Eli, Romo type).10 team non PPR Tennessee gave up:Newton, Cam CAR QBYear 2012 Draft Pick 3.07Year 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from TennesseeYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from Los AngelesOklahoma gave up:Hightower, Tim WAS RBYear 2012 Draft Pick 1.02Year 2012 Draft Pick 2.05Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from HarlemYear 2014 Round 3 Draft Pick from OklahomaOklahoma basically turned Crabtree/Gore/Hightower into Newton thru a series of trades.First traded Gore for 2 2nds and a 3rdThen Traded Crabtree for a future 1stThen traded that 1st for 1.06/2.03Then traded the 1.06/2.03 for 1.02Then the trade above
He has RodgersNice work by the guy turning Crabs/Gore/Hightower into Newton. I will say I like the value the team giving Newton got, though. In a 10 team league it's generally easier to find a decent starting QB, so I think it's not a bad deal there provided he has someone good enough to replace Newton and not lose a ton (Rivers, Eli, Romo type).10 team non PPR Tennessee gave up:Newton, Cam CAR QBYear 2012 Draft Pick 3.07Year 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from TennesseeYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from Los AngelesOklahoma gave up:Hightower, Tim WAS RBYear 2012 Draft Pick 1.02Year 2012 Draft Pick 2.05Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from HarlemYear 2014 Round 3 Draft Pick from OklahomaOklahoma basically turned Crabtree/Gore/Hightower into Newton thru a series of trades.First traded Gore for 2 2nds and a 3rdThen Traded Crabtree for a future 1stThen traded that 1st for 1.06/2.03Then traded the 1.06/2.03 for 1.02Then the trade above
Ah. I guess that'll have to do.He has RodgersNice work by the guy turning Crabs/Gore/Hightower into Newton. I will say I like the value the team giving Newton got, though. In a 10 team league it's generally easier to find a decent starting QB, so I think it's not a bad deal there provided he has someone good enough to replace Newton and not lose a ton (Rivers, Eli, Romo type).10 team non PPR Tennessee gave up:Newton, Cam CAR QBYear 2012 Draft Pick 3.07Year 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from TennesseeYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from Los AngelesOklahoma gave up:Hightower, Tim WAS RBYear 2012 Draft Pick 1.02Year 2012 Draft Pick 2.05Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from HarlemYear 2014 Round 3 Draft Pick from OklahomaOklahoma basically turned Crabtree/Gore/Hightower into Newton thru a series of trades.First traded Gore for 2 2nds and a 3rdThen Traded Crabtree for a future 1stThen traded that 1st for 1.06/2.03Then traded the 1.06/2.03 for 1.02Then the trade above

Pick'Instinctive said:14 team 0.5 ppr dynasty QB/2RB/2WR/1RW/1RWT/1TETeam A sends:2013 1st round pick (back half)Team B sends:James StarksRashad Jennings
rogers or not. he under sold Cam. gore is done'Dez said:He has Rodgers'todisco1 said:Nice work by the guy turning Crabs/Gore/Hightower into Newton. I will say I like the value the team giving Newton got, though. In a 10 team league it's generally easier to find a decent starting QB, so I think it's not a bad deal there provided he has someone good enough to replace Newton and not lose a ton (Rivers, Eli, Romo type).'Dez said:10 team non PPR Tennessee gave up:Newton, Cam CAR QBYear 2012 Draft Pick 3.07Year 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from TennesseeYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from Los AngelesOklahoma gave up:Hightower, Tim WAS RBYear 2012 Draft Pick 1.02Year 2012 Draft Pick 2.05Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from HarlemYear 2014 Round 3 Draft Pick from OklahomaOklahoma basically turned Crabtree/Gore/Hightower into Newton thru a series of trades.First traded Gore for 2 2nds and a 3rdThen Traded Crabtree for a future 1stThen traded that 1st for 1.06/2.03Then traded the 1.06/2.03 for 1.02Then the trade above
The owner that traded for Dez must be deep at WR.DezforJordy and Torrey Smith

I don't think it's that bad, though I'd rather have Dez. But it's not like Jordy isn't a good WR and Smith has a shot to be very good as well.The owner that traded for Dez must be deep at WR.DezforJordy and Torrey Smith![]()
I'm curious if he turns around and goes QB at 1.2 now.If you're holding Rodgers and Cam, it's a must-trade now situation and sometimes their just isn't anyone that is wanting to give up full value for a guy. I think the guy did fine dealing Cam.'fsufan said:rogers or not. he under sold Cam. gore is done'Dez said:He has Rodgers'todisco1 said:Nice work by the guy turning Crabs/Gore/Hightower into Newton. I will say I like the value the team giving Newton got, though. In a 10 team league it's generally easier to find a decent starting QB, so I think it's not a bad deal there provided he has someone good enough to replace Newton and not lose a ton (Rivers, Eli, Romo type).'Dez said:10 team non PPR Tennessee gave up:Newton, Cam CAR QBYear 2012 Draft Pick 3.07Year 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from TennesseeYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 4 Draft Pick from Los AngelesOklahoma gave up:Hightower, Tim WAS RBYear 2012 Draft Pick 1.02Year 2012 Draft Pick 2.05Year 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from OklahomaYear 2013 Round 2 Draft Pick from HarlemYear 2014 Round 3 Draft Pick from OklahomaOklahoma basically turned Crabtree/Gore/Hightower into Newton thru a series of trades.First traded Gore for 2 2nds and a 3rdThen Traded Crabtree for a future 1stThen traded that 1st for 1.06/2.03Then traded the 1.06/2.03 for 1.02Then the trade above
Really? I feel like I would prefer Starks over most/all the 1.10 or later picks this year.Pick'Instinctive said:14 team 0.5 ppr dynasty QB/2RB/2WR/1RW/1RWT/1TETeam A sends:2013 1st round pick (back half)Team B sends:James StarksRashad Jennings
By "done" you're saying Gore will never be a fantasy starter again? I'm going to disagree on that.'fsufan said:rogers or not. he under sold Cam. gore is done
I think Welker plays this season out under the franchise tag, but then leaves, destroying his fantasy value. So I got Harvin side here12 team, 1 PPR, 1QB, 1-3RB, 2-4WR, 1-3TETeam A gave Percy Harvin, Jordan CameronTeam B gave Wes Welker, Santonio Holmes
Yeah, I agree that if Welker is one more and out (with the Pats) that the Harvin side wins but if I'm not mistaken Welker can play under the franchise tag for the next 2 years, and if he does end up with a 3 or 4 yr contract then it could end up being a winner for Team B over the next 3-4 yrs. I think Holmes can only go up. Personally, I think the Pats need to retain Welker.I think Welker plays this season out under the franchise tag, but then leaves, destroying his fantasy value. So I got Harvin side here12 team, 1 PPR, 1QB, 1-3RB, 2-4WR, 1-3TETeam A gave Percy Harvin, Jordan CameronTeam B gave Wes Welker, Santonio Holmes
You're underestimating Welker's talent here IMO. He's a really good football player; his route-running and short area quickness are absolutely elite. Obviously his numbers would likely go down if he left NE, but he'd still be fantasy relevant (90-1000-5 range maybe) with another team, particularly in PPR.I think Welker plays this season out under the franchise tag, but then leaves, destroying his fantasy value.
I know he is, but right now he's been a PPR monster. I know he finished no.1 last year in my league. He wasn't superb before Brady. I think he's going to fall a bit this year anyway. If he leaves, who knows where he could end up? In DET he'd be amazing, but in CLE he'd fall off a cliff.You're underestimating Welker's talent here IMO. He's a really good football player; his route-running and short area quickness are absolutely elite. Obviously his numbers would likely go down if he left NE, but he'd still be fantasy relevant (90-1000-5 range maybe) with another team, particularly in PPR.I think Welker plays this season out under the franchise tag, but then leaves, destroying his fantasy value.
Brown is on the wrong side.16 team PPRDemaryius Thomas and Vincent Brownfor Victor Cruz
It's Harvin side regardless of what happens with Welker.Yeah, I agree that if Welker is one more and out (with the Pats) that the Harvin side wins but if I'm not mistaken Welker can play under the franchise tag for the next 2 years, and if he does end up with a 3 or 4 yr contract then it could end up being a winner for Team B over the next 3-4 yrs. I think Holmes can only go up. Personally, I think the Pats need to retain Welker.I think Welker plays this season out under the franchise tag, but then leaves, destroying his fantasy value. So I got Harvin side here12 team, 1 PPR, 1QB, 1-3RB, 2-4WR, 1-3TETeam A gave Percy Harvin, Jordan CameronTeam B gave Wes Welker, Santonio Holmes
The net is fine but I strongly disagree that DMC and Charles are close.Overhauled my roster with a pair of trades - see where these fall when evaluated dyno value.McFadden and DJaxforCharles and Dezthen about two weeks later...DezforJordy and Torrey Smithso overall:McFadden and DjaxforCharles, Nelson, Torrey SmithIMO I got Nelson for more or less free as I value DMac and Charles close, and DJax and Smith close.
It's Harvin side regardless of what happens with Welker.Yeah, I agree that if Welker is one more and out (with the Pats) that the Harvin side wins but if I'm not mistaken Welker can play under the franchise tag for the next 2 years, and if he does end up with a 3 or 4 yr contract then it could end up being a winner for Team B over the next 3-4 yrs. I think Holmes can only go up. Personally, I think the Pats need to retain Welker.I think Welker plays this season out under the franchise tag, but then leaves, destroying his fantasy value. So I got Harvin side here12 team, 1 PPR, 1QB, 1-3RB, 2-4WR, 1-3TETeam A gave Percy Harvin, Jordan CameronTeam B gave Wes Welker, Santonio Holmes
