Kenny Powers
Footballguy
How are you doing this? I only see 1 TE position slot.My only regret is for the gridiron, Julius Thomas was $5k, if I picked him up I couldn't afford Graham, settled for Sudfeld and Graham. Got Demaryius though!![]()
How are you doing this? I only see 1 TE position slot.My only regret is for the gridiron, Julius Thomas was $5k, if I picked him up I couldn't afford Graham, settled for Sudfeld and Graham. Got Demaryius though!![]()
How are you able to do this? I only see the ability to add or drop, and even if I do drop a guy and then re-add them, Im still getting them at last week's - more expensive - price.When you sign a guy, you have that guy at that price until you drop him. Though if his price drops you can hit the "Renegotiate" button and it'll drop it to whatever the new, lower rate is. Basically this saves you the hassle of cutting the guy and adding him back at the lower amount.
Losing my mind, I meant if I took JT I couldn't afford the same receivers that I couldn't afford if I took Graham, who had a poor week 1. So I took Graham, Demaryius and Kenbrell (I regret many things.)How are you doing this? I only see 1 TE position slot.My only regret is for the gridiron, Julius Thomas was $5k, if I picked him up I couldn't afford Graham, settled for Sudfeld and Graham. Got Demaryius though!![]()
Well yes, the objective is to accrue best possible lineup by buying low. I somewhat trapped myself by picking up Lesean Mccoy when he was relatively cheap (5.7), so if he were to have an early bye I would be unlikely to reroster him after weathering the bye as hes gone up 0.6 already in just two weeks - fortunately his bye is week 11 and I'm gonna ride him until then.I read thru the rules last week and noticed the salary cap thing as opposed to renogotiating, but one thing I dont see anywhere is what about bye weeks?
Is it that youre basically forced to drop guys on a bye to fill that spot for the week, and then expected you can pick them back up because their value doesnt change?
You didnt really answer my question. So during a bye week, Im basically forced to drop Rodgers, Peterson, Calvin, etc (or McCoy for you) because I cant score on a bye, but I also dont get the leverage Ive had from having them since week 1 and have to pay the up-price?Well yes, the objective is to accrue best possible lineup by buying low. I somewhat trapped myself by picking up Lesean Mccoy when he was relatively cheap (5.7), so if he were to have an early bye I would be unlikely to reroster him after weathering the bye as hes gone up 0.6 already in just two weeks - fortunately his bye is week 11 and I'm gonna ride him until then.I read thru the rules last week and noticed the salary cap thing as opposed to renogotiating, but one thing I dont see anywhere is what about bye weeks?
Is it that youre basically forced to drop guys on a bye to fill that spot for the week, and then expected you can pick them back up because their value doesnt change?
My team is currently valued at 51.9, but I'm rostering Ben Tate - so if everyone else continues to perform well that disparity will continue or even grow and ill always be stuck with someone like Tate as my RB2.
Since I havent done this before, I still dont understand how this works with bye weeks. If you hold onto a player whose value has increased, but then has a bye, what is the reasoning behind keeping them when they wont score points, or dropping them and having the pay for them at an increased price?My cap is 50.2 - my team value is 51.9 at this point.
It is interesting. It basically turns the game on its head - the idea is to pick up guys who will get better so you can horde space and get whoever you want at the end. Previously you had guys either under-perform and/or fall out of favor, recoup space and look for cheapo guys.
-QG
You aren't forced to drop anyone, you can field a player on bye if you wish to keep them at their lower value at the expense of the potential points, but if you wanna stay competitive - yes you will have to drop players on bye.You didnt really answer my question. So during a bye week, Im basically forced to drop Rodgers, Peterson, Calvin, etc (or McCoy for you) because I cant score on a bye, but I also dont get the leverage Ive had from having them since week 1 and have to pay the up-price?Well yes, the objective is to accrue best possible lineup by buying low. I somewhat trapped myself by picking up Lesean Mccoy when he was relatively cheap (5.7), so if he were to have an early bye I would be unlikely to reroster him after weathering the bye as hes gone up 0.6 already in just two weeks - fortunately his bye is week 11 and I'm gonna ride him until then.I read thru the rules last week and noticed the salary cap thing as opposed to renogotiating, but one thing I dont see anywhere is what about bye weeks?
Is it that youre basically forced to drop guys on a bye to fill that spot for the week, and then expected you can pick them back up because their value doesnt change?
My team is currently valued at 51.9, but I'm rostering Ben Tate - so if everyone else continues to perform well that disparity will continue or even grow and ill always be stuck with someone like Tate as my RB2.
But your cap doesn't realize the gain until you cut him, so I think the key is to ride his value until it's as high as possible (or until you need the increased cap space), then cut him and add someone else whose value is about to go up. I don't know how they're going to address values as the byes come in, but my guess is that a player's value takes a dive on his bye week and then rises dramatically the next week. So, if you want to realize the biggest gain, you need to cut a player with a Week 5 bye in Week 4 (before it falls). Does that make sense?You didnt really answer my question. So during a bye week, Im basically forced to drop Rodgers, Peterson, Calvin, etc (or McCoy for you) because I cant score on a bye, but I also dont get the leverage Ive had from having them since week 1 and have to pay the up-price?Well yes, the objective is to accrue best possible lineup by buying low. I somewhat trapped myself by picking up Lesean Mccoy when he was relatively cheap (5.7), so if he were to have an early bye I would be unlikely to reroster him after weathering the bye as hes gone up 0.6 already in just two weeks - fortunately his bye is week 11 and I'm gonna ride him until then.I read thru the rules last week and noticed the salary cap thing as opposed to renogotiating, but one thing I dont see anywhere is what about bye weeks?
Is it that youre basically forced to drop guys on a bye to fill that spot for the week, and then expected you can pick them back up because their value doesnt change?
My team is currently valued at 51.9, but I'm rostering Ben Tate - so if everyone else continues to perform well that disparity will continue or even grow and ill always be stuck with someone like Tate as my RB2.
I have 12 pts.If I ever needed any more proof that I will never bet NFL games, I need to look no further then the FBG Pickem:
Snogger's Vikings - 13pts - Ranking (38.9%)
![]()
You can keep them and get zero if you really want toYou didnt really answer my question. So during a bye week, Im basically forced to drop Rodgers, Peterson, Calvin, etc (or McCoy for you) because I cant score on a bye, but I also dont get the leverage Ive had from having them since week 1 and have to pay the up-price?Well yes, the objective is to accrue best possible lineup by buying low. I somewhat trapped myself by picking up Lesean Mccoy when he was relatively cheap (5.7), so if he were to have an early bye I would be unlikely to reroster him after weathering the bye as hes gone up 0.6 already in just two weeks - fortunately his bye is week 11 and I'm gonna ride him until then.I read thru the rules last week and noticed the salary cap thing as opposed to renogotiating, but one thing I dont see anywhere is what about bye weeks?
Is it that youre basically forced to drop guys on a bye to fill that spot for the week, and then expected you can pick them back up because their value doesnt change?
My team is currently valued at 51.9, but I'm rostering Ben Tate - so if everyone else continues to perform well that disparity will continue or even grow and ill always be stuck with someone like Tate as my RB2.
Now this makes sense. I think the one thing that was confusing me since its so early in the year, is the +/- value change. It seemed like you would only get the bump or decrease in cap if you dropped a player based on the previous week, but it does appear that its whatever the overall +/- is since you have owned them.In years past, I've often kept a stud like Calvin through his bye week because his price tag had gone up so much that you couldn't afford to get him back. Now, you can invest in a player like him, get the cap increase for his value peak when you drop him on bye, pick up a lower priced guy with a good matchup and get his value rise for the week, then go get Calvin back while (potentially) increasing your salary cap in the process.
Sitting at 148 pts for this week, in 4th place currently with Demaryius Thomas and Matt Prater still to go.I like my shot to move up in the Gridiron this week, im in the 75th percentile but I finally shed Brady who has been dragging me down.
Depending on who you're cashing inCashing in this week, if you're holding this is a good week to sell with byes coming up.
[SIZE=12pt]With week 4 behind us, we have our first solid evidence. As far as I can tell, Cam Newton and Aaron Rodgers, who had week 4 byes, both showed no change in their values going into this week. This leads me to think you are correct -- a player's value will not change during his bye week.[/SIZE]What still remains to be seen I think is how does the bye week effect a players cost. Does it hold - because they arent playing - or does is decrease because they put up a 0. The price holding makes sense to me, but you never know. Consider a guy like SJax value hasnt changed and he's supposed to miss at least a couple weeks, Id lean toward a player's price being locked during a bye.