What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2014 NFL DRAFT PROJECTED TRADES (1 Viewer)

Blackjacks

Footballguy
I know its only February but the Shark Pool Draft got me thinking.

What are some trades you could see your team/or any team pulling?

I see the Rams trading the #2 overall with Cle and acquiring the #4 and the #26 but then I also see them trading the #13 and #26 to move back up to the #8 with Minnesota.

With the #4 the Rams would select Sammy Watkins and with the #8 The Rams would select Jake Mathews

Why?

Cle moves up to get Manziel....they just need a face of the franchise

Minn should last year what they could do with multiple picks, they need young talent and with the top 3 qb already gone by 8 they move back to select Carr or whoever they want

STL 2 biggest needs addressed without giving up picks for next year

I don't see who loses in this scenario.

What do you see happening in the realm of trades?

 
I know its only February but the Shark Pool Draft got me thinking.

What are some trades you could see your team/or any team pulling?

I see the Rams trading the #2 overall with Cle and acquiring the #4 and the #26 but then I also see them trading the #13 and #26 to move back up to the #8 with Minnesota.

With the #4 the Rams would select Sammy Watkins and with the #8 The Rams would select Jake Mathews

Why?

Cle moves up to get Manziel....they just need a face of the franchise

Minn should last year what they could do with multiple picks, they need young talent and with the top 3 qb already gone by 8 they move back to select Carr or whoever they want

STL 2 biggest needs addressed without giving up picks for next year

I don't see who loses in this scenario.

What do you see happening in the realm of trades?
While I think the Rams would do backflips if they traded the 1.2 to the Browns for the 1.4 and 1.26, I doubt it happens. Why would it, when Houston would likely take the same deal unless they are dead-set on getting Clowney?

I also don't think the Rams and Watkins at 1.4 is a good fit; Watkins offers too much overlap in skills with Tayvon Austin. Also, the Rams are fairly loaded up with receivers already and IMHO Stedman Bailey is going to blow up next year thus filling the "possession receiver" spot in the lineup. To me, the Rams are likely to try solving their "no true WR1" in this order: (1) get a cheap FA like Kenny Britt on a 1-year deal, (2) Defer drafting a WR until the 2nd round or later, (3) Try to snag Mike Evans at the 1.13, and (4) hold pat for 2014 and hope Chris Givens or Pettis starts contributing more.

Here's how I think the Rams will draft: OT, S, OLB, CB in roughly that order. If they actually pull off the Browns trade they'll almost certainly hope that Mack or Gilbert falls to them at 1.13 and wait until the 1.26 to pick a safety unless someone like C.J. Mosley falls to 1.26 in which case they'll wait until Round 2 for their safety.

 
I know its only February but the Shark Pool Draft got me thinking.

What are some trades you could see your team/or any team pulling?

I see the Rams trading the #2 overall with Cle and acquiring the #4 and the #26 but then I also see them trading the #13 and #26 to move back up to the #8 with Minnesota.

With the #4 the Rams would select Sammy Watkins and with the #8 The Rams would select Jake Mathews

Why?

Cle moves up to get Manziel....they just need a face of the franchise

Minn should last year what they could do with multiple picks, they need young talent and with the top 3 qb already gone by 8 they move back to select Carr or whoever they want

STL 2 biggest needs addressed without giving up picks for next year

I don't see who loses in this scenario.

What do you see happening in the realm of trades?
While I think the Rams would do backflips if they traded the 1.2 to the Browns for the 1.4 and 1.26, I doubt it happens. Why would it, when Houston would likely take the same deal unless they are dead-set on getting Clowney?

I also don't think the Rams and Watkins at 1.4 is a good fit; Watkins offers too much overlap in skills with Tayvon Austin. Also, the Rams are fairly loaded up with receivers already and IMHO Stedman Bailey is going to blow up next year thus filling the "possession receiver" spot in the lineup. To me, the Rams are likely to try solving their "no true WR1" in this order: (1) get a cheap FA like Kenny Britt on a 1-year deal, (2) Defer drafting a WR until the 2nd round or later, (3) Try to snag Mike Evans at the 1.13, and (4) hold pat for 2014 and hope Chris Givens or Pettis starts contributing more.

Here's how I think the Rams will draft: OT, S, OLB, CB in roughly that order. If they actually pull off the Browns trade they'll almost certainly hope that Mack or Gilbert falls to them at 1.13 and wait until the 1.26 to pick a safety unless someone like C.J. Mosley falls to 1.26 in which case they'll wait until Round 2 for their safety.
I don't see Watkins and Austin as the same type player at all. Watkins is more of a true #1 (which the Rams are drastically missing). Austin is more set up for a slot, gadget type weapon. I think they would actually compliment each other nicely. I do like Pettis, Bailey and Givens as extra pieces of the puzzle but definitely not people you want to rely on every week.

I think we are better than people think at corner. Jenkins is a stud and like the young talent behind him but I could see drafting someone a little later. Safety is a definite need, agreed. I think our 2nd round pick would be a nice fit for that position if a nice player is available.

OL, absolutely. Even if we get Staffold back we still need depth at the position unless your counting on Jake Long to come back healthy all year (which I don't see).

At the end of the day though I see Watkins as a large piece that we are missing and the piece we need to be competitive. We need a true #1 wr and as of now we don't have that on the roster.

.

 
I know its only February but the Shark Pool Draft got me thinking.

What are some trades you could see your team/or any team pulling?

I see the Rams trading the #2 overall with Cle and acquiring the #4 and the #26 but then I also see them trading the #13 and #26 to move back up to the #8 with Minnesota.

With the #4 the Rams would select Sammy Watkins and with the #8 The Rams would select Jake Mathews

Why?

Cle moves up to get Manziel....they just need a face of the franchise

Minn should last year what they could do with multiple picks, they need young talent and with the top 3 qb already gone by 8 they move back to select Carr or whoever they want

STL 2 biggest needs addressed without giving up picks for next year

I don't see who loses in this scenario.

What do you see happening in the realm of trades?
While I think the Rams would do backflips if they traded the 1.2 to the Browns for the 1.4 and 1.26, I doubt it happens. Why would it, when Houston would likely take the same deal unless they are dead-set on getting Clowney?

I also don't think the Rams and Watkins at 1.4 is a good fit; Watkins offers too much overlap in skills with Tayvon Austin. Also, the Rams are fairly loaded up with receivers already and IMHO Stedman Bailey is going to blow up next year thus filling the "possession receiver" spot in the lineup. To me, the Rams are likely to try solving their "no true WR1" in this order: (1) get a cheap FA like Kenny Britt on a 1-year deal, (2) Defer drafting a WR until the 2nd round or later, (3) Try to snag Mike Evans at the 1.13, and (4) hold pat for 2014 and hope Chris Givens or Pettis starts contributing more.

Here's how I think the Rams will draft: OT, S, OLB, CB in roughly that order. If they actually pull off the Browns trade they'll almost certainly hope that Mack or Gilbert falls to them at 1.13 and wait until the 1.26 to pick a safety unless someone like C.J. Mosley falls to 1.26 in which case they'll wait until Round 2 for their safety.
I don't see Watkins and Austin as the same type player at all. Watkins is more of a true #1 (which the Rams are drastically missing). Austin is more set up for a slot, gadget type weapon. I think they would actually compliment each other nicely. I do like Pettis, Bailey and Givens as extra pieces of the puzzle but definitely not people you want to rely on every week.

I think we are better than people think at corner. Jenkins is a stud and like the young talent behind him but I could see drafting someone a little later. Safety is a definite need, agreed. I think our 2nd round pick would be a nice fit for that position if a nice player is available.

OL, absolutely. Even if we get Staffold back we still need depth at the position unless your counting on Jake Long to come back healthy all year (which I don't see).

At the end of the day though I see Watkins as a large piece that we are missing and the piece we need to be competitive. We need a true #1 wr and as of now we don't have that on the roster.

.
I could easily see the Rams taking a safety in the first, then target someone like LaMarcus Joyner in the 2nd since he can play either S or CB providing depth at both positions.

As for Watkins, IMHO the Rams would be far better to grab Matthews at 1.2 or 1.4 since he's equally good at both RT and LT, and defer WR until a later pick. To me, the drop-off isn't that huge from Watkins to Mike Evans or even a Round 2 guy like Kelvin Benjamin, Allen Robinson, Brandon Cooks, or Jordan Matthews. The Rams could be competitive without Watkins, but will get Bradford killed if they don't put significant resources into the OL with Safford and others probably leaving as FAs.

 
The Patriots will trade down.
The Pats are smart about acquiring picks, but at some point you have to use them wisely. Why they didn't move up to grab Julio Jones or AJ Green when they had the ammunition is beyond me. Instead, they just move down again, and again, and again. I think they out smarted themselves . Look at that crap WR unit they have now.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know its only February but the Shark Pool Draft got me thinking.

What are some trades you could see your team/or any team pulling?

I see the Rams trading the #2 overall with Cle and acquiring the #4 and the #26 but then I also see them trading the #13 and #26 to move back up to the #8 with Minnesota.

With the #4 the Rams would select Sammy Watkins and with the #8 The Rams would select Jake Mathews

Why?

Cle moves up to get Manziel....they just need a face of the franchise

Minn should last year what they could do with multiple picks, they need young talent and with the top 3 qb already gone by 8 they move back to select Carr or whoever they want

STL 2 biggest needs addressed without giving up picks for next year

I don't see who loses in this scenario.

What do you see happening in the realm of trades?
While I think the Rams would do backflips if they traded the 1.2 to the Browns for the 1.4 and 1.26, I doubt it happens. Why would it, when Houston would likely take the same deal unless they are dead-set on getting Clowney?

I also don't think the Rams and Watkins at 1.4 is a good fit; Watkins offers too much overlap in skills with Tayvon Austin. Also, the Rams are fairly loaded up with receivers already and IMHO Stedman Bailey is going to blow up next year thus filling the "possession receiver" spot in the lineup. To me, the Rams are likely to try solving their "no true WR1" in this order: (1) get a cheap FA like Kenny Britt on a 1-year deal, (2) Defer drafting a WR until the 2nd round or later, (3) Try to snag Mike Evans at the 1.13, and (4) hold pat for 2014 and hope Chris Givens or Pettis starts contributing more.

Here's how I think the Rams will draft: OT, S, OLB, CB in roughly that order. If they actually pull off the Browns trade they'll almost certainly hope that Mack or Gilbert falls to them at 1.13 and wait until the 1.26 to pick a safety unless someone like C.J. Mosley falls to 1.26 in which case they'll wait until Round 2 for their safety.
I don't see Watkins and Austin as the same type player at all. Watkins is more of a true #1 (which the Rams are drastically missing). Austin is more set up for a slot, gadget type weapon. I think they would actually compliment each other nicely. I do like Pettis, Bailey and Givens as extra pieces of the puzzle but definitely not people you want to rely on every week.

I think we are better than people think at corner. Jenkins is a stud and like the young talent behind him but I could see drafting someone a little later. Safety is a definite need, agreed. I think our 2nd round pick would be a nice fit for that position if a nice player is available.

OL, absolutely. Even if we get Staffold back we still need depth at the position unless your counting on Jake Long to come back healthy all year (which I don't see).

At the end of the day though I see Watkins as a large piece that we are missing and the piece we need to be competitive. We need a true #1 wr and as of now we don't have that on the roster.

.
I could easily see the Rams taking a safety in the first, then target someone like LaMarcus Joyner in the 2nd since he can play either S or CB providing depth at both positions.

As for Watkins, IMHO the Rams would be far better to grab Matthews at 1.2 or 1.4 since he's equally good at both RT and LT, and defer WR until a later pick. To me, the drop-off isn't that huge from Watkins to Mike Evans or even a Round 2 guy like Kelvin Benjamin, Allen Robinson, Brandon Cooks, or Jordan Matthews. The Rams could be competitive without Watkins, but will get Bradford killed if they don't put significant resources into the OL with Safford and others probably leaving as FAs.
I just want to make it clear that I agree we need a top notch Olineman

 
I see the Rams trading the #2 overall with Cle and acquiring the #4 and the #26 but then I also see them trading the #13 and #26 to move back up to the #8 with Minnesota.
This would be a dream scenario for the Vikings.
Kind of makes sense for everyone. Rams would get Watkins and Robinson or Mathews (if both are gone they stay with the 13 and 26.

Minny gets multiple picks for only moving back 5 spots and Cle jumps ahead of Jax for Manziel or Bridgewater.

Makes too much sense

 
i think if some one trades for the 1.02, it'll be for Clownly. If Teddy is taken at 1 StL's phone is going to be blown up

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Patriots will trade down.
The Pats are smart about acquiring picks, but at some point you have to use them wisely. Why they didn't move up to grab Julio Jones or AJ Green when they had the ammunition is beyond me. Instead, they just move down again, and again, and again. I think they out smarted themselves . Look at that crap WR unit they have now.
:goodposting:

 
The Patriots will trade down.
The Pats are smart about acquiring picks, but at some point you have to use them wisely. Why they didn't move up to grab Julio Jones or AJ Green when they had the ammunition is beyond me. Instead, they just move down again, and again, and again. I think they out smarted themselves . Look at that crap WR unit they have now.
I don't think we can question the Patriots' front office. Would the Patriots have won the Super Bowl if they had Julio or AJ, who knows? I do know the Bengals and Falcons didn't make their conference championship games, however.

 
The Patriots will trade down.
The Pats are smart about acquiring picks, but at some point you have to use them wisely. Why they didn't move up to grab Julio Jones or AJ Green when they had the ammunition is beyond me. Instead, they just move down again, and again, and again. I think they out smarted themselves . Look at that crap WR unit they have now.
I don't think we can question the Patriots' front office. Would the Patriots have won the Super Bowl if they had Julio or AJ, who knows? I do know the Bengals and Falcons didn't make their conference championship games, however.
Sure we can question their front office. I'm just saying that NE doesn't seem to want to budge from the budget WR philosophy and could have used those collection of picks to obtain a stud WR, but instead wanted more picks. All I know is that if they had moved up for Jones or Green they wouldn't be in this situation they're in with their WRs. Sometimes it's ok to take a better player at the current draft slot, or move up for a stud, rather than trying to get cute and obtain more picks. I think they went to the same well too many times.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Patriots will trade down.
The Pats are smart about acquiring picks, but at some point you have to use them wisely. Why they didn't move up to grab Julio Jones or AJ Green when they had the ammunition is beyond me. Instead, they just move down again, and again, and again. I think they out smarted themselves . Look at that crap WR unit they have now.
I don't think we can question the Patriots' front office. Would the Patriots have won the Super Bowl if they had Julio or AJ, who knows? I do know the Bengals and Falcons didn't make their conference championship games, however.
The Patriots only ever seem willing to trade up for defensive players, like into the 2012 1st for DE Chandler Jones and LB Don'ta Hightower.

 
I will bey any amount of money the Browns do not trade picks 4/26 to get pick 2.
I agree. I think they should take BPA at 4 and 26. Then maybe a quarterback in the 2nd or 3rd and let Hoyer and that quarterback battle for the starting spot. This is the Browns though.

 
I will bey any amount of money the Browns do not trade picks 4/26 to get pick 2.
I agree. I think they should take BPA at 4 and 26. Then maybe a quarterback in the 2nd or 3rd and let Hoyer and that quarterback battle for the starting spot. This is the Browns though.
Unfortunately, the Browns and the Raiders are both teams where if I hear they've made a trade, I can almost guarantee you it's a dumb move. IMHO the jury is still out on the TRich for Indy 1st round trade, but that might fall into the "broken clock right twice a day" or "blind squirrel finds a nut" category until the Browns prove otherwise that they know WTF they're doing.

 
I think the Steelers look really hard at trading down and getting extra picks in the 2nd and/or 3rd

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will bey any amount of money the Browns do not trade picks 4/26 to get pick 2.
I keep thinking that the Rams GM might have been spoiled by the RGIII trade. After all they got 3 firsts and second to move down a couple more spots. So that would be a rather cheap deal to move down.

I won't be surprised if Houston takes Bortles first and I suspect that Farmer will prefer Bridgewater. Would St. Louis trade down with Clowney on the board? I suspect that teams won't meet their price and they decide that he is much better than Long.

 
I know its only February but the Shark Pool Draft got me thinking.

What are some trades you could see your team/or any team pulling?

I see the Rams trading the #2 overall with Cle and acquiring the #4 and the #26 but then I also see them trading the #13 and #26 to move back up to the #8 with Minnesota.

With the #4 the Rams would select Sammy Watkins and with the #8 The Rams would select Jake Mathews

Why?

Cle moves up to get Manziel....they just need a face of the franchise

Minn should last year what they could do with multiple picks, they need young talent and with the top 3 qb already gone by 8 they move back to select Carr or whoever they want

STL 2 biggest needs addressed without giving up picks for next year

I don't see who loses in this scenario.

What do you see happening in the realm of trades?
While I think the Rams would do backflips if they traded the 1.2 to the Browns for the 1.4 and 1.26, I doubt it happens. Why would it, when Houston would likely take the same deal unless they are dead-set on getting Clowney?
Are you that sure Houston isn't going to want their choice of the QBs?

I could definitely see the Rams pick being in motion, and I think the picks closest to them have the best shot. Rams should be able to get another 1st rounder, and not move too far, and still get Robinson or Matthews.

THe teams that need QBs are going to want to make moves to get one, aren't they? They are going to have their favorite. It's not like Cleveland, Oakland or Tampa will just sit back, in need of a QB, and take whichever one is left.

 
The Cowboys will trade up,take a defensive player they could have gotten later,and the pick will be a first round bust.

The Washington team will trade Cousins for a 2nd or 3rd round pick and then take a quarterback with that pick.

The Browns and Jaguars will both trade up and/or down and both will take 2 quarterbacks.

 
Definitely see STL trying to trade down some from #2, which makes the trade for RGIII that much more genius. The big question is WHO will trade up to #2? I think no one will know until HOU picks. Then the offers will fly!

 
The Patriots will trade down.
The Pats are smart about acquiring picks, but at some point you have to use them wisely. Why they didn't move up to grab Julio Jones or AJ Green when they had the ammunition is beyond me. Instead, they just move down again, and again, and again. I think they out smarted themselves . Look at that crap WR unit they have now.
I don't think we can question the Patriots' front office. Would the Patriots have won the Super Bowl if they had Julio or AJ, who knows? I do know the Bengals and Falcons didn't make their conference championship games, however.
The Patriots only ever seem willing to trade up for defensive players, like into the 2012 1st for DE Chandler Jones and LB Don'ta Hightower.
By Mike Reiss | ESPNBoston.com


INDIANAPOLIS -- When it comes to selecting wide receivers in the NFL draft and then developing them into big-time contributors, the New England Patriots could use a comeback route.

Not since the second-round pick of Deion Branch and seventh-round heist of David Givens have they struck gold at the position. That was 2002.

Misses include Taylor Price (third round, 2010), Brandon Tate (third round, 2009), Chad Jackson (second round, 2006) and Bethel Johnson (second round, 2003), with the Jackson and Johnson selections magnifying the struggle because the Patriots aggressively traded up to secure them. Three times, there have been game-changing receivers selected shortly after the Patriots' pick -- Pittsburgh's Mike Wallace in '09, Green Bay'sGreg Jennings in '06 and Arizona's Anquan Boldin in '03.

Why such a hard time for the Patriots at receiver?

The question is especially relevant this year, considering the team's glaring need for an outside threat and the fact the position rates as one of the deepest and most talented in this year's draft.

The Patriots aren't alone: Receiver is among the most boom-or-bust positions on a yearly basis. Two general managers (the Chiefs' Scott Pioli and the Rams' Les Snead) and one former team president (the Colts' Bill Polian) helped paint a picture at the NFL combine as to why that is the case.

While every position involves a projection of some sort, the personnel men say receiver is one of the toughest when factoring how a college player will transition to the pros. Snead opined that quarterback might be the only one harder to analyze.

For Pioli, one of the challenges of evaluating receivers is determining how well they can escape press coverage and then get open when the size advantage they might have had in college is negated in the pros.

"College receivers don't get a lot of press coverage, and if they get it, it's not good quality press coverage," he said. "There are some really good corners in this league that know how to press, and really good defensive coordinators that know how to set things up.

"In the big picture, it's getting off the line and then the ability to get open in the NFL. In the college game, a lot of big receivers know how to use their bodies in college as a way that they get open, or they have a snapshot of time to be open, and that doesn't necessarily work in the NFL. In that sense, it's a little bit different because you have to find out, first of all, how is he going to get off the line of scrimmage? And then how, beyond size, is that player going to be able to get open?"

Polian expounded on Pioli's thoughts, adding his own wrinkle to the discussion.

"At the college level now with all the spread offenses, they don't see much man-to-man coverage," Polian said. "Even the great ones that you would expect to get double-teamed don't, because the spread doesn't allow that. So the first thing you have to find out is 'Can they separate from man-to-man coverage?' You hope to see that in the all-star games.

"The second thing you want to find out is 'What is the true speed?' Because whether you like it or not, speed is an important factor -- less so in the West Coast offense, more so in the Tom Moore [old Colts offense] or Patriot offense. That you find out here [at the combine].

"I think you can measure hands pretty easily at the collegiate level. Do they have dexterity? Can they adjust? All of those things, you can see at the collegiate level. But separation from man coverage, and true speed, are the things that you have a difficult time measuring."

Snead, the first-year Rams general manager who worked under former Patriots director of college scouting Thomas Dimitroff with the Atlanta Falcons the past four seasons, agreed that press coverage is a big change for receivers coming into the NFL. Then he added a slightly different perspective on another challenge for clubs.

"There are a lot of sight adjustments in the NFL, based on coverages," he said. "If the receiver can react without thinking, which slows you down, that's something that is hard [to project]. That's probably why it takes a little more time for them to come on, not discounting the whole timing thing with your quarterback as well."

So how, then, does a talent evaluator garner enough comfort and confidence that a receiver will be able to do those things?

This is the projection that has mostly eluded the Patriots since 2002 -- tying together the football intelligence with important physical attributes such as speed, quick feet, strength, good hands and toughness.

If there is good news for the team, the projection seems to be getting easier in recent years.

"A big part of it is that in college football, they are throwing the ball more now," Snead opined. "Like the NFL, there are a lot of timing routes, so I think they're coming into the league more ready to run an NFL offense."

Yet while it might be getting easier, it's still one of the toughest, according to Polian, who pointed to former Bills receivers Don Beebe and Andre Reed and Colts receiver Reggie Wayne as those who entered the league with a tougher projection -- Beebe from little-known Chadron State, Reed as a tight end and Wayne with a slower-than-desired 40-yard dash time -- but successfully made the transition.

"It's right up there in difficulty, because they're seeing coverages that they haven't seen before and they're playing players every week that maybe they played against once at the collegiate level -- every week you're seeing an All-American," Polian said.

"They're playing against sophisticated coverages that they've never dreamed of seeing before. Try go playing against the Jets and figuring out what they're doing, post-snap and pre-snap. And then they have to play and practice for 24 weeks as opposed to 13 in college, so it takes a big toll on their bodies. It's a very difficult position to play, in addition to which, if you've been in a spread offense, a conventional NFL offense is much more complex."

So these are some of the variables in play for teams taking the plunge at receiver, which highlight some of the Patriots' struggles and perhaps why Bill Belichick has leaned heavier on free agency at the position in recent years. But even then there is a projection with veteran receivers and it doesn't always work out (e.g. Chad Ochocinco, 15 catches in 2011).

For Snead, who was part of the Falcons' brain trust that traded up to the No. 6 spot to select Alabama receiver Julio Jones last year, drafting a talented receiver alone isn't good enough. There has to be a road map to follow from the first day the receiver enters the facility.

"What you have to do is ask, 'What's the best plan to develop this player the fastest?' and everybody in the building that is going to touch that player needs to know the plan and then execute it," he said.

"It's like teaching your kid to ride a bike. You have to rep it and work it, and eventually the guy goes from training wheels to riding his bike, and the next thing you know you come home and he's jumping and built a ramp in the driveway, and as a dad you're scared to death because he's doing wheelies. I think that's the process."

The Patriots haven't had a young receiver going the wheelie route for almost 10 years now. Instead, there have been too many flat tires.

In a year in which need meets depth and quality in the draft, the Patriots would like nothing more than to have a new ramp built leading right into Gillette Stadium.

Mike Reiss covers the Patriots for ESPNBoston.com.
The option route passing system that the Patriots run requires very smart and adaptable WRs as part of the reason they do not value rookie WR as much as other teams do. Instead preferring veteran players who fit what they want their WR to do.

I think Dobson will pan out for them. He may not be spectacular, but he seems smart and efficient enough to fill a role for them.

As far as predicting trades goes I do see the Rams trading down with pick 2 to the highest bidder with a team that controls a top 13 pick.

Clowney and the 2 top offensive tackles seem like their most likely targets for top player on their board, one of those 3 players. With it seeming likely that 3 QB will be drafted in the top 5 (with some trades of teams moving up to get them) that means that one of those 3 players should be available at pick 6. So I do not see the Rams moving down further than pick 6 from pick 2.

Rams fans seem to think WR is a priority for the Rams and some think they need another QB besides Bradford. I do not think these 2 positions are as a great of a need (right or wrong) from the Rams perspective, what they need is a offensive tackle, safety (Greg Williams defense likes to play cover 3 or single high coverage often as part of the scheme) and corner back. If the Rams do draft Clowney it will be because of BPA more than need. I could see that being their pick at 2 if Houston passes on him, otherwise I think the Rams will trade down because they can still get one of the tackles if they do not drop too far.

Honestly I think the Jaguars should trade down from 3 to gain more picks. They have a ton of needs on both sides of the ball. But the Jags do not seem like a very well run team, so they may just draft QB of the future and hope that energizes the fan base. I actually think Manziel might be their guy if they do that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd like to see the falcons move up for Clowney
Very-likey that 'could' happen.

Atlanta has moved-up in the past and Falcon GM Thomas Dimitroff states matter-of-factly that he is open to trading-up and that the cost isn't as dire as it was in the past since the cap-hit is not as severe due to the new CBA.

http://atlantafalcons.blog.ajc.com/2014/02/24/video-plus-thomas-dimitroffs-full-transcript/

INDIANAPOLIS – ... transcript of Falcons general manager Thomas Dimitroff’s media session at the NFL scouting combine:

Q: Given you track record, are you open to the possibility of trading up?

A: Yes. I’ve said that from Day One, since 2008 that I always want to have the light on for business. I never want to be one of those teams that (when) people pick up the phone and they quickly throw the phone back down and hesitate to reach out; thinking that we’re not going to be straight up. I think that’s the biggest thing. When you are ever able to cultivate trades it’s about being honest with people in your dealings and I think that we’ve done a nice job of that. We’re always going to be open for business.

Q: Is it easier in the top 10 to trade up because the cap and the new CBA, making it less expensive?

A: Yes. There is no question about that. Moving up from the late 20s into sixth, that was so long ago, it’s always difficult (Julio Jones trade). I thought that was going to be a multi-tiered trade to be honest with you and we were very fortunate to secure a trade with Tom Heckert and the Browns to get Julio during that time. But yes, in the top 10, I believe it’s a little easier to move around.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top