LOL at all the hyperbole on Lebrons greatness. He loses and hes a joke and he wins and he's "top 2 to 5".
Win or lose, he's where he will always be, just barely outside the top 10.
I disagree. Prior to this year's playoffs, IMO there were a clear top 11 players in NBA history (not in order): Jordan, Kareem, Magic, Bird, Russell, Wilt, Duncan, Oscar, Hakeem, Shaq, Lebron. If I had to rank Lebron, I would have put him at #8, ahead of Oscar, Hakeem, and Shaq.
I felt entering this year's playoffs that Lebron did not measure up to the 7 others I had ranked ahead of him. Yes, he has two titles, had made the Finals 6 times (before this year), and has 4 MVPs and many other honors. But in my mind, he did not measure up to those I had ranked ahead of him, because most of them had more titles, most of them were better than 33% in their Finals opportunities, most/all of them had harder roads to the Finals, etc. I also felt Lebron did not have enough defining moments.
If he leads his team from 3-1 down to a title against a 73 win team, having come back to Cleveland because of his ties there with the intent of bringing the city its first major title in 50 years, that is as compelling as it gets. It adds another title, and it is one of the strongest defining moments ever. To me, that absolutely elevates him into the top 5, moving him up a tier in the all-time greats.
If it seems like splitting hairs, that's because we are talking about ranking the top 10 players of all-time.