What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2014 Oakland Raiders Regular Season Thread (1 Viewer)

Carr throws the ball to an ineligible receiver.

The ineligible receiver decides to catch it, even though he's ineligible.

The ineligible receiver fumbles the ball away.

Check please!

 
Remember when this game was 10-6? It's like the Raiders forgot their role in this script and came to their senses.

And the sea of orange in the crowd makes me want to vomit!

 
If they get the #1and I was GM, I the would take Mariota. I would then try to repeat history and trade Carr to Arizona for a 2nd round pick ala Kevin Kolb.
The Jets are drafting at #3 and will definitely be looking for a QB. Trade with them and grab DE Leonard Williams plus pick up another pick

from Jets for the trade. Carr can play, we just need to have a defense that can actually put pressure on the QB and make some stops.
Still on the Carr bandwagon?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm going to make you all cry. You ready?

We took the legendary Fabian Washington one pick before Aaron Rodgers went to Green Bay.

But in all fairness, we had 33-year-old Kerry Collins in the fold.

 
Speaking of what could have been, Rodgers could have been throwing the ball to CalJo.
and Fitz on the other side. Or handing off to Adrian Peterson, if Calvin and Fitz weren't open. SMH
I would settle for handing off to Murray to see what he can do, but with the enormous success McFadden and MJD have had running the ball how can we expect them to go away from them and for him to get any work.

 
Speaking of what could have been, Rodgers could have been throwing the ball to CalJo.
and Fitz on the other side. Or handing off to Adrian Peterson, if Calvin and Fitz weren't open. SMH
I would settle for handing off to Murray to see what he can do, but with the enormous success McFadden and MJD have had running the ball how can we expect them to go away from them and for him to get any work.
LoL, this is funny. I have been saying the same things. We are only last in rushing with McFadden and MJD why not give Murray a game to see what he can do, it can't be any worse.

 
Well, that is true to a certain point then you have elite guys like Charles, McCoy and Petterson that make everyone around them better. Not saying that Ingram is in that class, only pointing out that an elite talent would make a huge difference at RB as well. And help give Carr time to develop.

 
Mark Ingram, anyone?
Nah. They first need to build from the inside out. OL, QB, etc. No reason to try and patch holes with a RB when the rest is a mess. Fix that first. RBs are a dime a dozen.
Agree that they need to build from the inside out and am an advocate for taking either the best OL or best WR at the top of the 2015 draft. But the thought of pairing Ingram with a top WR behind a young and upcoming line with the franchise QB already in place is pretty tantalizing and could help turn things around in a hurry.

RBs may be a dime a dozen but there are still some that are far better than others. Ingram looks like he may finally be turning into one of the truly top notch ones. And it's not like the market for even top flight RBs is outrageously overpriced. I can't see him commanding more then $5M/season on a 3 year deal. It's a lot but not bank breaking for the franchise with the most cap room in the league.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chargers on the road is very tough, but right now them, the Rams in STL in 3 weeks, and the Bills at home in Dec really seem like the only chances to get off the schneid.

Yes, you can never tell which way a division game with KC is going to go, but they are a game behind the broncs and are more motivated to stay in the hunt. I just don't see it happening.

 
What's more important? Avoiding 0-16 or the #1 overall pick? I'm not sure.

I like what I see from Carr enough to trade down for a Marriota bounty.

Need more OL/DL help.

Ingram would be an excellent signing, especially if front loaded to minimize future cap liability if he doesn't work out.

Why isn't Brice Butler playing more?

All is moot if we don't pony up for a legit head coach and OC.

 
All is moot if we don't pony up for a legit head coach and OC.
And that right there is the #1 pitfall for this team IMO. I think there is enough talent in place, including the high draft slot and incredible cap space, to make Oak an attractive job. Reggie, or his successor, just has to make the right choice/sales pitch.

New stadium commitment (Los Angeles) would also be a huge selling point for a new HC.

 
Al Davis must be rolling over in his grave at the thought of an 0-16 season.....how far we have fallen

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mark Ingram, anyone?
Nah. They first need to build from the inside out. OL, QB, etc. No reason to try and patch holes with a RB when the rest is a mess. Fix that first. RBs are a dime a dozen.
It's not like it would cost them anything they don't have in abundance. He won't cost a draft pick, and they have a ton of cap space. Heck they can even take some calculated risks with cap space. They should be chasing any and all UFA that will pick up the phone.

 
Question - the Raiders have run the ball less than any team since 1932, maybe in NFL history going back to 1919 or so. Why don't they at least try to run the ball more?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Poll: Should the Raiders bring back GM Reggie McKenzie?

By Vic Tafur on November 11, 2014 11:39 AM

http://blog.sfgate.com/raiders/2014/11/11/poll-should-the-raiders-bring-back-gm-mckenzie/
The fact that they not only signed Vincent 'Ive never done anything in the NFL' Brown but then give him playing time tells everyone what the correct answer should be.
Yes?

And while he signed Brown I am not sure he is the one dictating how much PT he gets.

 
Rotoworld:

Raiders CB D.J. Hayden strained his groin during Sunday's Week 10 loss to the Broncos.

Another week, more of the same for the oft-injured Hayden. This tweak isn't considered overly serious, but he's missed 15-of-25 games already since the Raiders surprisingly took him 12th overall in 2013. Raiders corners Carlos Rogers, TJ Carrie and Chimdi Chekwa are also banged up heading into a Week 11 game at San Diego.

Nov 10 - 11:21 AM
Source: CSN Bay Area
 
Poll: Should the Raiders bring back GM Reggie McKenzie?

By Vic Tafur on November 11, 2014 11:39 AM

http://blog.sfgate.com/raiders/2014/11/11/poll-should-the-raiders-bring-back-gm-mckenzie/
The fact that they not only signed Vincent 'Ive never done anything in the NFL' Brown but then give him playing time tells everyone what the correct answer should be.
Yes?

And while he signed Brown I am not sure he is the one dictating how much PT he gets.
I didn't think I needed to explain anything about Sparano. He's not going to be the HC after this year ends.

 
Poll: Should the Raiders bring back GM Reggie McKenzie?

By Vic Tafur on November 11, 2014 11:39 AM

http://blog.sfgate.com/raiders/2014/11/11/poll-should-the-raiders-bring-back-gm-mckenzie/
The fact that they not only signed Vincent 'Ive never done anything in the NFL' Brown but then give him playing time tells everyone what the correct answer should be.
Yes?

And while he signed Brown I am not sure he is the one dictating how much PT he gets.
I didn't think I needed to explain anything about Sparano. He's not going to be the HC after this year ends.
Yeah, that's pretty obvious but I still contend that McKenzie isn't dictating how much PT Brown gets.

 
Poll: Should the Raiders bring back GM Reggie McKenzie?

By Vic Tafur on November 11, 2014 11:39 AM

http://blog.sfgate.com/raiders/2014/11/11/poll-should-the-raiders-bring-back-gm-mckenzie/
The fact that they not only signed Vincent 'Ive never done anything in the NFL' Brown but then give him playing time tells everyone what the correct answer should be.
Yes?

And while he signed Brown I am not sure he is the one dictating how much PT he gets.
I didn't think I needed to explain anything about Sparano. He's not going to be the HC after this year ends.
Yeah, that's pretty obvious but I still contend that McKenzie isn't dictating how much PT Brown gets.
Didn't mean to imply that he is. He's the idiot that signed him. Sparano is the idiot that is putting him on the field, setting the team back further as better WRs get limited reps. These guys should not be making NFL decisions.

 
Poll: Should the Raiders bring back GM Reggie McKenzie?

By Vic Tafur on November 11, 2014 11:39 AM

http://blog.sfgate.com/raiders/2014/11/11/poll-should-the-raiders-bring-back-gm-mckenzie/
The fact that they not only signed Vincent 'Ive never done anything in the NFL' Brown but then give him playing time tells everyone what the correct answer should be.
Yes?

And while he signed Brown I am not sure he is the one dictating how much PT he gets.
I didn't think I needed to explain anything about Sparano. He's not going to be the HC after this year ends.
Yeah, that's pretty obvious but I still contend that McKenzie isn't dictating how much PT Brown gets.
Didn't mean to imply that he is. He's the idiot that signed him. Sparano is the idiot that is putting him on the field, setting the team back further as better WRs get limited reps. These guys should not be making NFL decisions.
I am not convinced there are better WRs on the roster. Seems like a big group of players that occasionally flash but are otherwise incredibly inconsistent in all facets of the game. There isn't a legitimate #1 WR on the roster and there may not be a legitimate #2 WR on the roster.

As much as I like building through the offensive line if there is a top notch "can't miss" WR prospect available in the 2015 draft I think the Raiders need to take that guy. I am just not sure there is a guy like that out there.

 
I think Brice Butler can be that guy. There is something that is stopping them from putting him out there. They are stupid. That much is for sure. The evidence is overwhelming. They have no ability to judge talent.

The TD catch, which was a flat out hands catch of a bullet by Carr, last week is a catch that Vincent Brown would only dream of making. Holmes would drop it. Moore would run the wrong route. Only thing I have been able to find is something about practice habits.

 
lod01 said:
I think Brice Butler can be that guy. There is something that is stopping them from putting him out there. They are stupid. That much is for sure. The evidence is overwhelming. They have no ability to judge talent.

The TD catch, which was a flat out hands catch of a bullet by Carr, last week is a catch that Vincent Brown would only dream of making. Holmes would drop it. Moore would run the wrong route. Only thing I have been able to find is something about practice habits.
That seems like a very optimistic judgment on many levels. It suggests that you believe yourself to be a better evaluator of NFL talent based on an extremely limited amount of information, then the guys who get paid quite handsomely to judge NFL talent. I think it is fair to say that even the stupidest NFL coach (say Rich Kotite) probably has forgotten more about football then any of us ever knew, or will ever know so I hope you understand that I have more faith in even the worst NFL coach then even the smartest poster in the Shark Pool.

I have been hearing all off-season and in-season how Raider WR X, Y & Z will become a true #1 WR. I think in this thread you will find arguments about how Moore, Holmes, Butler, Jones & Streater (remember him?) would emerge as the lead guy in this offense and prove themselves to be a #1 WR. Well, for whatever reason that hasn't happened. Maybe you could argue that if they were drafted by the Packers or Broncos those guys would emerge as legitimate #1 WRs but I think those situations make the WR as much as the other way around.

I guess Randy Moss looked pedestrian in Oakland, because he quit on the team but whatever, so maybe one of these guys may be a legit #1 but that seems unlikely scenario for completely unproven players.

Bottom line is the reality that the Raiders have not had a WR perform well enough to demand the respect, or provide the production, of a #1 WR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What's more important? Avoiding 0-16 or the #1 overall pick? I'm not sure.
I don't believe that getting a single win at this point is enough of a moral victory to make me want a win more than the first overall pick.

We need elite talent. Not a victory or two in a lost season

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top